Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-347-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 20 October 2009 and 01 December 2009.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not effect the quality of the relevant results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of GLP inspection: 28 January 2010 Date of Signature on GLP certificate: 26 November 2009
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
Harlan UK Limited, Bicester, Oxon, UK.
- Age at study initiation:
At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age.
- Weight at study initiation:
The bodyweight variation did not exceed ± 20% of the initial/mean bodyweight of any previously dosed animal(s).
- Fasting period before study:
overnight fast immediately before dosing
- Housing:
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
(2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Teklad, Blackthorn, Bicester, Oxon, UK) was allowed ad libitum throughout the study.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):free access to mains drinking water
- Acclimation period:acclimatisation period of at least five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
19 to 25°C
- Humidity (%):
30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):
The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: Day 1 To: Day 14 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Remarks:
- Arachis oil BP was used because the test material did not dissolve/suspend in distilled water.
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle:
For the purpose of the study the test material was freshly prepared, as required, as a solution in arachis oil BP to give dose levels of 300 and 2000mg/kg bodyweight.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):
Not stated
- Justification for choice of vehicle:
Arachis oil BP was used because the test material did not dissolve/suspend in distilled water.
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
Not stated
- Purity:
Not stated
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED:
10ml/kg
DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual):
Not applicable
CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose:
In the absence of data regarding the toxicity of the test material, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose. - Doses:
- Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test material, as a solution in arachis oil BP, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Based on the results of this, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test material, as a solution in arachis oil BP, at a dose level of 300 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- EXAMPLE:
5 females at 300 mg/kg
5 females at 2000 mg/kg
EXAMPLE: - Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration:
14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Clinical observations were made ½, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and then daily for fourteen days. Morbidity and mortality checks were made twice daily. Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed:
Yes
- Other examinations performed:
Clinical signs, body weight. - Preliminary study:
- A sighting test sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg was performed.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 300 - 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Mortality:
- 300 mg/kg: There were no deaths.
2000 mg/kg: Four animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were humanely killed two hours after dosing. - Clinical signs:
- other: 300 mg/kg: Increased salivation was noted in one animal during the day of dosing. No other signs of systemic toxicity were noted. 2000 mg/kg: Signs of systemic toxicity noted were ataxia, lethargy, pilo-erection, splayed gait, prostration, decreased r
- Gross pathology:
- 300 mg/kg: No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
2000 mg/kg: Yellow liquid present in the stomach was noted at necropsy of animals that were humanely killed during the study. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of the animal that was killed at the end of the study. - Other findings:
- - Organ weights:
EXAMPLE: Not recorded
- Histopathology: N/A
- Potential target organs:
EXAMPLE: Not recorded
- Other observations:
EXAMPLE: None - Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Migrated information: The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be in the range of 300 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System Category 4).
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be in the range of 300 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Category 4).
- Executive summary:
Introduction. The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test material in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No 420 “Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method” (2001)
Method B1 bisAcute Toxicity (Oral) of CommissionRegulation (EC) No. 440/2008
Method. Following a sighting test at dose levels of 300 mg/kg and2000 mg/kg, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test material, as asolutioninarachis oil BP, at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Based on the results of this, a further group of four fasted females was given a single oral dose of test material, as asolutioninarachis oil BP, at a dose level of 300 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Mortality. Four animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were humanely killed two hours after dosing. There were no deaths noted at a dose level of 300 mg/kg.
Clinical Observations. Signs of systemic toxicity noted in animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were ataxia, lethargy, pilo-erection, splayed gait, prostration, decreased respiratory rate and laboured respiration. Four animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were comatose two hours after dosing. The surviving animal treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg appeared normal one day after dosing. Increased salivation was noted in one animal treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg. No other signs of systemic toxicity were noted in animals treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg.
Bodyweight. Surviving animals showed expected gains in bodyweight.
Necropsy. Yellow liquid present in the stomach was noted at necropsy of animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg that were humanely killed during the study. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy of animals that were killed at the end of the study.
Conclusion. The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be in the range of 300 - 2000 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System-Category 4).
Reference
Table1 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data - 2000 mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
AWs |
ALP |
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-0 Female |
PrRdRlLWs |
PrRdRlLWs |
CoRdRlWsX* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-1 Female |
PrRdRlLWs |
PrRdRlLWs |
CoRdRlWsX* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-2 Female |
PrRdRlLWs |
PrRdRlLWs |
CoRdRlWsX* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-3 Female |
PrRdRlLWs |
PrRdRlLWs |
CoRdRlWsX* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
A= Ataxia
L = Lethargy
P = Pilo-erection
Ws = Splayed gait
Pr = Prostration
Rd = Decreased respiratory rate
Rl = Laboured respiration
Co = Comatose
X* = Animal humanely killed
Table2 Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes - 2000 mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight (g) |
Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
|||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
203 |
209 |
221 |
|
6 |
12 |
3-0 Female |
184 |
- |
- |
184 |
- |
- |
|
3-1 Female |
180 |
- |
- |
176 |
- |
- |
|
3-2 Female |
181 |
- |
- |
181 |
- |
- |
|
3-3 Female |
165 |
- |
- |
163 |
- |
- |
Table3 Individual Necropsy Findings - 2000 mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
2000 |
2-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
3-0 Female |
Humanely killed Day 0 |
Stomach: yellow liquid present |
|
3-1 Female |
Humanely killed Day 0 |
Stomach: yellow liquid present |
|
3-2 Female |
Humanely killed Day 0 |
Stomach: yellow liquid present |
|
3-3 Female |
Humanely killed Day 0 |
Stomach: yellow liquid present |
Table4 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data -300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Dosing |
Effects Noted During Period After Dosing |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
S |
S |
S |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-1 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-2 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-3 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
S = Increased salivation
Table5 Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes-300mg/kg
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
300 |
1-0 Female |
176 |
185 |
198 |
9 |
13 |
4-0 Female |
179 |
188 |
196 |
9 |
8 |
|
4-1 Female |
173 |
182 |
190 |
9 |
8 |
|
4-2 Female |
173 |
178 |
183 |
5 |
5 |
|
4-3 Female |
170 |
179 |
184 |
9 |
5 |
Table6 Individual Necropsy Findings-300mg/kg
Dose Level |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
300 |
1-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
4-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
4-1 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
4-2 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
4-3 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 300 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The study is GLP compliant and has a Klimisch score 1
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 01 April 2010 and 15 April 2010.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The sequence of dosing may not always follow the Test Guideline as shown in the schematic diagram in attachment 1. It is Company Policy to minimisethe number of animals used on each study in accordance with UK Government Home Office guidelines.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of GLP inspection: 18 May 2010 Date of Signature on GLP certificate: 26 November 2009
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Test Animals:
Animals: Rat, HsdRccHan: WIST
Rationale: Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system.
Breeder: Harlan Laboratories UK Limited, Bicester, Oxon, UK.
Number of Animals per Group: 5 males and 5 females
Total number of Animals: 5 males and 5 females
Age when treated: At the start of the study the animals weighed at least 200g, and were eight to twelve weeks of age. The weight variation did not exceed ± 20% of the mean weight for each sex.
Identification: After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card.
Acclimatization: At least 5 days under laboratory conditions, after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
Environmental Conditions:
Conditions:
The temperature and relative humidity were within the range of 19 to 21 cC and 45 to 56% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
Accommodation:
The animals were housed in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24-hour exposure period and in groups of five, by sex, for the remainder of the study.
Diet:
Free access food (2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Teklad, Blackthorn, Bicester, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet was routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
Water:
Free access to mains drinking water was allowed throughout the study. The drinking
water was routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- One day before treatment, the backs of the animals were clipped with an electric clipper, exposing an area of approximately 10 % of the total body surface.
Using available information on the toxicity of the test material, a single group of animals was treated as follows:
Dose Level Specific Gravity Dose Volume Number of Rats
(mg/kg) (ml/kg) Male Female
2000 1.070 1.87 5 5
The calculated volume of test material, as received, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body
surface area) using a graduated syringe. A piece of surgical gauze, approximately 10 cm x 8 cm in size, was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24 hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the
dressings were examined to ensure that they were securely in place.
After the 24-hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened
with distilled water to remove any residual test material. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.
Rationale: Dermal administration was used as this is one possible route of human exposure during manufacture, handling and use of the test item. - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg /kg body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 Example:
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- After the 24-hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened
with distilled water to remove any residual test material. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourte The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.
After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and
scored according to the following scale from Draize J H (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the
Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.31:
EVALUATION OF SKIN REACTIONS
Erythema and Eschar Formation Value
No erythema 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1
Well-defined erythema 2
Moderate to severe erythema 3
Severe erythema (beef redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) 4
Oedema Formation
No oedema 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimetre) 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimetre and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4
Any other skin reactions, if present were also recorded.
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test material on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the study the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external
examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were
retained.
Rationale: Dermal administration was used as this is one possible route of human exposure during manufacture, handling and use of the test item. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No deaths occurred during the study.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs were observed during the course of the study. There were no signs of dermal irritation.
- Gross pathology:
- No macroscopic findings were recorded at necropsy.
- Other findings:
- None.
- Interpretation of results:
- practically nontoxic
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: expert judgment
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
- Executive summary:
Introduction.
The study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test material in the Wistar strain rat.
Method.
A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24‑hour, semi‑occluded dermal application of the undiluted test material to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Mortality.
There were no deaths.
Clinical Observations.
There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
Dermal Irritation.
Very slight erythema was noted at the test sites of all males and three females. Light brown discolouration of the epidermis was also noted at the test sites of all males and two females. No signs of dermal irritation were noted in two females.
Bodyweight.
All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.
Necropsy.
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Conclusion.
The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test material in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Reference
Table1 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Hours) |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1-1 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-2 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-3 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-4 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-1 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-2 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-3 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-4 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table2 Individual Dermal Reactions - Males
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Observation |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
|||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-1 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-2 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-3 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-4 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table3 Individual Dermal Reactions - Females
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Observation |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
|||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|||
2000 |
2-0 Female |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
2-1 Female |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
2-2 Female |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
2-3 Female |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
2-4 Female |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
Br |
Br |
Br |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
0= No reactions Br = Light brown discolouration of the epidermis
0= No reactions Br = Light brown discolouration of the epidermis
Table4 Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Change (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
251 |
278 |
296 |
27 |
18 |
1-1 Male |
260 |
289 |
302 |
29 |
13 |
|
1-2 Male |
234 |
249 |
259 |
15 |
10 |
|
1-3 Male |
248 |
273 |
286 |
25 |
13 |
|
1-4 Male |
244 |
268 |
283 |
24 |
15 |
|
2-0 Female |
204 |
210 |
212 |
6 |
2 |
|
2-1 Female |
211 |
215 |
218 |
4 |
3 |
|
2-2 Female |
200 |
201 |
209 |
1 |
8 |
|
2-3 Female |
217 |
221 |
229 |
4 |
8 |
|
2-4 Female |
201 |
203 |
209 |
2 |
6 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The study is GLP compliant and has a Klimisch score of 1
Additional information
The test substance was found to be of low toxicity in an acute dermal toxicity test in rats (LD50 >2000 mg/kg bw). Effects were limited to very slight erythema observed in 5/5 males and 3/5 females, which persisted up to 4-5 days after treatment. In addition, light brown discolouration of the epidermis was observed in 5.5 males and 2/5 females. No mortalities or signs of systemic toxicity were reported.
The test substance is not volatile (vapour pressure 1.4 x 10-1Pa at 25ºC; boiling point >495 ºK) and would not pose an inhalation hazard under normal conditions of use. Under normal conditions of uses there is minimal potential for formation of mists / aerosols and blending operations occur with low energy mixing and in closed systems. In addition, the acute toxicity of the test substance has been assessed by the oral and dermal routes of exposure, which are the main exposure routes. Results of in-vitro irritation studies indicate that the liquid material is irritating to both skin and eyes (see appropriate sections). It is possible that the material will be irritating to the respiratory tract epithelial tissue if significant exposure were to occur.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Only one study available
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test data support classification of the registered substance as acutely toxic via ingestion (Category 4), but not via the dermal route, according to the criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (i.e. CLP)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.