Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Restriction: only 2 strains of S. typhimurium used.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Reverse mutation according to Ames, B. N. et al., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 70, 2281-2285 (1973). Modification described by Rannug et al., Chem. Biol. Interaction, 12, 151-263 (1976) and Lutz et al., Mut. Res., 93, 305-315 (1982)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
EC Number:
203-527-6
EC Name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
Cas Number:
107-86-8
Molecular formula:
C5H8O
IUPAC Name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 3-Methyl-2-butenal, CAS: 107-86-8
- Analytical purity: 98%
- Lot/batch No.: B 2240/12.04.88
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

Method

Target gene:
Salmonella/Mammalian-Microsomes
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
liver S9 Aroclor 1254-induced
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
20, 100, 500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 4000, 5000, 6000 ug/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: with S-9: 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA) (DMSO) for TA 100 and TA 98; without S-9: N-methyl-N*-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) (DMSO) for the strain TA 100 4-nitro-o-phenylendiamine (NPD) (DMSO) for the strain TA 98
Evaluation criteria:
In general, a substance to be characterized as positive in the Ames test has to fulfill the following requirements:
- doubling of the spontaneous mutation rate (control)
- dose-response relationship
- reproducibility of the results
Statistics:
none

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: 1000-3000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: 1000-3000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Results without S9-mix: TA 100 was weakly positive (2.1-2.5-fold) in the 1st experiment at 2500-5000 ug/plate and more positive in subsequent experiments from 100-500 ug/plate (factor 1.7-4.6) with a maximum at 1000-3000 ug/plate (factor 6.0-8.1). TA 98 showed a slight increase (factor 2.1) at 2500 µg/plate which was not concentration dependent.
Results with S9-mix: With TA 100 increased revertant numbers were seen at very high concentrations in the first experiment (1.6-fold at 5000 ug/plate) and in the second experiment (2.5-fold at 2000 ug/plate). In the third experiment mutagenicity was seen at lower concentrations (2.4-2.7-fold at 100-500 ug/plate). TA 98 showed no increased number of revertants. Cytotoxicity was observed only in the 2nd and 3rd experiment using TA 100 from 1000-3000 ug/plate.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

TA 100

Dose (mg/plate)

S9-mix

mean

SD

S9-mix

mean

SD

negative ctrl

- S9

106

8

+S9

124

8

20

98

9

108

14

100

100

7

96

12

500

123

14

90

16

2500

219

28

122

28

5000

265

44

199

60

positive ctrl (2-AA)

n.d.

n.d.

851

497

positive ctrl (MNNG)

670

3

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (CA)

265

17

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (MVK)

261

19

n.d.

n.d.


TA 98

Dose (mg/plate)

S9-mix

mean

SD

S9-mix

mean

SD

negative ctrl

- S9

40

3

+S9

37

6

20

37

7

32

2

100

33

3

39

5

500

34

3

34

6

2500

84

8

31

2

5000

49

9

29

2

positive ctrl (NPD)

581

104

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (2-AA)

n.d.

n.d.

2113

110

Test 2:

TA 100

Dose (mg/plate)

S9-mix

mean

SD

S9-mix

mean

SD

negative ctrl

- S9

126

7

+S9

139

12

2000

1013

26

349

59

3000

865

22

-

-

4000

300

8

-

-

5000

-

-

0

0

6000

0

0

0

0

positive ctrl (2-AA)

n.d.

n.d.

2313

244

positive ctrl (MNNG)

2927

64

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (CA)

1317

51

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (MVK)

544

31

n.d.

n.d.


TA 98

Dose (mg/plate)

S9-mix

mean

SD

S9-mix

mean

SD

negative ctrl

- S9

125

11

+S9

115

17

100

208

14

279

60

500

579

37

309

38

1000

743

91

76

45

2000

331

20

37

9

3000

234

78

28

5

positive ctrl (2-AA)

n.d.

n.d.

1643

199

positive ctrl (MNNG)

1527

119

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (CA)

779

31

n.d.

n.d.

positive ctrl (MVK)

489

34

n.d.

n.d.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive

Positive results of the study are ambiguous since the
effects were not coherent between the three experiments and the dose-relationship was not clear.