Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-353-2 | CAS number: 57-88-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Publication from the open literature. No detailed description of the substance tested and on test method (such as incubation conditions). No positive/negative controls included. Cholesterol has been tested in a battery of 135 compounds. All information on genotoxicity will be considered together as weight of evidence for this endpoint.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Genotoxic activity and potency of 135 compounds in the Ames reversion test and in a bacterial DNA-repair test.
- Author:
- De Flora S., Zanacchi P., Camoirano A, Bennicelli C., Badolati G.S.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutation Research 133, 161-198
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The plate-incorporation test was performed according to the standard procedure described by Ames et al (1975), with some revisions as published by Maron and Ames (1983).
The DNA-repair test in E. coli was performed similar to the procedure as desribed by Kada et al (1980) in the rec-assay system with B. subtilis and by McCarrol et al (1981) with various strains of E. coli. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cholesterol
- EC Number:
- 200-353-2
- EC Name:
- Cholesterol
- Cas Number:
- 57-88-5
- Molecular formula:
- C27H46O
- IUPAC Name:
- cholest-5-en-3-ol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cholesterol
- Analytical purity: reagent pure grade, Sigma
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- - S. typhimurium: Histidine gene
- E. coli: Tryptophan gene
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, TA100; E. coli WP2, WP67, CM871
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Prepared according to Ames et al (1975), containing 10% liver S9 fractions from Aroclor-treated Sprague-Dawley rats (protein concentration adjusted to 30 mg/ml).
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- not specified
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The plate-incorporation test was performed according to the standard procedure described by Ames et al (1975), with some revisions as published by Maron and Ames (1983). Each compound (total of 135 compounds, including cholesterol (reagent pure grade, Sigma)) was tested with each strain (5 his- S. typhimurium strains, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, TA100; 3 isogenic E. coli strains, WP2 (repair-proficient), WP67 (uvrA-, polA-), CM871 (uvrA-, recA-, lexA-)), both with and without S9 mix at various dilutions (duplicate or triplicate plates) performed by a geometric ratio of 2, starting from its solubility or toxicity limit. Throughout the period of experiments the spontaneous reversion rate of Salmonella tester strains was within the range indicated by Ames et al (1975) and Maron and Ames 91983).
The DNA-repair test in E. coli was performed similar to the procedure as desribed by Kada et al (1980) in the rec-assay system with B. subtilis and by McCarrol et al (1981) with various strains of E. coli. The initial concentration of each compound was governed either by its solubility or by its toxicity for bacteria. Starting from this concentration compounds were further diluted in nutrient broth for a total of 8 2-fold dilutions. In confirmatory assays only 4 dilutions were tested. The assay was performed with and without S9. Per well 1000 bacteria were added. Controls of bacterial density were prepared by seeding 100 µl in nutrient agar pour plates. The exact number of bacteria used was scored after 16h at 37°C. Bacterial growth was visually evaluated after 16h at 37°C. Each compound was assayed in at least 5 separate experiments in order to check the reproducibility of results. - Evaluation criteria:
- Plate-incorporation test: criteria for positivity of results included rate of increase of induced versus spontaneous revertants, dose dependence and reproducibility in separate experiments. The mutagenic potency was expressed by dividing the number of revertants in excess of controls by the corresponding amount of compounds (in nmoles). For negative compounds 'less than' figures were calculated by dividing an arbitrary value of 100 revertants by the nmoles corresponding to the maximum dose of compound tested.
DNA-repair test in E. coli: A ratio between the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) in repair-proficient and -deficient strain greater than 2 (confirmed in 5 experiments) was considered to be significant in this test. - Statistics:
- not indicated
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA 98, TA100; E. coli WP2, WP67, CM871
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- not examined
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
S. typhimurium reversion test: Potency of cholesterol (revertants/nmole) = <0.01
E. coli repair test: MIC (µg) +/-S9 >1000; potency ( ΔMICs/nmole) = <0.0002
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
In a S. typhimurium reversion assay with strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100, and in an E. coli DNA-repair test with WP2, WP67 and CM871 cholesterol showed no mutagenic. - Executive summary:
The gentoxic activity and potency of 135 compounds, amongst which cholesterol, were tested in the Ames reversion assay and in a bacterial DNA-repair assay. In the Ames assay, cholesterol was tested with S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100, and in the DNA-repair assay with E. coli strains WP2, WP67 and CM871. The assays were performed with and without metabolic activation (S9) in duplicate or triplicate (Ames test) or in 5 experiments (bacterial DNA-repair test). In these tests, cholesterol did not show genotoxic potential.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.