Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
additional toxicological information
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
12th June 1989 to 13th July 1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: A GLP study performed in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles, with incomplete reporting or methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
This endpoint provideds information determined from an in vivo photoallergenicity study. The test material was applied using a similar procedure to the standard maximisation test, however, the test sites were also subjected to an irratiation regimen during the course of the test to determine the photoallerginicity.
Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: CTFA Safety Testing Guidelines, The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20005; "Guidelines for Evaluating Photodermatitis" pp. 9-11
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Ten albino female guinea pigs were used as a control group and twenty females were used in the treatment group (using the highest non-irritating concentration of 30 %). The reactions to the skin of the irradiated and not radiated test sites were compared.
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-methyl-3-decen-5-ol
EC Number:
279-815-0
EC Name:
4-methyl-3-decen-5-ol
Cas Number:
81782-77-6
Molecular formula:
C11H22O
IUPAC Name:
4-methyldec-3-en-5-ol
Test material form:
liquid

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

Erythema and Edema Scoring

- All animals were scored 0 for both the irradiated and non-radiated test sites at each of the concentrations tested.

 

Local Symptoms

- Control and the test group displayed the same symptoms:

Erythema and edema were observed on all application areas from Day 2 to 7.

Necrosis was observed from Day 8 to 16 and exfoliation from Day 17 until termination on Day 25.

- Epidermal Application:

No symptoms were observed in either the test or control groups.

 

Mortality/Viability

One female died spontaneously on Day 23.

 

Macroscopical Findings

- The lungs were not collapsed but reddened in the female found dead on day 23.

 

Clinical Signs

- No systemic symptoms were observed.

 

Body Weights

- Two females lost weight during the acclimatization period.

- One female lost weight during treatment.

Table 2. Body Weights (g)

Acclimatisation

Group 1

Group 2

Day 1, Week 1

Mean

431.6

432.7

SD

17.5

16.9

N

10

20

Treatment

 

Day 1, Week 1

Mean

466.3

474.

SD

27.3

29.7

N

10

20

Day 25, Week 4

Mean

530.4

544.7

SD

48.0

36.2

N

10

19

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test material was determined to be not sensitising in the photoallergenic guinea pig maximisation test.
Executive summary:

The photoallergenicity caused by exposure to the test material combined with irradiation was determined in a GLP compliant study conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles. The test material was applied as a 10% dilution in acetone/ethanol (1:1) for the induction, while the test material was applied at concentrations of 30, 10, 3 and 1 % for the challenge. During the challenge animals were exposed to the test material on both the left and right flanks, where only the left was irradiated with UV-A light.

Under the conditions of the study no skin responses were observed after the induction or on the irradiated and non-irradiated challenge sites. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the test material possesses no photoallergic potential for guinea pigs and thus the likelihood that the test material would cause a reaction in humans is low.