Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-082-2 | CAS number: 32492-61-8 1 - 4.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The skin irritation gave mean erythema scores for both animals (24, 48 and 72 hours) were 0.7 -1, and a mean edema score for both animals (24, 48 and 72 hours) was 0. The test substance is not classified as a skin irritant according to EU CLP. In the eye irritation test the mean conjuctivae score was 0.7, the mean cornea score was 0, the mean iris score was 0 and the mean chemosis score was 0 (all at 24, 48 and 72 hours) The test substance is not classified as an eye irritant according to EU CLP.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (partly limited documentation, e.g. no analytical characterisation of the test substance)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Standardized test method (BASF-Test): The test substance was applied to a 2.5 x 2.5 cm application site of two white Vienna rabbits for 20 h under occlusive conditions. The skin was intact and shaved. After the application time, the skin was washed with water containing a mild detergent. Animals were observed for 5 or 6 days. Findings were recorded after 24, 48 and (for one animal) after 72 hours and at the end of the observation period. Descriptive scores of the raw data have been converted to Draize numerical scores, as recommended by the current OECD 404 Guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Source: Gaukler
Weight at study initiation: 2.86 kg (mean)
Diet: ad libitum
Water: ad libitum - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: untreated skin of same animal
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test substance was applied for 1 min, 5 min, 15 min and 20 h
- Observation period:
- 5 or 6 days
- Number of animals:
- 2 animals
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
Area of exposure: 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
Type of wrap if used: occlusive
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
Washing: yes, with water containing a mild detergent (Lutrol)
Time after start of exposure: 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 20 h
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system, as recommended by the OECD Testing Guideline 404 - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- (20 h exposure)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- (20 h exposure)
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 5 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- (20 h exposure)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: no edema observed
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- (20 h exposure)
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: no edema observed
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Treatment 20 hours: Very slight signs of irritation (erythema score 1) were observed at the 24 and 48 hour reading time point in both animals. Effects were reversible within 72 hours in animal #1, whereas 72 hours reading time point is missing in animal #2. None of the animals displayed edema.
Treatment 1 min / 5 min / 15 min: no erythema or edema observed until the end of the observation period (48 and 72 hours, respectively). - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The mean erythema scores for both animals (24, 48 and 72 hours) were 0.7 -1, and the mean edema score for both animals (24, 48 and 72 hours) was 0. The test item is therefore classified as “non-irritant” in accordance with EU CLP 1272/2008 Regulation.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study (equivalent to OECD guideline 404), 1 mL of the test substance was applied in an occlusive cover to the clipped skin of Vienna white rabbits (n= 2) for 20 hours followed by 5-6 days observation period. The mean erythema scores for both animals after 24, 48, and 72 hours were 0.7 - 1, and the mean oedema score for both animals after 24, 48 and 72 hours was 0. Based on the results, the test substance is not classified as a skin irritant according to the EU Classification, Labelling, and Packaging (CLP) criteria.
Reference
Table 1: Mean erythema score animal #1 / animal #2 after 24, 48 and 72 h (72 h reading time point is missing in animal #2)
Exposure duration | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | Effect reversible after |
20 h | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/- | 72 h / 5 d |
Mean score, animal #1 (24 – 48 – 72 h): 0.7
Mean score, animal #2 (24 – 48 h): 1
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (no details about the test substance; 50 µl instead of 100 µl test substance instilled, eyes were not washed out.)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Standardized test method (BASF-Test): 50 µL of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in 2 animals. The animals were observed after 10 min, 1 and 3 h on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. Findings were recorded daily. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours as specified in OECD Guideline 405.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Source: Gaukler
Weight at study initiation: 2.05 kg (mean)
Diet: ad libitum
Water: ad libitum - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The adjacent eye served as control treated with NaCl.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 µL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single application (not washed out)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h (study was interrupted after 72 h due to reversibility of observed effects)
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 animals
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system, as recommended by the OECD Testing Guideline 405
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein (at the end of exposure period) - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (animal #1 and #2)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (animal #1 and #2)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (animal #1 and #2)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- (animal #1 and #2)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects:
- No other findings were observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The mean conjuctivae score was 0.7, the mean cornea score was 0, the mean iris score was 0 and the mean chemosis score was 0 (all at 24, 48 and 72 hours) The test substance is not classified as an eye irritant according to EU CLP Regulation criteria.
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study (equivalent to OECD Guideline 405), the test substance was administered undiluted at a dose of 50 µL to one eye of Vienna White rabbits (n=2), the adjacent eye served as a control treated with NaCl. The treated eye of each rabbit was scored for irritation at 24- 48- and 72-hours following test item administration. According to the study protocol, treated eyes were examined 72 hours after dosing. Irritation was scored according to OECD guideline 405 and to the criteria of Draize.
The mean conjunctivae score was 0.7, the mean cornea score was 0, the mean iris score was 0 and the mean chemosis score was 0 (all at 24, 48 and 72 hours). In this study, the test substance was not irritating to the eyes of rabbits. Thus, based on this result, the classification of the test substance as an eye irritant is not warranted according to the EU CLP Regulation 1272/2008 criteria.
Reference
Table 1: Summary results
Findings animal #1 / #2:
Time | Redness |
10 min | 1 / 1 |
1 h | 1 / 1 |
3 h | 1 / 1 |
24 h | 1 / 1 |
48 h | 1 / 1 |
72 h | 0 / 0 |
Mean (24 – 48 – 72 h) | 0.7 / 0.7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
There was no skin and eye irritation/corrosion data available with the target substance. Thus, the main constituent of the target substance BPA-2EO was used in a read-across approach to assessing the skin and eye irritation/corrosion potential of the target substance.
In a primary dermal irritation study (equivalent to OECD guideline 404), 1 mL of the test substance was applied under occlusive condition to the skin of Vienna white rabbits (n= 2). The mean erythema scores for both animals after 24, 48, and 72 hours were 0.7 - 1, and the mean oedema score for both animals after 24, 48 and 72 hours was 0.
In a primary eye irritation study (equivalent to OECD Guideline 405), 50 µL of the test substance was administered undiluted into one eye of Vienna White rabbits (n=2), the adjacent eye served as a control treated with NaCl. The mean conjunctivae score was 0.7, the mean cornea score was 0, the mean iris score was 0 and the mean chemosis score was 0 (all at 24, 48, and 72 hours)
In conclusion, based on the available data, the target substance is not a skin and eye irritant, therefore the classification of the target substance as a skin and eye irritant is not warranted according to the criteria of the EU CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In conclusion, based on the available data, the target substance is not a skin and eye irritant, therefore the classification of the target substance as a skin and eye irritant is not warranted according to EU CLP Regulation 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.