Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 255-217-5 | CAS number: 41098-56-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Acute Toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from experimental report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The aim of this study was to assess the dermal toxicity of the test chemical after single dose application by dermal route in rats and 14 day observation period.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexasodium 2,2'-[vinylenebis[(3-sulphonato-4,1-phenylene)imino[6-(diethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl]imino]]bis(benzene-1,4-disulphonate)
- EC Number:
- 255-217-5
- EC Name:
- Hexasodium 2,2'-[vinylenebis[(3-sulphonato-4,1-phenylene)imino[6-(diethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl]imino]]bis(benzene-1,4-disulphonate)
- Cas Number:
- 41098-56-0
- Molecular formula:
- C40H44N12O18S6.6Na
- IUPAC Name:
- hexasodium 2,2'-(ethene-1,2-diylbis{(3-sulfonato-4,1-phenylene)imino[6-(diethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl]imino})dibenzene-1,4-disulfonate
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of the test chemical: Hexasodium 2,2'-(vinylenebis((3-sulphonato-4,1-phenylene)imino(6-(diethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine-4,2-diyl)imino))bis(benzene-1,4-disulphonate)
- Molceular formula: C40H38N12O18S6.6Na
- Molecular weight: 1305.1422 g/mol
- Smiles: CCN(CC)c1nc(nc(n1)Nc2cc(ccc2S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-])Nc3ccc(c(c3)S(=O)(=O)[O-])/C=C/c4ccc(cc4S(=O)(=O)[O-])Nc5nc(nc(n5)N(CC)CC)Nc6cc(ccc6S(=O)(=O)[O-])S(=O)(=O)[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[Na+]
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:In-House Bred at the CROAnimal Facility.
- Age at study initiation: N/A
- Health Status: Healthy young adult animals were used for the study. Females were nulliparous and non pregnant
- Weight (Prior to Treatment): Male:Minimum: 237 g and Maximum: 281 g , Female:Minimum: 230 g and Maximum: 250 g
- Fasting period before study:N/A
- Housing: The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages.
- Bedding : All cages were provided with corn cobs.
- Room Sanitation : The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle : All the cages and water bottles were changed at least twice every week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): All animals were provided conventional laboratory rodent diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum via drinking bottles.
- Acclimation period: All animals were acclimatized to the test conditions for 5 days prior to administration of the test item.
- Randomization: Animals were selected manually. No computer generated randomization program was used.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Minimum: 19.40 °C Maximum: 22.10 °C
- Humidity (%): Minimum: 47.80% Maximum: 65.40%
- Air changes (per hr): More than 12 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12:12
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:The test item was applied uniformly over clipped dorsal area of rat skin.
- % coverage:Approximately 10% body surface area of rat.
- Type of wrap if used:The porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The residual test item was removed by using distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure: 24-hour.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item was applied.
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes
- For solids, paste formed: yes
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): No data
- Concentration (if solution): N/A
- Lot/batch no. (if required): N/A
- Purity: N/A - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hrs
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg body weight.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (Five per sex)
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
At the end of 14 day observation period, all the surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 and subjected to gross pathology examination, for external and internal observations.
- Other examinations performed:
- Clinical signs : After test item administration, individual animals were frequently observed at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dosing on day 0 (day of dosing). Subsequently, all animals were observed once a day during the 14 day observation period.
- Body weight:All rats were weighed on days 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14
other:
- Local Signs/Skin Reactions
All animals were observed once daily during days 1-14 (in common with clinical signs).
- Mortality
Animals were observed twice daily for any mortality during the experimental period - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed since the study was terminated with limit test.
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- No data
Effect levels
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Non toxic to animals
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight during the 14 day observation period
- Clinical signs:
- other: At 2000 mg/kg, all the animals were observed normal throughout the experimental period
- Gross pathology:
- The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality
Any other information on results incl. tables
TABLES
Table 1: Individual Animal Body Weight (g) and Body Weight Changes(%)
Dose:2000 mg/ kg bodyweight Density:1.06881
Animal No. |
Sex |
Dose Volume* (ml) |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Change (%) |
|||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
|||
1 |
Male |
0.53 |
281 |
305 |
331 |
8.54 |
17.79 |
2 |
0.46 |
246 |
262 |
286 |
6.50 |
16.26 |
|
3 |
0.47 |
252 |
260 |
282 |
3.17 |
11.90 |
|
4 |
0.50 |
266 |
277 |
297 |
4.14 |
11.65 |
|
5 |
0.44 |
237 |
256 |
285 |
8.02 |
20.25 |
|
6 |
Female |
0.43 |
230 |
235 |
241 |
2.17 |
4.78 |
7 |
0.45 |
238 |
252 |
272 |
5.88 |
14.29 |
|
8 |
0.46 |
244 |
248 |
253 |
1.64 |
3.69 |
|
9 |
0.47 |
250 |
255 |
263 |
2.00 |
5.20 |
|
10 |
0.46 |
244 |
252 |
259 |
3.28 |
6.15 |
Keys: * = based on the test item density and day 0 body weight
Table 2: Individual Animal Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Hour(s) - Day 0 |
Day |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
||
1 |
Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Animal No. |
Sex |
Day |
||||||
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
1 |
Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Key: 1 = Normal
Table 3: Individual Animal Mortality Record
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Days of Observation (0 to 14) |
|
Morning Observations |
Evening Observations |
||
1 |
Male |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
2 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
3 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
4 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
5 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
6 |
Female |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
7 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
8 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
9 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
10 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
Table 4:Summaryof Animal Body Weight (g) and Body Weight Changes (%)
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight
Sex |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Changes (%) |
||||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
||
Male |
Mean |
256.40 |
272.00 |
296.20 |
6.07 |
15.57 |
SD |
17.33 |
20.09 |
20.27 |
2.36 |
3.75 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Female |
Mean |
241.20 |
248.40 |
257.60 |
2.99 |
6.82 |
SD |
7.56 |
7.89 |
11.57 |
1.73 |
4.27 |
|
n |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Keys:SD= Standard deviation, n = Number of animals
Table 5: GrossNecropsyObservation
Dose:2000 mg/kg body weight Mode of Death:Terminal Sacrifice
Animal No. |
Sex |
Gross Observation |
|
External |
Internal |
||
1 |
Male |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
2 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
3 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
4 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
5 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
6 |
Female |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
7 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
8 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
9 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
|
10 |
No abnormality detected |
No abnormality detected |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not Classified
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal median lethal dose of the test chemical was >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, the test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it was acutely non toxic to animals and can be classified under the category "Not Classified".
- Executive summary:
Acute Dermal Toxicity Study of the test chemical was performed in Wistar Rats, This study was performed as per OECD No. 402. Five male and five female healthy young adult rats were randomly selected and used for conducting acute dermal toxicity study. Rats free from injury and irritation of skin were selected for the study. Approximately, twenty four hours prior to dermal application of test item, greater than 10% of body surface area of each rat was clipped. A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight based on the test item density (1.06881) and latest body weight was applied by single dermal application and observed for 14 days after treatment. On test day 0, calculated volume of test item was applied directly on the intact skin of clipped area of rats; the porous gauze dressing was put on to the intact skin of clipped area. This porous gauze dressing was covered with a non-irritating tape. After the 24-hour application period, the dressings were removed and the skin was gently wiped with distilled water. The skin reactions were assessed. The animals were observed daily for mortality and clinical signs, during the acclimatization period and post dosing till the termination. All animals were observed for clinical signs at approximately 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours after treatment on day 0 and once daily during test days 1‑14. Mortality was recorded after application on test day 0 and twice daily during days 1-14 (at least once on the day of sacrifice). Local signs / Skin reactions were observed daily from test days 1-14. Body weights were recorded on day 0 (prior to application) and on day 7 and 14. All animals were necropsied and examined macroscopically. No mortality was observed in any animal till the end of the experimental period. At 2000 mg/kg, all the animals were observed normal throughout the experimental period. Mean body weight was observed with gain on day 7 and 14 of male and female animals, as compared to day 0.The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality. The acute dermal median lethal dose of the test chemical was >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, the test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it was acutely non toxic to animals and can be classified under the category "Not Classified".
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
