Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-550-5 | CAS number: 90640-32-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Guideline Study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 006
- Report date:
- 2006
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Amines, coco alkyl
- EC Number:
- 262-977-1
- EC Name:
- Amines, coco alkyl
- Cas Number:
- 61788-46-3
- IUPAC Name:
- 61788-46-3
- Details on test material:
- - Chemical name: Amines, coco alkyl
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Dispersion treatment: Stock solution was 5 mg/L. 6 μL/L test item were applied to 3 L natural river water. This solution was treated for 30 minutes with ultrasound at 40 °C. After a cooling period of 10 minutes the test item concentrations were prepared out of this stock solution.
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Strain: Daphnia magna STRAUS (Clone 5)
- Source: Institut für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene (WaBoLu); Breeder DR.U.NOACK-LABORATORIEN, D-31157 Sarstedt, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 2 - 24 h old
- Feeding during test: The daphnids were not fed during the study.
HOUSING:
- Conditions: In 2-3 L glass vessels with approximately 1.8 L culture medium, at 21 °C (temperatures of 20 - 25 °C are tolerated), in an
incubator, 16 h illumination, illumination strength max. 20 μE⋅m-2 ⋅s-1.
- Culture medium: Elendt M4, according to ELENDT (1990), modified to a total hardness of 160 to 180 mg CaCO3/L.
- Type and amount of food: Feeding ad libitum with a mix of Desmodesmus subspicatus and Chlorella vulgaris, with an algae cell density of > 106 cells/mL.
- Feeding frequency: 5x weekly
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: At least 2 h in dilution water
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
Test conditions
- Hardness:
- 131.4 mg CO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 19.6 °C
- pH:
- 7.6 - 7.8
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.89 - 9.25 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 5.00 - 2.00 - 0.80 - 0.32 - 0.123 - 0.051 mg/L (factor 2.5)
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Material, size, fill volume: Glass beakers (5 cm ID x 8 cm H), 50 mL; Volume of the study medium is 20 mL
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: A natural occurring river water (River Böhme) was used as test medium.
Test water parameter:
pH: 7.68
Conductivity [μS/cm]: 451
DOC [mg C/L]: 6.3
TOC [mg C/L]: 7.1
Ammonium-N [mg N/L]: < 1.94
Nitrate-N [mg N/L]: 3.9
o-Phosphate-P [mg P/L]: 0.029
Total Phosphate mg P/L]: 0.080
Suspended Matter [mg/L]: 16.9
Total Hardness [mg CO3/L]: 131.4
- Culture medium different from test medium: yes
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Prior to test start (0 h) pH-value, dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature, conductivity and total hardness of the dilution water were measured. At the beginning of the test water parameters (pH value, oxygen concentration) were measured in one additional replicate per concentration and control. After 48 h the water parameters in old media were measured in all replicates per concentration and control. The room temperature was recorded throughout the test with a thermohygrograph.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16/8 h light/dark cycle
- Light intensity: Diffuse light, illumination range max. 20 μE⋅m-2 ⋅ s-1
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : The percentage immobility was determined in all test and control groups after 24 h and 48 h. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 0.23 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.32 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC100
- Effect conc.:
- 0.8 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Percentage of Daphnids incapable of swimming after 24 and 48 h of exposure with
Amines, coco alkyl
Nominal conc.(mg/l) |
IMMOBILISATION [%]
|
|||||||||
24 h |
48 h |
|||||||||
|
Replicates |
Replicates |
||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
MW |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
MW |
5.00 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
2.00 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0.80 |
80 |
60 |
80 |
80 |
75 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
0.32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
5 |
60 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
45 |
0.128 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.051 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
5 |
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 2: Concentrations of Amines, coco alkyl
Nominal test item conc. [mg/L]
|
Meas. conc. [mg/L]after 0 h |
Meas. conc. [mg/L]after 48 h |
5.00 |
5.9 |
0.02 |
2.00 |
2.3 |
< detection limit |
0.80 |
0.9 |
< detection limit |
0.32 |
0.38 |
< detection limit |
0.128 |
0.19 |
< detection limit |
0.051 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
Control |
< detection limit |
< detection limit |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The total amount of test item recovered from the the stock solution and glassware (aqueous phase and adsorption to glass) was higher than expected. Therefore a correction was applied.
The measured initial concentrations in the test replicates (0 h) showed a good accordance with the geometrical series of dilution. After a 48 h exposure all concentrations (except the lowest one) had dropped below the limit of quantification (10 μg/L).
The adsorption of the test item to glassware used during the test was quantified at the two concentrations which framed the EC50 (0-48 h). As expected, Amines, coco alkyl showed only a limited adsorption to glassware. The amount recovered from the glassware did not exceed 3.6 % of the applied amount. These results indicate that adsorption to glassware contributes only little to the observed decrease of the test item during the test. Under test conditions with natural river water, adsorption to glass can be considered negligible.
Other effects must have caused the observed decrease of concentration in the aqueous phases. Adsorption to humic acids, suspended matter or daphnia surfaces are the most likely mechanisms. - Executive summary:
The Acute Immobilisation of the test item Amines, coco alkyl (batch number: S000358) to Daphnia magna (STRAUS) was determined according to OECD Guideline 202 / 92/69/EC Method C.2 from 2006-03-01 to 2006-03-03 at DR.U.NOACK-LABORATORIEN, D-31157 Sarstedt, Germany. The study was conducted with 6 nominal concentrations ranging from 0.051 to 5.00 mg/L in a geometric series with a factor of 2.5 under static conditions over a duration of 48 h. 20 test organisms were exposed to each test concentration and control. The water quality parameters pH-value and dissolved oxygen concentration were determined to be within the acceptable limits. The validity criteria of the test guideline were fulfilled. All concentration levels and the control groups were analytically verified via LC-MS/MS after 0 h (new media) and 48 h (old media). The measured initial concentration levels were in good accordance, whereas test concentration after 48 h exposure were below the limit of quanitification (= 10 μg/L). Adsorption to the test vessels after 48 h of exposure, determined from the dosage levels framing the LC50, was found to be negligible (for details of the analytical method and results please refer to chapter 9).
The test item has a low water solubility and sorbs to organic and inorganic materials by different mechanisms. The sorption processes are mostly non-linear, means are concentration dependent. Due to these properties the test item is difficult to test in synthetic water (e.g. sorption to the test organism and walls of the test vessel) and results from such tests depend from the test settings applied. Using natural river water which contains particulate as well as dissolved organic carbon to which the test item can sorb partially reduces the difficulties encountered in tests with synthetic water e.g. preventing that the test item settles onto surfaces. The sorbed fraction of the test item is difficult to extract from the test system which normally leads to low analytical recoveries. Due to the short exposure period these low recoveries cannot be associated to biodegradation. This means the test substance is present in the test system and therefore available for exposure (dissolved in water and sorbed also called bulk). Due to the properties of the test item nominal concentrations have to be used instead of measured ones (see Table 1). This so called Bulk Approach is described by ECETOC (2003). Sorption of the test item to the glass ware of the test system was monitored and found to be small.
Test Duration [h] Nominal Test Item Concentration [mg/L] Confidence Interval p = 95% [mg/L] EC10 24 0.369 --- 48 0.236 --- EC50 24 0.613 0.516 – 0.729 48 0.323 0.296 – 0.353 EC100 24 2.00 --- 48 0.80 --- The study was performed according to OECD Guideline 202 (2004) and Directive 92/69/EC
Method C.2 (1992). The validity criteria were fulfilled:
• In the control group no Daphnia were immobilised or trapped on the surface of the water.
• The EC50 -value after 24 h of the reference item was in the range of 1.0 to 2.5 mg/L.
• The dissolved O2 concentration was > 3 mg/L.
• The pH-value did not vary by more than 1.5 unit.
• The recovery rates of the test item were > 80 % at test begin and < LOQ (10 μg/L) at test
end. Due to the properties of the test item all effect levels are given based on nominal test
item concentrations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.