Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-974-4 | CAS number: 68647-86-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Ames tests (for coconut shell charcoal)
The study was performed to investigate the potential of coconut shell charcoal to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the preincubation test (experiment II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 153, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations:
Pre-Experiment /Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500 and 5000 µg/plate
The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test group with and without metabolic activation.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with coconut shell charcoal at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagenes were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Therefore, coconut shell charcoal is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay.
Ames test (for Read-Across substance charcoal)
The three tests were performed in the tester strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, and TA 1535 using both the plate incorporation and the pre-incubation method, both with and without metabolic activation by rat S9 mix. All three tests were essentially similar in design and were conducted according to OECD guideline no. 471 and EU method B.13/14.
When tested in amounts corresponding to nominal test item concentrations of up to 5,000 µg/plate, none of the extracts did induce an increased rate of revertants in any of the tester strains, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation. No cytotoxic effects were observed at any of the tested concentrations.
Concurrently performed negative and solvent controls as well as appropriate positive controls gave the expected results.
Accordingly, charcoal was concluded to be non-mutagenic in the tests.
In vitro gene mutation assay in mammalian cells (for Read-Across substance charcoal)
In addition, the potential mutagenicity of Probe 2 was studied in an in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay in mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK+/-cells which was performed according to OECD guideline no. and EU method B.17.
Based on the results of a preliminary solubility and toxicity test, concentrations of the extract corresponding to nominal test item concentrations of 128; 320; 800; 2,000 and 5,000 µg/mL were selected for the two main experiments, assay 1 and 2.
In assay 1, a 3-h treatment, both with and without metabolic activation was utilised while in assay 2, a 3-h treatment with metabolic activation and a 24-h treatment without metabolic activation were used. The relative harmonised survival the relative total growth of the cells, cell viability, and the potential mutagenicity (5-trifluorothymidine resistance) were determined.
The extract of the test item was not cytotoxic up to and including the highest concentration of 5,000 µg/mL.
The mutation frequencies observed in both assays did not show dose-related tendencies, remained far below the relevant thresholds for positive results, and were not statistically significantly different from that of the vehicle control.
Both main assays fulfilled the validity criteria. Concurrently performed positive and negative controls gave the expected results thus demonstrating the correct functioning of the assay system.
In conclusion, the extract of Probe 2 did not induce gene mutations in cultured mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK+/-cells under the conditions of this study, neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation.
Accordingly, the test item charcoal was concluded to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the present study.
In vitro chromosomal aberrations assay (for Read-Across substance charcoal)
The potential genotoxicity of Probe 2 was investigated in an in vitro chromosome aberration assay in V79 cells. The assay was conducted according to OECD guideline no. 473 and EU method B.10. Based on the results of a pre-test for solubility and cytotoxicity test, concentrations of 1,250, 2,500, and 5,000μg/mL were chosen for the main assay. The main assay consisted of two independent experiments, experiment A (3 h treatment, harvest after 20 h, both with and without metabolic activation) and experiment B (3 h treatment with and 20 h treatment without metabolic activation, harvest after 28 h).
In both experiments A and B, the test item extract did not induce an increase in the number of cells with aberrations without gaps at any examined concentration, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, up to and including the maximum concentration.
There were no statistical differences between treatment and concurrent solvent control groups, and no dose-response relationships were noted.
No statistically significant differences between treatment and concurrent negative (vehicle) control groups and no dose-response relationships were noted.
An adequate degree of cytotoxicity was observed at the highest test concentration in both experiments.
The observed chromosome aberration rates were within the ranges of historical control data. There were no biologically relevant increases in the rate of polyploid or endoreduplicated metaphases in the two experiments, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
The validity of the test was shown using ethyl methanesulphonate (0.4 and 1.0μL/mL) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (1.0μL/mL) as positive controls.
In conclusion, the test item charcoal was considered as non-genotoxic in this system.
Taken together, the results of the three Ames test, the in vitro gene mutation assay in mammalian cells, and the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay clearly indicate that charcoal is non-mutagenic and non-genotoxic.
Genetic toxicity in vivo
In vivo mutagenicity testing is not needed as no positive results were observed in the battery of the in vitro genotoxicity tests (see above).Short description of key information:
The potential genetic toxicity of coconut shell charcoal was evaluated in a bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test as well as (for the Read-Across substance charcoal) in an in vitro gene mutation assay in mammalian cells and an in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay.
The test for coconut shell charcoal was conducted with coconut shell charcoal dissolved in deionised water. The tests for charcoal were conducted with organic extracts of the three charcoal samples Probe 1 (C-Fix = 73.3%), Probe 2 (C-Fix=80.5%), and Probe 3 (C-Fix=88.7%). For the Read-Across substance charcoal extracts of all three test items were tested in the Ames test, the in vitro gene mutation assay in mammalian cells and an in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay were conducted with the extract of Probe 2 only.
Each extract (for the Read-Across substance charcoal) was prepared from 250 g of the respective test item by extraction with acetone: n-hexane 50:50 (v/v). The nominal concentration of the test item in each extract was 1,000 mg/mL.
Value used for CSA: Genetic toxicity: negative
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the results obtained in the four tests, the gene mutation assay in mammalian cells in vitro, and the in vitro chromosomal aberrations assay, coconut shell charcoal is concluded to be non-genotoxic. Accordingly, coconut shell charcoal is not classified as a germ cell mutagen according to the current EU-CLP Regulation. However, results from specific mutagenicity studies in germ cells are lacking.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.