Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-169-4 | CAS number: 513-79-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-10-13 to 2010-10-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation (Altern Lab Anim. 2007 Dec; 35 (6):559-601)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- signed 2009-03-30
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Not applicable - Since this is an in vitro study there is no information on test animals.
- Vehicle:
- water
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Approx. 10 mg of the test item were applied to each of triplicate tissues, spread to match the tissue size, and wetted with 15 µL deionised water.
No further information on the amount/concentration applied was stated. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 15 minutes
- Observation period:
- not applicable
- Number of animals:
- not applicable
- Details on study design:
- CELL CULTURE:
EpiSkin™ kit (Lot No.: 10-EKIN-028) was purchased from Skinethic Laboratories (06000 Nice, France). The EpiSkin™ tissue consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers arranged in patterns analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiSkin™ tissues (surface 0.38 cm²) are cultured on specially prepared cell culture inserts.
The RhE (Reconstructed human Epidermis) model supplier ensured and demonstrated that each batch of the RhE model used met defined production release criteria, e.g. viability, barrier function, no bacterial and mycoplasma contamination and histological scoring.
TREATMENT:
The negative control (deionised water (Lot no. 230710, produced in-house); Volume 10 µL) and positive control (5% SLS (Sodium lauryl sulphate, lot no. 1353471 51508322, Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, 89555 Steinheim, Germany) solution in deionised water, prepared freshly prior to the performance of the experiment; Volume 10 µL) and the test item were added into the insert atop the concerning EpiSkin™ triplicate tissues each. The 12-well plates were placed into the incubator for 15 min at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5% CO2.
After the end of the treatment interval the inserts were removed immediately from the 12-well plate. Using a wash bottle the tissues were gently rinsed with PBS to remove any residual test material. Excess PBS was removed by gently shaking the inserts and blotting the bottom with blotting paper. The inserts were placed in the plates with 2 mL maintenance medium. The tissues were incubated for about 42 hours at 37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5% CO2.
CELL VIABILITY TEST:
Cell viability is measured by dehydrogenase conversion of MTT [(3-4,5-dimethyl thiazole 2-yl) 2,5-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide], present in cell mitochondria, into a blue formazan salt that is quantitatively measured after extraction from tissues (Faller, C., Bracher, M., Dami, N., Roguet, R., 2002. Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics. Toxicology in vitro 16 (5), 557-552). The percent reduction of cell viability in comparison of untreated negative controls is used to predict skin irritation potential (see OECD TG 439) and is used for the purpose of classification as irritating or non-irritating according to chemicals law (EU CLP, UN GHS).
After the treatment procedure was completed for all tissues of each time point cell culture inserts were transferred from the holding plates to plates filled with 2 mL assay medium containing 0.3 mg/mL MTT per well. After a 3 hour incubation period (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5% CO2) MTT solution was aspirated from the wells and the wells were rinsed three times with PBS. Tissue samples were cut out of the inserts with a biopsy punch and transferred into plastic vials. The tissue samples were immersed into extractant solution by gently pipetting 0.5 mL extractant solution (isopropanol) into each vial. The tissue samples were completely covered by isopropanol. The vials were sealed to inhibit isopropanol evaporation. The formazan salt was extracted about 67 hours in the refrigerator.
Per each tissue sample 2 X 200 µL aliquots of the blue formazan solution were transferred into a 96-well flat bottom microtiter plate. OD was read in a microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices, 85737 Ismaning, Germany) at 570 nm without reference filter. Mean values were calculated from the 2 wells per tissue sample.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS:
The mean OD of the three negative control tissues was calculated. This value corresponds to 100% tissue viability in the current test. For each individual tissue treated with the test item or the positive control the individual relative tissue viability is calculated according to the following formula:
Relative viability (%) = [OD test item/ OD negative control] X 100
For the test item and the positive control the mean relative viability +/- standard deviation of the three individual tissues are calculated and used for classification according to the following prediction model:
For the current test, an irritation potential of a test item according to EU classification R38 (according to directive 67/548/EEC), H315 (according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008) is recommended if the mean relative tissue viability of three individual tissues is reduced below 50% of the negative control.
ACCEPTABILITY OF THE ASSAY:
The absolute OD 570 nm of the negative control tissues in the MTT test is an indicator of tissue viability obtained after the shipping and storing procedure and under specific conditions of the assay. Tissue viability is meeting the acceptance criterion if the mean OD of the three tissues is ≥ 0.6 till ≤ 1.5.
The standard deviations in between tissues of the same treatment group should be ≤ 18%.
An assay is meeting the acceptance criterion if mean relative tissue viability of the positive control is ≤ 40%.
TEST FOR DIRECT MTT REDUCTION:
It was necessary to assess the ability of the test item to directly reduce MTT. To test for this ability approximately 25 mg of the test item were added to 1 mL of MTT solution and the mixture was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 60 minutes. Untreated MTT medium was used as control. If the MTT solution colour turned blue/purple, the test item was presumed to have reduced the MTT.
No colour change could be observed in the present study.
No further information on the study design was stated. - Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Value:
- 99.6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- After treatment with the test item cobalt carbonate the relative absorbance values decreased to 95.1%. This value is well above the threshold for irritancy of ≤ 50%. Therefore, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item cobalt carbonate is not irritating to the skin and therefore, the test item should not be classified and labelled as skin irritant according to regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Reference
Results after treatment with cobalt carbonate:
Dose group |
Treatment Interval |
Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 1 |
Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 2 |
Absorbance 570 nm Tissue 3 |
Mean Absorbance of 3 Tissues |
Absorbance [%] Tissue 1, 2 + 3 |
Standard Deviation [%] |
Rel. Absorbance [% of Negative Control] |
Negative Control |
15 min |
1.057 |
0.920 |
0.912 |
0.963 |
109.8 95.5 94.7 |
8.5 |
100.0 |
Positive Control |
15 min |
0.204 |
0.185 |
0.285 |
0.225 |
21.2 19.2 29.6 |
5.5 |
23.4 |
Test Item |
15 min |
0.960 |
0.956 |
0.962 |
0.959 |
99.7 99.2 99.9 |
0.3 |
99.6 |
HISTORICAL DATA:
Positive Control |
Negative Control |
||
Number of Studies |
85 |
Number of Studies |
85 |
Period |
July 2007-June 2010 |
Period |
July 2007-June 2010 |
Mean Viability |
17.8% |
Mean OD |
1.051 |
Standard Deviation |
10.7% |
Standard Deviation |
0.185 |
Range of Viabilities |
3%-34% |
Range of ODs |
0.7-1.5 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation, other
- Remarks:
- in vivo study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well documented with individual Draize Scoring Scheme Minor deviations from guideline with no effect on the results: - There were no observations made at 1 hour. - It was not stated if effects other than ocular were observed. - The purity and stability of the test item was missing.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987-02-24
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , see "rational for reliability"
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Sweetwater farms
No further information on the test animals was stated. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g of the undiluted sample was applied to the right eye of each of six rabbits. The left eye of all rabbits was untreated and served as a cntrol.
No further information on amount/concentration applied was stated.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- In 3 of 6 rabbits the test material was left in the eye for 30 seconds . For the remaining three rabbits no statement regarding duration of treatment/exposure was made.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 24, 48 and 72 hours after application of the test material
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The treated eyes of three rabbits were irrigated following application with 200 ml of lukewarm tap water. The treated eyes of the three remaining received no further treatment.
- Time after start of exposure: Irrigation after 30 seconds
SCORING SYSTEM: Scoring of irritative effects was according to the method of Draize in which corneal, iris and conjunctival effects are scored separately. In this scoring system, injuries to the cornea and iris may represent as much as 80 percent of the total score. Cornea and iris scores are heavily weighted because of their essential role in vision.
No further information on the study design was stated. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Eyes were not rinsed after application of the test item.
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- At the 24 to 48-hour readings following application of cobalt carbonate powder without a rinse, mild to moderate conjunctivitis in all rabbits was noted. All irritative effects subsided by the 72-hour reading (for results see "Overall irritation/ corrosion results" above).
After application of cobalt carbonate powder followed after 30 seconds with a 200 ml rinse, irritative effects at the 24-hour reading included mild conjunctival erythema in two rabbits. No irritative effects were noted at the 48 and 72-hour observation intervals (for results see "Remarks on results including tables and figures"; table 1). - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The following classification is based on the results obtained without rinsing the eyes after application.
According to the EC Regulation No. 1272/2008 and subsequent regulations, the test item is classified as not irritating.
Reference
Table 1. Eye irritation scores in New Zealand White rabbits following application of 0.1 gram of cobalt carbonate powder followed in 30 seconds by irrigation with 200 mls of lukewarm tap water
Irritation parameter |
Basis |
Time point |
|
Max. Score |
Reversibility |
Remarks |
Cornea score |
Mean animal #4 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Iris score |
Mean animal #4 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Conjunctivae score |
Mean animal #4 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0.33 |
1 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Chemosis score |
Mean animal #4 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Cornea score |
Mean animal #5 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Iris score |
Mean animal #5 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Conjunctivae score |
Mean animal #5 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0.33 |
1 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Chemosis score |
Mean animal #5 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Cornea score |
Mean animal #6 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Iris score |
Mean animal #6 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Conjunctivae score |
Mean animal #6 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Chemosis score |
Mean animal #6 |
24, 48, and 72 hours |
0 |
0 |
|
Eyes rinsed after 30 seconds |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Key study
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Key study
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation
Reference Heppenheimer (2011) is considered as the key study for skin irritation and will be used for classification. The mean relative absorbance (% of the negative control, correlating with mean tissue viability) after 15 minutes incubation in the in vitro human skin model test (EpiSkin, according to OECD TG 439) was 99.6%. The classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as skin irritant are not met, since the mean tissue viability was above the threshold for skin irritants of 50.0%. No classification required.
Eye irritation
Reference Vinegar (1977) is considered as the key study for eye irritation and will be used for classification. The overall irritation results 24, 48 and 72h after application per animal are as follows:
Corneal opacity: mean score=0.0 for all 3 animals
Iritis: mean score=0.0 for all 3 animals
Conjunctival redness: 0.33, 0.67, 1.0
Conjunctival oedema (chemosis): 0.0 for all 3 animals
The classification criteria acc. to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as irritating to eyes are not met, since none of the 3 animals showed after 24, 48 and 72hours a conjunctival and chemosis score of 2.0 and above, or a cornea and iritis score of 1.0 and above, thus cobalt carbonate will not be classified.
Respiratory irritation
The justification for classification as respiratory irritant is covered under the endpoint specific target organ toxicity- single exposure: inhalation as given in the acute toxicity section.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
