Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-478-4 | CAS number: 616-38-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study conducted according to a recognised guideline.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Samples were taken all test concentrations and the control. Fresh and expired media were sampled and analysed..
- Sampling method: Samples (approx. 50 mL) were stored in high density polyethylene bottles.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: samples were stored deep frozen (<-10C). - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: analytical and internal standard stock solutions were prepared by weighing DMC or acetone respectively into glass volumetric flasks and dissoving in and diluting to volume with water. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: not stated
- Strain/clone: STRAUS, Clone 5
- Justification for species other than prescribed by test guideline:
- Source: the Umweltbundesamt, Germany
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD):
- Feeding during test
- Food type: D. subspicatus
- Amount:
- Frequency: daily
Daphnia magna were bred in 1 L beakers with test medium. About 20 adults were kept per litre. The animals were fed on single cell green algae (e.g.
Desmodesmus subspicatus) about 3 times a week. Only as much food was added as the animals consumed per day.
The daphnids were reared at a temperature of 20 ± 2 DC in a RUMED chamber with 16 hours of illumination and 8 hours of darkness. The medium was changed three times per week, and the young were separated from the adults with sieves of 2 different meshes (ISO 3310-1) at the same time.
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Hardness:
- 231 mg/L as calcium carbonate
- Test temperature:
- test temperatures were in the range 19.5 to 20.20.8C with a mean of 20.0C
See table 1 (Any other information on materials and methods including tables) - pH:
- pH values ranged from 7.92 to 8.96
See table 2 (Any other information on materials and methods including tables) - Dissolved oxygen:
- dissolved oxygen concentrations ranged from 6.9 to 11.0 mg/L
see table 3 (Any other information on materials and methods including tables) - Salinity:
- not reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- See tables 4 and 5 in section, "Any other informaytion on materials and methods including tables"
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Type (delete if not applicable): assume closed and flask contents were mixed by shaking
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass flask
- Aeration: not stated
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): semi-static
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): Test solutions were renewed on each Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): not applicable
- Biomass loading rate: not stated
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: mix of deionised water and dechlorinated drinking water
- Total organic carbon: not stated
- Particulate matter: not stated
- Metals: not stated
- Pesticides: not stated
- Chlorine: not stated
- Alkalinity: not stated
- Ca/mg ratio: not stated
- Conductivity: 490 uS/cm
- Salinity: not stated
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement:
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH:
- Photoperiod: 16 h photoperiod daily
- Light intensity: 800 - 1400 Lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes/no
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations:
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 25 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Remarks:
- No significant mortality of adult animals was seen
- Details on results:
- - Mortality of parent animals: no significant adult mortality
- No. of offspring produced per female: 58.1 - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- The mean quotient (only vessels with alive adults at the end of the test) of each treatment group was compared with the mean quotient of the control of group with a U-test (2-tailed, p = 0.05) according to Mann/Whitney. For each day of the test, the statistical evaluation was done with the non-cumulative quotients of all individual vessels at which no adult died until the end of the test. The results show an increasing variance with increasing dosage. A dosage dependent inhibition was observed at and above 50 mg/L.
Comparison of the quotients (number of all offspring per number of adults per vessel) to the control quotients show a decrease of reproduction at concentration levels at and above 50 mg/L of DMC. Based on the means of the cumulative number of offspring per adult and vessel over the entire reproduction period, significant dose dependent inhibition effects on reproduction in comparison to the control could not be calculated up to 25 mg/L. The detected statistical significance at 6.25 mg/L is out of the dose/response range and considered to be caused by the variance of the biological system. Therefore, the NOEC for reproduction was determined at a concentration of 25 mg/L ofDMC and the LOEC at 50 mg/L.
See table in "Remarks on results including tables and figures" - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Due to the distribution of data the 21 d EC50 (immobilisation) could not be calculated. It is however estimated to be greater than 100 mg/L.
Due to the distribution of data no EC50 value for reproduction could be calculated on the basis of the reproduction inhibition values obtained. Therefore, the EC50 for reproduction was estimated to be above 100 mg/L.
All toxicological evaluations presented in this report were performed using nominal concentrations. Significant reproduction inhibition was not observed up to 25.0 mglL. Therefore, the NOEC can be estimated to be 25.0 mgIL DMC..
Reference
Mean number of all offspring (0 d - 21 d) per adult and vessel,
reduction of reproduction (%)
Group mg/L |
Mean of cumulative number of offspring per adult |
Percentage inhibition |
Control |
66.1 |
0.0 |
3.13 |
61.0 |
7.7 |
6.25 |
56.0 |
15.3 |
12.5 |
60.4 |
8.6 |
25 |
61.2 |
7.4 |
50 |
53.6 |
19.0 |
100 |
48.6 |
26.5 |
Description of key information
The NOEC can be estimated to be 25.0 mg/L DMC. The reproduction rate was decreased 26.5 % at the highest test concentration of 100 mglL.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 25 mg/L
Additional information
Significant reproduction inhibition was not observed up to 25.0 mg/L. Therefore, the NOEC can be estimated to be 25.0 mg/L DMC. The reproduction rate was decreased 26.5 % at the highest test concentration of 100 mglL.
Due to the distribution of data the 21 d EC50 (immobilisation) could not be calculated. It is however estimated to be greater than 100 mg/L. Due to the distribution of data no EC50 value for reproduction could be calculated on the basis of the reproduction inhibition values obtained. Therefore, the EC50 for reproduction was estimated to be above 100 mg/L.
The concentration range for the test was chosen using information from the acute toxicity test with DMC provided by the sponsor: Six concentration levels in the range 3.13 and 100 mg/L DMC with a dilution factor of 2.0 were selected. The concurrent control group was exposed to test medium without DMC. No EC50 values on toxicity could be calculated because no mortality caused by dosage treatment was observed at the end of the test after 21 days. Due to the distribution of data no EC50 value for reproduction inhibition could be calculated. All toxicological evaluations presented in the report were performed with the nominal concentrations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.