Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-304-6 | CAS number: 8002-26-4 A complex combination of tall oil rosin and fatty acids derived from acidulation of crude tall oil soap and including that which is further refined. Contains at least 10% rosin.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on available data for groups of constituents present in Distilled Tall Oil, a conservative 2-year NOAEL of >200 mg/kg/d is set for the oral route.
An OECD 422 Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with Reproductive/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Study is available for Distilled Tall Oil via the oral route in the diet for Sprague-Dawley rats (Inveresk Research, 2002e). The test was carried out according to the requirements of the guideline and in compliance with GLP. Effects on organ weights and clinical chemistry were observed at 5000 and 20,000 ppm in the diet, and decreased food consumption was also seen at the highest dose level, 20,000 ppm. A NOEL of 1000 ppm in the diet was established for general systemic toxicity in the study. Based on mean body weight and food consumption data over the duration of the study, this is equivalent to approximately 83 mg/kg/d for males and 100 mg/kg/d for females.
In a recently conducted OECD 408 repeated dose toxicity study in the rat (Charles River, 2020), administration of Tall Oil by dietary administration for at least 90 days was well tolerated in rats at levels up to 15,000 ppm and did not result in any adverse test item related (morphologic) alterations. Based on these results, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was considered to be 15,000 ppm. This dietary level was equivalent to an overall mean daily intake of 1104 mg/kg/d in males and 1221 mg/kg/d in females.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21st March 2002 to 26th February 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- It was based on the version of the test guideline available at the time (Adopted 22nd March 1996). There are some differences in the information reported compared with stipulations in the current version of OECD 422 (Adopted 29th July 2016). These are: • Functional Observations not performed • Thyroid hormones not measured • Study terminated on PND6, rather than continuing until minimally PND13 • Anogenital distance was not reported There were no deviations from the study plan that impacted upon the integrity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no certificate of analysis or details of test substance supplied, however given the nature of the distillation products this deviation was not thought to have affected the integrity of the study.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- N/A
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
At room temperature, in the dark, under nitrogen>
STABILITY UNDER TEST CONDITIONS
Not evaluated during study.
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST
Batches of diet were prepared weekly.
An appropriate quantity of the test item was dissolved in a suitable volume of acetone. This solution was added to a suitable quantity of untreated diet, then mixed for ca one hour with fan assisted venting to remove the ethanol to form a dose premix. A control premix was prepared using the same proportion of acetone and untreated diet. The diets for the Intermediate and High dose groups were prepared by dilution of the dose premix with untreated diet to give the desired concentrations. The Low dose diet was prepared by dilution of the High dose diet with untreated diet. The diet premixes were then placed on a Winkworth mixer for ca 20 min. The Control diet was prepared by dilution of the control premix with untreated diet such that the diet contained the same proportion of premix as the High dose diet. - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat is a standard rodent species for the reproduction toxicity testing in animals required by regulatory authorities. The normal processes of reproduction in the rat are well documented in the test laboratory.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 180-190 g. Females: 113-161 g.
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Initially two per polypropylene cages.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ±2
- Humidity (%): 50 ±15
- Air changes (per hr): minimum 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 08.04.02 To: 27.05.02 - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- acetone
- Details on oral exposure:
- The test material was administered orally because this is a possible route of exposure in humans. Administration via the diet is an established experimental routine in rats.
The dose levels were selected and agreed with the Sponsor, following evaluation of existing toxicological data. This included data from a one-week dose range finding study in rats carried out under a separate contract and project number at Inveresk (Inveresk Project No. 493160). - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analysis of the formulated diets was undertaken regarding concentration and homogeneity. Diet prepared for Week 1 and Week 4 of treatment was sampled. Triplicate samples of each formulation, including control, were taken immediately after preparation. The samples were analysed by the Inveresk Product Chemistry Laboratory using a method previously validated in the Inveresk laboratory under a separate protocol and contract (Inveresk Project No. 491836).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The males were treated for at least four weeks overall, starting from two weeks prior to mating until termination. The females were treated for two weeks prior to mating, then through mating, until termination after Day 4 of lactation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Continuous in diet.
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm
- Remarks:
- Group 1 (control)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 ppm
- Remarks:
- Group 2
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 ppm
- Remarks:
- Group 3
- Dose / conc.:
- 20 000 ppm
- Remarks:
- Group 4
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Ten
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were selected and agreed following evaluation of existing data and a one week dose range-finding study in rats.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No satellite groups. - Positive control:
- No positve control
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Males: once during the week prior to the commencement of dosing and once weekly thereafter. Females: once during the week prior to commencement of treatment, and weekly thereafter until the start of the mating period, then on Day 0 of gestation (the day of detection of a positive mating sign) followed by Days 7, 14 and 20 of gestation, and then Days 1 and 4 of lactation (where Day 0 is the day of parturition).
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/animal/day: Yes
- Group mean achieved dosages of test substance calculated: Yes
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: During Week 5 of dosing for males and on Day 6 of lactation for females.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: Five males and five females
- Parameters checked in table [No.1] were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood:
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: Five males and five females
- Parameters checked in table [No.1] were examined.
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
- Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 2), all animals (males: after 4 weeks treatment; females: after Day 4 of lactation)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see table 2), on control and high dose animals. - Other examinations:
- No other examinations.
- Statistics:
- Body weight and food consumption (prior to mating for females), haematology and clinical chemistry data were statistically analysed for homogeneity of variance using the 'F-max' test. If the group variances appeared homogeneous, a parametric ANOVA was used and pairwise comparisons made via Student's t-test using Fisher's F-protected LSD. If the variances were heterogeneous, log or square root transformations were used in an attempt to stabilise the variances. If the variances remained heterogeneous then Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used. Organ weights were also analysed likewise, and by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using terminal kill body weight as covariate. Histology incidence data were analysed using Fisher's Exact Probability Test. The following pairwise comparisons were performed against the Control group (Group 1): Control group vs Low dose; control group vs intermediate dose; Control group vs high dose. All statistical tests were two-sided and performed at the 5% significance level.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All clinical observations were considered to be consistent with those normally seen in rats of this age and strain.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- N/A
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Please see Table 3-Table 5 for data.
At 20000 ppm, there was a transient decrease in weight gain in both sexes. In males, decreased weight gain was most notable for over the first week, although absolute weights were significantly lower over the first 3 weeks of treatment. In females, there was a notable decrease throughout the pre-mating phase. The resulting deficit in body weight was never regained in either sex. In pregnant females, reduced weight gain was evident over Day 7- 20 of gestation, compared to the Control animals.
There were no obvious effects of treatment at 5000 or 1000 ppm. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- FOOD CONSUMPTION
Please see Table 6 to Table 8 for data.
At 20000 ppm, food consumption in males was reduced for the first 2 weeks of treatment (attaining significance during Week 1) and in Week 4 (not recorded Week 3 as paired for mating). In females, food consumption was significantly decreased during the pre-mating period. Consumption was also reduced during the first half of the gestation period, compared to the Control animals.
There were no obvious effects of treatment at 5000 or 1000 ppm.
COMPOUND INTAKE
Please see Table 9 for data. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Please see Table 10 & Table 11 for data.
At 20000 ppm, there was a non-significant decrease In white blood cells in females. Any other intergroup differences were not considered to reflect an effect of treatment. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Please see Table 12 & Table 13 for data.
Alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly Increased in females at 5000 and 20000 ppm, and in males at 20000 ppm. In males, there was a non-significant increase in levels at 5000 ppm, and in females at 1000 ppm there was an equivocal increase, but, given the small group sjze, it was considered that the difference was too small to reflect an effect of treatment.
Total bilirubin was increased in both sexes at 20000 ppm.
In addition, at 20000 ppm, cholesterol levels were Increased in males; albumin (and consequently total protein) were reduced in females. - Endocrine findings:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Please see Table 14 & Table 15 for data.
In males, at 20000 ppm, there was a decrease in body weights, with liver weights being essentially similar to Controls. At 5000 and 1000 ppm, liver weight was slightly greater than Controls. Following covariance analysis, there was a dose related increase in liver weights, with the increases at 5000 and 20000 ppm attaining statistical significance.
In females, slight non-significant increases in liver weights following covariance analysis at 5000 and 20000 ppm were too small to attribute to treatment.
In males at 20000 ppm, spleen weight was notably increased following variance and covariance analysis. Adrenal gland and thymus weights were slightly but significantly decreased. Following covariance analysis, adrenal gland weight was still significantly decreased, but for the thymus there was no significant difference from Controls.
In females, ovary, adrenal gland and kidney weights were significantly reduced at 5000 and 20000 ppm, with pituitary gland weight reduced at 20000 ppm. Following covariance analysis, kidney and pituitary gland weights were essentially similar to Controls, but a decrease in ovary weight at 20000 ppm, and adrenal gland weight at 5000 and 20000 ppm, was still evident, but not significant. - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All histology findings were typical of spontaneously arising background findings in rats of this strain and age.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- N/A
- Details on results:
- N/A
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Decreased weight gain and food consumption in both sexes at 20000 ppm. Changes in liver function in both sexes at 20000 ppm. At 5000 ppm there was increased liver weight and alkaline phosphatase in both sexes.
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In a good quality Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test conducted to OECD test guideline 422, and GLP, the parental NOAEL ,for Tall Oil administered continuously in the diet to rats (Sprague-Dawley), was 1000ppm.
- Executive summary:
Four groups of 10 male and 10 female Sprague-Dawley rats received Tall Oil in diets at concentrations of 0, 1000, 5000 and 20000 ppm. The males were dosed for at least four weeks, starting from two weeks prior to mating. The females were dosed from two weeks prior to mating until at least Day 6 of lactation. The animals were monitored for clinical signs, body weight, food consumption,
mating and litter performance. Blood samples were taken from five males (during week five) and five females (lactation Day 6) per group for laboratory investigations. All parental animals were subjected to necropsy, which included weighing of major organs. Histopathology was conducted on tissues from five males from Control and High dose, and seven females from the Control and eight females from the High dose.
At 20000 ppm in-life observations included decreased weight gain and food consumption in both sexes. Increased male liver weight, and increases in bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase were noted in both sexes. In addition, small decreases were noted in adrenal gland weight in both sexes, and in albumin, white blood cell count and ovary weight in females; spleen weight and cholesterol were slightly increased in males.
At 5000 ppm liver weight in males and alkaline phosphatase in both sexes were increased. Female adrenal gland weight was reduced.
In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, toxicity was exhibited at levels of 5000 and 20000 ppm, but there were no clear effects of toxicity at 1000 ppm. Therefore the parental NOAEC was considered to be 1000 ppm.
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 25/03/19 - 24/09/19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.26 (Sub-Chronic Oral Toxicity Test: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3100 (90-Day Oral Toxicity in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Appendix to Director General Notification, No. 12-Nousan-8147
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch (Lot) Number: AN-400-125
Purity: 100%
Amber transparent liquid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- This strain is an accepted rodent species for preclinical toxicity testing by regulatory agencies.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animals were acclimatised for 13 days before the start of dosing. A clinical observation was undertaken during this period.
Animals were housed in a temperature range of 18-24 ºC, a relative target humidity of 40-70%, and a 12 hour light/dark cycle.
Rats were housed in groups up to 5 animals of the same sex and same dosing group together in polycarbonate cages. - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on route of administration:
- The test and control items were administered by inclusion in the diet to the appropriate animals ad libitum from Day 1 for a minimum of 90 days, up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy. The first day diets were available to the animals was designated as Day 1.
The same diets remain in the food hopper for a maximum of one week. On the day of weighing the remaining food in the food hopper, remaining diet was replaced with new diet. The amount of test item incorporated into the diet was kept at a constant level in terms of ppm, throughout the study period. After termination, the actual test article intake was estimated based on the body weight and food consumption values. - Vehicle:
- acetone
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical verification of doses was performed using a Agilent Technologies 7890B Gaschromatograph machine. The injection temperature was 260°C.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Test and control items were administered by inclusion in the diet to the appropriate animals ad libitum from day 1 for a minimum of 90 days- up to, and including the day before scheduled necropsy.
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 500 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 15 000 ppm
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10/sex/group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control:
- None
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Throughout the study, animals were observed for general health/mortality and moribundity twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the working day. Animals were not removed from the cage during observation, unless necessary for identification or confirmation of possible findings.
Clinical observations were performed once daily, once prior to first administration and beginning during the first administration of the test item and lasting up to the day prior to necropsy.
Animals were weighed individually weekly, starting on Day 1. A fasted weight was recorded on the day of necropsy
Food consumption was quantitatively measured weekly starting on Day 1 and continuing weekly throughout the Dosing Period.
Water consumption was monitored on regular basis throughout the study by visual inspection of the water bottles.
The eyes were examined using an ophthalmoscope after application of a mydriatic agent (Tropicol 5 mg/ml solution, THEA Pharma, Wetteren, Belgium) during Pretreatment in all Main Study animals, and at the end of the Dosing Period in Week 13 in all Group 1 and 4 Main study animals
Functional tests were performed on the first 5 animals per sex per group during Week 12-13. These tests were performed, after completion of clinical observations (including arena observation, if applicable).
Hearing ability (HEARING) (Score 0 = normal/present, score 1 = abnormal/absent).
• Pupillary reflex (PUPIL L/R) (Score 0 = normal/present, score 1 = abnormal/absent).
• Static righting reflex (STATIC R) (Score 0 = normal/present, score 1 = abnormal/absent).
• Fore- and hind-limb grip strength, recorded as the mean of three measurements per animal (Series M4-10, Mark-10 Corporation, J.J. Bos, Gouda, The Netherlands).
• Locomotor activity (recording period: 1-hour under normal laboratory light conditions, using a computerized monitoring system, Kinder Scientific LLC, Poway, USA). Total movements and ambulations were reported. Ambulations represent movements characterized by a relocation of the entire body position like walking, whereas total movements represent all movements made by the animals, including ambulations but also smaller or more fine movements like grooming, weaving or movements of the head.
In the absence of a vaginal lavage, the study pathologist determined the estrous stage of all females by examining the reproductive organs.
These data were only used for evaluation of extreme thyroid hormone effects in females and are not included in the results section. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- Blood was collected between 7.00 and 10.30 a.m. from the retro-orbital sinus under anesthesia using isoflurane (Abbott B.V., Hoofddorp, The Netherlands) for analysis. A blood smear was prepared from each hematology sample.
Haematology
Blood smears were labeled, stained, and stored. Blood smear from Animal No. 69 (5000 ppm) was evaluated to confirm analyser results.
Haematology parameters:
White blood cells (WBC), Red Blood Cell Distribution Width (RDW), Neutrophils (absolute), Haemoglobin, Lymphocytes (absolute), Haematocrit, Monocytes (absolute), Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), Eosinophils (absolute), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), Basophils (absolute), Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Red blood cells, Reticulocyte (absolute), and Platelets
Coagulation
Blood samples at a target volume of 0.45 mL were collected into tubes containing citrate as anticoagulant. Samples were processed for plasma, and plasma was analyzed for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time
Clinical chemistry
Blood samples at a target volume of 0.5 mL were collected into tubes containing Li-heparinas anticoagulant. Samples were processed for plasma, and were analysed.
Blood samples at a target volume of 1.0 mL were collected in tubes without anticoagulant. Blood samples were processed for serum (bile acids and thyroid hormone measurement) and analysed
Clinical Chemistry parameters:
Alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) Glucose, Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Cholesterol, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), HDL and LDL Cholesterol, Total protein, Triglyceridea (Triglyceride concentration determined from remaining thyroid hormone serum samples), Albumin, Sodium, Bile acids, Potassium, Total Bilirubin, Chloride, Urea, Calcium, Creatinine, and Inorganic Phosphate (Inorg. Phos)
Thyroid hormone
Serum samples at a target volume of 1.0 mL were collected in tubes without anticoagulant (same sample as for bile acid measurement). Blood samples were processed for serum, and were analysed.
Thyroid hormone parameters:
Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Thyroxine (T4)
Terminal procedures
Main study and recovery animals surviving until scheduled euthanasia were weighed, and euthanized using isoflurane, followed by exsanguination. Animals were fasted (overnight with a maximum of 24 hours) before their scheduled necropsy
Animals were subjected to a complete necropsy examination, which included evaluation of the carcass and musculoskeletal system; all external surfaces and orifices; cranial cavity and external surfaces of the brain; and thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities with their associated organs and tissues. Necropsy procedures were performed by qualified personnel with appropriate training and experience in animal anatomy and gross pathology. A veterinary pathologist, or other suitably qualified person, was available.
The following organ weights were weighed at necropsy for all scheduled euthanasia animals (paired organs were weighed together)
Brain, Epididymisa, Gland, adrenala, Gland, pituitary, Gland, prostate, Gland, seminal vesicle, Gland, thyroida, Heart, Kidney, Liver, Ovary, Spleen, Testis, Thymus, Uterus/Cervix
Organ to body weight ratio was calculated.
The following tissues were embedded in paraffin (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands), sectioned, mounted on glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands)
Artery, aorta, Body cavity, nasopharynx, Bone, femur, Bone marrow, Bone, sternum, Brain, Cervix, Epididymisa, Esophagus, Eye, adrenal gland, clitoral gland, harderian gland, lacrimal gland, mammary gland, parathyroid gland, pituitary gland, preputial gland, prostate gland, salivary gland, seminal vesicle gland, thyroid gland, Gross lesions/masses, Gut-associated lymphoid tissue, Heart, Kidney, Large intestine, cecum, Large intestine, colon, Large intestine, rectum, Larynx, Liver, Lung, Lymph node, mandibular, Lymph node, mesenteric, skeletal muscle, optica nerve, sciatic nerve, Ovary, Pancreas, Skin, Small intestine, duodenum, Small intestine, ileum, Small intestine, jejunum, Spinal cord, Spleen, Stomach, Testisa, Thymus, Tongue, Trachea, Urinary bladder, Uterus, Vagina
All tissues were examined by a board-certified toxicological pathologist with training and experience in laboratory animal pathology. Target tissues identified by the study pathologist during microscopic evaluation were communicated to the Study Director; tissues were evaluated and reported. Tissues that were supposed to be microscopically evaluated per protocol but were not available on the slide (and therefore not evaluated) are listed in Individual Animal Data of the pathology report as not present. These missing tissues did/not affect the outcome or interpretation of the pathology portion of the study because sufficient data was available. A peer review on the histopathology data was performed by a second pathologist. - Statistics:
- Body Weight Gains: Calculated against the body weight on Day 1.
Relative Food Consumption: Calculated between at least each scheduled interval.
Test Item Intake: Calculated as concentration of test item in diet against relative food consumption.
Organ Weight Relative to Body Weight: Calculated against the Terminal body weight
Means, standard deviations (or % coefficient of variation or standard error, when deemed appropriate), ratio, percentages, numbers, and/or incidences were reported as appropriate by dataset.
All statistical tests was conducted at the 5% significance level. All pairwise comparisons were conducted using two sided tests and were reported at the 1% or 5% levels. Numerical data collected on scheduled occasions for the listed variables were analyzed as indicated according to sex and occasion. Descriptive statistics number, mean and standard deviation (or %CV or SE when deemed appropriate) were reported whenever possible.
Inferential statistics were performed according to the matrix below when possible, but excluded semi-quantitative data, and any group with less than 2 observations. The following pairwise comparisons were made:
Group 2 vs. Group 1
Group 3 vs. Group 1
Group 4 vs. Group 1
Parametric
Datasets with at least 3 groups (the designated control group and 2 other groups) were compared using Dunnett-test (many-to-one-t-test). For the motor activity data set (at least 3 groups) parametric (ANOVA) tests on group means were applied with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Mixed modelling techniques, comparing six different covariance structures, were used in order to select the best fitting statistical model.
Non-parametric
Datasets with at least 3 groups were compared using a Steel-test many-to-one rank test).
Incidence
An overall Fisher’s exact test was used to compare all groups at the 5% significance level. The above pairwise comparisons were conducted using Fisher’s exact test whenever the overall test is significant. - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No test item-related clinical signs were noted during daily detailed clinical observations or during weekly arena observations.
Clinical signs, such as alopecia, scabs and incidental piloerection, noted during the Dosing Period occurred within the range of background findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study and did not show any apparent dose-related trend. At the incidence observed, these were considered to be unrelated to treatment. - Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No mortality occurred during the study period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effects on body weight and body weight gain were noted in males up to 5000 ppm and in females up to 15000 ppm.
A slightly lower body weight gain was observed in males at 15000 ppm throughout the administration period (-5% compared to controls). - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption before or after correction for body weight was similar to the control level over the study period in males and females up to 15000 ppm.
Mean test article intake over the study period tabulated in "Any other information on results incl. tables" section. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no ophthalmology findings at Pretreatment and in Week 13. The nature and incidence of ophthalmology findings noted during the Pretreatment Period and in Week 13 was similar among the groups, and occurred within the range considered normal for rats of this age and strain. These findings were therefore considered to be unrelated to treatment with the test item.
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effects on haematology parameters were noted in males at 1500 ppm and in females up to 15000 ppm.
Lower reticulocyte count was observed in males at 5000 ppm and 15000 ppm (0.83x and 0.84x of controls). In addition, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) was also minimally decreased in males at 15000 ppm (0.92x of controls). These changes werer just marginally outside historical control data, but in absence of any organ weight change or histopathological correlation these changes were not considered to be of toxicological significance.
While few other changes were statistically significant in males at 5000 and/or 15000 ppm, the alterations in haematological parameters were unrelated to administration of the test item due to the minimal magnitude of the change, remained within the historical control range, and/or absence of a clear dose response relationship.
Coagulation parameters of treated rats were considered not to have been affected by treatment with the test item. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effects on clinical chemistry parameters were noted in males and females at 1500 and 5000 ppm.
At 15000 ppm, an increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in males and females (1.53x and 2.06x of controls, respectively) and total bilirubin concentration in males (1.53x of controls) was observed. Furthermore, slight increases in total cholesterol and HDL and LDL cholesterol concentrations were observed in males at 15000 ppm (1.26x, 1.31x 1.60x of controls). In females at 15000 ppm, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were also slightly increased (1.16x and 1.28x of controls, respectively). Bile acids was also decreased in in males and females (0.54x and 0.41x of controls, respectively).
Total T3 was increased in males at 15000 ppm (1.50x of controls), which was caused by 4 males showing levels above the concurrent control range (maximally 2.41x of mean control value).
Other values in treated males and females achieving a levle of statistical significance when compared to controls where considered to have arisen as a result of slightly high or low control values, occured in the absence of a dose-related distribution and/or were, given the magnitude of change, considered to be of no toxicological significance. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Hearing ability, pupillary reflex and static righting reflex were normal in all examined animals. Grip strength in animals up to 15000 ppm was similar to control, with the exception of the fore grip strength in males at 15000 ppm, which was slightly lower compared to control. However, as this fore grip strength remained well within the historical control range (633-1649 gram), this isolated finding was therefore considered not to be either test-material related or toxicologically relevant.
Motor activity was similar between treated and control groups. All groups showed a similar motor activity habituation profile with a decreasing trend in activity over the duration of the test period. - Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Increased absolute liver weight in females at 15000 (22%), and relative liver weight (to body weight) in males and females at 15000 (14 and 23% respectively)
There were no other test item-related organ weight changes. All other organ weight differences observed, were considered incidental and/or related to difference of sexual maturity and unrelated to the administration of Tall Oil. - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no test item-related gross observations.
All of the recorded macroscopic findings were within the range of background gross observations encountered in rats of this age and strain. - Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Test item-related microscopic findings after treatment with Tall Oil were noted at 15000 ppm in the liver of females and lung of both sexes.
Multifocal macrophage aggregation in the alveoli of the lung (minimal or slight) was recorded at increased incidence in males and females of the 15000 ppm group. The recorded incidences in the 1500 and/or 5000 ppm groups were comparable with the recorded incidences in the control group, or did not show a dose response and were therefore considered to be unrelated to treatment with the test item.
Hepatocellular hypertrophy of the liver was recorded at minimal degree in females of the 15000 ppm group.
Evaluation of the female reproductive organs for estrus stage revealed no abnormalities.
There were no other test item-related histologic changes. Remaining histologic changes (including the requested adrenal gland of males and kidneys of females) were considered to be within the range of background pathology encountered in rats of this age and strain. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 15 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects
- Remarks on result:
- other: approximate achieved doses of 1104 mg/kg/day in males and 1221 mg/kg/day in females
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, administration of Tall Oil by dietary administration for at least 90 days was generally well tolerated in Han Wistar rats at levels up to 15000 ppm and did not result in any adverse test item-related (morphologic) alterations.
Therefore, based on these results, the No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 15000 ppm (which equates to approximate achieved doses of 1104 mg/kg/day in males and 1221 mg/kg/day in females). - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to determine the potential toxicity of Tall Oil, when given via diet administration for 90 days to Wistar Han rats. In addition, a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was evaluated.
The study design was as follows:
Table 1: Experimental Design
Group No.
Test Item ID.
Dose level (ppm)
No. of Animals
Male
Female
1
-
0 (Vehicle)
10
10
2
Tall Oil
1500
10
10
3
5000
10
10
4
15000
10
10
Table 2: Test Article Intake
Group
Nominal dietary inclusion level (ppm)
Mean over means intake (mg test item/kg body weight) (mean range indicated within brackets)
Males
Females
2
1500
107 (79-153)
119 (94-152)
3
5000
367 (270-522)
420 (341-526)
4
15000
1104 (837-1506)
1221 (993-1520)
Chemical analyses of dietary preparations were conducted three times to assess accuracy and homogeneity. Additional analysis for stability was done in Week 13.
The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: clinical signs, body weights, food consumption, ophthalmology, functional observations, estrous stage determination, clinical pathology parameters (hematology, coagulation and clinical chemistry), gross necropsy findings, organ weights, and histopathologic examinations. Dietary analyses confirmed that formulations of test item in diets were prepared accurately and homogenously in Weeks 1 and 6. The concentrations analyzed in the diets prepared in Week 13 were not in agreement with target concentrations (i.e. mean accuracies between 73 and 79%). Therefore, as concentrations in Week 13 were only below the acceptable range (80%-120%) for up to a maximum of 7% and taken into account that the Weeks 1 and 6 diets which were analyzed were within specification, it was concluded that the diets were accurately prepared throughout the administration period.
At 1500 ppm, no test item-related changes were observed.
At 5000 ppm, the only observed test item-related finding was lower reticulocyte count in males which was, at the severity observed and the absence of histopathological correlation, considered not to be adverse.
At 15000 ppm, multiple test item-related effects were seen, which were considered not to be adverse. Firstly, a lower body weight gain was observed in males throughout the administration period. Affected test item-related hematology changes consisted of slightly lower reticulocyte count and decreased red blood cell distribution width in males. The body weight and hematology effects were only slight and in absence of a histopathological correlation considered not to be adverse.
At clinical chemistry, an increase in alkaline phosphatase activity was noted in males and females, which in females correlates with the hepatocellular hypertrophy of the liver. Furthermore, increases in total bilirubin concentration in males and total cholesterol and HDL and/or LDL cholesterol concentrations in males and females and decreases in bile acids concentration in males and females were observed. Finally, total T3 was increased in males at 15000 ppm. The bilirubin, cholesterol, bile acids and T3 findings were in absence of a histopathological correlation or any effects in the other thyroid hormones considered not to be adverse. At histopathological examination, minimal hepatocellular hypertrophy of the liver was observed in females, which correlated with increased liver weights and higher alkaline phosphatase activity and total bilirubin concentration. There was no microscopic correlate for the observed increased liver weight in males. These findings were at the observed severity and/or magnitude and in absence of any concomitant degenerative finding considered nonadverse and is a commonly observed adaptive response associated with the metabolism of xenobiotics or their metabolites. In the lung, multifocal macrophage aggregation was observed in males and females. The exacerbation in incidence of this finding at low degree of both sexes was regarded as test item-related and in absence of any other test item-related lung finding, was considered not to be adverse.
No test item-related or toxicologically significant changes were noted in any of the remaining parameters investigated in this study (i.e. clinical appearance, food consumption, functional observations, ophthalmoscopy, coagulation parameters and macroscopic examination). In conclusion, administration of Tall Oil by dietary administration for at least 90 days was generally well tolerated in Han Wistar rats at levels up to 15000 ppm and did not result in any adverse test item-related (morphologic) alterations. Therefore, based on these results, the No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 15000 ppm (which equates to approximate achieved doses of 1104 mg/kg/day in males and 1221 mg/kg/day in females).
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 3 Body Weights & Body Weight Gain (g). Male
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
BODY WEIGHT | |||||
DAY 0 | MEAN SD N | 320 17 10 | 313 9 10 | 316 11 10 | 313 10 10 |
DAY 7 | MEAN SD N | 374 26 10 | 369 16 10 | 373 16 10 | 351** 13 10 |
DAY 14 | MEAN SD N | 414 34 10 | 408 17 10 | 415 20 10 | 386* 18 10 |
DAY 21 | MEAN SD N | 447 37 10 | 437 19 10 | 444 26 10 | 413** 22 10 |
DAY 28 | MEAN SD N | 468 45 10 | 460 23 10 | 471 28 10 | 434 29 10 |
BODY WEIGHT GAIN | |||||
DAY 0 to DAY 28 | MEAN SD N | 149 30 10 | 147 16 10 | 154 20 10 | 121* 24 10 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 4 Body Weights & Body Weight Gain (g). Female – Pre-mating
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
BODY WEIGHT | |||||
DAY 0 | MEAN SD N | 194 9 10 | 199 15 10 | 197 8 10 | 188 9 10 |
DAY 7 | MEAN SD N | 217 13 10 | 221 18 10 | 219 10 10 | 200** 9 10 |
DAY 14 | MEAN SD N | 237 16 10 | 240 22 10 | 237 10 10 | 214** 15 10 |
BODY WEIGHT GAIN | |||||
DAY 0 to DAY 14 | MEAN SD N | 43 9 10 | 41 12 10 | 40 4 10 | 25** 12 10 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 5 Mean Body Weights & Mean Body Weight Gain (g). Female – Gestation and Lactation
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
BODY WEIGHT | |||||
DAY 0 Of gestation | MEAN | 245 | 247 | 240 | 218 |
DAY 7 Of gestation | MEAN | 286 | 285 | 275 | 256 |
DAY 14 Of gestation | MEAN | 329 | 320 | 317 | 288 |
DAY 20 Of gestation | MEAN
| 410 | 407 | 388 | 345 |
BODY WEIGHT GAIN | |||||
DAY 0 to DAY 20 | MEAN (% of Control) | 165 - | 160 97 | 148 90 | 127 77 |
BODY WEIGHT | |||||
DAY 1 Of lactation | MEAN | 298 | 286 | 273 | 261 |
DAY 4 Of Lactation | MEAN | 319 | 313 | 300 | 281 |
Table 6 Food Consumption (g/animal/day). Male
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
DAYS 0-7 | MEAN SD N (CAGE) | 31.5 2.2 5 | 30.9 2.0 5 | 32.6 1.6 5 | 27.2** 2.2 5 |
DAYS 7-14 | MEAN SD N (CAGE) | 35.5 3.9 5 | 34.1 1.9 5 | 34.9 1.3 5 | 32.1 2.4 5 |
DAYS 21-28 | MEAN SD N (CAGE) | 32.0 2.8 5 | 31.5 1.5 5 | 32.4 2.5 5 | 29.9 1.9 5 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 7 Food Consumption (g/animal/day). Female – pre-mating
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
DAYS 0-7 | MEAN SD N (CAGE) | 21.1 1.0 5 | 21.7 1.2 5 | 20.5 2.0 5 | 17.2*** 1.3 5 |
DAYS 7-14 | MEAN SD N (CAGE) | 22.9 1.3 5 | 22.6 1.1 5 | 21.6 1.5 5 | 20.3** 1.5 5 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 8 Mean Food Consumption (g/animal/day). Female – Gestation and Lactation
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
DAYS 0-7 Of gestation | MEAN | 26.9 | 26.5 | 26.2 | 23.9 |
DAYS 7-14 Of gestation | MEAN | 29.9 | 30.0 | 27.9 | 26.7 |
DAYS 14-20 Of gestation | MEAN | 31.8 | 32.8 | 32.6 | 30.1 |
DAYS 0-4 Of lactation | MEAN | 33.9 | 31.9 | 31.6 | 30.1 |
Table 9 Group Mean Achieved Dosage of Test Item (mg/kg/day)
| GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM |
MALES | |||
WEEK 1 | 91 | 473 | 1639 |
WEEK 2 | 88 | 443 | 1742 |
WEEK 4 | 70 | 354 | 1412 |
FEMALES | |||
WEEK 1 | 103 | 493 | 1773 |
WEEK 2 | 98 | 474 | 1961 |
DAYS 0-7 (OF GESTATION) | 100 | 509 | 2017 |
DAYS 7-14 (OF GESTATION) | 99 | 471 | 1963 |
DAYS 14-20 (OF GESTATION | 90 | 462 | 1902 |
DAYS 1-4 (OF LACTATION) | 107 | 551 | 2221 |
Table 10 Haematology, Week 5. Males
|
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM |
Hb | MEAN SD N | 16.1 0.6 5 | 16.1 0.4 5 | 15.5 0.1 5 | 15.7 0.5 5 |
RBC | MEAN SD N | 8.28 0.32 5 | 8.34 0.23 5 | 7.95 0.27 5 | 8.10 0.25 5 |
Hct | MEAN SD N | 0.453 0.019 5 | 0.452 0.014 5 | 0.442 0.004 5 | 0.440 0.015 5 |
MCH | MEAN SD N | 19.5 0.4 5 | 19.3 0.5 5 | 19.5 0.7 5 | 19.4 0.3 5 |
MCV | MEAN SD N | 54.7 1.5 5 | 54.2 1.4 5 | 55.5 1.7 5 | 54.3 0.9 5 |
MCHC | MEAN SD N | 35.6 0.3 5 | 35.7 0.4 5 | 35.1* 0.2 5 | 35.7 0.4 5 |
WBC | MEAN SD N | 14.50 2.21 5 | 14.33 2.85 5 | 15.82 4.05 5 | 12.97 3.93 5 |
Neut | MEAN SD N | 1.54 0.37 5 | 2.30 1.46 5 | 1.57 0.49 5 | 1.49 0.74 5 |
Lymp | MEAN SD N | 12.39 1.96 5 | 11.41 3.59 5 | 13.71 4.23 5 | 10.91 3.02 5 |
Mono | MEAN SD N | 0.25 0.07 5 | 0.28 0.10 5 | 0.20 0.02 5 | 0.22 0.11 5 |
Eos | MEAN SD N | 0.19 0.05 5 | 0.17 0.07 5 | 0.16 0.07 5 | 0.15 0.10 5 |
Baso | MEAN SD N | 0.04 0.02 5 | 0.04 0.02 5 | 0.06 0.03 5 | 0.04 0.02 5 |
LUC | MEAN SD N | 0.09 0.03 5 | 0.12 0.03 5 | 0.12 0.05 5 | 0.16 0.10 5 |
Plat | MEAN SD N | 1023 102 5 | 975 122 5 | 967 119 5 | 994 195 5 |
PT | MEAN SD N | 13 1 5 | 13 1 5 | 13 1 5 | 12* 1 5 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 11 Haematology, Week 7. Females
|
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM |
Hb | MEAN SD N | 14.0 1.0 5 | 13.9 0.6 5 | 13.2 0.4 5 | 13.0 1.7 5 |
RBC | MEAN SD N | 7.30 0.46 5 | 7.13 0.31 5 | 6.88 0.29 5 | 6.87 0.85 5 |
Hct | MEAN SD N | 0.394 0.029 5 | 0.390 0.021 5 | 0.370 0.014 5 | 0.365 0.048 5 |
MCH | MEAN SD N | 19.1 0.6 5 | 19.5 0.2 5 | 19.2 0.4 5 | 19.0 0.4 5 |
MCV | MEAN SD N | 54.0 1.4 5 | 54.7 1.3 5 | 53.8 1.3 5 | 53.2 1.6 5 |
MCHC | MEAN SD N | 35.4 0.6 5 | 35.7 0.7 5 | 35.7 0.4 5 | 35.7 0.3 5 |
WBC | MEAN SD N | 12.99 3.46 5 | 12.79 3.85 5 | 12.15 2.84 5
| 8.89 2.28 5 |
Neut | MEAN SD N | 3.84 1.68 5 | 3.30 1.19 5 | 3.62 1.09 5 | 2.44 0.98 5 |
Lymp | MEAN SD N | 8.55 2.89 5 | 8.78 2.85 5 | 7.99 2.05 5 | 6.04 1.83 5 |
Mono | MEAN SD N | 0.28 0.13 5 | 0.34 0.22 5 | 0.26 0.04 5 | 0.15* 0.04 5 |
Eos | MEAN SD N | 0.18 0.07 5 | 0.15 0.07 5 | 0.14 0.03 5 | 0.17 0.17 5 |
Baso | MEAN SD N | 0.03 0.03 5 | 0.04 0.03 5 | 0.03 0.01 5 | 0.02 0.01 5 |
LUC | MEAN SD N | 0.11 0.06 5 | 0.17 0.10 5 | 0.12 0.07 5 | 0.08 0.02 5 |
Plat | MEAN SD N | 1073 133 5 | 1061 145 5 | 1110 170 5 | 906 478 5 |
PT | MEAN SD N | 14 1 5 | 14 1 4 | 14 1 4 | 13 2 3 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 12 Clinical Chemistry, Week 5. Male
|
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM |
Urea | MEAN SD N | 7.3 0.5 5 | 7.4 1.1 5 | 6.5 0.5 5 | 6.4 0.6 5 |
Glu | MEAN SD N | 7.92 0.42 5 | 7.95 0.76 5 | 8.12 0.88 5 | 7.90 0.29 5 |
AST | MEAN SD N | 86 8 5 | 92 15 5 | 92 6 5 | 83 5 5 |
ALT | MEAN SD N | 59 2 5 | 71 8 5 | 70 11 5 | 65 9 5 |
AP | MEAN SD N | 683 39 5 | 699 137 5 | 842 183 5 | 1891** 905 5 |
Na | MEAN SD N | 144 1 5 | 144 2 5 | 143 2 5 | 142 3 5 |
k | MEAN SD N | 4.9 0.2 5 | 5.0 0.1 5 | 4.9 0.3 5 | 5.0 0.2 5 |
Cl | MEAN SD N | 101 1 5 | 102 2 5 | 101 2 5 | 101 4 5 |
TP | MEAN SD N | 68 2 5 | 70 2 5 | 66 2 5 | 66 2 5 |
Alb | MEAN SD N | 41 1 5 | 43 1 5 | 41 1 5 | 41 2 5 |
AG-R | MEAN SD N | 1.6 0.2 5 | 1.6 0.1 5 | 1.6 0.3 5 | 1.7 0.1 5 |
Chol | MEAN SD N | 2.0 0.4 5 | 1.9 0.3 5 | 2.0 0.3 5 | 2.4* 0.1 5 |
Crea | MEAN SD N | 51 2 5 | 53 2 5 | 52 3 5 | 56 4 5 |
Ca | MEAN SD N | 2.91 0.06 5 | 2.95 0.07 5 | 2.94 0.07 5 | 2.94 0.07 5 |
Phos | MEAN SD N | 2.01 1.13 5 | 2.58 0.09 5 | 2.60 0.14 5 | 2.08 1.17 5 |
T. Bi | MEAN SD N | 0.6 0.2 5 | 1.0 0.6 5 | 0.9 0.2 5 | 1.7*** 0.4 5 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 13 Clinical Chemistry, Week 7. Female
|
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM |
Urea | MEAN SD N | 10.7 1.2 5 | 11.1 2.7 5 | 11.8 1.2 5 | 10.5 0.7 5 |
Glu | MEAN SD N | 6.68 0.90 5 | 6.65 0.70 5 | 6.00 0.35 5 | 6.44 0.77 5 |
AST | MEAN SD N | 96 17 5 | 88 17 5 | 98 8 5 | 84 14 5 |
ALT | MEAN SD N | 105 23 5 | 114 31 5 | 128 28 5 | 113 21 5 |
AP | MEAN SD N | 509 203 5 | 638 152 5 | 980* 378 5 | 1649*** 929 5 |
Na | MEAN SD N | 145 3 5 | 141 3 5 | 144 1 5 | 142 3 5 |
k | MEAN SD N | 5.3 0.7 5 | 5.6 0.3 5 | 5.9 0.4 5 | 5.9 0.5 5 |
Cl | MEAN SD N | 106 4 5 | 103 4 5 | 105 2 5 | 104 1 5 |
TP | MEAN SD N | 64 1 5 | 65 4 5 | 62 2 5 | 59* 4 5 |
Alb | MEAN SD N | 40 1 5 | 39 2 5 | 39 2 5 | 35*** 1 5 |
AG-R | MEAN SD N | 1.6 0.1 5 | 1.5 0.1 5 | 1.7 0.2 5 | 1.4* 0.1 5 |
Chol | MEAN SD N | 2.4 0.5 5 | 2.2 0.5 5 | 1.9* 0.1 5 | 2.7 0.3 5 |
Crea | MEAN SD N | 59 4 5 | 58 2 5 | 62 4 5 | 63 3 5 |
Ca | MEAN SD N | 2.84 0.12 5 | 2.90 0.06 5 | 2.79 0.08 5 | 2.77 0.09 5 |
Phos | MEAN SD N | 1.89 0.27 5 | 1.93 0.31 5 | 1.58 0.21 5 | 1.86 0.24 5 |
T. Bi | MEAN SD N | 0.9 0.2 5 | 0.9 0.6 5 | 1.4 0.6 5 | 1.9** 0.5 5 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 14 Absolute Organ Weights (Following Covariance Analysis). Males
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
BODY WEIGHT | MEAN SE N | 458 11 10 | 458 11 10 | 458 11 10 | 458 11 10 |
ADRENAL GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.0757 0.0036 10 | 0.0803 0.0036 10 | 0.0674 0.0036 10 | 0.0634* 0.0038 10 |
BRAIN | MEAN SE N | 2.10 0.03 10 | 2.12 0.03 10 | 2.12 0.03 10 | 2.08 0.03 10 |
EPIDIDYMIDES | MEAN SE N | 1.2041 0.0292 10 | 1.2032 0.0287 10 | 1.2048 0.0291 10 | 1.2047 0.0311 10 |
HEART | MEAN SE N | 1.72 0.06 10 | 1.82 0.06 10 | 1.73 0.06 10 | 1.72 0.06 10 |
KIDNEYS | MEAN SE N | 3.77 0.10 10 | 3.85 0.10 10 | 4.01 0.10 10 | 4.07 0.11 10 |
LIVER | MEAN SE N | 17.88 0.53 10 | 18.88 0.52 10 | 19.46* 0.53 10 | 20.12** 0.56 10 |
LUNG | MEAN SE N | 1.82 0.06 9 | 1.86 0.05 10 | 1.76 0.05 10 | 1.75 0.06 10 |
PITUITARY GLAND | MEAN SE N | 0.0013 0.0001 10 | 0.012 0.001 10 | 0.013 0.001 10 | 0.011 0.001 10 |
PROSTATE | MEAN SE N | 0.771 0.046 10 | 0.777 0.045 10 | 0.704 0.046 10 | 0.761 0.049 10 |
SPLEEN | MEAN SE N | 0.85 0.03 10 | 0.83 0.03 10 | 0.85 0.03 10 | 1.04*** 0.03 10 |
SALIVARY GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.7770 0.0240 10 | 0.7572 0.0236 10 | 0.7501 0.0239 10 | 0.7978 0.0255 10 |
TESTES | MEAN SE N | 3.55 0.08 10 | 3.51 0.07 10 | 3.69 0.08 10 | 3.74 0.08 10 |
THYMUS | MEAN SE N | 0.491 0.032 10 | 0.415 0.031 10 | 0.435 0.032 10 | 0.385 0.034 10 |
THYROID GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.0219 0.0010 10 | 0.0233 0.0009 10 | 0.0225 0.0010 9 | 0.0230 0.0010 10 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Table 15 Absolute Organ Weights (Following Covariance Analysis). Females
| GROUP 1 CONTROL | GROUP 2 1000 PPM | GROUP 3 5000 PPM | GROUP 4 20000 PPM | |
BODY WEIGHT | MEAN SE N | 310 7 10 | 310 7 10 | 310 7 10 | 310 8 8 |
ADRENAL GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.0911 0.0037 10 | 0.0843 0.0032 10 | 0.0791 0.0032 10 | 0.0774 0.0042 8 |
BRAIN | MEAN SE N | 1.87 0.02 10 | 1.87 0.02 10 | 1.90 0.02 10 | 1.96 0.03 8 |
HEART | MEAN SE N | 1.12 0.04 10 | 1.16 0.04 10 | 1.25 0.04 10 | 1.18 0.05 8 |
KIDNEYS | MEAN SE N | 2.59 0.05 10 | 2.53 0.05 10 | 2.47 0.05 10 | 2.53 0.06 8 |
LIVER | MEAN SE N | 16.69 0.48 10 | 16.16 0.43 10 | 17.77 0.43 10 | 17.87 0.55 8 |
LUNG | MEAN SE N | 1.32 0.04 9 | 1.38 0.03 10 | 1.29 0.03 10 | 1.37 0.04 8 |
OVARIES | MEAN SE N | 0.114 0.005 10 | 0.106 0.004 10 | 0.104 0.004 10 | 0.097 0.006 8 |
PITUITARY GLAND | MEAN SE N | 0.014 0.001 10 | 0.016 0.001 10 | 0.015 0.001 10 | 0.013 0.001 8 |
SPLEEN | MEAN SE N | 0.59 0.03 10 | 0.63 0.03 10 | 0.68 0.03 10 | 0.72 0.03 8 |
SALIVARY GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.6038 0.0208 10 | 0.6027 0.0184 10 | 0.6121 0.0185 10 | 0.5755 0.0238 8 |
THYMUS | MEAN SE N | 0.198 0.024 10 | 0.233 0.021 10 | 0.201 0.021 10 | 0.242 0.028 8 |
THYROID GLANDS | MEAN SE N | 0.0166 0.0010 9 | 0.0165 0.0009 10 | 0.0152 0.0009 10 | 0.0171 0.0011 8 |
UTERUS | MEAN SE N | 0.53 0.02 10 | 0.53 0.02 10 | 0.51 0.02 10 | 0.50 0.03 8 |
Significantly different from the Control: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001
Test Article Intake
Group |
Nominal dietary inclusion level (ppm) |
Mean over means intake (mg test item/kg body weight) (mean range indicated within brackets) |
|
Males |
Females |
||
2 |
1500 |
107 (79-153) |
119 (94-152) |
3 |
5000 |
367 (270-522) |
420 (341-526) |
4 |
15000 |
1104 (837-1506) |
1221 (993-1520) |
Summary of Body Weights (g) - Males
Treatment |
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Day 1 Week 1 |
Mean |
177 |
176 |
173 |
179 |
St. Dev. |
11.7 |
10.0 |
7.9 |
5.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 8 Week 2 |
Mean |
227 |
222 |
218 |
217 |
St. Dev. |
15.4 |
14.4 |
11.9 |
6.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 15 Week 3 |
Mean |
265 |
261 |
260 |
257 |
St. Dev. |
18.6 |
20.0 |
15.9 |
8.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 22 Week 4 |
Mean |
291 |
287 |
286 |
281 |
St. Dev. |
21.7 |
26.3 |
21.0 |
9.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 29 Week 5 |
Mean |
315 |
311 |
315 |
308 |
St. Dev. |
23.4 |
31.5 |
23.8 |
10.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 36 Week 6 |
Mean |
337 |
334 |
335 |
331 |
St. Dev. |
26.7 |
33.3 |
25.7 |
19.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 43 Week 7 |
Mean |
354 |
350 |
352 |
346 |
St. Dev. |
29.2 |
35.4 |
28.7 |
10.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 50 Week 8 |
Mean |
370 |
363 |
367 |
359 |
St. Dev. |
30.9 |
38.1 |
30.9 |
11.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 57 Week 9 |
Mean |
378 |
371 |
376 |
365 |
St. Dev. |
31.1 |
37.9 |
34.2 |
12.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 64 Week 10 |
Mean |
387 |
385 |
387 |
374 |
St. Dev. |
34.7 |
40.0 |
35.2 |
14.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 71 Week 11 |
Mean |
397 |
391 |
393 |
383 |
St. Dev. |
34.3 |
40.9 |
36.4 |
15.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 78 Week 12 |
Mean |
404 |
400 |
401 |
389 |
St. Dev. |
33.6 |
41.4 |
34.4 |
15.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 85 Week 13 |
Mean |
415 |
407 |
411 |
399 |
St. Dev. |
34.7 |
38.9 |
35.2 |
14.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 91 Week 13 |
Mean |
416 |
408 |
406 |
397 |
St. Dev. |
35.1 |
40.0 |
35.7 |
16.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Body Weights (g) - Females
Treatment |
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Day 1 Week 1 |
Mean |
131 |
132 |
137 |
132 |
St. Dev. |
4.9 |
8.2 |
7.1 |
7.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 8 Week 2 |
Mean |
150 |
153 |
158 |
149 |
St. Dev. |
8.4 |
8.8 |
7.1 |
10.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 15 Week 3 |
Mean |
169 |
173 |
178 |
166 |
St. Dev. |
8.2 |
8.6 |
7.8 |
10.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 22 Week 4 |
Mean |
180 |
183 |
191* |
177 |
St. Dev. |
9.3 |
8.9 |
7.1 |
10.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 29 Week 5 |
Mean |
193 |
194 |
202 |
190 |
St. Dev. |
9.7 |
10.1 |
7.4 |
9.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 36 Week 6 |
Mean |
200 |
205 |
211 |
200 |
St. Dev. |
12.3 |
10.2 |
10.7 |
8.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 43 Week 7 |
Mean |
212 |
215 |
220 |
206 |
St. Dev. |
10.8 |
11.6 |
10.3 |
11.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 50 Week 8 |
Mean |
218 |
223 |
224 |
212 |
St. Dev. |
12.5 |
11.8 |
10.4 |
13.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 57 Week 9 |
Mean |
219 |
222 |
226 |
213 |
St. Dev. |
11.9 |
14.1 |
9.2 |
9.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 64 Week 10 |
Mean |
219 |
226 |
231 |
216 |
St. Dev. |
12.7 |
12.6 |
12.1 |
9.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 71 Week 11 |
Mean |
223 |
232 |
234 |
220 |
St. Dev. |
11.6 |
13.1 |
11.6 |
11.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 78 Week 12 |
Mean |
229 |
234 |
238 |
223 |
St. Dev. |
12.3 |
13.4 |
10.9 |
10.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 85 Week 13 |
Mean |
232 |
234 |
242 |
227 |
St. Dev. |
12.5 |
14.8 |
11.6 |
12.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 91 Week 13 |
Mean |
227 |
235 |
240 |
225 |
St. Dev. |
11.3 |
14.2 |
11.4 |
10.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Body Weight Gain (%) - Males
Treatment |
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Day 1 Week 1 |
Mean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
St. Dev. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 8 Week 2 |
Mean |
28 |
26 |
26 |
21** |
St. Dev. |
1.9 |
2.7 |
1.7 |
3.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 15 Week 3 |
Mean |
50 |
48 |
50 |
43** |
St. Dev. |
3.7 |
4.9 |
3.6 |
4.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 22 Week 4 |
Mean |
64 |
62 |
65 |
57* |
St. Dev. |
3.9 |
8.9 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 29 Week 5 |
Mean |
78 |
76 |
82 |
72 |
St. Dev. |
5.6 |
12.6 |
7.7 |
7.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 36 Week 6 |
Mean |
90 |
89 |
93 |
85 |
St. Dev. |
6.6 |
13.1 |
8.5 |
10.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 43 Week 7 |
Mean |
100 |
98 |
103 |
93 |
St. Dev. |
7.0 |
14.4 |
10.5 |
7.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 50 Week 8 |
Mean |
109 |
106 |
111 |
101 |
St. Dev. |
8.4 |
15.8 |
11.8 |
8.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 57 Week 9 |
Mean |
113 |
110 |
117 |
104 |
St. Dev. |
9.0 |
16.1 |
13.1 |
9.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 64 Week 10 |
Mean |
118 |
118 |
123 |
109 |
St. Dev. |
10.3 |
17.3 |
13.8 |
10.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 71 Week 11 |
Mean |
124 |
122 |
126 |
114 |
St. Dev. |
10.6 |
17.6 |
14.4 |
10.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 78 Week 12 |
Mean |
128 |
127 |
131 |
117 |
St. Dev. |
10.5 |
17.5 |
14.2 |
10.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 85 Week 13 |
Mean |
134 |
131 |
137 |
123 |
St. Dev. |
11.5 |
16.4 |
14.3 |
10.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 91 Week 13 |
Mean |
135 |
131 |
134 |
121 |
St. Dev. |
10.8 |
16.5 |
14.6 |
10.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Body Weight Gain (%) - Females
Treatment |
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Day 1 Week 1 |
Mean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
St. Dev. |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 8 Week 2 |
Mean |
14 |
17 |
16 |
12 |
St. Dev. |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 15 Week 3 |
Mean |
29 |
32 |
30 |
26 |
St. Dev. |
3.1 |
3.3 |
4.4 |
3.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 22 Week 4 |
Mean |
37 |
39 |
39 |
34 |
St. Dev. |
3.4 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
3.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 29 Week 5 |
Mean |
47 |
47 |
47 |
43 |
St. Dev. |
3.7 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
5.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 36 Week 6 |
Mean |
52 |
56 |
54 |
51 |
St. Dev. |
5.2 |
6.9 |
7.4 |
4.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 43 Week 7 |
Mean |
62 |
64 |
61 |
56 |
St. Dev. |
4.4 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
8.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 50 Week 8 |
Mean |
66 |
70 |
63 |
60 |
St. Dev. |
5.9 |
8.8 |
6.6 |
8.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 57 Week 9 |
Mean |
67 |
69 |
65 |
61 |
St. Dev. |
4.9 |
9.8 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 64 Week 10 |
Mean |
66 |
72 |
69 |
63 |
St. Dev. |
6.6 |
7.7 |
8.1 |
6.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 71 Week 11 |
Mean |
70 |
77 |
71 |
67 |
St. Dev. |
5.3 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
6.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 78 Week 12 |
Mean |
74 |
78 |
74 |
69 |
St. Dev. |
5.8 |
7.8 |
7.3 |
8.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 85 Week 13 |
Mean |
77 |
78 |
77 |
72 |
St. Dev. |
6.9 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
9.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Day 91 Week 13 |
Mean |
73 |
78 |
76 |
70 |
St. Dev. |
5.7 |
7.8 |
9.5 |
7.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Ophthalmoscopic Observations
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Males |
||||
Pre-treatment |
|
|||
No findings |
8/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
10/10 |
Persistent Pupillary Membrane |
2/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
End of Treatment |
|
|
|
|
No findings |
10/10 |
|
|
10/10 |
Females |
||||
Pre-treatment |
|
|
|
|
No findings |
10/10 |
10/10 |
9/10 |
9/10 |
Focal Corneal Opacity |
0/10 |
0/10 |
1/10 |
1/10 |
End of Treatment |
|
|
|
|
No findings |
10/10 |
|
|
10/10 |
# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level
Haematology summary – Males
End of treatment |
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
|
WBC 10E9/L |
Mean |
7.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
5.8 |
St. Dev |
1.4 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Neutrophils 10E8/L |
Mean |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
St. Dev |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Lymphocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
5.9 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
4.8 |
St. Dev |
1.2 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Monocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
St. Dev |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Eosinophils 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
St. Dev |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Basophils 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
St. Dev |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Red Blood Cells 10E12/L |
Mean |
9.08 |
8.94 |
8.90 |
8.85 |
St. Dev |
0.42 |
0.24 |
0.42 |
0.33 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Reticulocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
165.2 |
164.4 |
137.0 |
139.8 |
St. Dev |
30.5 |
24.2 |
45.0 |
20.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
RDW % |
Mean |
11.9 |
11.6 |
11.4 |
11.0** |
St. Dev |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Haemoglobin Mmol/L |
Mean |
10.3 |
10.1 |
9.9* |
9.7** |
St. Dev |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Haematocrit L/L |
Mean |
0.477 |
0.470 |
0.464 |
0.460 |
St. Dev |
0.017 |
0.010 |
0.018 |
0.012 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
MCV fL |
Mean |
52.5 |
52.6 |
52.1 |
52.0 |
St. Dev |
1.5 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
MCH Fmol |
Mean |
1.13 |
1.13 |
1.12 |
1.10 |
St. Dev |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
MCHC Mmol/L |
Mean |
21.54 |
21.47 |
21.39 |
21.05* |
St. Dev |
0.52 |
0.42 |
0.37 |
0.30 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
Platelets 10E9/L |
Mean |
710 |
680 |
680 |
723 |
St. Dev |
70 |
75 |
75 |
81 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
PT s |
Mean |
17.8 |
17.1 |
17.6 |
17.8 |
St. Dev |
0.9 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
|
APTT s |
Mean |
17.7 |
17.9 |
18.1 |
16.7 |
St. Dev |
3.4 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Haematology summary – Females
End of treatment |
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
|
WBC 10E9/L |
Mean |
6.7 |
4.3** |
3.9** |
5.4 |
St. Dev |
1.6 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Neutrophils 10E8/L |
Mean |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
St. Dev |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
|
N |
105.8 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Lymphocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
1.5 |
3.6 + |
3.3++ |
4.6 |
St. Dev |
0.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Monocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.1 |
0.1 + |
0.1 |
0.1 |
St. Dev |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Eosinophils 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
St. Dev |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Basophils 10E9/L |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
St. Dev |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Red Blood Cells 10E12/L |
Mean |
8.28 |
7.91* |
8.11 |
8.14 |
St. Dev |
0.26 |
0.21 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Reticulocytes 10E9/L |
Mean |
187.8 |
195.0 |
165.2 |
158.3 |
St. Dev |
29.4 |
25.8 |
15.7 |
23.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
RDW % |
Mean |
10.3 |
10.4 |
10.3 |
10.2 |
St. Dev |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Haemoglobin Mmol/L |
Mean |
9.5 |
9.0 ** |
9.2* |
9.2 |
St. Dev |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Haematocrit L/L |
Mean |
0.118 |
0.433* |
0.434 |
0.435 |
St. Dev |
0.014 |
0.012 |
0.011 |
0.015 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
MCV fL |
Mean |
54.1 |
54.7 |
53.6 |
53.6 |
St. Dev |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
MCH Fmol |
Mean |
1.15 |
1.14 |
1.14 |
1.14 |
St. Dev |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
MCHC Mmol/L |
Mean |
21.26 |
20.84 |
21.24 |
21.21 |
St. Dev |
0.38 |
0.39 |
0.40 |
0.35 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Platelets 10E9/L |
Mean |
835 |
7.3* |
707* |
795 |
St. Dev |
139 |
69 |
114 |
105 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
PT s |
Mean |
17.7 |
17.4 |
17.2 |
17.3 |
St. Dev |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
APTT s |
Mean |
18.5 |
16.9 |
17.0 |
17.0 |
St. Dev |
1.2 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Clinical Biochemistry Summary – Males
End of treatment |
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
|
ALAT U/L |
Mean |
46.2 |
47.0 |
48.9 |
54.0 |
St. Dev |
8.4 |
10.8 |
8.8 |
15.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
ASAT U/L |
Mean |
84.1 |
79.9 |
81.2 |
82.6 |
St. Dev |
13.8 |
10.6 |
936 |
7.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
ALP U/L |
Mean |
130 |
125 |
155 |
199** |
St. Dev |
45 |
24 |
43 |
42 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total Protein g/L |
Mean |
66.6 |
65.6 |
64.4 |
65.6 |
St. Dev |
2.0 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Albumin g/L |
Mean |
33.5 |
33.5 |
32.7 |
33.3 |
St. Dev |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total Bilirubin μmol/L |
Mean |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
3.5* |
St. Dev |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Urea mmol/L |
Mean |
7.4 |
7.9 |
7.2 |
8.0 |
St. Dev |
1.4 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Creatinine μmol/L |
Mean |
39.7 |
42.7** |
41.9 |
44.4** |
St. Dev |
1.9 |
1.7 |
2.5 |
1.8 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Glucose mmol/L |
Mean |
11.89 |
11.02 |
10.07* |
10.46 |
St. Dev |
2.00 |
1.66 |
1.29 |
1.26 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
2.29 |
2.31 |
2.29 |
2.88** |
St. Dev |
0.28 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
0.43 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
HDL cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
0.94 |
0.97 |
0.89 |
1.23** |
St. Dev |
0.12 |
0.14 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
LDL Cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.48** |
St. Dev |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.11 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Triglycerides mmol/L |
Mean |
1.16 |
0.86 |
1.00 |
0.78* |
St. Dev |
0.21 |
0.15 |
0.43 |
0.23 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Bile Acids μmole/L |
Mean |
20.3 |
25.3 |
15.5 |
10.9* |
St. Dev |
6.1 |
10.8 |
5.6 |
4.5 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Sodium mmol/L |
Mean |
140.6 |
141.7* |
141.8* |
140.5 |
St. Dev |
0.9 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Potassium mmol/L |
Mean |
3.84 |
3.85 |
3.97 |
4.01 |
St. Dev |
0.12 |
0.0 |
0.19 |
0.22 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Chloride mmol/L |
Mean |
102 |
103* |
103** |
103* |
St. Dev |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Calcium mmol/L |
Mean |
2.66 |
2.58* |
2.61 |
2.64 |
St. Dev |
0.07 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Inorg. Phos mmol/L |
Mean |
1.56 |
1.47 |
1.53 |
1.57 |
St. Dev |
0.20 |
0.14 |
0.12 |
0.21 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
TSH ulU/mL |
Mean |
0.129 |
0.309* |
0.201 |
0.16. |
St. Dev |
0.134 |
0.192 |
0.198 |
0.094 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total T3 ng/dL |
Mean |
47.4 |
47.6 |
53.4 |
71.1* |
St. Dev |
4.4 |
4.4 |
10.2 |
25.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total T4 μg/dL |
Mean |
4.73 |
4.51 |
4.30 |
4.70 |
St. Dev |
0.59 |
0.77 |
0.73 |
1.12 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Clinical Biochemistry Summary – Females
End of treatment |
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
|
ALAT U/L |
Mean |
48.7 |
36.5 |
43.2 |
52.2 |
St. Dev |
14.0 |
7.9 |
13.6 |
15.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
ASAT U/L |
Mean |
81.5 |
77.5 |
87.4 |
81.0 |
St. Dev |
5.8 |
4.4 |
7.1 |
8.1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
ALP U/L |
Mean |
53 |
49 |
59 |
109** |
St. Dev |
14 |
12 |
15 |
54 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total Protein g/L |
Mean |
69.4 |
69.1 |
68.1 |
68.1 |
St. Dev |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Albumin g/L |
Mean |
36.8 |
36.4 |
36.3 |
35.8 |
St. Dev |
1.3 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total Bilirubin μmol/L |
Mean |
3.3 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
St. Dev |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Urea mmol/L |
Mean |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.2 |
7.6 |
St. Dev |
1.4 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Creatinine μmol/L |
Mean |
38.8 |
45.4** |
43.2* |
43.3* |
St. Dev |
3.0 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
2.7 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Glucose mmol/L |
Mean |
9.27 |
8.87 |
8.20 |
8.63 |
St. Dev |
1.79 |
1.53 |
0.90 |
1.26 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
2.17 |
2.20 |
2.22 |
2.51 |
St. Dev |
0.30 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
0.22 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
HDL cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
0.94 |
0.95 |
0.98 |
1.20** |
St. Dev |
0.17 |
0.19 |
0.21 |
0.14 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
LDL Cholesterol mmol/L |
Mean |
0.28 |
0.28 |
0.26 |
0.32 |
St. Dev |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Triglycerides mmol/L |
Mean |
0.66 |
0.59 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
St. Dev |
0.27 |
0.16 |
0.25 |
0.21 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Bile Acids μmole/L |
Mean |
19.2 |
13.2 |
15.2 |
7.9** |
St. Dev |
13.1 |
5.4 |
4.1 |
3.6 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Sodium mmol/L |
Mean |
140.2 |
140.7 |
140.6 |
140.4 |
St. Dev |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Potassium mmol/L |
Mean |
3.77 |
3.45* |
3.53* |
3.57 |
St. Dev |
0.14 |
0.22 |
0.17 |
0.16 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Chloride mmol/L |
Mean |
103 |
105** |
104* |
104 |
St. Dev |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Calcium mmol/L |
Mean |
2.72 |
2.60** |
2.59** |
2.71 |
St. Dev |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Inorg. Phos mmol/L |
Mean |
1.56 |
1.14** |
1.11** |
1.51 |
St. Dev |
0.13 |
0.19 |
0.14 |
0.19 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
TSH ulU/mL |
Mean |
0.036 |
0.119* |
0.103 |
0.109* |
St. Dev |
0.015 |
0.089 |
0.064 |
0.073 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total T3 ng/dL |
Mean |
49.2 |
51.6 |
49.1 |
43.7 |
St. Dev |
7.9 |
7.8 |
4.8 |
2.3 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Total T4 μg/dL |
Mean |
1.95 |
2.94* |
2.55 |
2.37 |
St. Dev |
0.63 |
1.01 |
0.77 |
0.049 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Macroscopic Findings
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Males |
||||
End of Treatment |
|
|||
Animals examined |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Animals without findings |
6 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
Animals affected |
4 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
||||
Stomach: Thickened |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminal vesicles: Reduced size |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Preputial glands: Focus/Foci |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Thyroid gland: Discolouration |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Thymus: Focus/Foci |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Mandibular lymph Node: Enlarged |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Females |
||||
End of Treatment |
|
|
|
|
Animals examined |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Animals without findings |
8 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
Animals affected |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
|
||||
Kidneys: Pelvic dilation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Uterus: Contains fluid |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
Clitoral glands: Focus/Foci |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Thymus: Focus/Foci |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Mandibular lymph Node: Discolouration |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Eyes: Exophthalmus |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Body cavities: Nodule(s) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level
Summary of Organ Weights (g) - Males
|
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
End of Treatment |
|||||
Body Weight (g) |
Mean |
396 |
387 |
384 |
382 |
St. Dev. |
34 |
38 |
33 |
18 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Brain (g) |
Mean |
2.04 |
2.07 |
2.06 |
2.07 |
St. Dev. |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Pituitary (g) |
Mean |
0.009 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
St. Dev. |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Heart (g) |
Mean |
1.020 |
1.018 |
0.968 |
0.976 |
St. Dev. |
0.086 |
0.110 |
0.075 |
0.036 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Liver (g) |
Mean |
9.32 |
9.19 |
8.91 |
10.18 |
St. Dev. |
1.24 |
1.42 |
1.09 |
0.86 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thyroids (g) |
Mean |
0.018 |
0.019 |
0.021 |
0.020 |
St. Dev. |
0.002 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.003 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thymus (g) |
Mean |
0.301 |
0.258 |
0.264 |
0.300 |
St. Dev. |
0.070 |
0.083 |
0.063 |
0.065 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Kidneys (g) |
Mean |
2.38 |
2.39 |
2.39 |
2.40 |
St. Dev. |
0.24 |
0.28 |
0.19 |
0.19 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Adrenals (g) |
Mean |
0.056 |
0.053 |
0.055 |
0.051 |
St. Dev. |
0.006 |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.006 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Spleen (g) |
Mean |
0.569 |
0.577 |
0.580 |
0.553 |
St. Dev. |
0.059 |
0.085 |
0.063 |
0.053 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Testes (g) |
Mean |
3.68 |
3.66 |
3.62 |
3.64 |
St. Dev. |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
0.17 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Prostate (g) |
Mean |
0.908 |
0.805 |
0.843 |
0.790 |
St. Dev. |
0.149 |
0.188 |
0.101 |
0.135 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Epididymides (g) |
Mean |
1.195 |
1.187 |
1.147 |
1.178 |
St. Dev. |
0.085 |
0.084 |
0.091 |
0.053 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Seminal Vesicle (g) |
Mean |
1.219 |
1.251 |
1.223 |
1.300 |
St. Dev. |
0.181 |
0.220 |
0.212 |
0.616 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Organ / Body weight Ratios (%) - Males
|
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
End of Treatment |
|||||
Body Weight (g) |
Mean |
396 |
387 |
384 |
382 |
St. Dev. |
34 |
38 |
33 |
18 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Brain (%) |
Mean |
0.52 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
0.54 |
St. Dev. |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Pituitary (%) |
Mean |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
St. Dev. |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Heart (%) |
Mean |
0.258 |
0.263 |
0.253 |
0.255 |
St. Dev. |
0.012 |
0.010 |
0.012 |
0.008 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Liver (%) |
Mean |
2.34 |
2.37 |
2.32 |
2.66** |
St. Dev. |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.14 |
0.18 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thyroids (%) |
Mean |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
St. Dev. |
0.000 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thymus (%) |
Mean |
0.076 |
0.067 |
0.069 |
0.079 |
St. Dev. |
0.016 |
0.018 |
0.016 |
0.017 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Kidneys (%) |
Mean |
0.60 |
0.62 |
0.62 |
0.63 |
St. Dev. |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Adrenals (%) |
Mean |
0.014 |
0.014 |
0.014 |
0.013 |
St. Dev. |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Spleen (%) |
Mean |
0.144 |
0.149 |
0.151 |
0.145 |
St. Dev. |
0.018 |
0.019 |
0.015 |
0.012 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Testes (%) |
Mean |
0.93 |
0.96 |
0.95 |
0.96 |
St. Dev. |
0.10 |
0.13 |
0.09 |
0.06 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Prostate (%) |
Mean |
0.230 |
0.208 |
0.220 |
0.207 |
St. Dev. |
0.041 |
0.043 |
0.025 |
0.038 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Epididymides |
Mean |
0.304 |
0.309 |
0.300 |
0.309 |
St. Dev. |
0.038 |
0.036 |
0.024 |
0.022 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Seminal Vesicle (%) |
Mean |
0.309 |
0.325 |
0.320 |
0.341 |
St. Dev. |
0.054 |
0.058 |
0.059 |
0.047 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Organ Weights (g) - Females
|
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
End of Treatment |
|||||
Body Weight (g) |
Mean |
217 |
223 |
229 |
214 |
St. Dev. |
11 |
14 |
10 |
9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Brain (g) |
Mean |
1.89 |
1.88 |
1.89 |
1.89 |
St. Dev. |
0.08 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Pituitary (g) |
Mean |
0.013 |
0.014 |
0.012 |
0.011 |
St. Dev. |
0.002 |
0.004 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Heart (g) |
Mean |
0.704 |
0.729 |
0.710 |
0.654 |
St. Dev. |
0.066 |
0.087 |
0.051 |
0.042 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Liver (g) |
Mean |
5.27 |
5.66 |
5.70 |
6.42** |
St. Dev. |
0.40 |
0.58 |
0.40 |
0.53 |
|
N |
9 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thyroids (g) |
Mean |
0.014 |
0.015 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
St. Dev. |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.022 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thymus (g) |
Mean |
0.270 |
0.264 |
0.275 |
0.269 |
St. Dev. |
0.035 |
0.036 |
0.055 |
0.055 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Kidneys (g) |
Mean |
1.53 |
1.52 |
1.55 |
1.50 |
St. Dev. |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Adrenals (g) |
Mean |
0.067 |
0.070 |
0.065 |
0.058 |
St. Dev. |
0.008 |
0.007 |
0.011 |
0.008 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Spleen (g) |
Mean |
0.377 |
0.422 |
0.390 |
0.393 |
St. Dev. |
0.039 |
0.051 |
0.047 |
0.043 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Ovaries (g) |
Mean |
0.133 |
0.145 |
0.148 |
0.140 |
St. Dev. |
0.020 |
0.021 |
0.018 |
0.021 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Uterus (g) |
Mean |
0.669 |
0.628 |
0.765 |
0.662 |
St. Dev. |
0.400 |
0.199 |
0.389 |
0.445 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Organ / Body weight Ratios (%) - Females
|
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
End of Treatment |
|||||
Body Weight (g) |
Mean |
217 |
223 |
229 |
214 |
St. Dev. |
11 |
14 |
10 |
9 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Brain (%) |
Mean |
0.87 |
0.85 |
0.83 |
0.88 |
St. Dev. |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Pituitary (%) |
Mean |
0.006 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
St. Dev. |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Heart (%) |
Mean |
0.326 |
0.327 |
0.314 |
0.305 |
St. Dev. |
0.037 |
0.042 |
0.013 |
0.015 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Liver (%) |
Mean |
2.44 |
2.54 |
2.52 |
3.00** |
St. Dev. |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.12 |
0.28 |
|
N |
9 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thyroids (%) |
Mean |
0.006 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
St. Dev. |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Thymus (%) |
Mean |
0.124 |
0.118 |
0.125 |
0.126 |
St. Dev. |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.020 |
0.027 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Kidneys (%) |
Mean |
0.70 |
0.68 |
0.69 |
0.70 |
St. Dev. |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Adrenals (%) |
Mean |
0.031 |
0.031 |
0.028 |
0.027 |
St. Dev. |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Spleen (%) |
Mean |
0.174 |
0.189 |
0.169 |
0.183 |
St. Dev. |
0.016 |
0.022 |
0.019 |
0.107 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Ovaries (%) |
Mean |
0.061 |
0.065 |
0.064 |
0.065 |
St. Dev. |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.006 |
0.008 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|||||
Uterus (%) |
Mean |
0.307 |
0.283 |
0.344 |
0.309 |
St. Dev. |
0.177 |
0.093 |
0.167 |
0.206 |
|
N |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Mean percentage liver weight differences from control groups
Dose level (ppm) |
Males |
Females |
||||
1500 |
5000 |
15000 |
1500 |
5000 |
15000 |
|
LIVER |
||||||
Absolute |
-1 |
-4 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
22** |
Relative to body weight |
1 |
-1 |
14** |
4 |
3 |
23** |
*: P<0.05, **:P<0.01
Summary of Treatment-Related Microscopic Finding
|
Males |
Females |
||||||
Dose Level (ppm) |
0 |
1500 |
5000 |
15000 |
0 |
1500 |
5000 |
15000 |
Lunga |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Macrophage aggregation, multifocal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimal |
1 |
- |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
Slight |
- |
- |
1 |
3 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
||||||||
Livera |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
Hepatocellular hypertrophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimal |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
a Number of tissues examined from each group.
Summary of Functional Observations
|
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Males |
|||||
End of Treatment |
|
||||
Hearing Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Pupil L Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Pupil R Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Static R Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Grip Fore Gram |
Mean |
1263 |
1211 |
1094 |
956* |
St. Dev |
61 |
270 |
218 |
120 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Grip Hind Gram |
Mean |
493 |
592 |
515 |
520 |
St. Dev |
62 |
115 |
47 |
76 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Females |
|||||
End of Treatment |
|
||||
Hearing Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Pupil L Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Pupil R Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Static R Score 0/1 |
Median |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Grip Fore Gram |
Mean |
980 |
850 |
747 |
882 |
St. Dev |
129 |
102 |
147 |
182 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|||||
Grip Hind Gram |
Mean |
363 |
381 |
396 |
422 |
St. Dev |
41 |
68 |
93 |
60 |
|
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level
*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level
Summary of Motor Activity
|
Group 1 Control |
Group 2 1500 ppm |
Group 3 5000 ppm |
Group 4 15000 ppm |
Males |
||||
Total Movements |
|
|||
Mean |
4535 |
4340 |
3552 |
4174 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
St. Dev |
929 |
1039 |
731 |
372 |
Ambulations |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
950 |
924 |
697 |
846 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
St. Dev |
385 |
264 |
272 |
112 |
Females |
||||
Total Movements |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
4536 |
5543 |
4666 |
4490 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
St. Dev |
866 |
766 |
927 |
1538 |
Ambulations |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
1224 |
1530 |
1140 |
1208 |
N |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
St. Dev |
294 |
315 |
321 |
612 |
* indicates a p-value <0.05, ** indicates a p-value <0.01
MEAN and ST. DEV values are calculated per group, from each animal's Total Movements over all interval
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In addition, data are also available for the constituent parts of DTO and related substances (unpublished laboratory studies and information published in the public domain). These are as follows -
Fatty acids: Three repeated dose toxicity studies are reported under the US EPA HPV program for TOFA. The study of longest duration, 90-days, is considered to be the key study for this endpoint. During the 90 day study administration of up to 25% (approximately 12,500 mg/kg bw/day) Tall Oil Fatty Acids (TOFA) in the diet of Charles River rats daily for 90 days did not produce any adverse effects. The NOAEL is greater than or equal to 12,500 mg/kg bw/day.
Resin acids and neutrals: A number of repeated dose toxicity studies (90-day and 2-year) are available in rats and dogs for Tall Oil Rosin and other related types of rosin. Although these tests do not meet current test guidelines in all respects, the overall lack of toxicity in two species with all product types indicates that further testing would not be appropriate. Only the rat data are discussed further here, since this is the preferred species for testing according to REACH. The following oral dietary studies have been performed: Tall oil Rosin (90 day, Calandra, 1960a, Kay 1962a), Gum rosin (90 day & 2 year, calandra 1960c, Kay 1962b), n-wood rosin (90 day & 2 year study, Calandra 1960d, Kay 1962c).Studies were performed at dose levels up to 1.0% in the diet, prepared as a suspension in corn oil prior to mixing with feed.
Examinations performed were: Body weight gain, mortality and abnormal behavioural reactions on a daily basis; Haematological studies and urine analysis; Liver and kidney function tests, gross and microscopic pathologic studies (comprising heart, aorta, trachea, lungs, liver, gall bladder, pancreas, oesophagus, stomach, small & large intestine, spleen, lymph nodes, kidney, urinary bladder, gonads, prostate, uterus, pituitary, adrenal gland, salivary gland, thyroid gland, parathyroid gland, skeletal muscle, bone marrow, peripheral nerve, spinal cord and brain).
In all cases, rats fed diets containing 1% test substance displayed a significant growth depression throughout the major part of the study. No adverse effects were apparent at lower dietary levels. The growth effect observed among animals at the 1% dietary level was attributable to the palatability of the test diet. Animal survival was not however influenced by the ingestion of the test material at any dose level. As a result, the reported NOAEL for the studies was 0.05% or 0.2% in the diet (equivalent to approximately 50 or 200 mg/kg/day), depending on the dose levels used. However, for the purposes of human hazard assessment, the reduced growth observed for the high dose group is not relevant, since this is related to exposure route. The NOAEL can therefore be considered to be >200 mg/kg/day for risk characterisation purposes.
Sterols: In a published study (Hepburn et al., 1999), phytosterol esters (PE) were added to the diet of male and female Wistar derived rats over a period of 90 days, to give concentrations of 0.16, 1.6, 3.2, and 8.1% (w/w) equivalent to phytosterol concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 % (w/w) respectively. The results of this study showed there to be no clinical signs or effects on survival attributed to the administration of the test material. A NOEL of 8.1% (PE) was identified in the study, which is equivalent to a dose of 6.6 g/kg/bw/day PE or 4.1 g phytosterol/kg bw/day.
In summary,
Constituent type |
Proportion in DTO (%) |
NOAEL (mg/kg/day, rat) |
Duration |
Remarks |
DTO |
100 |
>1000 |
90 days |
OECD 408 |
Fatty acids |
66 |
≥12,500 |
90 days |
|
Resin acids and neutrals |
30 |
>200 |
2 year |
Weight of evidence from a number of 90-day and 2-year studies |
Sterols |
- |
≥4100 |
90 days |
These data are sufficient to demonstrate that none of the constituents of DTO require classification for specific target organ toxicity following repeated oral exposure, and to allow quantitative Derived No Effect Level to be set for risk characterisation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data for DTO and constituents of DTO indicate that classification for specific target organ toxicity is not required according to the criteria set out in Regulation EC No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.