Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Basic toxicokinetics

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Objective of study:
other: investigation of copper status of rats exposed to silver powder
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In the comparative in vivo TK study, at termination, analysis of serum for total copper concentration was undertaken in the case of the test items AgMP and AgNO3.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on species / strain selection:
Crl:CD IGS (SD)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
Charles River UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks old at start of treatment
- Weight at study initiation: min. 170 g for females and 200 g for males
- Housing: up to four animals of the same sex per cage. Within each group, cages will be blocked together (by sex). The distribution of the groups within and between racks and the position of the racks within the room will be determined to equalize environmental influences across the study while minimizing the opportunity for inter-group contamination.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SDS VRF-,1 pelleted diet, non-restricted availability (diet contains no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): potable water from the public supply, non-restricted availability via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes (except during urine collection)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before commencement of treatment
- Health status: visually inspected at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): monitored and maintained within the range of 20-24ºC
- Humidity (%): monitored and maintained within the range of 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): air filtered, not recirculated
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light : 12 hours dark
- Fasting period: none

IN-LIFE DATES: study performed in phases, with first phase started on 13 July 2021 and last (repeated) phase ended on 20 August 2021
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Notes:
- Chloride and phosphate containing vehicles and reagents were avoided due to the potential for silver precipitation effects.
- Dissolved silver and silver particles adsorb onto material surfaces including glass and metals, and as such use of these was avoided.
- Formulations were protected from light during preparation (use of yellow-light instead).
- The formulation procedures are documented in the study data and will be included in the final report.
- The pH of the final formulations was measured and recorded in the data.
- A series of formulations at the required concentrations is prepared by dilution of individual weighing of the Test Item and dispensed in polypropylene screw top jars or similar

Method of preparation:
- 50% of the final volume of vehicle is added to an appropriate container. The required amount of Test Item is weighed and added to the vehicle whilst stirring at an appropriate speed to obtain a vortex that is half the depth of the suspension. The ‘weighing’ container is rinsed several times using 20% final volume of vehicle. After addition of the rinsing, the suspension is stirred for 60 seconds and then sonicated for approximately 30 minutes. This stir and sonicate step is then repeated, after which the remaining 30% final volume of vehicle is added and stirring continued at an appropriate speed to obtain a vortex that is half the depth of the final suspension for at least 60 minutes.
- The suspensions are sampled for formulation analysis (whilst under constant stirring, according to the previously described technique) prior to dispensing and aliquoting into suitable containers for dose administration.

Frequency of preparation:
- Repeat dose formulations were prepared weekly and split into daily aliquots.
- The suitability and homogeneity of formulations were confirmed as part of studies, undertaken separately by third parties designated by the Sponsor, and by the Principal Investigator for dose formulation analysis.

Storage of formulation: Silver AgMP suspensions: refrigerated (2 to 8°C), protected from light.
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
28 days; frequency: once daily at approximately the same time each day
Dose / conc.:
5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
55 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
4 males + 4 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
The dose levels selected in the case of silver nitrate (AgNO3) extend existing but limited toxicokinetic data for this compound. A previous 28-day toxicity study demonstrated that up to 100 mg/kg bw/d of AgNO3 administered to rats via oral gavage produced minimal toxicity. The high-dose treatment level has been set with due regard for the local tissues irritancy profile of AgNO3
Details on dosing and sampling:
TOXICOKINETIC STUDY (Absorption, distribution, excretion)
- Body fluids sampled: blood
- Sample treatment: Whole blood was left to clot according to standard operating procedures. Serum was collected and frozen upright on dry ice following centrifugation, pending transfer to frozen storage.
- Time and frequency of sampling: at termination (after 28 days treatment)

ANALYTICAL METHOD
Serum samples were analysed for copper using ICP-MS method. The method was successfully validated with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 30 ng/mL.
Statistics:
Summary statistics (e.g. means and standard deviations) presented in the report were calculated from computer-stored individual raw data.
Type:
other: investigation of Cu status of rats exposed to AgNO3
Results:
After AgNO3 dosing, Cu conc. at LD were similar to those of controls, at MD (55 mg/kg/day) 20% lower and at HD (125 mg/kg/day) 26-38% lower.
Details on absorption:
n.a.
Details on distribution in tissues:
n.a.
Details on excretion:
n.a.
Metabolites identified:
no
Details on metabolites:
n.a.
Conclusions:
There was a treatment-related effect on the concentration of copper in serum following repeated oral dose of AgNO3, the serum concentration of copper decreased with increasing dose.
Executive summary:

The copper status of rats exposed to an ionic Ag (AgNO3) was investigated in this study. a treatment-related effects on concentration of Cu in serum was observed after 28 days treatment via the oral route. This depression in circulating Cu levels was apparent from a quite low exposure in the case of the ionic reference compound (AgNO3) (being evident from 35 mg Ag/kg bw/day).

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Objective of study:
absorption
bioaccessibility (or bioavailability)
tissue distribution
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 417 (Toxicokinetics)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Radiolabelling:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on species / strain selection:
Crl:CD IGS (SD)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks old at start of treatment
- Weight at study initiation: min. 170 g for females and 200 g for males
- Housing: up to four animals of the same sex per cag. Within each group, cages will be blocked together (by sex). The distribution of the groups within and between racks and the position of the racks within the room will be determined to equalize environmental influences across the study while minimizing the opportunity for inter-group contamination.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SDS VRF-,1 pelleted diet, non-restricted availability (diet contains no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): potable water from the public supply, non-restricted availability via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes (except during urine collection)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before commencement of treatment
- Health status: visually inspected at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): monitored and maintained within the range of 20-24ºC
- Humidity (%): monitored and maintained within the range of 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): air filtered, not recirculated
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light : 12 hours dark
- Fasting period : none

IN-LIFE DATES: study performed in phases, with first phase started on 30 Sep 2020 and last (repeated) phase ended on 20 Aug 2021
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Notes:
- Chloride and phosphate containing vehicles and reagents were avoided due to the potential for silver precipitation effects.
- Dissolved silver and silver particles adsorb onto material surfaces including glass and metals, and as such use of these was avoided.
- Formulations were protected from light during preparation (use of yellow-light instead).
- The formulation procedures are documented in the study data and will be included in the final report.
- The pH of the final formulations was measured and recorded in the data.
- A series of formulations at the required concentrations is prepared by dilution of individual weighing of the Test Item and dispensed in polypropylene screw top jars or similar

Method of preparation:
The required amount of test item was weighed out, (Ag Acetate was ground in a pestle and mortar) and then added to ca 50% of the final volume of vehicle and magnetically stirred to mix/disperse. The ‘weighing’ vessel was rinsed, and the rinsing is added to the container before bringing to volume with the vehicle. The mixture was then transferred to a magnetic stirrer and stirred for a minimum of 20 minutes, recording the start and finish times in the raw data. Formulation analysis sampling will occur whilst under constant stirring, prior to dispensing and aliquoting into suitable containers for dose administration (stirrer bars will be included).

Frequency of preparation:
- Repeat dose formulations were prepared weekly and split into daily aliquots.
- The suitability and homogeneity of formulations were confirmed as part of studies, undertaken separately by third parties designated by the Sponsor, and by the Principal Investigator for dose formulation analysis.

Storage of formulation: Silver solutions – ambient temperature (15 to 25°C), protected from light.
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
Two treatments:
- single oral dose: single occasion on day 1
- repeat oral doses: 28 days; frequency: once daily at approximately the same time each day
Dose / conc.:
5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
single + repeat oral doses
Dose / conc.:
55 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
repeat oral doses
Dose / conc.:
125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
single + repeat oral doses
No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
4 males + 4 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Rationale for Dose Level Selection and Route:
The dose levels selected in the case of silver nitrate (AgNO3) extend existing but limited toxicokinetic data for this compound. A previous 28-day toxicity study demonstrated that up to 100 mg/kg bw/d of AgNO3 administered to rats via oral gavage produced minimal toxicity. The high-dose treatment level has been set with due regard for the local tissue irritancy profile of AgNO3.
Details on dosing and sampling:
TOXICOKINETIC STUDY (Absorption, distribution, excretion)
- Tissues and body fluids sampled: blood, brain, bone marrow, small intestine, liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, uterus
- Time and frequency of sampling: blood: Day 15: PD, 6 hours post-dose, Day 28: PD, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 72, 96 hours post-dose. (10 time points) ; tissues: at termination (after 28 days treatment)

ANALYTICAL METHOD
Total Ag concentrations were determined in whole blood and tissues by ICP-MS after microwave digestion with nitric acid and hydrochloric acid. This method was successfully validated with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 10 ng/mL for silver in rat blood4 and 30 ng/g for silver in rat tissue.
Statistics:
- Ag analysis data were acquired and integrated using MassHunter (version C.01.05 Agilent). Peak area results were exported to Watson LIMS (Version 7.5 SP1, Thermo Scientific) in text file format. Watson LIMS was used to calculate standard curve parameters and concentration data for Silver. The concentration and statistical data were generated by computerized techniques.
- AUC(0-t): area under the concentration-time curve from hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule.
Type:
absorption
Results:
Based on matched dose assessments, silver acetate (AgAc) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) exhibit very similar systemic exposure profiles while AgMP leads to appreciably lower Ag amplitude of systemic exposure.
Type:
distribution
Results:
Levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 and considerably lower in the case of AgMP .
Details on absorption:
- Comparisons via normalised administered doses (i.e. Ag equivalent dose) can be made between the different Ag test items. Based on these matched dose assessments, the extent of systemic exposure was similar for AgAc and AgNO3 but about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of Ag metal powder versus AgAc
- The maximum observed Ag concentration in blood occurs between 3-9h post-dosing for repeat dose groups.
Details on distribution in tissues:
- Levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 (but considerably lower in the case of AgMP ).
- The study shows that the testis and brain are minor sites of distribution. In contrast, the ovary has been shown to be an important site of distribution. However, ancillary investigations strongly suggest silver is present in the ovary as chemically stable silver sulphide/selenide complexes with very low local bioavailability.
Details on excretion:
not investigated
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 1600
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 5 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 2240
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 5 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#2
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 581
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 55 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#2
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 601
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 55 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#3
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 476
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 125 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#3
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 601
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 125 mg/kg bw/d
Metabolites identified:
no
Remarks:
n.a.
Details on metabolites:
n.a.

Systemic exposure / Ag in blood

- Figure 1 (attached below) shows the extent of systemic exposure as area under the concentration time curve (AUC) values after repeated dose administration of silver nitrate (AgNO3) for 28 days.

- Comparisons via normalised administered doses (i.e. Ag equivalent dose) can be made between different Ag test items. Based on these matched dose assessments, the extent of systemic exposure was similar for AgAc and AgNO3 but about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of Ag metal powder versus a reference ionic Ag salt.

- Table 2 shows the blood Ag concentrations at predicted steady state (day 15) after repeated dose administration of AgNO3. The maximum observed concentration occurs between 3-9h post-dosing for repeat dose groups, hence the 6h values for the respective test substances are shown as an indicator of peak exposure.

Table 2.  Blood Ag concentrations at day 15 after repeated oral dose administration of silver nitrate (AgNO3).

Dose level Mean 6h blood [Ag] Mean [Ag]6h/
(mg/kg Test Item bw/d) ng/mL Ag Equiv. Dose 
    ng/mL
 
Control <LLOQ <LLOQ -- --
(n=3)
5 131 199 26 40
± 45 ± 71
55 449 471 8.2 8.6
± 204 ± 48
  (n=3)
125 540 691 4.3 5.5
± 111 ± 133

- Comparing these data to the data for other Ag test items, this demonstrates that oral dosing of AgAc and AgNO3 lead to similar systemic exposure and AgMP leads to appreciably lower Ag amplitude of systemic exposure in comparison to ionic Ag forms.

 

Tissue exposure / Ag distribution

Table 3 shows the Ag tissue levels / distribution after repeated dose administration of AgNO3.

Table 3. Terminal Ag tissue levels following repeated oral dose administration for 28 days of silver nitrate (AgNO3)

Dose (mg/kg bw/d)

/Sex

 

Bone marrow

Brain

GI tract

Spleen

Testis

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control M

Mean

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

 

SD

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 M

Mean

73.1

142

1310

404

231

81.7

 

SD

16.2

35.4

214

191

103

33.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 M

Mean

10739

632

5319

39789

1202

4668

 

SD

2104

129

2412

5704

246

2919

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125 M

Mean

46553

1091

10592

54070

1464

28859

 

SD

26985

57.0

10669

21236

260

36648

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dose(mg/kg bw/d)

/Sex

 

Bone Marrow

Brain

GI Tract

Spleen

Ovaries

Uterus

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control F

Mean

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

 

SD

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 F

Mean

87.0

177

2438

722

1484

145

130

 

SD

36.8

41.7

425

335

561

81.7

39.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 F

Mean

NC

700

3624

41558

31357

8104

5295

 

SD

NC

96.2

1449

5668

8793

3075

3561

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

125 F

Mean

25200

1019

14798

62335

44025

22466

16024

 

SD

4630

209

7728

22794

16158

4327

6464

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BLQ    <5.00 ng/mL
NC
      Not calculated

- Comparing these data to the data for other Ag test items, this demonstrates that levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 but considerably lower in the case of Ag metal powder.

Conclusions:
This in-vivo toxicokinetic study (in rats) by oral gavage comparing silver metal powder, nanosilver, silver nitrate and silver acetate shows a lower absorption/distribution and lower systemic exposure to tissues and organs for silver metal powder than for the other silver substances. The amount of Ag+ in blood and tissues is much higher for silver acetate/silver nitrate than for silver metal powder at comparable Ag dosing levels. Although all silver-containing substances have the ability to release Ag+, the extent of released silver ions is significantly different between substances. Therefore, a direct read-across of mammalian toxicity datasets for simple ionic silver salts like silver acetate or silver nitrate and nanosilver to silver metal powder/massive is not supported (from a scientifically valid toxicokinetic perspective).

Executive summary:

This in-vivo toxicokinetic study is an oral route investigation using adult CD Sprague Dawley rats. The design conformed to OECD TG 417 and was conducted in compliance to GLP. The study was designed as a comparative toxicokinetic assessment of the test items Silver Acetate (AgAc), Silver Nitrate (AgNO3), Micron-sized Silver (AgMP) and Nanoparticulate Silver (AgNP). This included assessment of bioavailability following single oral doses relative to single intravenous doses and systemic exposure following single and repeat oral doses. Groups of 4 male and 4 female CD Sprague Dawley rats were administered the test items, either as a single intravenous dose, a single oral dose or repeated daily oral doses for 4 weeks.

The systemic exposure (28 days) results show a difference in the extent of absorption and systemic circulation for silver acetate and nitrate versus silver metal powder. Based on a matched dose assessment, the extent of systemic exposure was about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of silver metal powder versus silver acetate (as reference ionic silver compound).

The silver tissue levels after repeated dose administration are considerably lower in the case of silver metal powder (AgMP) than for silver acetate. This suggests that AgMP represents a correspondingly lower health hazard, i.e. AgMP (and by extrapolation also massive Ag with a tremendously lower particle size/reactive surface area) is expected to cause less effects at corresponding Ag dose levels than AgAc.

In conclusion, it is assumed that the systemic toxicity of silver substances is driven by the release potential of Ag ionic species as the primary moiety for systemic circulation and tissue exposure, and hence hazard assessment. The comparative TK study is a high quality GLP investigation and the first which permits a direct comparison of systemic circulation and tissue distribution of Ag ionic species between soluble Ag salts (AgNO3and Ag acetate), AgNP and AgMP. This new evidence demonstrates that oral intake of AgMP results in markedly lower absorption, distribution and systemic tissue/organ exposure to silver than more bioavailable forms like AgAc. As a generic observation, the following trend is being observed: AgAc > AgNO3>> AgNP >>> AgMP.

The study findings show that the direct read-across of mammalian toxicity data with soluble silver salts (like silver acetate and silver nitrate) and nanosilver to silver metal (powder and massive) is not justified (based on their individual toxicokinetic profiles).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Objective of study:
absorption
bioaccessibility (or bioavailability)
tissue distribution
Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 417 (Toxicokinetics)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Silver acetate
EC Number:
209-254-9
EC Name:
Silver acetate
Cas Number:
563-63-3
Molecular formula:
C2H4O2.Ag
IUPAC Name:
silver(1+) acetate
Test material form:
solid
Radiolabelling:
no

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on species / strain selection:
Crl:CD IGS (SD)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-10 weeks old at start of treatment
- Weight at study initiation: min. 170 g for females and 200 g for males
- Housing: up to four animals of the same sex per cag. Within each group, cages will be blocked together (by sex). The distribution of the groups within and between racks and the position of the racks within the room will be determined to equalize environmental influences across the study while minimizing the opportunity for inter-group contamination.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): SDS VRF-,1 pelleted diet, non-restricted availability (diet contains no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): potable water from the public supply, non-restricted availability via polycarbonate bottles with sipper tubes (except during urine collection)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before commencement of treatment
- Health status: visually inspected at least twice daily for evidence of ill-health

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): monitored and maintained within the range of 20-24ºC
- Humidity (%): monitored and maintained within the range of 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): air filtered, not recirculated
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light : 12 hours dark
- Fasting period : none

IN-LIFE DATES: study performed in phases, with first phase started on 30 Sep 2020 and last (repeated) phase ended on 20 Aug 2021

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Notes:
- Chloride and phosphate containing vehicles and reagents were avoided due to the potential for silver precipitation effects.
- Dissolved silver and silver particles adsorb onto material surfaces including glass and metals, and as such use of these was avoided.
- Formulations were protected from light during preparation (use of yellow-light instead).
- The formulation procedures are documented in the study data and will be included in the final report.
- The pH of the final formulations was measured and recorded in the data.
- A series of formulations at the required concentrations is prepared by dilution of individual weighing of the Test Item and dispensed in polypropylene screw top jars or similar

Method of preparation:
The required amount of test item was weighed out, (Ag Acetate was ground in a pestle and mortar) and then added to ca 50% of the final volume of vehicle and magnetically stirred to mix/disperse. The ‘weighing’ vessel was rinsed, and the rinsing is added to the container before bringing to volume with the vehicle. The mixture was then transferred to a magnetic stirrer and stirred for a minimum of 20 minutes, recording the start and finish times in the raw data. Formulation analysis sampling will occur whilst under constant stirring, prior to dispensing and aliquoting into suitable containers for dose administration (stirrer bars will be included).

Frequency of preparation:
- Repeat dose formulations were prepared weekly and split into daily aliquots.
- The suitability and homogeneity of formulations were confirmed as part of studies, undertaken separately by third parties designated by the Sponsor, and by the Principal Investigator for dose formulation analysis.

Storage of formulation: Silver solutions – ambient temperature (15 to 25°C), protected from light.
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
Two treatments:
- single oral dose: single occasion on day 1
- repeat oral doses: 28 days; frequency: once daily at approximately the same time each day
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
single + repeat oral doses
Dose / conc.:
55 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
repeat oral doses
Dose / conc.:
175 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
single + repeat oral doses
No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
4 males + 4 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
Rationale for Dose Level Selection and Route:
The dose levels for silver acetate (AgAc) have been chosen to support a program of reproductive toxicology studies on this compound. Based on existing toxicity data for AgAc, from repeated administration studies in rodents the dose levels are expected to be well tolerated.
Details on dosing and sampling:
TOXICOKINETIC STUDY (Absorption, distribution, excretion)
- Tissues and body fluids sampled: blood, brain, bone marrow, small intestine, liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, uterus
- Time and frequency of sampling: blood: Day 15: PD, 6 hours post-dose, Day 28: PD, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 72, 96 hours post-dose. (10 time points) ; tissues: at termination (after 28 days treatment)

ANALYTICAL METHOD
Total Ag concentrations were determined in whole blood and tissues by ICP-MS after microwave digestion with nitric acid and hydrochloric acid. This method was successfully validated with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 10 ng/mL for silver in rat blood4 and 30 ng/g for silver in rat tissue.
Statistics:
- Ag analysis data were acquired and integrated using MassHunter (version C.01.05 Agilent). Peak area results were exported to Watson LIMS (Version 7.5 SP1, Thermo Scientific) in text file format. Watson LIMS was used to calculate standard curve parameters and concentration data for Silver. The concentration and statistical data were generated by computerized techniques.
- AUC(0-t): area under the concentration-time curve from hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule.

Results and discussion

Main ADME resultsopen allclose all
Type:
absorption
Results:
Based on matched dose assessments, silver acetate (AgAc) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) exhibit very similar systemic exposure profiles while AgMP leads to appreciably lower Ag amplitude of systemic exposure.
Type:
distribution
Results:
Levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 and considerably lower in the case of AgMP .

Toxicokinetic / pharmacokinetic studies

Details on absorption:
- Comparisons via normalised administered doses (i.e. Ag equivalent dose) can be made between Ag acetate and bulk Ag (AgMP). Based on these matched dose assessments, the extent of systemic exposure was about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of Ag metal powder versus AgAc
- The maximum observed Ag concentration in blood occurs between 3-9h post-dosing for repeat dose groups.
Details on distribution in tissues:
- Levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 (but considerably lower in the case of AgMP ).
- The study shows that the testis and brain are minor sites of distribution. In contrast, the ovary has been shown to be an important site of distribution. However, ancillary investigations strongly suggest silver is present in the ovary as chemically stable silver sulphide/selenide complexes with very low local bioavailability.
Details on excretion:
not investigated
Toxicokinetic parametersopen allclose all
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 1770
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 5 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#1
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 2920
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 5 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#2
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 664
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 55 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#2
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 846
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 55 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#3
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 342
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for male rats at dose level of 175 mg/kg bw/d
Key result
Test no.:
#3
Toxicokinetic parameters:
AUC: 400
Remarks:
Dose normalised AUC(0-t) after 28d dosing; for female rats at dose level of 175 mg/kg bw/d

Metabolite characterisation studies

Metabolites identified:
no
Remarks:
n.a.
Details on metabolites:
n.a.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Systemic exposure / Ag in blood

- Figure 1 (attached below) shows the extent of systemic exposure as area under the concentration time curve (AUC) values after repeated dose administration of silver acetate (AgAc) for 28 days.

- Comparisons via normalised administered doses (i.e. Ag equivalent dose) can be made between different Ag test items. Based on these matched dose assessments, the extent of systemic exposure was similar for AgAc and AgNO3 but about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of Ag metal powder versus a reference ionic Ag salt.

- Table 2 shows the blood Ag concentrations at predicted steady state (day 15) after repeated dose administration of AgAc. The maximum observed concentration occurs between 3-9h post-dosing for repeat dose groups, hence the 6h values for the respective test substances are shown as an indicator of peak exposure.

Table 2.  Blood Ag concentrations at day 15 after repeated oral dose administration of silver acetate (AgAc).

Dose level Mean 6h blood [Ag] Mean [Ag]6h/
(mg/kg Test Item bw/d) ng/mL Ag Equiv. Dose 
    ng/mL
 
Control <LLOQ <LLOQ -- --
(n=3)
5 113 204 34.8 62.8
± 15 ± 26
55 317 423 8.9 11.8
± 93 ± 72
175 652 918 5.7 8.1
± 171 ± 103
(n=3) (n=3)

- Comparing these data to the data for other Ag test items, this demonstrates that oral dosing of AgAc and AgNO3 lead to similar systemic exposure and AgMP leads to appreciably lower Ag amplitude of systemic exposure in comparison to ionic Ag forms.

 

Tissue exposure / Ag distribution

Table 3 shows the Ag tissue levels / distribution after repeated dose administration of AgAc.

Table 3. Terminal Ag tissue levels following repeated oral dose administration for 28 days of silver acetate (AgAc)

 

Dose (mg/kg bw/d)

/Sex

 

Bone marrow

Brain

GI tract

Spleen

Testis

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control M

Mean

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 M

Mean

62.0

142

2770

283

168

55.4

 

SD

13.5

36.0

1720

71.2

75.9

15.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 M

Mean

3500

637

19200

38700

1510

9470

 

SD

1540

57.2

7680

11000

215

4120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175 M

Mean

21400

1460

83200

96400

1530

22700

 

SD

15400

33.1

5270

55200

237

7630

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dose(mg/kg bw/d)

/Sex

 

Bone Marrow

Brain

GI Tract

Spleen

Ovaries

Uterus

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control F

Mean

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

BLQ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 F

Mean

126

169

3800

990

2200

188

305

 

SD

110

21.2

1490

455

1080

121

232

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55 F

Mean

4500

805

50700

60800

24300

8000

16500

 

SD

1420

35.9

11200

10400

2610

3300

3610

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

175 F

Mean

46800

1460

104000

142000

39700

11100

21900

 

SD

19800

114

12600

93500

19800

2320

13100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BLQ    <5.00 ng/mL

- Comparing these data to the data for other Ag test items, this demonstrates that levels of Ag distributed into tissues and organs are similar for AgAc and AgNO3 but considerably lower in the case of Ag metal powder.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
This in-vivo toxicokinetic study (in rats) by oral gavage comparing silver metal powder, nanosilver, silver nitrate and silver acetate shows a lower absorption/distribution and lower systemic exposure to tissues and organs for silver metal powder than for the other silver substances. The amount of Ag+ in blood and tissues is much higher for silver acetate/silver nitrate than for silver metal powder at comparable Ag dosing levels. Although all silver-containing substances have the ability to release Ag+, the extent of released silver ions is significantly different between substances. Therefore, a direct read-across of mammalian toxicity datasets for simple ionic silver salts like silver acetate or silver nitrate and nanosilver to silver metal powder/massive is not supported (from a scientifically valid toxicokinetic perspective).

Executive summary:

This in-vivo toxicokinetic study is an oral route investigation using adult CD Sprague Dawley rats. The design conformed to OECD TG 417 and was conducted in compliance to GLP. The study was designed as a comparative toxicokinetic assessment of the test items Silver Acetate (AgAc), Silver Nitrate (AgNO3), Micron-sized Silver (AgMP) and Nanoparticulate Silver (AgNP). This included assessment of bioavailability following single oral doses relative to single intravenous doses and systemic exposure following single and repeat oral doses. Groups of 4 male and 4 female CD Sprague Dawley rats were administered the test items, either as a single intravenous dose, a single oral dose or repeated daily oral doses for 4 weeks.

The systemic exposure (28 days) results show a difference in the extent of absorption and systemic circulation for silver acetate and nitrate versus silver metal powder. Based on a matched dose assessment, the extent of systemic exposure was about 10 to 30-fold lower in the case of silver metal powder versus silver acetate (as reference ionic silver compound).

The silver tissue levels after repeated dose administration are considerably lower in the case of silver metal powder (AgMP) than for silver acetate. This suggests that AgMP represents a correspondingly lower health hazard, i.e. AgMP (and by extrapolation also massive Ag with a tremendously lower particle size/reactive surface area) is expected to cause less effects at corresponding Ag dose levels than AgAc.

In conclusion, it is assumed that the systemic toxicity of silver substances is driven by the release potential of Ag ionic species as the primary moiety for systemic circulation and tissue exposure, and hence hazard assessment. The comparative TK study is a high quality GLP investigation and the first which permits a direct comparison of systemic circulation and tissue distribution of Ag ionic species between soluble Ag salts (AgNO3and Ag acetate), AgNP and AgMP. This new evidence demonstrates that oral intake of AgMP results in markedly lower absorption, distribution and systemic tissue/organ exposure to silver than more bioavailable forms like AgAc. As a generic observation, the following trend is being observed: AgAc > AgNO3>> AgNP >>> AgMP.

The study findings show that the direct read-across of mammalian toxicity data with soluble silver salts (like silver acetate and silver nitrate) and nanosilver to silver metal (powder and massive) is not justified (based on their individual toxicokinetic profiles).