Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 932-124-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 14 December 2009 to 15 March 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study. As this study is being used for read-across, the reliability has been amended to reflect this.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Calcium carbonate (nano)
- IUPAC Name:
- Calcium carbonate (nano)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Calcium carbonate (nano)
- Physical state: white powder
- Purity: 98.5% w/w
- Batch No.: GICM014427
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
The nano form of calcium carbonate was tested because this form was anticipated to represent the worst case as it is likely to be more soluble than the bulk form due to the smaller particle size and hence greater surface area. Furthermore, the smaller particle size will be more likely to penetrate the cells.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: Human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- For each experiment, sufficient whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation of a volunteer who had been previously screened for suitability. The volunteer had not been exposed to high levels of radiation or hazardous chemicals and had not knowingly recently suffered from a viral infection. The cell-cycle time for the lymphocytes from the donors used in this study was determined using BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) incorporation to assess the number of first, second and third division metaphase cells and so calculate the average generation time (AGT). The average AGT for the regular donors used in this laboratory has been determined to be approximately 17 hours under typical experimental exposure conditions.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone and beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver, S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 - 4(20) hour:
Without S9-mix: 0*, 31.25, 62.5, 125*, 250*,500*, 1000 (* Dose levels selected for metaphase analysis)
With S9-mix: 0*, 31.25, 62.5, 125*, 250*,500*, 1000 (* Dose levels selected for metaphase analysis)
Experiment 2 - 24 hour:
Without S9-mix: 0*, 31.25, 62.5, 125*, 250*,500*, 1000 (* Dose levels selected for metaphase analysis)
This study was run in parallel with a Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA) using L5178Y cells (Harlan Laboratories Ltd project No. 2974/0008) which has the capability of detecting clastogenic activity. The study was performed to meet the requirements of the OECD 476 Guideline. It was therefore considered that the results of the MLA study gave adequate scientific justification for the omission of the repeat of the with metabolic activation exposure group. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of vehicle: A solubility check process was performed to determine a suitable solvent; initially an aqueous vehicle (MEM culture medium) was investigated. However, this was unsuitable and therefore the next coice was DMSO, resulting in a suitable dosable suspension.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- In the presence of S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- In the absence of S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hours
- Exposure duration: Experiment 1 - 4 hrs with and without S9. Experiment 2 - 24 hrs without S9
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 hrs for 4 hrs exposure
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): Not applicable
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No selection agent
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Demecolcine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): When the slides were dry they were stained in 5% Giemsa for 5 minutes, rinsed, dried and coverslipped using mounting medium.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Where possible the first 100 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each culture were counted, where there were approximately 30 to 50% of cells with aberrations, slide evaluation was terminated at 50 cells. If the cell had 44-48 chromosomes, any gaps, breaks or rearrangements were noted according to the simplified system of Savage (1976) recommended in the 1983 UKEMS guidelines for mutagenicity testing (Appendix 1). Cells with chromosome aberrations were reviewed as necessary by a senior cytogeneticist prior to decoding the slides.
In the 24 hours continuous exposure group, dose level 250 µg/ml, A culture, only 80 metaphases were scored due to partial loss of pellet during the experiment. However due to no aberrations being seen in the 80 metaphases scored it was considered to have no impact on the study.
In addition, cells with 69 chromosomes or more were scored as polyploid cells and the incidence of polyploid cells (%) reported.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy:
- Determination of endoreplication:
- Other:
OTHER: - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response was recorded for a particular treatment if the % cells with aberrations, excluding gaps, markedly exceeded that seen in the concurrent control, either with or without a clear dose-relationship. For modest increases in aberration frequency a dose response relationship is generally required and appropriate statistical tests may be applied in order to record a positive response.
- Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: There was no significant change in pH when the test material was dosed into media
- Effects of osmolality: The osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm.
- Evaporation from medium: Not applicable
- Water solubility: Not applicable, the test substance was suspended in DMSO
- Precipitation:
Preliminary test:
A precipitate of the test material was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure, at and above 31.25 µg/ml, in the 4(20)-hour pulse exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation and at and above 62.5 µg/ml in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation and in the 24-hour continuous exposure group.
Main test:
The maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was limited by the presence of heavy precipitate on the slides at 1000 µg/ml in all three exposure groups. The precipitate was such that it was considered impractical to accurately assess the metaphases for the presence of aberrations and, therefore, the maximum dose level selected was 500 µg/ml.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The dose range for the Preliminary Toxicity Test was 3.91 to 1000 µg/ml. The maximum dose was based on the maximum recommended 10 mM concentration. A precipitate of the test material was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure, at and above 31.25 µg/ml, in the 4(20)-hour pulse exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation and at and above 62.5 µg/ml in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation and in the 24-hour continuous exposure group. Microscopic assessment of the slides prepared from the exposed cultures showed that metaphase cells were present up to 1000 µg/ml in all three of the exposure groups. The mitotic index data are presented in Table 1. The test material induced modest evidence of toxicity in all three of the exposure groups.
The selection for the main experiment was the maximum recommended 10 mM concentration and was 1000 µg/ml for all three exposure groups.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range. The positive control materials induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. The metabolic activation system was therefore shown to be functional and the test method itself was operating as expected.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the toxicity was less than that observed in the Preliminary Toxicity Test and that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present at the maximum dose level of test material, 1000 µg/ml in all three exposure groups. The mitotic index data are given in Tables 1, 2 and 3 (attached background information). They confirm the qualitative observations in that no clear dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed in any of the exposure groups. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The chromosome aberration data are given in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 (attached background information). All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range. The positive control materials induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. The metabolic activation system was therefore shown to be functional and the test method itself was operating as expected.
The test material did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations in either the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
The polyploid cell frequency data are given in Table 7 (attached background information). The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in any of the exposure groups.
There was no evidence of a response in the presence of metabolic activation in this study or in the MLA performed on the test material (Harlan Laboratories Ltd Project No. 2974/0008). This was taken as scientific justification to confirm that the repeat of the exposure group with metabolic action was not required.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test material did not induce a statistically significant increase in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations in either the absence or presence of a liver enzyme metabolising system. The test material was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.