Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-877-4 | CAS number: 89-04-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Fertility
A repeated-dose toxicity combined with a reproductive/developmental toxicity screen, conducted according (OECD Test Guideline No 422), was undertaken on the registered substance, an ester of 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with C8 linear side chains. No adverse effects on oestrous cycle, copulation, fertility, delivery or lactation and no changes related to gestation index, gestation length, numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites or implantation index were found. There were no changes in sex ratio, body weight, viability or morphology of pups. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for reproductive toxicity was 500 mg/kg/day for both parent animals and offspring, this being the highest dose level investigated.
Reproductive toxicity - rat: NO(A)EL 500 mg/kg/day
Gene expression associated with reproductive toxicity: No repression of genes in the testicular mal-development pathway
This substance is manufactured by the lead registrant in quantities >1000 tpa. As such, a two-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD Test Guideline No 443) is required in accordance with REACH Regulation 1907/2006, Annex X, Section 8.7.3 of Column 1. It is proposed to conduct the OECD 443 with the structural analogue TM 08-10 and then read across to the results of this study for TM08, once ECHA provides the final compliance check for TM08-10.
TM8-10 is a structural analogue of TM 8, as it is 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with linear C8- and C10 -alcohols, produced by esterification of trimellitic anhydride with a mixture of linear C8-C10-alcohols (40 - 60 % C8 and 40 - 60 % C10) rather than C8 alcohol alone, as in TM8.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- extended one-generation reproductive toxicity - with F2 generation (Cohorts 1A, and 1B with extension)
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Justification for type of information:
- This information will be submitted later based on ECHA decision number CCH-D-2114440644-51-0
The complex mixture TM 8-10 is a structural analogue of TM 8, as it is 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with linear C8- and C10 -alcohols, produced by esterification of trimellitic anhydride with a mixture of linear C8-C10-alcohols (40 - 60 % C8 and 40 - 60 % C10) rather than C8 alcohol alone, as in TM8.
This is also subject to an ECHA compliance check and a testing proposal for an extended one generation reproduction toxicology test (OECD 443): Final CCH-D-2114517041-67-01/F sent to all registrant of JS-C810trimellitate, 19th August 2020.
The existing developmental toxicology information (OECD 414) for two species with TM08 and the rat with TM 08-10, indicates the NOAEL for developmental effects on both substances are at or above 1000 mg/kg/bw.
In order to prevent the excessive use of animals, it is proposed that only one EOGRT is conducted, for TM 08-10, and that this is used as read across for TM 08. - Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 443 (Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Justification for study design:
- Guideline study planned for structural analogue
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Lot/batch No.: C-120
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crj:CD:SD
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan
- Age at study initiation: (P) x 10 weeks;
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 388-420 g; Females: 242-277 g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: wire mesh cages, in pairs for mating
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): Not applicable
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): yes, pelleted diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): yes, tap water
- Acclimation period: 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22-25
- Humidity (%): 50-65
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12:12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Prepared weekly by dissolving required weight of the substance in corn oil and stored refrigerated in airtight containers in the dark until use.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Substance is poorly soluble in water
- Concentration in vehicle: As required to achieve nominal dose, up to 25% w/v
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 2mL/kg - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: up to 14 days (until sperm detected in vagina).
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): singly
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: None reported - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data except that concentration of preparations were analysed and the results were in the range 98-102% of nominal. Formulated substance stable for at least 8 days.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: from 14 days before pairing for 42days
Females: from 14 days before pairing to day 4 of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily during treatment period
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 (control), 30, 125 and 500 mg/kg/day
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 13 males & 13 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: based on results of 14 day preliminary study at dose levels of 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Effects on body weight, increased liver weight and oedema of gastric mucosa noted in animals given 1000 mg/kg/day
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random, stratified body weight - Positive control:
- No
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily, parents & foetuses
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Males: Weekly; Females: days 0, 7, 14, 20, gestation days 1, 7, 14 and parturition, lactation days 0 and 4.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes - Males: days 1-2, 7-8, 14-15, 29-30, 35-36 and 41-42; Females: days 1-2, 7-8, 14-15, days 7-8, 14-15 and 20-21 of gestation, 3-4 of lactation
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Examined pre-dose and during dosing period
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in P males/group : yes
- testis weight and microscopic pathology, epididymis weight and microscopic pathology - Litter observations:
- PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities, :
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was/was not determined for pups born or found dead - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals following 42 days of treatment
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals day 4 of lactation
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations of all organs & including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera. Pups: all organs
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The following tissues were weighed: Brain, heart, thymus, liver, kidneys, spleen, adrenals, testes, epididymides
The following tissues were prepared for microscopic examination: Brain, heart, thymus, liver, kidneys, spleen, adrenals, testes, epididymides, stomach, prostate, urinary bladder, lungs (and bronchi), ileum, trachea, mandibular lymph node, seminal vesicles and coagulating gland, duodenum, jejunum, caecum, colon, rectum, mesenteric lymph nodes, pituitary gland, thyroid gland, sciatic nerve, spinal cord, bone marrow (from femur), ovary, uterus, vagina
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination). Pups: found dead & abnormalities
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera. - Statistics:
- Sexual cycle, copulation rate and conception rate were examined using Fisher's exact test
Clinical signs and histopathological findings were graded by Mann-Whitney U test with the sum of the positive findings. Significant difference tests were performed between the control group by one-sided test of direct probability of Fischer.
Other data, as a sample value or the average value of each litter, were obtained for each individual and tested for uniformity of the variance of each group by the method of Bartlett. If the distribution was uniform, ANOVA and significance was examined using the multiple comparison method of Dunnett. If the distribution was not uniform, a Kruskal-Wallis rank test was performed with significance between the groups examined by Dunnett test. The significance level was 5%. - Reproductive indices:
- Copulation Index: No. of pairs with successful copulation/no. of pairs mated X 100
Fertility Index: No of pregnant females/no. of pairs with successful copulation X 100
Implantation index: No. of implantation sites/no. of corporea lutea X 100
Delivery index: No. of pups born/no. of implantation sites X 100
Gestation index: No. of females with live pups delivered/no. of pregnant females X 100
Nursing index: No. of females nursing live pups/no. of females with normal delivery X 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- Live birth index: No. of live pups at birth/no. of pups at birth X 100
Viability index: No. of live pups on d4/no.of live pups at birth - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- hepatocellular hypertrophy of liver of males at 500 mg/kg/day
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- System:
- hepatobiliary
- Organ:
- liver
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Absence of effects on pup weight; sex ratio; survival index; viability index
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- A repeated-dose toxicity combined with a reproductive/developmental toxicity screen conducted according to OECD Test Guideline No 422 found no adverse effects on oestrous cycle, copulation, fertility, delivery or lactation and no changes related to gestation index, gestation length, numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites or implantation index. There were no changes in sex ratio, body weight, viability or morphology of pups. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOEL) for reproductive and developmental toxicity was considered to be 500 mg/kg/day for both parent animals and offspring, this being the highest dose level investigated.
- Executive summary:
A repeated-dose toxicity combined with a reproductive/developmental toxicity screen conducted according to OECD Test Guideline No 422 found no adverse effects on oestrous cycle, copulation, fertility, delivery or lactation and no changes related to gestation index, gestation length, numbers of corpora lutea, implantation sites or implantation index. There were no changes in sex ratio, body weight, viability or morphology of pups. The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOEL) for reproductive and developmental toxicity was considered to be 500 mg/kg/day for both parent animals and offspring, this being the highest dose level investigated.
Referenceopen allclose all
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS): Decreased body weight gain from day 7 to 14 of gestation observed in females treated at 500 mg/kg/day. No adverse effects on body weights in males. No effects on food consumption in either sex.
REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION: SPERM MEASURES (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No data
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No effects
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No effects
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No effects
HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS): Hypertrophy of hepatocytes in the centrilobular zone of the liver in males treated at 500 mg/kg/day. No adverse changes in other organs.
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING): No effects
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING): No effects
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING): No effects
Oestrus cycle
Dose level (mg/kg body weight/day |
0 |
30 |
125 |
500 |
4 day cycle |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Irregular cycle |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Length of oestrus cycle (days |
4.1 ± 0.2 (13) |
4.0± 0.0 (13) |
4.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
4.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
Reproductive performance
Dose level (mg/kg body weight/day |
0 |
30 |
125 |
500 |
Number of mated pairs |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Number of copulated pairs |
13 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Copulation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Number of pregnant animals |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Fertility index |
92.3 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Number of pairing days |
2.3 ± 1.3 (13) |
2.5 ± 1.1 (13) |
1.8 ± 1.0 (13) |
2.2 ± 1.1 (13) |
Frequency of oestrus |
1.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
1.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
1.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
1.0 ± 0.0 (13) |
Developmental toxicity parameters
Dose level (mg/kg body weight/day |
0 |
30 |
125 |
500 |
Number of pregnant animals |
12 |
13 |
13 |
13 |
Number of pregnant animals with live young |
12 |
13 |
13 |
12 * |
Gestation index |
100 |
100 |
100 |
92.3 |
Gestation length (days) |
22.6 ± 0.5 |
22.2 ± 0.4 |
22.5 ± 0.5 |
22.6 ± 0.5 |
Number of corpora lutea |
17.3 ± 1.5 |
17.9 ± 2.5 |
17.0 ± 1.8 |
16.9 ± 2.3 |
Number of implantation sites |
15.8 ± 1.5 |
16.3 ± 1.4 |
15.8 ± 1.3 |
15.2 ± 2.6 |
Implantation index |
91.6 ± 7.8 |
91.6 ± 6.5 |
93.6 ± 6.1 |
90.3 ± 12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lactation day 0: |
|
|
|
|
Number of pups born |
14.7 ± 2.3 |
15.2 ± 1.9 |
14.7 ± 1.4 |
13.3 ± 4.0 |
Delivery index |
92.8 ± 7.4 |
93.3 ± 7.1 |
92.9 ± 6.5 |
88.1 ± 20.7 |
Number of pups alive |
14.1 ± 1.8 |
15.1 ± 1.8 |
14.5 ± 1.4 |
13.2 ± 4.0 |
Birth index |
89.5 ± 7.8 |
92.4 ± 7.3 |
91.9 ± 6.8 |
86.9 ± 20.1 |
Live birth index |
96.6 ± 6.3 |
99.1 ± 2.3 |
99.0 ± 2.5 |
98.8 ± 2.8 |
Pup weight (g) - Males |
7.1 ± 0.8 |
6.8 ± 0.5 |
7.1 ± 0.8 |
7.2 ± 1.0 |
- Females |
6.7 ± 0.8 |
6.4 ± 0.5 |
6.5 ± 0.7 |
6.9 ± 1.0 |
Sex ratio (% males) |
45.3 ± 12.9 |
53.5 ± 12.3 |
46.6 ± 11.5 |
53.0 ± 18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lactation day 4: |
|
|
|
|
Number of live pups |
13.8 ± 1.7 |
14.8 ± 1.6 |
14.1 ± 1.1 |
12.9 ± 3.9 |
Viability index |
98.3 ± 4.1 |
98.6 ± 2.7 |
98.6 ± 3.6 |
98.4 ± 5.4 |
Pup weight (g) - Males |
10.6 ± 2.6 |
10.5 ± 1.5 |
11.1 ± 1.6 |
11.5 ± 2.3 |
- Females |
10.2 ± 2.7 |
10.0 ± 1.3 |
10.4 ± 1.4 |
11.1 ± 2.3 |
Sex ratio (% males) |
44.8 ± 12.4 |
53.2 ± 12.4 |
46.3 ± 11.4 |
53.5 ± 17.4 |
* One female found dead on gestation day 23
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In addition, by analogy with the phthalate esters, the principle concern for benzenetricarboxylic acids with linear carbon chains alcohols might be expected to be for potential effects for the developing male testes. This aspect has been studied on a structural analogue of the substance (TM 8 -10 - see below) using RNA transcriptional profiling in an assay that subscribes to the principle of the 3R’s and reported in 7.9.4: Specific investigations; other studies.
TM8-10 is a structural analogue of TM 8, as it is 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with linear C8- and C10 -alcohols, produced by esterification of trimellitic anhydride with a mixture of linear C8-C10-alcohols (40 - 60 % C8 and 40 - 60 % C10) rather than C8 alcohol alone, as in TM8.
Short description of key information:
Fertility - Rat: NO(A)EL - 500 mg/kg/day
No expected effect on male reproductive organs.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Developmental toxicity / teratogencity
The results of two high quality prenatal developmental toxicity studies (OECD Test Guideline No 414) are available for both the rat and the 2nd species, rabbit, conducted with the registered substance: an ester of 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with C8 linear side chains (TM 8).
Both studies provided a NOAEL for maternal toxicity of 1000 mg/kg/day, the highest concentration tested. For developmental toxicity the NOAEL was also 1000 mg/kg/day in both species.
In addition, a prenatal developmental toxicity studies (OECD Test Guideline No 414), as weight of evidence, is provided for the multi-constituent substance 1,2,4 -Benzenetricarboxylic acid, decyl octyl ester (TM 8-10), as a structural analogue of TM8. The results of this study the maternal toxicity was 300 mg/kg, although the embryo foetal developmental NOAEL was 1000 mg/kg/day, comparable to TM8.
As supporting information, an in-silico QSAR analysis utilising the Danish QSAR assessment models (Battery; CASE Ultra; Leadscope: SciQSAR) for the teratogenic potential is included. This also predicted that the teratogenic potential in humans of trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate was negative.
This substance is manufactured by the lead registrant in quantities >1000 tpa. As such, a two-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD Test Guideline No 443) is required in accordance with REACH Regulation 1907/2006, Annex X, Section 8.7.3 of Column 1. It is proposed to conduct the OECD 443 with the structural analogue TM 08-10 and then read across to the results of this study for TM08, once ECHA provides the final compliance check for TM08-10.
Developmental toxicity - rat: NO(A)EL 1000 mg/kg/day
Developmental toxicity study - rabbit: NO(A)EL 1000 mg/kg/day
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2017-05-09 to 2017-06-11
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted 22nd January 2001
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Polynt Lot No. 3606217009
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 09 Jan 2018
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Ambient conditions
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: None
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: None - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS srl, San Pietro al Natisone, Italy
- Age at study initiation: circa 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 203 - 259 g
- Fasting period before study: None
- Housing: Group caged except during mating
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Commercial laboratory rodent dient, ad-libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Municipal drinking water, ad-libitum
- Acclimation period: circa 4 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24 deg C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2017-05-09 To: 2017-06-11 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- - PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
- VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Commonly used vehicle for non-water miscible materials
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 25, 75 and 250 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg bw - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The formulation procedure was checked in the range from 1 to 250 mg/mL by chemical analysis for concentration and homogeneity to confirmthat the method was suitable.
Samples of the formulations prepared during Weeks 1 and 3 of the dosing phase were analysed to check the homogeneity and concentration. - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: Cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Length of cohabitation: Until mating verified
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: Yes
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as Day 0 of pregnancy
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: No - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From Day to Day 19 post coitum (13 days)
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- 20 days post coitum
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Vehicle control
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 mated females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on data from screening studies
- Rationale for animal assignment: Random - Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Day 0, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20 post coitum
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes - At intervals over Days 0-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15 and 15-20
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation Day 20
- Organs examined: Detailed examination with particular attention to ovaries and uterus - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter - Statistics:
- For continuous variables the significance of the differences amongst group means was assessed by Dunnett's test or a modified t test, depending on the homogeneity of data.
Statistical analysis of non-continuous variables was carried out by means of the Kruskal-Wallis test and intergroup differences between the control and treated groups assessed by a non-parametric version of the Williams test. - Indices:
- Pre-implantation loss
Post-implantation loss
Total implantation loss
Sex ratio - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Significantly reduced body weight and body weight gain in animals dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Reduced food consumption in animals dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Lack of treatment related effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Lack of treatment related effects
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Developmental toxicity has been examined in rats at dose levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day administered during teh period of organogenesis.
No exposure related developmental toxic effects were observed and, as a result, the highest dose investigated, 1000 mg/kg bw/day, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for embryo-foetal effects. - Executive summary:
Developmental toxicity has been examined in rats using methods described in OECD test guideline No. 414. The substance was administered during the period of organogenesis at levels of 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
No exposure related developmental toxic effects were observed and, as a result, the highest dose investigated, 1000 mg/kg bw/day, was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for embryo-foetal effects.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental Start Date: 23/07/2019 (dosing); Experimental Completion Date:14/08/2019 (necropsy)
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 25 June 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch 3606218211
Retest 15 May 2020 - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Remarks:
- 0.5% w/w
- Details on exposure:
- Dose volumes (5 mL/kg) calculated on indvidual bodyweights on Days 6, 9, 12, 15, 18,21,24 and 27 pc
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Liquid chromatography with UV detection; method validated at test lab
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Dosing solutions prepared daily; samples from first and last week of dosing were analysed and were within acceptable range
- Details on mating procedure:
- Single females introduced to single sexually mature male from same supplier, and retained for at least 1 hour following successful mating observed.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 to day 28 post coitum
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- Day six to euthanasia at day 29 post coitum
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Control plus carrier
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 mated females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- Measurements and observations: Mortality, abortions, clincal signs, bodyweights, food consumption.
Thyroid was dissected free of fat, weighed and examined histopathologically for all controls, high dose and euthanised animals. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The following were recorded:
Gravid uterine weights
Number of corpora lutea for pregnant animals
Number of implantations for pregnanat animals
Uteri and individual uterine horms without impanatations immersed in 20% ammonium sulphide for evidence of early embryonic death - Fetal examinations:
- The following observations were made:
Number, sex and weight of live and dead foetus
Number of interuterine deaths; early or late resorptions
Gross placentae evaluation
The thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and examined
Head sections on each foetus, skeletal exam and brain ventricles
Head from half of all foetus removed/preserved for examination of internal structures; eye, brain, nasal passage and tongue
Skeletal examination for all groups for structural deviations (malformations, anomalies, variants) - Statistics:
- Continuous variables: group means asessed by Dunnets test or modified t test.
Non continuos variables Kruskal Wallis test and intergroup difference assessed with non-parametric version of the Williams test.
Statistical significance; p < 0.05 - Indices:
- Pre-implantation loss
Post-implantation loss
Total implantation loss
Sex ratio - Historical control data:
- Yes
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related clinical signs were recorded.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No treatment related effects; 1 mid dose (300 mg/kg/day) and 1 high dose (1000 mg/kg/day) animal was terminated early.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment related effects. Average body weights did not differ although the highest dose group had significantly lower body weight gain at gestation day 9.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 300 mg/kg bw; significantly reduced food consumption on days 9 and 21
1000 mg/kg bw; reduced food consumption on days 9, 12 and 21
Recovered by end of treatment phase - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Except for the two sacrificed females (1 at 300 mg/kg; 1 at 1000 mg/kg), in which dark red staining in the urogenital region was observed, there were no treatment related findings in dams compared to control animals.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Number of abortions:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Abortions occurred in one female of the mid-dose (300 mg/kg/day) and in one of the high
dose level (1000 mg/kg/day). - Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Two dams were found to be not pregnant at the end of the study; one in the low dose and one in the high dose. Given the lack of a dose response this was regarded as incidental.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- None oberved
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Signs of maternal toxicity
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 300 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg statistically significantly reduced foetal weight compared to control, but these did not follow a dose related pattern. Assumed to be delayed development effects of early stage maternal toxicity, linked with reduced food consumption.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Only observed external abnormality was the smaller size of foetuses; 36.7% of foetus in treated groups cf to 4.7% in the control group were less than 35 g.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Severe skeletal findings were recorded in a litter of the low dose group. One foetus in low dose showed malformation; absence of tail and absence of all caudal vertebrae.
In the same litter skeletal examination identified one other foetus with fused causdal vetrabrae.
Skeletal examination recorded a number of unossified bones. This was related to the small size of fetus (<35g). It was suggested this was related to some retardion of fetal growth. - Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- One foetus with skeletal malformations from a litter in the low dose group showed agenesis of left kideny plus hyploplasia azygous lobe of lung and dark area in liver. In the high dose group two foetus from one litter showed enlarged bilteral brain ventricle.
One foetus (Dam no. X1050057) showed malformations like the absence of the tail and the agenesis of the left kidney. In the same foetus, additional abnormalities included hypoplasia of the azygous lobe of the lung and the presence of dark area in the liver. In the high dose group, two foetuses (Dam no. X1050159) showed enlarged bilateral brain ventricles.
In the absence of a dose relationship, the low occurrence and the different nature of malformation, these major abnormalities were considered to be incidental. - Other effects:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Folded retina
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Some retardation of foetal growth observed in mid and high doses with reduced foetal weights and delayed ossification anomalies. This was related to maternal toxicity.
Observed malformations were limited to single foetus in litters at low and high dose and were not observed to be dose dependent - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- foetal
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no direct dose related teratological effects.
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- external: paw
- skeletal: pelvic girdle
- skeletal: hindlimb
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Regarded as effect of reduced delayed growth in higher number of small feotus as a result of reduced food consumption and body weight gain in dams.
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Slight maternal toxicity was observed at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day based on reduced food consumption and reduced body weight gain in the early stages of gestation. These effects were not observed later in the study. The reduced foetal weight observed at these dosages may be a secondary effect of obeseved early maternal toxicity. However, no adverse effects were seen on foetuses at termination including the skeletal and fixed head examinations.
Therefore, it can be concluded that 1000 mg/kg was considered the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for maternal toxicity and 1000 mg/kg for the developmental toxicity of rabbits, orally administered with Trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate (DIPLAST TM8). - Executive summary:
The effects of Trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate (DIPLAST TM8) were investigated in New Zealand White rabbits during pregnancy and embryo-foetal development. Females were in-house mated with sexually mature males of the same strain, held as ERBC stock animals, and then assigned to 4 groups of 20 animals each at dose levels of 0, 100, 300 & 1000 mg/kg/day.
All femaleswere administered by oral gavage during the gestation period from Day 6 through Day 28 post coitum . The dose volume was set at 5 mL/kg body weight. Females from the control group (Group 1) received 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (0.5% CMC) as vehicle at the same dose volume during the same treatment period. Mortality check, clinical signs, body weight and food consumption were recorded during the in-life phase. At completion of the study period, females were caesarean-sectioned on Day 29 post coitum and subjected to detailed post mortem examination. Gravid uterus was weighed and the uterine content examined for the number of implantations, intra-uterine deaths and live foetuses. Live foetuses were weighed, sexed and observed for external and internal abnormalities. The ovaries were also examined and the corpora lutea counted.
Maternal Findings
Two rabbits were sacrificed for abortion, one each in the mid-dose (300 mg/kg/day) and high dose (1000 mg/kg/day) groups on gestation Day 25 and 28, respectively. All the remaining females were sacrificed at termination and only two were found not pregnant, one each in the low and high dose groups (100 and 1000 mg/kg/day). The final number of females with live foetuses on gestation Day 29 was: 20 in the control group, 19 in the low and mid-dose groups and 18 in the high dose group.
No treatment-related signs were recorded in the study.
The body weight gain was statistically significantly lower in the high dose group when compared to the control group on gestation Day 9.
Food consumption was statistically significantly reduced in the high dose group on gestation Days 9, 12 and 21 and in the mid-dose group on gestation Days 9 and 21.
These effects on food consumption were not apparent by the end of the gestation period.
No differences were seen in the uterus weight, corrected body weight (terminal body weight minus the uterus weight) and the absolute weight gain, calculated subtracting the uterus weight and the body weight at gestation Day 6 from the terminal body weight, between control and treated groups.
There was no effect on terminal body weight or on the thyroid gland weight, absolute or relative to body weight, in treated females, when compared to controls.
A single female in Groups 3 & 4 was sacrificed for humane reasons on Day 25 and 28 post coitum, respectively. At post mortem observation, both females showed dark red staining in the urogenital region. No treatment-related changes were noted in all other (scheduled) terminations.
Upon histopathological examination, no treatment related changes were noted in thyroid gland of females receiving Trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate at 1000 mg/kg.
Foetal Findings
Statistically significantly lower mean foetal weight was observed in the mid- and high dose groups compared to controls. This reduction was seen both in male and female foetuses. In addition, the mean female foetal weight was found statistically significantly lower also in the low dose group.
Upon external examination, the most recurrent abnormality was the small size of the foetuses (b.w. less than 35 g) which was observed up to 36.7% in treated groups versus 4.7% in the control group. No treatment related findings were observed at internal examination.
Upon visceral examination, no treatment related findings were recorded between groups when compared to controls.
Upon skeletal examination, no treatment related findings were recorded between groups when compared to controls.
Conclusion
In conclusion, slight maternal toxicity was observed at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day based on the reduced body weight gain and food consumption in the early stages of gestation. The reduced foetal weight observed at these dosages may be a secondary effect of the early stage maternal toxicity. However, no adverse effects were seen on foetuses at termination including the skeletal and fixed head examinations.
Therefore, it can be concluded that 1000 mg/kg was considered the NOAEL for maternal toxicity and 1000 mg/kg was the NOAEL for the developmental toxicity in rabbits, orally administered with Trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate (DIPLAST TM8).
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- August 10, 2016
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- The model is been assessed according to the OECD principles for the validation of QSAR, to generate a transparent, understandable, reproducible and verifiable result.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment - Chapter R.06: QSARs and grouping of chemicals
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Battery algorithm
The models are made in three independent systems: CASE Ultra (CU), Leadscope Predictive Data Miner (LS) and SciQSAR (SQ). Based on predictions from each of the applied systems, a battery prediction is made using a so-called battery algorithm. The battery approach can give more reliable predictions and can also expand the applicability domain, which was shown in a previous pilot project including 32 different models and the three systems mentioned above (not published).
For the teratogenic potential, QSAR predictions are made in each of the independent QSAR model systems and combined into a battery prediction by using the criteria shown in the following table. The first column shows the total number of predictions (positive/negative) in domain. The next two columns show the number of positive and negative predictions, respectively. The final battery prediction based on the individual predictions is shown in the fourth column.
Total POS/NEG POS NEG Battery prediction (a) Remarks
in domain in domain in domain
3 3 0 POS_IN
3 0 3 NEG_IN
3 2 1 POS_IN
3 1 2 INC_OUT EXCEPT when CU and LS are both NEG_IN,
or (see remark) in this case the battery call is NEG_IN
NEG_IN
(a) POS, positive; NEG, negative; INC, inconclusive; IN, inside applicability domain; OUT, outside applicability domain.
(b) Less weight is put on an SQ POS compared to LS or CU POS in cases where LS and CU agree on a NEG in AD prediction, because SQ in many cases has lower specificity than LS and CU. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- other: Humans
- Dose descriptor:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Based on:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Basis for effect level:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Remarks on result:
- other: no teratogenic potential based on (Q)SAR prediction
- Dose descriptor:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Based on:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Basis for effect level:
- other: (Q)SAR prediction
- Remarks on result:
- other: no teratogenic potential based on (Q)SAR prediction
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- As result of the in-silico assessment, the teratogenic potential in humans of trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate was estimated to be negative.
- Executive summary:
As result of the in-silico assessment, the teratogenic potential in humans of trioctyl benzene-1,2,4-tricarboxylate was estimated to be:negative.
Referenceopen allclose all
Body weight (g) of dams - Group mean data
|
|
Gestation day: |
|||||
Treatment |
|
0 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
20 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Control |
Mean |
233.12 |
257.83 |
266.89 |
278.76 |
297.89 |
373.46 |
|
SD |
10.52 |
10.80 |
11.61 |
10.89 |
14.68 |
25.64 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
100 mg/kg |
Mean |
235.71 |
258.33 |
268.14 |
279.27 |
295.16 |
372.80 |
|
SD |
12.70 |
11.49 |
11.68 |
11.01 |
11.88 |
12.55 |
|
(n) |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
300 mg/kg |
Mean |
234.61 |
257.08 |
266.14 |
276.12 |
294.56 |
371.29 |
|
SD |
11.62 |
11.97 |
110.8 |
12.01 |
12.87 |
19.92 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
1000 mg/kg |
Mean |
231.91 |
255.48 |
262.70 |
272.62 |
288.40* |
355.69*($) |
|
SD |
11.81 |
11.68 |
11.07 |
11.73 |
13.63 |
23.18 |
Food consumption (g/animal/day) of dams - Group mean data
|
|
Gestation day: |
||||
Treatment |
|
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
20 |
|
(n) |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
Control |
Mean |
20.21 |
18.90 |
20.13 |
20.79 |
22.99 |
|
SD |
1.72 |
1.10 |
2.12 |
2.59 |
1.47 |
|
(n) |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
100 mg/kg |
Mean |
19.82 |
19.22 |
18.55 |
18.52 |
22.02 |
|
SD |
0.87 |
2.05 |
0.72 |
1.37 |
2.55 |
|
(n) |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
300 mg/kg |
Mean |
20.59 |
19.51 |
19.20 |
19.33 |
23.39 |
|
SD |
1.80 |
2.05 |
1.52 |
1.46 |
1.11 |
|
(n) |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
1000 mg/kg |
Mean |
20.35 |
17.28 |
17.37*($) |
18.37* |
22.35 |
|
SD |
0.97 |
2.17 |
2.50 |
1.97 |
3.11 |
Uterus weight (g) of dams - Group mean data
|
|
Terminal body weight |
Absolute weight gain |
Gravid uterus weight |
Treatment |
|
(g) |
(g) |
(g) |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Control |
Mean |
371.23 |
62.94 |
75.15 |
|
SD |
25.84 |
10.06 |
18.48 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
100 mg/kg |
Mean |
370.42 |
55.76 |
78.96 |
|
SD |
11.78 |
8.31 |
7.97 |
|
(n) |
22 |
22 |
22 |
300 mg/kg |
Mean |
370.59 |
57.96 |
78.01 |
|
SD |
15.73 |
11.70 |
11.76 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
1000 mg/kg |
Mean |
352.09* |
44.83* |
75.33 |
|
SD |
22.26 |
11.47 |
13.47 |
Macroscopic findings in dams - Group incidence
|
Treatment: |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
1000 mg/kg |
|
|
Number in group: |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
Finding |
Number examined: |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
Uterus |
Not pregnant |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Unilateral implantation |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No abnormalities |
|
22 |
23 |
22 |
23 |
Litter data - Group mean data
|
|
Corpora |
Implantations |
Uterine deaths |
Viable foetuses |
% |
Implantation loss |
Litter weight |
|||||
Treatment |
|
Lutea |
|
Early |
Late |
Total |
Male |
Female |
males |
Pre- |
Post- |
Total |
(g) |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
22 |
23 |
22 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Control |
Mean |
13.78 |
13.70 |
0.52 |
0.00 |
13.17 |
6.00 |
7.17 |
43.43 |
0.48 |
3.69 |
4.17 |
48.05 |
|
SD |
3.67 |
3.59 |
0.73 |
0.00 |
3.52 |
2.54 |
2.37 |
15.61 |
2.31 |
5.06 |
5.22 |
13.47 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
100 mg/kg |
Mean |
15.04 |
14.70 |
0.74 |
0.00 |
13.96 |
7.13 |
6.83 |
51.74 |
2.07 |
4.83 |
6.84 |
51.55 |
|
SD |
2.01 |
1.89 |
1.48 |
0.00 |
2.06 |
2.24 |
2.44 |
14.64 |
5.92 |
9.01 |
10.32 |
8.05 |
|
(n) |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
300 mg/kg |
Mean |
14.86 |
14.45 |
1.18 |
0.00 |
13.27 |
6.64 |
6.64 |
49.03 |
2.14 |
8.05 |
10.15 |
50.47 |
|
SD |
2.62 |
2.06 |
1.62 |
0.00 |
2.39 |
2.15 |
1.59 |
13.53 |
6.01 |
11.29 |
11.59 |
8.88 |
|
(n) |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
1000 mg/kg |
Mean |
14.26 |
13.83 |
0.65 |
0.00 |
13.17 |
6.91 |
6.26 |
51.67 |
2.58 |
4.87 |
7.38 |
49.46 |
|
SD |
2.75 |
2.50 |
1.11 |
0.00 |
2.81 |
2.79 |
2.05 |
14.03 |
6.66 |
8.70 |
10.33 |
9.71 |
External examination of foetuses - Group incidence
|
|
|
|
Number of foetuses |
|
Number of litters |
||||
Treatment |
Organ |
Category |
Observation |
Observed |
Affected |
% |
|
Observed |
Affected |
% |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities observed |
303 |
298 |
98.35 |
|
23 |
- |
- |
|
|
AN |
Small |
303 |
5 |
1.65 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
100 mg/kg |
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities observed |
321 |
321 |
100.00 |
|
23 |
23 |
100.00 |
300 mg/kg |
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities observed |
292 |
291 |
99.66 |
|
22 |
- |
- |
|
|
AN |
Small |
292 |
1.00 |
0.34 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
1000 mg/kg |
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities observed |
303 |
303 |
100.00 |
|
23 |
23 |
100.00 |
Skeletal examination of foetuses - Group incidence
|
|
|
|
Number of foetuses |
|
Number of dams |
||||
Treatment |
Organ |
Category |
Observation |
Observed |
Affected |
% |
|
Observed |
Affected |
% |
Control |
Forepaw(s) |
AN |
Metacarpal(s) no ossification 4th |
157 |
16 |
10.19 |
|
23 |
9 |
39.13 |
|
Hindpaw(s) |
AN |
Metatarsal(s) no ossification 4th |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Lumbar vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum dumbbell shaped |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Lumbar vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Pelvic girdle |
AN |
Pubis incomplete ossification |
157 |
2 |
1.27 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Rudimentary 14th |
157 |
26 |
16.56 |
|
23 |
15 |
65.22 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Short 14th |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sacral vertebrae |
AN |
Arch(es) incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sacral vertebrae |
AN |
Arch(es) no ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Skull |
AN |
General incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Temporal incomplete ossification |
157 |
27 |
17.20 |
|
23 |
15 |
65.22 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Palatine incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Skull |
VA |
Interparietal incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Skull |
VA |
Supraoccipital incomplete ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
No ossification 6th |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Bipartite 5th |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification |
157 |
3 |
1.91 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Rudimentary 5th |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Bipartite |
157 |
2 |
1.27 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification 5th |
157 |
2 |
1.27 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 6th |
157 |
17 |
10.83 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
No ossification 5th |
157 |
4 |
2.55 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 5th |
157 |
15 |
9.55 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification |
157 |
6 |
3.82 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum no ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum bipartite |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum asymmetrical ossification |
157 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
157 |
10 |
6.37 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
157 |
86 |
54.78 |
|
- |
- |
- |
100 mg/kg |
Forepaw(s) |
AN |
Metacarpal(s) no ossification 4th |
156 |
12 |
7.69 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Hindpaw(s) |
AN |
Metatarsal(s) no ossification 4th |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Lumbar vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Pelvic girdle |
AN |
Ischium incomplete ossification |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Pelvic girdle |
MA |
Pubis no ossification |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
14 ribs |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Rudimentary 14th |
156 |
26 |
16.67 |
|
23 |
14 |
60.87 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Temporal incomplete ossification |
156 |
18 |
11.54 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Palatine incomplete ossification |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Skull |
VA |
Supraoccipital incomplete ossification |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification 5th |
156 |
4 |
2.56 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification |
156 |
3 |
1.92 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
No ossification |
156 |
3 |
1.92 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
No ossification 6th |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Rudimentary 5th |
156 |
3 |
1.92 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 6th |
156 |
26 |
16.67 |
|
23 |
11 |
47.83 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
No ossification 5th |
156 |
5 |
3.21 |
|
23 |
5 |
21.74 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification |
156 |
4 |
2.56 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 5th |
156 |
12 |
7.69 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum no ossification |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
156 |
4 |
2.56 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum asymmetrical dumb-bell shaped |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum dumb-bell shaped |
156 |
4 |
2.56 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
156 |
50 |
32.05 |
|
- |
- |
- |
300 mg/kg |
Forepaw(s) |
AN |
Metacarpal(s) no ossification 4th |
151 |
9 |
5.96 |
|
22 |
4 |
18.18 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
14 ribs |
151 |
6 |
3.97 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Short 14th |
151 |
1 |
0.66 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Rudimentary 14th |
151 |
33 |
21.85 |
|
22 |
15 |
68.18 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Temporal incomplete ossification |
151 |
13 |
8.61 |
|
22 |
10 |
45.45 |
|
Skull |
VA |
Supraoccipital incomplete ossification |
151 |
1 |
0.66 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Bipartite 5th |
151 |
1 |
0.66 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification |
151 |
2 |
1.32 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
No ossification |
151 |
1 |
0.66 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification 5th |
151 |
2 |
1.32 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
No ossification 5th |
151 |
4 |
2.65 |
|
22 |
3 |
13.64 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification |
151 |
3 |
1.99 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 5th |
151 |
15 |
9.93 |
|
22 |
8 |
36.36 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 6th |
151 |
12 |
7.95 |
|
22 |
7 |
31.82 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum dumb-bell shaped |
151 |
6 |
3.97 |
|
22 |
4 |
18.18 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
151 |
5 |
3.31 |
|
22 |
3 |
13.64 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum asymmetrical dumb-bell shaped |
151 |
2 |
1.32 |
|
22 |
2 |
0.09 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
151 |
86 |
56.95 |
|
- |
- |
|
1000 mg/kg |
Forepaw(s) |
AN |
Metacarpal(s) no ossification 4th |
154 |
4 |
2.60 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Pelvic girdle |
AN |
Pubis incomplete ossification |
154 |
1 |
0.65 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Rudimentary 14th |
154 |
18 |
11.69 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
14 ribs |
154 |
1 |
0.65 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ribs |
VA |
Short 14th |
154 |
3 |
1.95 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Skull |
AN |
Temporal incomplete ossification |
154 |
17 |
11.04 |
|
23 |
11 |
47.83 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification |
154 |
2 |
1.30 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Sternebrae |
AN |
Asymmetrical ossification 5th |
154 |
8 |
5.19 |
|
23 |
6 |
26.09 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 5th |
154 |
8 |
5.19 |
|
23 |
6 |
26.09 |
|
Sternebrae |
VA |
Incomplete ossification 6th |
154 |
8 |
5.19 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
AN |
Centrum bipartite |
154 |
1 |
0.65 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum incomplete ossification |
154 |
2 |
1.30 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Thoracic vertebrae |
VA |
Centrum dumb-bell shaped |
154 |
3 |
1.95 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
154 |
99 |
64.29 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Visceral examination of foetuses - Group incidence
|
|
|
|
Number of foetuses |
|
Number of dams |
||||
Treatment |
Organ |
Category |
Observation |
Observed |
Affected |
% |
|
Observed |
Affected |
% |
Control |
Abdomen |
VA |
Haemorrhagic |
146 |
2 |
1.37 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Brain |
AN |
Ventricles enlarged moderate |
146 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Brain |
VA |
Ventricles enlarged slight |
146 |
2 |
1.37 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Great vessels |
VA |
Innominate artery longer |
146 |
3 |
2.05 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Atrium enlarged |
146 |
8 |
5.48 |
|
23 |
5 |
21.74 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Ventricle enlarged |
146 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Pericardial fluid |
146 |
6 |
4.11 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Heart |
VA |
Ventricle enlarged |
146 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Ectopic |
146 |
13 |
8.90 |
|
23 |
8 |
34.78 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Pelvic dilatation moderate |
146 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Kidneys |
VA |
Pelvic dilatation slight |
146 |
5 |
3.42 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Testis |
AN |
Displaced |
146 |
9 |
6.16 |
|
23 |
5 |
21.74 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Enlarged moderate |
146 |
11 |
7.53 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Kinked moderate |
146 |
2 |
1.37 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Kinked slight |
146 |
9 |
6.16 |
|
23 |
8 |
34.78 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Enlarged slight |
146 |
27 |
18.49 |
|
23 |
16 |
69.57 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
146 |
85 |
58.22 |
|
- |
- |
- |
100 mg/kg |
Abdomen |
VA |
Haemorrhagic |
156 |
6 |
3.85 |
|
23 |
3 |
13.04 |
|
Great vessels |
VA |
Innominate artery longer |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Atrium enlarged |
156 |
19 |
12.18 |
|
23 |
9 |
39.13 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Pericardial fluid |
156 |
18 |
11.54 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Heart |
VA |
Ventricle enlarged |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Ectopic |
156 |
22 |
14.10 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Pelvic dilatation moderate |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Kidneys |
VA |
Pelvic dilatation slight |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Testis |
AN |
Displaced |
156 |
19 |
12.18 |
|
23 |
10 |
43.48 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Kinked moderate |
156 |
2 |
1.28 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Enlarged moderate |
156 |
10 |
6.41 |
|
23 |
6 |
26.09 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Kinked slight |
156 |
19 |
12.18 |
|
23 |
12 |
52.17 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Enlarged slight |
156 |
26 |
16.67 |
|
23 |
17 |
73.91 |
|
Whole foetus |
AN |
Generalised oedema slight |
156 |
1 |
0.64 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
156 |
69 |
44.23 |
|
- |
- |
- |
300 mg/kg |
Abdomen |
VA |
Haemorrhagic |
140 |
2 |
1.43 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Great vessels |
VA |
Innominate artery short |
140 |
1 |
0.71 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Ventricle enlarged |
140 |
1 |
0.71 |
|
22 |
5 |
22.73 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Pericardial fluid |
140 |
10 |
7.14 |
|
22 |
7 |
31.82 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Atrium enlarged |
140 |
12 |
8.57 |
|
22 |
8 |
36.36 |
|
Heart |
VA |
Ventricle enlarged |
140 |
4 |
2.86 |
|
22 |
5 |
22.73 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Pelvic dilatation moderate |
140 |
2 |
1.43 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Ectopic |
140 |
14 |
10.00 |
|
22 |
9 |
40.91 |
|
Kidneys |
VA |
Pelvic dilatation slight |
140 |
2 |
1.43 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Testis |
AN |
Displaced |
140 |
5 |
3.57 |
|
22 |
4 |
18.18 |
|
Thoracic cavity |
AN |
Haemorrhage |
140 |
2 |
1.43 |
|
22 |
2 |
9.09 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Enlarged moderate |
140 |
11 |
7.86 |
|
22 |
9 |
40.91 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Kinked moderate |
140 |
4 |
2.86 |
|
22 |
3 |
13.64 |
|
Ureter |
MA |
Kinked extreme |
140 |
1 |
0.71 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Enlarged slight |
140 |
32 |
22.86 |
|
22 |
14 |
63.64 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Kinked slight |
140 |
15 |
10.71 |
|
22 |
10 |
45.45 |
|
Whole foetus |
AN |
Generalised oedema slight |
140 |
1 |
0.71 |
|
22 |
1 |
4.55 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
140 |
68 |
48.57 |
|
- |
- |
- |
1000 mg/kg |
Abdomen |
VA |
Haemorrhagic |
147 |
11 |
7.48 |
|
23 |
6 |
26.09 |
|
Great vessels |
AN |
Innominate artery absent |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Great vessels |
MA |
Absence of aortic arch |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Great vessels |
VA |
Innominate artery short |
147 |
2 |
1.36 |
|
23 |
2 |
8.70 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Pericardial fluid |
147 |
11 |
7.48 |
|
23 |
8 |
34.78 |
|
Heart |
AN |
Atrium enlarged |
147 |
7 |
4.76 |
|
23 |
5 |
21.74 |
|
Kidneys |
AN |
Ectopic |
147 |
12 |
8.16 |
|
23 |
8 |
34.78 |
|
Kidneys |
VA |
Pelvic dilatation slight |
147 |
5 |
3.40 |
|
23 |
5 |
21.74 |
|
Testis |
AN |
Displaced |
147 |
4 |
2.72 |
|
23 |
4 |
17.39 |
|
Thoracic cavity |
AN |
Haemorrhage |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Kinked moderate |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ureter |
AN |
Enlarged moderate |
147 |
10 |
6.80 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Ureter |
MA |
Kinked extreme |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ureter |
MA |
Enlarged extreme |
147 |
1 |
0.68 |
|
23 |
1 |
4.35 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Kinked slight |
147 |
8 |
5.44 |
|
23 |
7 |
30.43 |
|
Ureter |
VA |
Enlarged slight |
147 |
16 |
10.88 |
|
23 |
12 |
52.17 |
|
Whole foetus |
|
No abnormalities detected |
147 |
96 |
65.31 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Key to tables
* = mean value of group is significantly different from control at p < 0.05
** = mean value of group is significantly different from control at p < 0.01
($) = Modified t test if group variances are inhomogeneous ($)
AN = Anomoly
VA = Variation
MA = Malformation
Body weight (kg)
Group |
Day Post-coitum |
0 (mating) |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
18 |
21 |
24 |
27 |
29 |
||||||||||||
Control |
No |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
||||||||||||
Mean |
3.898 |
4.074 |
4.084 |
4.084 |
4.162 |
4.221 |
4.247 |
4.276 |
4.307 |
4.325 |
|||||||||||||
SD |
0.3196 |
0.3175 |
0.3395 |
0.3329 |
0.3086 |
0.2833 |
0.3187 |
0.3077 |
0.3062 |
0.3077 |
|||||||||||||
100 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
||||||||||||
Mean |
3.994 |
4.143 |
4.169 |
4.191 |
4.218 |
4.258 |
4.282 |
4.307 |
4.339 |
4.361 |
|||||||||||||
SD |
0.3413 |
0.3275 |
0.3380 |
0.3457 |
0.3530 |
0.3313 |
0.3271 |
0.3077 |
0.2923 |
0.2946 |
|||||||||||||
300 mg/kg |
No |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
||||||||||||
Mean |
3.871 |
3.992 |
3.978 |
4.011 |
4.019 |
4.071 |
4.060 |
4.061 |
4.076 |
4.098 |
|||||||||||||
SD |
0.2753 |
0.2753 |
0.2553 |
0.2746 |
0.2744 |
0.2896 |
0.3097 |
0.3148 |
0.3012 |
0.2973 |
|||||||||||||
1000 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
||||||||||||
Mean |
3.897 |
4.057 |
4.013 |
4.053 |
4.085 |
4.093 |
4.113 |
4.141 |
4.159 |
4.232 |
|||||||||||||
SD |
0.2779 |
0.2463 |
0.2319 |
0.2150 |
0.1992 |
0.2483 |
0.2599 |
0.2847 |
0.3095 |
0.2775 |
Uterus weights; corrected body weights and absolute weight gain; females with live foetus
Group |
Day Post-coitum |
Gravid uterus weight (g) |
Corrected body weight (g) |
Absolute body weight gain (g) |
Total body weight (kg) |
Thyroid gland (g) |
Throid gland to terminal body weight (%) |
Control |
No |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Mean |
461.34 |
3858.15 |
-215.85 |
4.320 |
0.2492 |
0.0058 |
|
SD |
108.97 |
302.09 |
138.46 |
0.3035 |
0.06016 |
0.00147 |
|
100 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Mean |
446.33 |
3901.58 |
-241.11 |
4.297 |
0.2615 |
0.0061 |
|
SD |
66.05 |
302.63 |
207.00 |
0.3656 |
0.05887 |
0.00144 |
|
300 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
20 |
20 |
Mean |
399.31 |
3689.16 |
-303.53 |
4.088 |
0.2479 |
0.0061 |
|
SD |
108.10 |
302.63 |
207.57 |
0.2932 |
0.05776 |
0.00132 |
|
1000 mg/kg |
No |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
19 |
Mean |
410.16 |
3810.94 |
242.39 |
4.196 |
0.2331 |
0.0056 |
|
SD |
100.69 |
252.20 |
256.64 |
0.2931 |
0.03775 |
0.00093 |
Macroscopic findings
Findings |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
1000 mg/kg |
Number of animals |
20 |
20 |
19 |
19 |
Number examined |
20 |
20 |
19 |
19 |
Abnormal caecum contents |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Hairloss: forelimbs |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Hairloss; hindlimbs |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Hairloss; forepaws |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hairloss; head |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hair loss; skin |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
Abnormal sized gall bladder |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Uterus; not pregnant |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
No abnormalities observed |
18 |
15 |
14 |
14 |
Litter data and sex ratios (group data)
Group |
|
Corpora lutea |
Implantation |
Pre imp loss (%) |
Early resorptn. |
Late resorptn. |
Total resorptn. |
Foetus sex Males |
Foetal sex Females |
Male (%) |
Control |
No |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Mean |
8.15 |
7.95 |
2.38 |
0.15 |
0.4 |
0.55 |
3.75 |
3.65 |
49.2 |
|
SD |
2.28 |
2.24 |
5.09 |
0.49 |
0.68 |
1 |
1.74 |
4.26 |
18.64 |
|
100 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Mean |
8.63 |
8.32 |
3.58 |
0.11 |
0.47 |
0.58 |
3.47 |
3.74 |
56.05 |
|
SD |
1.74 |
1.73 |
5.51 |
0.32 |
0.69 |
0.84 |
1.74 |
1.33 |
15.88 |
|
300 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Mean |
8.42 |
8.21 |
2.51 |
0.32 |
0.58 |
0.9 |
3.58 |
3.74 |
52.32 |
|
SD |
2.12 |
2.15 |
5.03 |
0.75 |
1.26 |
1.33 |
1.74 |
1.85 |
22.05 |
|
1000 mg/kg |
No |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
Mean |
8.78 |
8.22 |
7.39 |
0.61 |
0.17 |
0.78 |
3.56 |
3.89 |
51.00 |
|
SD |
2.02 |
2.42 |
12.17 |
1.38 |
0.38 |
1.52 |
1.62 |
1.94 |
24.27 |
Litter data; viable foetus and foetal weights
Group |
|
Dead Foetus |
Live foetus |
Post implant loss (%) |
Litter weight (g) |
Foetal weight (g) |
Male foetal wt (g) |
Female foetal wt (g) |
Control |
No |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Mean |
0.05 |
7.35 |
7.38 |
313.21 |
43.44 |
43.24 |
43.6 |
|
SD |
0.22 |
2.11 |
11.96 |
78.62 |
4.45 |
5.77 |
4.27 |
|
100 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
Mean |
0.05 |
7.68 |
8.89 |
302.17 |
40.13 |
40.62 |
39.31* |
|
SD |
0.23 |
1.77 |
13.47 |
46.17 |
5.29 |
5.53 |
5.52 |
|
300 mg/kg |
No |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
Mean |
0.05 |
7.26 |
13.15 |
257.77 |
36.38* |
36.82* |
34.73* |
|
SD |
0.23 |
2.56 |
20.47 |
89.46 |
6.72 |
7.14 |
5.68 |
|
1000 mg/kg |
No |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
Mean |
0.00 |
7.44 |
7.44 |
282.71 |
38.43* |
37.45* |
37.45* |
|
SD |
0.00 |
2.01 |
14.10 |
75.93 |
4.95 |
4.89 |
4.89 |
*significant p <0.05
Foetal macroscopic observations; internal/external
Finding |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
1000 mg/kg |
|
Number of dams/foetus |
20/148 |
20/147 |
20/139 |
20/134 |
|
Number litters examined |
20 |
19 |
19 |
18 |
|
Litters(l)/foetus(f) |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
lf |
|
Abnormalities |
tail; short |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
liver: area |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
|
lung hypoplasia |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1 |
|
foetus; small |
4/7 |
7/31 |
10/51 |
8/33 |
|
Malformation
|
tail absent |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
enlarged brain Ventricle |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/2 |
|
Kidney (left) agenesis |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
|
Dead foetus |
1/1 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
|
No abnormalities detected (% foetal) |
20/140 (94.59) |
19/114 (77.55) |
17/87 (62.59) |
17/101 (75.37) |
Foetal visceral observations
|
Foetal skeletal observations
Finding |
Control |
100 mg/kg |
300 mg/kg |
1000 mg/kg |
Number of examined litters (l)/foetus (f): |
20/147 |
19/146 |
19/138 |
18/134 |
Anomalies |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
Caudal vertebra(e); fused |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Caudal vert.; malposition |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/2 |
One or more incomplete ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
2/2 |
Cervical vertebral centrum(s); no ossification(s) |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Forelimbs: throclea no ossification |
1/1 |
3/6 |
4/11 |
6/20 |
Forelimbs: head no ossification |
12/20 |
18/48 |
17/71 |
14/54 |
Forepaw: Distal phalanx no ossification 1st |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
One/more distal phalanx no ossification |
3/6 |
4/5 |
2/2 |
1/2 |
One/more distal phalanges no ossification |
5/8 |
8/13 |
6/16 |
3/8 |
Proximal phalanx no ossification 1st |
2/3 |
2/2 |
6/15 |
3/5 |
Hindlimb: Femur head no ossification |
11/18 |
11/22 |
13/54 |
15/53 |
Hind paw; astralagus incomplete ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Hind paw; astralagus no ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
3/7 |
1/1 |
Lumbar vertebrae arch; additional vertebra |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Pelvic girdle; articulation point absent |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/2 |
0/0 |
Pelvic girdle; additional articulation point |
11/16 |
4/5 |
11/17 |
8/9 |
Pubis; no ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/5 |
1/1 |
Ribs; floating 13th |
12/21 |
10/14 |
12/14 |
8/18 |
Ribs; one of more bifurcated |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Skull; nasal incomplete ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Skull; sutural bone |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Sternebra(e); additional ossification site |
2/2 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Sternebra(e); asymmetrical ossification |
2/2 |
2/2 |
4/5 |
3/3 |
Sternebra(e): bipartite |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
3/3 |
Sternebra(e): fused |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/3 |
1/1 |
Sternebra(e); no ossification |
2/4 |
7/11 |
2/5 |
5/10 |
Sternebra(e); abnormal shape |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
Sternebra(e); incomplete ossification |
0/0 |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
Sternebra(e); rudimentary 6th |
1/1 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Hyoid; incomplete ossification |
1/1 |
2/2 |
1/1 |
5/7 |
Hyoid; no ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/2 |
3/3 |
Malformation |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
All vertebrae; no ossification |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
Variant |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
l/f |
Caudal vertebra(e); less than 12th |
0/0 |
0/0 |
3/3 |
1/1 |
Forepaw; prox. phalange(s) no ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Hindlimbs; tibia head no ossification |
16/57 |
15/64 |
17/96 |
16/89 |
Hind paw; distal phalange(s) no ossification |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/2 |
1/1 |
Hind paw; distal phalange(s) incomplete |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
0/0 |
Pelvic girdle; insertion 2ndsacral vertebrae |
8/18 |
8/20 |
11/33 |
11/40 |
Ribs; 13 ribs |
19/98 |
18/73 |
18/77 |
18/93 |
Ribs; rudimentary 13th |
2/3 |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
Rib; short 13th |
18/67 |
18/54 |
18/69 |
17/57 |
Skull; anterior fontanelle enlarged |
1/2 |
1/2 |
4/5 |
3/6 |
Skull; posterior fontanelle enlarged |
0/0 |
0/0 |
1/1 |
2/2 |
Sternebra(e); no ossification 5th |
12/23 |
13/36 |
11/41 |
11/49 |
Sternebra(e); incomplete ossification |
12/26 |
13/25 |
11/21 |
14/21 |
Sternebra(e); rudimentary 5th |
4/5 |
7/8 |
9/10 |
4/7 |
Developmental Toxicity |
Exp |
Battery |
CASE Ultra |
Leadscope |
SciQSAR |
Teratogenic Potential in Humans |
|
NEG_IN |
NEG_IN |
POS_OUT |
NEG_IN |
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Both the registered substance and a structurally related substance, an ester of 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid with mixed C8 and C10 linear side chains, have been tested in rats to detect the effects on pregnant animals when the materials were administered during the period of organogenesis at dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Study design was based on OECD Test Guideline No. 414. No exposure related developmental toxic effects were observed in the study. In both cases a dose level of 300 mg/kg/day was considered the NOAEL for maternal toxicity and a dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day the NOAEL for embryo-foetal effects.
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Additional information
A study with a structurally related substance, an ester of 1,2,4 -benzenetricarboxylic acid mixed C8 and C10 linear side chains, of effects on gene expression associated with developmental toxicity in male rat foetal testes by transcriptional profiling indicate that the substance does not cause repression of genes in the testicular mal-development pathway indicating that the substance is unlikely to cause testicular dysgenesis in rats as is seen with some phthalates (7.9.4).
Justification for classification or non-classification
An OECD screening study of reproductive toxicity revealed no functional changes in fertility or reproductive performance.
A sub-chronic toxicity study on a structurally related substance showed no indications of possible reproductive effects, examinations including spermatogenic staging, oestrus cycle, weights of ovaries and testes, microscopic and macroscopic observations.
A study on a structurally related substance of effects on gene expression associated with developmental toxicity in male rat foetal testes by transcriptional profiling indicate that the substance does not cause repression of genes in the testicular mal-development pathway indicating that the substance is unlikely to cause testicular dysgenesis in rats.
A developmental toxicity study on the same structurally related substance revealed no effects on developmental toxicity at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day in rats. A second developmental study, in rabbits, on the same structurally related substance als show no maternal or developmental toxicity at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day.
In accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 no toxicologically significant effects are evident sufficient to warrant classification.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.