Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 219-924-2 | CAS number: 2576-47-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
LD50 was considered to be > 1138 mg/kg bw when Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide orally by gavage.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from per- reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute oral toxicity and repellency study of 2-bromoethanaminium bromide in mice
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: No data
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-bromoethanaminium bromide
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C2H6BrN.BrH
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 204.892 g/mole
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Deer
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Weight at study initiation: 20 gms
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): wheat seed - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: Water , corn oil, 1% carbopol
- Details on oral exposure:
- 2-bromoethanaminium bromide was administrated by gavage using Water , corn oil, 1% carbopol as carriers.
- Doses:
- 1138 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2 to 4 animals were used per geometrically spaced dosage.
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 3 days
- Statistics:
- estimated by method of thompson and weil
- Preliminary study:
- No data available
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 1 138 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mortality observed
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed in treated mice at 1138 mg/kg
- Clinical signs:
- other: No data available
- Gross pathology:
- No data available
- Other findings:
- No data available
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- LD50 was considered to be > 1138 mg/kg bw when Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide orally by gavage.
- Executive summary:
In a acute oral toxicity study, Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide in the concentration of 1138 mg/kg bw orally by gavage using Water , corn oil, 1% carbopol as carriers and observed for 3 days. No 50 % mortality was observed in treated mice at 1138 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 1138 mg/kg bw when Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide orally by gavage.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 138 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer- reviewed journal
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, 2-bromoethanaminium bromide has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 2-bromoethanaminium bromide along with the study available on structurally similar read across substance 2-(Ethylamino) ethanol (CAS no 110-73-6) and 2,2',2''-nitrilotriacetic acid (CAS no 139-13-6). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a experimental study conducted by Schaferet al(Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; 14, 111-129 (1985)), Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide in the concentration of 1138 mg/kg bw orally by gavage using Water , corn oil, 1% carbopol as carriers and observed for 3 days. No 50 % mortality was observed in treated mice at 1138 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 1138 mg/kg bw when Deer mice were treated with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide orally by gavage.
In another prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 2-bromoethanaminium bromide. The LD50 was estimated to be 937 mg/kg bw when Swiss mice were orally exposed with 2-bromoethanaminium bromide.
Also it is further supported experimental study conducted by Cornishet al(Food Cosmetic Toxicology. Vol. 5, pp. 327-332, 1967) on structurally similar read across substance 2-(Ethylamino) ethanol (CAS no 110-73-6), Sprague-Dawley male rats were treated with 2-(Ethylamino) ethanol in the concentration of 1000 mg/kg/day orally and observed for 14 days. 50 % mortality observed in treated male at 1000 mg/kg/day. No demonstrable damage were observed in lung, liver, kidney, and spleen of treated male rats at 1000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw when Sprague-Dawley male rats were treated with 2-(Ethylamino) ethanol orally.
This is further supported byexperimental study summarized by U.S. National Library of Medicine (ChemIDplusA TOXNET Database, 2017) on structurally similar read across substance 2,2',2''-nitrilotriacetic acid (CAS no 139-13-6), rat were treated with 2,2',2''-nitrilotriacetic acid in the concentration of1100 mg/kg/dayorally. 50 % mortality was observed in treated rat at 1100 mg/kg bw.Therefore,LD50 was considered to be1100 mg/kg bwwhenrat were treated with 2,2',2''-nitrilotriacetic acid orally.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 2-bromoethanaminium bromide and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-bromoethanaminium bromide can be classified as Category IV of acute oral toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and predictions on 2-bromoethanaminium bromide and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is less than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 2-bromoethanaminium bromide can be classified as Category IV of acute oral toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.