Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1984/1986
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP guideline study with some deviations from current guideline

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Contact allergy to chlorocresol, formaldehyde and other biocides.
Author:
Andersen, K.E.
Year:
1986
Bibliographic source:
Acta Dermato-Verereologica, Supplementum 125, pp. 2-21.
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1984
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
O-Phenylphenol and its Sodium and Potassium Salts: A Toxicological Assessment
Author:
Bomhard, E. M. et al.
Year:
2002
Bibliographic source:
Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 32(6):551-626

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
some reporting deficits, no appropriate positive control
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
A non-LLNA test is available that was performed prior to the current data requirements, stipulated in Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006. In accordance with the same Regulation, the data were included to avoid unnecessary testing.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Biphenyl-2-ol
EC Number:
201-993-5
EC Name:
Biphenyl-2-ol
Cas Number:
90-43-7
Molecular formula:
C12H10O
IUPAC Name:
[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-ol
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Preventol o extra, Dowicide I, o-phenylphenol
- Physical state: white granules
- Analytical purity: > 99.5%
- Other: information presented is as given from supplier

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: outbred albino guinea pigs (Ssc: Al)
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Statens Seruminstitute
- Weight at study initiation: 350-450 g
- Housing: in plastic cages
- Diet: standard diet, ad libitum
- Water: with vitamin C enriched, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: propylene glycol (PG) for the intradermal induction; for induction and challenge patch tests yellow petroleum was used
Concentration / amount:
1st application: Induction 0.5 or 5 % intradermal injection
2nd application: Induction 25 % occlusive epicutaneous
3rd application: Challenge 5 % occlusive epicutaneous
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: propylene glycol (PG) for the intradermal induction; for induction and challenge patch tests yellow petroleum was used
Concentration / amount:
1st application: Induction 0.5 or 5 % intradermal injection
2nd application: Induction 25 % occlusive epicutaneous
3rd application: Challenge 5 % occlusive epicutaneous
No. of animals per dose:
20 for both control and test groups
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
The concentration used for induction and challenge were determined in a minimum of 4 guinea pigs. For these one application irritancy tests animals were treated with FCA/vehicle (1:1) intradermal injections in the postnuchal area 3-5 weeks prior to the irritancy test. For intradermal and topical induction, a moderately irritant concentration was chosen. For challenge a non-irritant concentration and dilutions thereof were used.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 (intradermal and epicutaneous)
- Test groups:
Intradermal injection: FCA was emulsified with vehicle or test material (1:1 v/v) (not further specified)
Epicutaneous induction: 0.5 mL test material on filter paper mounted on Leucoflex sealed with Acrylastic
- Control group:
The control animals were treated as the test animals but with the vehicle only (not further specified)
- Concentrations: 0.5 or 5% intradermal injections; 25% epicutaneous

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 21
- Exposure period: 48 h
- Test groups: 0.5 mL test material in Finn Chambers on Scanpor sealed with Acrylastic.
- Control group: The control animals were treated as the test animals (not further specified)
- Site: flanks
- Concentrations: 5%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 48 h

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
other: test group induced with 0.5% intradermal injection annd 25% epicutaneous application
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: test group induced with 0.5% intradermal injection annd 25% epicutaneous application. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
other: test group induced with 5% intradermal injection annd 25% epicutaneous application
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: test group induced with 5% intradermal injection annd 25% epicutaneous application. Dose level: 5% . No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0% for induction; 5% epicutaneous treatment for challenge
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
other: not included in this study

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified