Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-499-3 | CAS number: 3121-61-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 Sep - 01 Oct 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methoxyethyl acrylate
- EC Number:
- 221-499-3
- EC Name:
- 2-methoxyethyl acrylate
- Cas Number:
- 3121-61-7
- Molecular formula:
- C6H10O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methoxyethyl acrylate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-methoxyethyl acrylate
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Lot/batch No.: C220424SP6
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2013-05-31
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark under nitrogen
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: cleansing medium (THG medium): medium containing thymidine (9 µg/mL), hypoxanthine (15 µg/mL) and glycine (22.5 µg/mL); THGM: TGM medium with methotrexate (0.3 µg/mL); growth medium (R10 medium): RPMI 1640 medium with Glutamax-1 and HEPES buffer (20 mM) supplemented with Penicillin (100 units/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), Sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL) and 10% donor horse serum; R20 medium: growth medium with 20% donor horse serum; R0 medium: growth medium without serum
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats daily treated with oral doses of a mixture of phenobarbitone (80 mg/kg bw) and β-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw) for 3 consecutive days prior to sacrifice
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary cytotoxicity test:
4 h treatment (-S9 mix): 0.64, 1.27, 2.54, 5.08, 10.16, 20.31, 40.63, 81.25 and 162.5 µg/mL
4 h treatment (+S9 mix): 10.16, 20.31, 40.63, 81.25, 162.5, 325, 650, 975 and 1300 µg/mL
24 h treatment (-S9 mix): 0.16, 0.32, 0.64, 1.27, 2.54, 5.08, 10.16, 20.31 and 40.63 µg/mL
Main experiment:
4 h treatment (-S9 mix): 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 µg/mL
4 h treatment (+S9 mix): 20.25, 40.5, 81, 162, 324, 432, 540 and 648 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cyclophosphamide, 2 µg/mL in R0 medium, +S9; ethylmethanesulphonate, 400 µg/mL in R0 medium, -S9
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h (± S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days after the end of treatment, cells were plated for determination of cell viability and the mutation frequency in 96-well microtitre plates containing TFT-selective medium.
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 12-16 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 4 µg/mL 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate cultures in one experiment in 96-well microtitre plates
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth; other: relative suspension growth and viability
OTHER EXAMINATIONS: Small and large colonies were differentiated, as small colonies are capable to indicate chromosomal aberrations. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance was considered mutagenic if:
- a statistically significant increase in the induced mutant frequency (IMF) over the concurrent vehicle mutant frequency value was observed.
- any test item concentration has a mutation frequency value that is greater than the corresponding vehicle control by the GEF (global evaluation factor; Moore et al. (2006) Mouse Lymphoma Thymidine Kinase Locus Gene Mutation Assay: Follow-up international workshop on genotoxicity test procedures, New Orleans Louisiana. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 40: 292-299) of 126E-06 and demonstrates a positive linear trend.
However, if a test item produced a modest increase in mutant frequency, which only marginally exceeded the global evaluation factor (GEF) value and was not reproducible or part of a dose-related response, then it may be considered to have no toxicological significance. Conversely, when a test item induced modest reproducible increases in the mutation frequencies that do not exceed the GEF value, then scientific judgement was applied. If the reproducible responses were significantly dose-related and included increases in the absolute numbers of mutant colonies, then they may be considered to be toxicologically significant. Small significant increases designated by the UKEMS statistical package were reviewed using the above criteria, and may be disregarded. - Statistics:
- The experimental data was analysed using a dedicated computer program, Mutant 240C by York Electronic Research, which followed the statistical guidelines recommended by the UKEMSA (Robinson et al., 1989). A test for linear trend was performed to identify a dose-response relationship.
Reference:
Robinson W D et al. (1989). Statistical evaluation of bacterial/mammalian fluctuation tests. In: Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data, UKEMS sub-committee on guidelines for mutagenicity testing (Kirkland D J Ed.), Cambridge University Press Report part III, pp102-140
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Preliminary cytotoxicity test: ≥ 5.08 µg/mL (-S9) and ≥ 162.5 µg/mL (+S9); Main experiment: ≥ 10 µg/mL (-S9) and ≥ 324 µg/mL (+S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: based on the toxicity observed in a previous chromosome aberration test, the concentration range used in the preliminary toxicity test was 0.64 to 162.5 µg/mL for the 4-h exposure in the absence of metabolic activation, 10.16 to 1300 μg/mL (corresponding to approx. 10 mM) for the 4-h exposure in the presence of metabolic activation, and 0.16 to 40.63 µg/mL for the 24-h exposure in the absence of metabolic activation. In all three exposure groups, there were marked dose-related reductions in the Relative Suspension Growth (%RSG) of cells treated with the test item when compared to the concurrent vehicle controls. After 4-h treatment, cytotoxicity was observed at concentrations ≥ 5.08 µg/mL without S9 mix and ≥ 162.5 µg/mL with S9 mix. After 24-h exposure in the absence of S9 mix, cytotoxicity was noted at ≥ 2.54 µg/mL (RSG: 72%). Due to the steep nature of the toxicity curve at the higher concentrations (RSG: ≤ 10), it was difficult to achieve the optimum toxicity for all exposure conditions.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the negative and positive control was within the historical ranges.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: in the main experiment, there was evidence of marked concentration-related toxicity following exposure to the test item in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation, as indicated by the reduction in %RSG and RTG (relative total growth) values. Toxicity occurred at concentrations ≥ 10 µg/mL in the absence of S9 mix and at concentrations ≥ 324 µg/mL in the presence of S9 mix. Optimum levels of toxicity were achieved in both the absence and presence of metabolic activation. The toxicity observed at 40 µg/mL in the absence of metabolic activation, and at 648 μg/mL in the presence of metabolic activation exceeded the upper acceptable limit of 90%. Therefore, these concentrations were excluded from the statistical analysis. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - Without Metabolic Activation
Concentration [mg/mL] |
Relative suspension growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Proportion small colony mutants |
|
Small colonies |
Large colonies |
||||||
0 (Medium) |
100 |
1 |
143.78 |
1 |
47.8 |
88.3 |
0.36 |
0.63 |
100 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
1.25 |
92 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
2.5 |
87 |
0.76 |
196.49 |
1.37 |
66.9 |
116.7 |
0.37 |
5 |
85 |
0.78 |
193.76 |
1.35 |
70.2 |
110.3 |
0.40 |
10 |
77 |
0.62 |
227.23* |
1.58 |
100.7 |
109.9 |
0.48 |
20 |
49 |
0.47 |
240.24* |
1.67 |
90.4 |
128.3 |
0.42 |
30 |
29 |
0.13 |
407.18* |
2.83 |
239.7 |
132.2 |
0.63 |
40# |
13 |
0.04 |
974.72 |
6.78 |
568.0 |
295.7 |
0.64 |
Linear trend |
*** |
|
|
|
|
||
EMS, 400 |
59 |
0.34 |
1237.59 |
8.61 |
373.3 |
524.0 |
0.43 |
EMS = ethylmethanesulphonate; NA = not analysed; # = excluded from statistical analysis due to overt toxicity
*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001
Table 2: Experiment I - 4 h exposure - With Metabolic Activation
Concentration [mg/mL] |
Relative suspension growth [%] |
Relative Total Growth |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Mutation factor |
Mutants per 1E+06 surviving cells |
Proportion small colony mutants |
|
Small colonies |
Large colonies |
||||||
0 (Medium) |
100 |
1 |
173.24 |
1 |
68.0 |
94.0 |
0.42 |
20.25 |
102 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
40.5 |
99 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
81 |
93 |
1.02 |
167.72 |
0.97 |
88.7 |
67.5 |
0.56 |
162 |
84 |
0.78 |
228.559 |
1.32 |
123.2 |
87.2 |
0.58 |
324 |
68 |
0.76 |
199.2 |
1.15 |
107.1 |
75.4 |
0.58 |
432 |
43 |
0.37 |
297.77** |
1.72 |
141.2 |
127.2 |
0.52 |
540 |
20 |
0.11 |
444.21** |
2.56 |
238.9 |
163.9 |
0.59 |
648# |
9 |
0.03 |
768.32 |
4.44 |
568.0 |
147.7 |
0.78 |
Linear trend |
*** |
|
|
|
|
||
CP, 2.0 |
63 |
0.35 |
1328.84 |
7.67 |
883.6 |
193.0 |
0.78 |
CP = cyclophosphamide; NA = not analysed; # = excluded from statistical analysis due to overt toxicity
*p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001
DIFFERENTIATION OF LARGE AND SMALL COLONIES
The increases in mutant frequency observed in the absence and presence of metabolic activation were mainly due to small colony formation indicating a clastogenic response (see Table 1 and 2).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.