Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-394-1 | CAS number: 95-14-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
No evidence for genetic toxicity was found in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay and mammalian cell reverese mutation assay reported in the dossier.
Mutagenicity of Benzotriazole is discussed in scientifc literature. A survey by Zeiger et al, (1987) is used often as reference, as this survey was used by Kirkland in various publications on test performance asssessment. However the available documentation is limited and not sufficent for a thorough evaluation.
A Publication by Zwart et al. (2020) reports a downscaled luminescent Ames assay with the Strains TA98lux and TA100lux. The authors are testing fractions of environmental samples, one fraction is claimed to contain Benzotriazole (analytically determined) and showing mutagenic properties. However, it is not clear whether other components, not detected and contained in the sample contribute to the observations. Furthermore, the available Ames test reported in the dossier (Andres, 2012) investigates the strains TA98 and TA100 and no mutagenic effect with the tested substance is observed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Guidance study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his-
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- first experiment
50/150/500/1501/5003 µg/plate
second experiment
313/625/1250/2500/5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)
DMSO is chosen because 1H-benzotriazole is completly soluble and the vehicle does not have any effects on the viability of the bacetria. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine; 2-Amino-anthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) with and without preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4 - Evaluation criteria:
- The colonies were counted visually.
The increase factor f(I) of revertant induction and the absolute number ov refertants were calculated.
If a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies (f(I) > 2) can be observed, 1H-benzotriazole is considered mutagenic. - Statistics:
- mean values and standard deviations of each treatment, solvent control and positive control are calculated. Calculations were performed with unrounded values
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97a
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The negative, vehicle and positive controls were compared to historical data and
found to be in the range of this data. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- 1H-benzotriazole did not show mutagenic effects in the two conducted experiments.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD Guidance study with minor deviations
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- test article treatment is 4 hours instead of 5; whole fetal bovine serum is used instead of dialyzed calf serum
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HGPRT (Hypoxanthine guanine phophoribosyl transferase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Clone: CHO-K1BH4
- Type and identity of media: Ham's Nutrient Mixture F10 supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin G, strptomycin sulfate, fungizone fetal bovine serum
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 rat liver homogenate
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50 to 1000 µg/ml see tables
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- other: 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 6 to 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: - Evaluation criteria:
- Relative survival
Relative Population Growth
Absolute cloning efficiency
Mutant Frequency - Statistics:
- mean values and standard deviation; significance calculated
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
concentrations ranging from 2 to 1000µg/ml were tested for cytotoxic effects.
Without activation, only in the highest concentration a decrease in the relative survival to 80 % was obtained.
With activation, a concentration of 125 µg/ml lead to a survival of 70 % and at the highest concentration the rate was 0%.
MUTAGENICITY STUDY:
Non activation
Three trials were performed under nonactivation conditions, but the first trial was not used for evaluation, because the cloning efficiency of the vehicle controls was too low. In the second trial the assayed cultrues showed a low toxicity up to 1000 µg/ml. The lowest two concentrations were not assyed, because enough concentrations were left for cloning. None of the ten treated cultrues showed increases in mutant frequency that were statistically significantly elevated over the concurrent vehicle controls. Therefore, this nonactivation assay was evaluated as negative. In the independent repeat test concentrations from 400 to 1000 µg/ml were cloned, inducing low toxicities. The mutatnt frequencies varied for concentrations up to the maximum applied concentration of 1000µg/ml. The test material was therefore evaluated as nonmutagenic in this trial.
Activation - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
In this study the toxicity and mutagenicity of Benzotriazole was assayed.
Under non-activating conditions only low toxicity could be induced up to the maximum applied concentration (1000 µg/ml).
With S9 metabolic activation the substance is more toxic to the used cells as seen by decreases in relative survival and relative population growth.
In all assays the mutant frequencies were within or near the range that is typical of vehiclecontrol variation between trials (1-15*10^-6), while no dose-respons relationships were evident.
Based on these conclusions, the substance 1H-benzotriazole is considered to be nonmutagenic
Referenceopen allclose all
Table: Mean revertants first experiment
Strain | TA97a | TA98 | TA100 | TA102 | TA1535 | ||||||
Induction | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
H2O | Mean | 118 | 121 | 15 | 19 | 90 | 101 | 145 | 144 | 16 | 17 |
sd | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 3 | 2 | |
DMSO | Mean | 126 | 121 | 19 | 20 | 97 | 94 | 127 | 140 | 17 | 15 |
sd | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 3 | |
Positive controls | Mean | 563 | 562 | 236 | 220 | 452 | 470 | 583 | 631 | 193 | 186 |
sd | 69 | 37 | 34 | 12 | 41 | 26 | 102 | 66 | 13 | 14 | |
f(I) | 4.47 | 4.64 | 12.42 | 11.00 | 5.02 | 5.00 | 4.59 | 4.51 | 12.06 | 12.40 | |
5003 µg/pl. | Mean | 107 | 125 | 18 | 15 | 99 | 102 | 149 | 141 | 16 | 14 |
sd | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 1 | |
f(I) | 0.85 | 1.03 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 1.17 | 1.01 | 0.94 | 0.93 | |
1501 µg/pl. | Mean | 123 | 124 | 17 | 16 | 103 | 103 | 143 | 146 | 17 | 17 |
sd | 10 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 | |
f(I) | 0.98 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.13 | |
500 µg/pl. | Mean | 120 | 118 | 15 | 16 | 89 | 110 | 139 | 130 | 15 | 14 |
sd | 5 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | |
f(I) | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.93 | |
150 µg/pl. | Mean | 116 | 121 | 14 | 18 | 88 | 101 | 136 | 141 | 15 | 15 |
sd | 3 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 21 | 10 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 1 | |
f(I) | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 1.00 | |
50 µg/pl. | Mean | 119 | 108 | 16 | 20 | 83 | 97 | 137 | 128 | 15 | 15 |
sd | 5 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 2 | |
f(I) | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 1.03 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
Table: Mean revertants second experiment
Strain | TA97a | TA98 | TA100 | TA102 | TA1535 | ||||||
Induction | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | -S9 | +S9 | |
H2O | Mean | 118 | 117 | 15 | 15 | 100 | 87 | 166 | 153 | 16 | 15 |
sd | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 2 | |
DMSO | Mean | 117 | 115 | 18 | 16 | 98 | 96 | 149 | 154 | 18 | 16 |
sd | 3 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 2 | |
Positive controls | Mean | 517 | 592 | 217 | 222 | 416 | 473 | 621 | 611 | 210 | 241 |
sd | 71 | 13 | 12 | 15 | 38 | 26 | 25 | 43 | 10 | 13 | |
f(I) | 4.42 | 5.15 | 12.06 | 13.88 | 4.16 | 4.93 | 4.17 | 3.97 | 13.13 | 15.06 | |
5002 µg/pl. | Mean | 104 | 112 | 15 | 14 | 95 | 93 | 139 | 146 | 15 | 14 |
sd | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 3 | |
f(I) | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.83 | 0.88 | |
2501 µg/pl. | Mean | 112 | 113 | 14 | 15 | 84 | 79 | 145 | 157 | 15 | 13 |
sd | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 1 | |
f(I) | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.83 | 0.81 | |
1251 µg/pl. | Mean | 117 | 109 | 14 | 16 | 82 | 79 | 143 | 150 | 17 | 16 |
sd | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 4 | 4 | |
f(I) | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
626 µg/pl. | Mean | 116 | 116 | 15 | 17 | 92 | 87 | 156 | 157 | 15 | 15 |
sd | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 3 | |
f(I) | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.83 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.83 | 0.94 | |
313 µg/pl. | Mean | 115 | 114 | 14 | 17 | 85 | 85 | 146 | 151 | 16 | 14 |
sd | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 2 | |
f(I) | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
One study for the endpoint in vivo genetic toxicity is reported. The Micronucleus test does not report any genotoxic properties of the substance.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD-Study with insufficient discussions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: F. Winkelmann, Borchen
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 28 - 42 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, using a randomisation plan produced by teh Institute of Biometrics, BAYER AG, Wuppertal
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: Makrolon cages type I and II, bedding of soft wood granules
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 to 24 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 - Route of administration:
- other: oral stomach tube
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol 400
- Details on exposure:
- a pilot study indicated 800 mg / kg bw as concentration for the test.
800 mg /kg bw were dissolved in polyethylene glycol 400.
Via stomach tube 5 ml / kg bw were administered. - Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 to 72 hours
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
800 mg / kgbw
Basis:
other: nominal in vehicle - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 animals, 5 male, 5 female
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): cyclophosphamide is a known clastogen
- Route of administration: oral via stomach tube
- Doses / concentrations: 20 mg / kg bw, dissolved in demineralised water, 10 ml / kg were administered - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
1. At least one intact femur was prepared from each
sacrificed animal (not pretreated with a spindIe
inhibitor). A suitale instrument was used to
sever the pelvic bones and calf area.
2. The femur was separated from muscular tissue.
3. The lowerleg stump with knee and all attached
soft parts in the distal epiphyseal cartilage
were remtoved by a gentIe pull at the distal end.
4. The proximal end of the femur was opened at its
extreme end with a suitable instrument, e.g.
fine scissors, so that a small opening of the
bone marrow channel became visible.
5. A suitable tube Has filled with sufficient fetal
calf serum.
6. Some serum was drawn from the tube into a suitable
syringe, with thin cannula.
7. The cannula was pushed into the open end of the
marrow cavity.
8. The femur was then completely immersed in the calf
serum and pressed against the wall of the tube,
so that it could not slip off.
9. The contents were then flushed several times, and
the bone marrow passed into the serum as a fine
suspension.
10. FinaIly, the flushing could be repeated from the
other end after it was opened.
11. The tube containing the serum and bone marrow
was centrifuged in a suitable centrifuge at
approximately 1000 rpm for five minutes.
12. The supernatant was removed with a suitable
pipette (e.g. Pasteur pipette) except for a
small resldue.
13. The sediment was mixed until the suspension
was homogeneous.
14. one drop of the viscous suspension was placed
on the thoroughly cleaned slide and spread
with a suitable object, e.g. a slide, so that
the smear could be properly evaluated.
15. The labeled slides were dried overnight.
If fresh smears are to be stained, they must
be dried for a short period with heat.
Staining of smears
The mears were stained automatically with an Ames Hema-Tek
Slide Stainer of Miles company. The slides were then
"destained" with methanol and rinsed with deionized water.
They were then le ft to dry.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
the slides were analysed with a light microscope at a magnification of 1000 - Evaluation criteria:
- ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes
- Statistics:
- The Preventol CI8-100 group with the highest mean, if this
superceded the negative control mean, and the positive
control were checked by Wilcoxon's non-parametric rank sum
test in respect to the count of polychromatic erythrocytes
with micronuelei and the rate of normochromatic
erythrocytes. A variation is considered statistically
significant if its error probability is below 5% and the
treatment group figure is higher than the negative
control's .
The rate of normochromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei is
examined if the micronucleus rate for polychromatic
erythrocytes was allready relevantly increased. In this case,
the group with the highest mean 1s compared with the
negative control using the one-sided chi 2-test. A variation
wss considered statistically significant if the error
probability is below 5% and the treatment group figure is
higher than the negative control's.
In addition, standard deviations (1s ranges) were calculated
for all the means. - Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 500/750/850/1000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: apathy, reduced motility, unkempt coat, lateral position, abdominal position, cramp, convulsion, rapid breathing
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): No, 0.9 - 1.3 micronucleated cell per 1000 NCE/PCE
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): 1.028 - 1.084
Positive control
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): No, 0.5 / 13.4 micronucleated cell per 1000 NCE/PCE
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): 1.133 - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
There is no sign of genotoxicity arising from this study.
In comparison with the negative control, no alteration in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythocytes was observed.
Further, there is no variation in regard to incidence of micronucleated cells between the negative control and the test groups.
In the positive control group there is a significant change in the incidence of micronuclei compared to the negative control.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The three performed studies were GLP compliant and of high quality (Klimisch score = 1). Therefore, there is no reason to believe that these results would not be applicable to humans.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
well performed study according to OECD Guidelines
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available information is conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.