Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-882-9 | CAS number: 75-59-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.164 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 75
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 12.3 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Kinetics (metabolism, distribution and excretion) are considered to be similar for oral and inhalation intake in the absence of evidence of the opposite.
Starting point:
NOAEL of 5 mg/kg bw/day in a 28-day repeated dose toxicity study in rat.
An additional factor of 1.4 was included in the modification calculation to take into account correction for differences between human and experimental exposure conditions. When correcting an oral NOAEL to inhalation NOAEC the correction factor for worker population would be: 7 day/week (experimental animal exposure, check study) / 5 days/week (worker exposure conditions) = 1.4. This additional factor is also provided by the IUCLID DNEL calculator tool.
Conversion of an oral NOAEL into a corrected NOAEC:
For workers (8h exposure/day), the corrected inhalatory NOAEC = oral NOAEL * 1/sRVrat * ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human * sRVhuman/wRV
= 5 * 1/0.38 m3/kg/8h * ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human * 6.7 m3 (8h)/10 m3 (8h) *1.4
= 5 * 1/0.38 m3/kg/8h * 1 * 6.7 m3 (8h)/10 m3 (8h) *1.4
= 5 /0.38 * 1* (6.7/10) * 1.4 = 12.3 mg/m3
With ABS: Absorption, sRV: Standard Respiratory Volume; wRV: Worker Respiratory Volume;
ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human= 100/100= 1, assuming no differences in inhalation absorption between rats and humans.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Based on NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure worker
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No correction for caloric demand for inhalation; is included in dose descriptor starting point
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity among workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 33.33 µg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 300
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No modification needed, repeated dose study via the dermal route is available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure worker
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Correction for caloric demand from rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity among workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.75 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 5
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Local effects are not dependent on exposure duration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No correction for caloric demand needed for local effects
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- For effects on the skin, eye or GI tract, where the mechanism of effect is direct chemical/pH reactivity, no further kinetic considerations apply and no safety factor needs to be included. Where tissue metabolism is a factor, the same kinetic and dynamic considerations (i.e. a chemical specific remaining uncertainties factor or the default factor of 2.5) should apply
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity among workers
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.029 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 4.35 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Kinetics (metabolism, distribution and excretion) are considered to be similar for oral and inhalation intake in the absence of evidence of the opposite.
For the general population (24h exposure/day), the corrected inhalatory NOAEC = oral NOAEL * 1/sRVrat * ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human
= 5 * 1/1.15 m3/kg * ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human
= 5 * 1/1.15 m3/kg * 1 = 4.35 mg/m3
With ABS: Absorption, sRV: Standard Respiratory Volume;
ABSoral-rat /ABSinhal-human= 100/100= 1, assuming no differences in inhalation absorption between rats and humans.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No correction for caloric demand for inhalation; is included in dose descriptor starting point
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic
rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically. In case substance-specific information shows specific susceptibility differences between species, which are not related to differences in basal metabolic rate, the additional factor of 2.5 for ‘remaining differences’ should be modified accordingly. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity within general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 16.67 µg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Dermal
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No modification needed, repeated dose study via the dermal route is available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Correction for caloric demand from rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic
rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically. - AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity within general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.875 µg/cm²
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Local effects are not dependent on exposure duration
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No correction for caloric demand needed for local effects
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 1
- Justification:
- For effects on the skin, eye or GI tract, where the mechanism of effect is direct chemical/pH reactivity, no further kinetic considerations apply and no safety factor needs to be included. Where tissue metabolism is a factor, the same kinetic and dynamic considerations (i.e. a chemical specific remaining uncertainties factor or the default factor of 2.5) should apply
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity within general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8.33 µg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No modification needed, repeated dose study via the oral route is available
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Value is NOAEL
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Correction for caloric demand from rat to human
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Factor to correct for toxicokinetic differences not related to metabolic rate (small part) and toxicodynamic differences (larger part). No substance-specific information is available to address this aspect more specifically.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Difference in sensitivity among general population
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Reliable studies used
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.