Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-722-6 | CAS number: 7704-34-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant, guideline study, unpublished report available, no restrictions, fully adequate for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sulfur
- EC Number:
- 231-722-6
- EC Name:
- Sulfur
- Cas Number:
- 7704-34-9
- Molecular formula:
- S
- IUPAC Name:
- sulfur
- Details on test material:
- Test substance/item: Sulphur 98.5% DP
Common name (active ingredient): Sulfur
Chemical name (IUPAC): Sulfur
Code by test facility: 115/1-SLR98.5DP
CAS no.: 7704-34-9
Batch no./ Lot no.: I-GLA
Batch produced by: SAPEC Agro S.A.; Rua Victor Cordon, 19; 1200-482 LISBOA Portugal
Supplier: ChemService srl Via F.lli Beltrami 15; 20026 Novate Milanese (MI) - Italy
Date of manufacture: 09/07/2004
Date of expiry: 09/07/2006
Receipt at test facility: The test item was received in good condition
Purity to be stated in report: 98.5% w/w
Bulk density: 0.84 g/ml
Storage conditions: ambient (+18 to +36°C)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine and tryptopahn
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 homogenate of the liver of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- first trial: 50, 158, 500, 1581 and 5000 µg/plate
second trial: 100, 266, 707, 1880 and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene; 9-aminoacridine; 2-nitrofluorene; 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide; sodium azide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test
One hundred microlitres each of the respective dilutions and the stock equivalent to a concentration of 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048 and 5000 µg was mixed with 2 ml of soft agar containing Histidine and Biotin, 500 µl of S-9 mix (for the test in the presence of metabolic activation) or 500 µl of PBS (for the test in the absence of metabolic activation), 0.1 ml of overnight TA 100 culture and overlaid onto pre-labeled VB agar plates in duplicate. A DMSO control, similarly treated, was maintained. After the agar had set, these plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours.
The number of revertant colonies on the VB agar plates was counted and the bacterial background lawn was observed. Toxicity was detectable as a decrease in the number of revertant colonies per plate and/or by a thinning or disappearance of the bacterial background lawn. If the test item is toxic, the highest concentration of the test item used in the subsequent mutagenicity assay will be that which gives a detectable reduction in the number of revertants on the selective agar plates and/or a thinning or disappearance of the bacterial background lawn.
Mutation Test
No. of Replicates: 3
The bacterial suspension of each tester strain was diluted up to 10-6 (six serial dilution) dilution in phosphate buffered saline. After dilution, 0.1 ml from the highest dilution of each tester strain was plated onto nutrient agar plates in triplicate. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours for both the trials mutation test. After incubation, the number of colonies in each plate were counted and colony forming units per ml of the suspension.
OBSERVATIONS
Effect on Bacterial Background Lawn: The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated for evidence of the test item toxicity using the code system.
Number of Revertants: Revertant colonies for all given strains, for all groups were counted manually.
Viable Counts: Viable counts for the different bacterial strains on nutrient agar plates were counted manually. - Evaluation criteria:
- Conditions necessary for determining a positive result are: there should be a concentration related increase over the range tested and/or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in the number of revertant colonies per plate in at least one strain, either in the presence or absence of the metabolic activation system.
A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeds the threshold level of twice [strains TA 98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA (pKM 101)], or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count when compared to the corresponding vehicle control and this should be evident at a minimum of three dose levels. - Statistics:
- Data were analyzed for differences among vehicle control, treatment and positive control groups using ANOVA. Differences between individual treatment and vehicle control was tested by Dunnet's 't' test at a 5% level (p < 0.05) of significance.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- but tested up to the limit concentration
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- PRELIMINARY TOXICITY TEST
The number of revertant colonies was comparable to that of the respective vehicle control plates up to the highest tested concentration of 5000 µg/plate, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. Similarly, the intensity of the bacterial background lawn was comparable to that of the vehicle control plates up to 5000 µg/plate, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
MUTATION TEST
Trial 1 was conducted using 5000 µg/plate as the maximum concentration, both in the presence and in the absence of metabolic activation. Since, the results of the Trial 1 were negative, a confirmatory trial (Trial 2) was conducted by modifying the method of exposure to treatment and also the concentration spacing of the test item up to a maximum of 5000 µg/plate, both in the presence and in the absence of metabolic activation.
Viable Counts:
The viable counts determined for all the tester strains were within the required range of 1 - 2 x 10E9 CFU/ml, in the first as well as the confirmatory trial.
Number of Revertants:
TRIAL 1: The mean number of revertant colonies/plate in the DMSO control was within the range of in-house spontaneous revertant counts for all the tester strains. For all the tester strains, the mean number of revertant colonies was statistically comparable to or lesser than that of the vehicle control at all the tested concentrations, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The intensity of the bacterial background lawn was comparable to that of the vehicle control plates up to 5000 µg/plate, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The specific positive control chemicals tested simultaneously produced a significantly high increase in the mean revertant colonies compared to the vehicle control plates.
TRIAL 2: The mean number of revertant colonies/plate in the DMSO control was within the range of in-house spontaneous revertant counts for all the tester strains. For all the tester strains, the mean number of revertant colonies was statistically comparable to or lesser than that of the vehicle control at all the tested concentrations, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The intensity of the bacterial background lawn was comparable to that of the vehicle control plates up to 5000 µg/plate both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The specific positive control chemicals tested simultaneously produced a significantly high increase in the mean revertant colonies compared to the vehicle control plates.
Mean number of Revertant Colonies: The means and standard deviations of the two trials indicated no doubling of mean numbers of revertant colonies in strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrA (pKM 101) or tripling of mean numbers of revertant colonies in strains TA1535 and TA1537 in any of the five concentrations tested as compared to the respective vehicle controls, presence or absence of metabolic activation. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary of Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test
Group |
Test Item concentration (µg/plate) |
No. of revertants/plate* |
|||||||||
Presence of Metabolic activation |
|||||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA (pKM 101) |
|||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
G1 |
Vehicle control – DMSO |
19 |
1 |
113 |
5 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
102 |
6 |
G2 |
50 |
18 |
2 |
111 |
4 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
100 |
3 |
G3 |
158 |
18 |
1 |
105 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
98 |
5 |
G4 |
500 |
18 |
2 |
136 |
2 |
14- |
1 |
14 |
1 |
95 |
2 |
G5 |
1581 |
17 |
2 |
93- |
3 |
15 |
0 |
13- |
2 |
87- |
7 |
G6 |
5000 |
15- |
1 |
90- |
3 |
12- |
1 |
11- |
1 |
83- |
7 |
G7 |
Positive control |
615+ |
24 |
805+ |
37 |
118+ |
6 |
127+ |
13 |
563+ |
34 |
*: Values are means of three replicates +/-: Significantly higher/lower than the vehicle control |
Group |
Test Item concentration (µg/plate) |
No. of revertants/plate* |
|||||||||
Absence of Metabolic activation |
|||||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA (pKM 101) |
|||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
G1 |
Vehicle control – DMSO |
18 |
1 |
109 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
98 |
7 |
G2 |
50 |
18 |
1 |
108 |
3 |
15 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
96 |
3 |
G3 |
158 |
17 |
1 |
103 |
3 |
14 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
97 |
5 |
G4 |
500 |
15 |
2 |
102 |
2 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
87 |
4 |
G5 |
1581 |
14- |
2 |
98- |
5 |
13 |
1 |
11- |
2 |
85- |
5 |
G6 |
5000 |
11- |
2 |
83- |
7 |
12- |
1 |
8- |
1 |
82- |
4 |
G7 |
Positive control |
172+ |
16 |
578+ |
38 |
139+ |
11 |
132+ |
9 |
589+ |
37 |
*: Values are means of three replicates +/-: Significantly higher/lower than the vehicle control |
Group |
Test Item concentration (µg/plate) |
No. of revertants/plate* |
|||||||||
Presence of Metabolic activation |
|||||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA (pKM 101) |
|||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
G1 |
Vehicle control – DMSO |
17 |
1 |
109 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
98 |
6 |
G2 |
100 |
17 |
2 |
107 |
4 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
96 |
4 |
G3 |
266 |
17 |
1 |
104 |
9 |
15 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
94 |
2 |
G4 |
707 |
16 |
2 |
97 |
5 |
14 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
94 |
5 |
G5 |
1880 |
16 |
1 |
95 |
7 |
13 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
88 |
3 |
G6 |
5000 |
13- |
2 |
85- |
4 |
11 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
80- |
7 |
G7 |
Positive control |
+597 |
47 |
+776 |
24 |
+114 |
9 |
+138 |
18 |
+571 |
25 |
*: Values are means of three replicates +/-: Significantly higher/lower than the vehicle control |
Group |
Test Item concentration (µg/plate) |
No. of revertants/plate* |
|||||||||
Absence of Metabolic activation |
|||||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
WP2 uvrA (pKM 101) |
|||||||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||
G1 |
Vehicle control – DMSO |
17 |
1 |
105 |
6 |
14 |
1 |
14 |
2 |
99 |
5 |
G2 |
100 |
17 |
1 |
103 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
93 |
5 |
G3 |
266 |
14 |
2 |
102 |
4 |
15 |
1 |
13 |
2 |
90 |
4 |
G4 |
707 |
15 |
2 |
94- |
3 |
13 |
1 |
12 |
2 |
84- |
3 |
G5 |
1880 |
13- |
2 |
89- |
3 |
12- |
1 |
11 |
1 |
81- |
5 |
G6 |
5000 |
10- |
1 |
80- |
6 |
10- |
1 |
8- |
1 |
77- |
2 |
G7 |
Positive control |
160 + |
14 |
565 + |
48 |
135 + |
8 |
129 + |
10 |
590+ |
38 |
*: Values are means of three replicates +/-: Significantly higher/lower than the vehicle control |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative without metabolic activation all strains tested
negative with metabolic activation all strains tested
Sulfur dust was not mutagenic in the Ames test up to the highest tested concentration of 5000 µg/plate. - Executive summary:
The genotoxic effect of sulfur dust was studied using the Ames test. The study, according to OECD guideline 471 and under GLP, was conducted using TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 strains of Salmonella typhimurium and WP2uvrA (pKM 101) strain of Escherichia coll. Two trials were carried out (with two experiments in each trial, in the presence and in the absence of metabolic activation). The test item was tested in triplicate at the concentrations of 50, 158, 500, 1581 and 5000 µg/plate in the first trial and 100, 266, 707, 1880 and 5000 µg/plate in the second trial using DMSO as vehicle. The vehicle control and the appropriate positive controls were tested simultaneously. The mean numbers of revertant colonies for the different concentrations of the test item in the different tester strains was statistically comparable with or lower than those of the respective vehicle control plates, for both the first and the confirmatory trials, either in the presence or in the absence of the metabolic activation, while there was a statistically significant increase in the mean number of revertant colonies in the positive controls under identical conditions.
The study indicated that the test item sulfur dust is not mutagenic in this Ames test up to the highest tested concentration of 5000 µg/plate.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.