Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
A mixture of isomers of: 1,1'-[(3,5(or 2,4 or 4,6 or 2,6)-dihydroxy-o(or m or p)-phenylene)bis(azo-meta-phenyleneazo{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxopyridine-5,3-diyl})]dipyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride; 1-(1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-5-{3-[x-(4-{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,6-dihydro-2-hydroxy-4-methyl-6-oxo-5-pyridinio-3-pyridylazo}phenylazo)-2,4(or 2,6 or 3,5 or 4,6)-dihydroxyphenylazo]phenylazo}-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxo-3-pyridyl)pyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride (where x is variable)
EC number: 404-540-1 | CAS number: 159405-95-5 BRAUN HM 2763; BROWN HM 2763; BRUN HM 2763; BRUNO HM 2763
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sensitisation data (human)
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sensitisation data (humans)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1990-01-08 to 1990-02-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 990
- Report date:
- 1990
Materials and methods
- Type of sensitisation studied:
- skin
- Study type:
- study with volunteers
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- A mixture of isomers of: 1,1'-[(3,5(or 2,4 or 4,6 or 2,6)-dihydroxy-o(or m or p)-phenylene)bis(azo-meta-phenyleneazo{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxopyridine-5,3-diyl})]dipyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride; 1-(1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-5-{3-[x-(4-{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,6-dihydro-2-hydroxy-4-methyl-6-oxo-5-pyridinio-3-pyridylazo}phenylazo)-2,4(or 2,6 or 3,5 or 4,6)-dihydroxyphenylazo]phenylazo}-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxo-3-pyridyl)pyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride (where x is variable)
- EC Number:
- 404-540-1
- EC Name:
- A mixture of isomers of: 1,1'-[(3,5(or 2,4 or 4,6 or 2,6)-dihydroxy-o(or m or p)-phenylene)bis(azo-meta-phenyleneazo{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxopyridine-5,3-diyl})]dipyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride; 1-(1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-5-{3-[x-(4-{1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1,6-dihydro-2-hydroxy-4-methyl-6-oxo-5-pyridinio-3-pyridylazo}phenylazo)-2,4(or 2,6 or 3,5 or 4,6)-dihydroxyphenylazo]phenylazo}-1,2-dihydro-6-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-oxo-3-pyridyl)pyridinium-dichloride-dihydrochloride (where x is variable)
- Cas Number:
- 159405-95-5
- Molecular formula:
- C50H56Cl4N14O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 1'-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-5'-(2-{3-[2-(4-{2-[3-(2-{1'-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-6'-hydroxy-4'-methyl-2'-oxo-1',2'-dihydro-1λ⁵-[1,3'-bipyridin]-1-ylium-5'-yl}diazen-1-yl)phenyl]diazen-1-yl}-2,6-dihydroxyphenyl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)-6'-hydroxy-4'-methyl-2'-oxo-1',2'-dihydro-1λ⁵-[1,3'-bipyridin]-1-ylium 1'-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-5'-(2-{4-[2-(4-{2-[4-(2-{1'-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-6'-hydroxy-4'-methyl-2'-oxo-1',2'-dihydro-1λ⁵-[1,3'-bipyridin]-1-ylium-5'-yl}diazen-1-yl)phenyl]diazen-1-yl}-2,6-dihydroxyphenyl)diazen-1-yl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)-6'-hydroxy-4'-methyl-2'-oxo-1',2'-dihydro-1λ⁵-[1,3'-bipyridin]-1-ylium tetrahydrochloride tetrachloride
Constituent 1
Method
- Type of population:
- general
- Ethical approval:
- confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
- Subjects:
- - Number of subjects exposed: 114 (enrolled), 104 (completed the study). 6 subjects discontinued for personal reasons; 2 subjects were discontinued due to non-compliance; 1 subject discontinued when a rash developed after taking erythromycin; 1 subject discontinued after developing flu.
- Sex: M and F
- Age: 21- 81 y
- Race: caucasoid, hispanic
- Clinical history:
- INCLUSION CRITERIA
1. Individuals eighteen (18) years of age or older.
2. Individuals free of any systemic or dermatologic disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the test results.
3. Individuals with fair, uniformly-colored skin on the lower thoracic area of the back.
4. Individuals who had completed a patch testing Medical Screening form as well as a Medical/Personal History form (prerequisite for all studies conducted at TKL Research).
5. Individuals who had read, understood and signed an informed consent agreement.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1. Individuals with any visible skin disease at the test site which, in the opinion of the investigative personnel, might have interfered with the evaluation.
2. Individuals taking medication which, in the opinion of the investigative personnel, would have interfered with the test results.
3. Individuals who are currently under treatment for asthma.
4. Individuals with psoriasis and/or active atopic dermatitis/eczema.
5. Females who were pregnant, planning a pregnancy or nursing a child.
6. Individuals with a known sensitivity to cosmetics, skin care products or topical drugs. - Route of administration:
- dermal
- Details on study design:
- Product identification: paper undyed and paper dyed by Brown HM 2763
Amount applied: approx. 4 cm2
SITE DEFINITION
The patches were applied to the infrascapular area of the back, either to the right or left of the midline.
PATCH DEFINITION
Occlusive: non-porous, plastic film adhesive bandage with a 2 cm × 2 cm Webril pad affixed with hypo-allergenic tape such as Scanpor or Micropore as needed.
The entire study extended over a 6 week period. It involved 3 phases: (1) Induction, (2) Rest, and (3) Challenge. Prior to study entry, the subjects were screened to assure that they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Informed consent was obtained. Each subject was provided with a schedule of the study activities. They were told to avoid wetting the test sites and were asked not to engage in activities that caused excessive perspiration. They were instructed to notify the staff if they experienced any discomfort beyond mild itching and/or observed any adverse changes at the test sites, while on the study or within 2 weeks of completing the study.
The Induction Phase consisted of 9 consecutive applications of the test material and subsequent evaluations of the test sites. Prior to application of the patches, the sites were outlined with a skin marker, e.g., gentian violet. The subjects were required to remove the patches approximately 24 hours after application. They returned to the facility at 48 hour intervals to have the sites evaluated and identical patches reapplied. Patches applied on Friday were removed by subjects after 24 hours and sites were evaluated on the following Monday, i.e., 72 hours after patch application. Following the ninth evaluation, the subjects were dismissed for a 14 day rest period.
The Challenge Phase was initiated during the sixth week of the study, with identical patches applied to sites previously unexposed to the test material. These patches were removed by subjects after 24 hours and the sites graded after additional 24 hour and 48 hour periods, i.e., 48 and 72 hours after application.
To be considered a completed case, a subject must have 6 or more applications and subsequent readings during induction and at least one reading during challenge. Only completed cases are used to assess sensitization.
Rechallenge, if required, was performed whenever there was evidence of possible sensitization. The rechallenge test was conducted on naive sites on the back under both occlusive and semi-occlusive conditions approximately 1 or 2 weeks after challenge testing had been completed. Patches were applied for 24 hours, the patches removed and the sites evaluated 48, 72 and 96 hours after patch application.
Results and discussion
Any other information on results incl. tables
Summary reaction data
grade | induction | challenge | |||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 2 | |
- | 102 | 104 | 104 | 101 | 101 | 101 | 103 | 102 | 100 | 103 | 104 |
? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
tot readings | 103 | 104 | 104 | 101 | 101 | 101 | 103 | 102 | 100 | 104 | 104 |
absent | 11 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 10 |
not applied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
patch disl | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- No reaction
? Doubtful response, barely perceptible erythema, only slightly different from surrounding skin
+ Definite erythema No edema T
+* Definite erythema Minimal or doubtful edema
++ Definite erythema Definite edema
+++ Definite erythema Definite edema & vesiculation
D or d Damage to epidermis: d = drying/scaling; D = oozing, crusting and/or superficial erosions
X Subject absent
NA Not Applied
PD Patch Dislodged
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions employed in this study, there was no evidence of sensitization to either of the products tested.
- Executive summary:
2 products, paper undyed and paper Brown HM 2763, were tested to determine their ability to sensitize the skin of normal volunteer subjects using an occlusive repeated insult patch test. The entire study extended over a 6 week period. It involved three phases: (1) induction, (2) rest, and (3) challenge. Induction consisted of 9 consecutive applications at 48 h intervals, except for the weekend (72 h interval); a patch was hold in place for 24 h, then removed by subjects. Rest period was 14 days, after the ninth induction. At challenge, patch was applied for 24 h and skin reactions were evaluated 24 and 48 h after removal of patch.
104 subjects completed the study. To be considered a completed case, a subject must have 6 or more applications and subsequent readings during induction and at least one reading during challenge. Only completed cases were used to assess sensitization.
Under the conditions employed in this study, there was no evidence of sensitization to either of the products tested.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.