Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-218-6 | CAS number: 7450-69-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011-11-20 - 2012-06-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted guideline. All study parameters are based on the specific guideline.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 487
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- Human peripheral blood lymphocytes
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes:
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9, produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats which were treated with 500 mg Aroclor 1254/kg body weight intra-peritoneally.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
Without S9 mix / 4 ± 1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430 µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4 ± 1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430 µg/mL nominal
Experiment II
Without S9 mix / 22 ± 2 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430 µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430 µg/mL nominal - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Test System
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were obtained from adequate donors (healthy, non-smoking, no known recent exposures to genotoxic chemicals or radiation, see below). Blood samples were drawn by venous puncture and collected in heparinized tubes. Blood cultures were set up within 24 hours after sample collection. - Evaluation criteria:
- see below
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes:
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item PPDA did not show any evidence of genotoxic activity in this in vitro test for the induction of micronuclei. - Executive summary:
This study was performed in order to evaluate the mutagenic potential of PPDA to induce formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytes
The lymphocytes, in whole blood culture, were stimulated to divide by addition of phytohaemagglutinin and exposed to the test item both in absence and presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (liver S9 mix from male rats, treated with Aroclor 1254). The proportion of cells containing micronuclei was determined.
Two independent experiments were performed. In each experimental group, all cell cultures were set up in duplicates. In order to asses the toxicity of the test solution to cultured human lymphocytes, the cytokinesis-block proliferation index was calculated in a pre-experiment. On the basis of this data, the following concentrations were selected for micronuclei scoring:
Experiment I
Without S9 mix / 4±1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4±1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
Experiment II
Without S9 mix / 22±2 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
In both experiments with and without metabolic activation, no concentration showed cytotoxicity.
All positive control compounds caused large, statistically significant increases in the proportion of micronucleated cells, demonstrating the sensitivity of the test system.
In conclusion, under the experimental conditions reported, PPDA does not induce the formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytesin vitro.
The test item PPDA is considered as “not genotoxic under the conditions of the test”.
Reference
Genotoxicity Results Experiment I
Treatment |
Average CBPI |
Cytostasis (%) |
Total No. of BNC examined |
Total No. of MBNC |
% MBNC |
Experiment I: exposure period 4±1 hrs without S9 |
|||||
Solvent controlDMSO |
1.84 |
-- |
2057 |
5 |
0.24 |
Positive control MMC |
1.80 |
5.4% |
2204 |
74 |
3.36 |
Test item 1721mg/mL |
1.83 |
1.2% |
2083 |
5 |
0.24 |
Test item 860mg/mL |
1.81 |
4.3% |
2045 |
13 |
0.64 |
Test item 430mg/mL |
1.81 |
4.4% |
2082 |
5 |
0.24 |
Experiment I: exposure period 4±1 hrs with S9 |
|||||
Solvent controlDMSO |
1.85 |
-- |
2057 |
8 |
0.39 |
Solvent control NaCl 0.9 % |
1.92 |
-- |
2080 |
2 |
0.10 |
Positive control CPA |
1.79 |
14.7% |
2151 |
66 |
3.07 |
Test item 1721mg/mL |
1.87 |
1.87% |
2120 |
18 |
0.85 |
Test item 860mg/mL |
1.88 |
1.88% |
2066 |
7 |
0.34 |
Test item 430mg/mL |
1.87 |
1.87% |
2066 |
14 |
0.68 |
Results Experiment II
Concentrations (µg/ml) |
Average CBPI |
Cytostasis (%) |
Total No. of BNC examined |
Total No. of MBNC |
% MBNC |
|
Experiment II: exposure period 20± 2hrs without S9 |
||||||
Solvent controlDMSO |
1.97 |
-- |
2068 |
16 |
0.77 |
|
Positive control MMC |
1.90 |
7.3% |
2102 |
71 |
3.38 |
|
Test item 1721mg/mL |
1.72 |
25.9% |
2033 |
11 |
0.54 |
|
Test item 860mg/mL |
1.91 |
6.3% |
2089 |
11 |
0.53 |
|
Test item 430mg/mL |
1.96 |
1.0% |
2057 |
8 |
0.39 |
|
Experiment II: exposure period 4±1 hrs with S9 |
||||||
Solvent controlDMSO |
1.90 |
-- |
1495 |
7 |
0.47 |
|
Solvent control NaCl 0.9 % |
1.97 |
-- |
2078 |
4 |
0.19 |
|
Positive control CPA |
1.76 |
21.4% |
2251 |
60 |
2.67 |
|
Test item 1721mg/mL |
1.89 |
5.4% |
1240 |
9 |
0.73 |
|
Test item 860mg/mL |
1.97 |
-3.3% |
2118 |
17 |
0.80 |
|
Test item 430mg/mL |
2.00 |
-6.7% |
2095 |
11 |
0.53 |
|
Test item215 µg/mL |
2.01 |
-7.6% |
2125 |
17 |
0.80 |
|
Test item108 µg/mL |
1.89 |
5.4% |
2033 |
18 |
0.89 |
|
Test item54 µg/mL |
1.95 |
-1.5% |
2061 |
17 |
0.82 |
|
Test item27 µg/mL |
1.97 |
-3.4% |
2047 |
22 |
1.07 |
|
Test item13 µg/mL |
1.95 |
-1:6% |
2090 |
22 |
1.05 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Ames-Test:
Two valid experiments were performed. First Experiment: Five concentrations of the test item, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (ranging from 5002 to 50 µg/plate) were used. Five genetically manipulated strains of Salmonella typhi-murium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535) were exposed to the test item both in the presence and in the absence of a metabolic activation system (S9) for 48 hours, using the plate incorporation method. None of the concentrations caused a significant increase in the number of revertant colo-nies in the tested strains. The test item didn’t show any mutagenic effects in the first experiment. No signs of toxicity towards the bacteria could be observed. The sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation. Second Experiment: To verify the results of the first experiment, a second experiment was performed, using five concentrations of the test item (ranging from 5001 to 313 µg/plate) and a modification in study performance (pre-incubation method). The test item didn’t show mutagenic effects in the second experiment, either. No signs of toxicity towards the bacteria could be observed. The sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation. Under the conditions of the test, the test item didn’t show mutagenic effects towards Sal-monella typhimurium, strains TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535. Therefore, no concentration-effect relationship could be determined. The test item PPDA is considered as “not mutagenic under the conditions of the test”.
Micronucleus-Test:
This study was performed in order to evaluate the mutagenic potential of PPDA to induce formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytes
The lymphocytes, in whole blood culture, were stimulated to divide by addition of phytohaemagglutinin and exposed to the test item both in absence and presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system (liver S9 mix from male rats, treated with Aroclor 1254). The proportion of cells containing micronuclei was determined.
Two independent experiments were performed. In each experimental group, all cell cultures were set up in duplicates. In order to asses the toxicity of the test solution to cultured human lymphocytes, the cytokinesis-block proliferation index was calculated in a pre-experiment. On the basis of this data, the following concentrations were selected for micronuclei scoring:
Experiment I
Without S9 mix / 4±1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4±1 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
Experiment II
Without S9 mix / 22±2 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
With S9 mix / 4 hrs exposure: 1720, 860 and 430µg/mL nominal
In both experiments with and without metabolic activation, no concentration showed cytotoxicity.
All positive control compounds caused large, statistically significant increases in the proportion of micronucleated cells, demonstrating the sensitivity of the test system.
In conclusion, under the experimental conditions reported, PPDA does not induce the formation of micronuclei in human lymphocytesin vitro.
The test item PPDA is considered as “not genotoxic under the conditions of the test”.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
The GLP-study is reliable without restrictions
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification of PPDA for mutagenicity is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.