Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Hazard for aquatic organisms

Freshwater

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC aqua (freshwater)
PNEC value:
0.045 mg/L
Assessment factor:
50
Extrapolation method:
assessment factor
PNEC freshwater (intermittent releases):
1 mg/L

Marine water

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC aqua (marine water)
PNEC value:
0.004 mg/L
Assessment factor:
500
Extrapolation method:
assessment factor

STP

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC STP
PNEC value:
589.6 mg/L
Assessment factor:
1
Extrapolation method:
assessment factor

Sediment (freshwater)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC sediment (freshwater)
PNEC value:
1.98 mg/kg sediment dw
Extrapolation method:
equilibrium partitioning method

Sediment (marine water)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC sediment (marine water)
PNEC value:
0.198 mg/kg sediment dw
Extrapolation method:
equilibrium partitioning method

Hazard for air

Air

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for terrestrial organisms

Soil

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC soil
PNEC value:
0.37 mg/kg soil dw
Assessment factor:
10
Extrapolation method:
equilibrium partitioning method

Hazard for predators

Secondary poisoning

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no potential for bioaccumulation

Additional information

Conclusion on classification

Environmental classification justification


Aquatic compartment


According to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 Annex VI Table 3.1 and 3.2, the substance is not classified regarding environmental hazards. 


 


Self-classification


Aquatic compartment


Following CLP (GHS-EU), the substance is not to be classified as acutely hazardous to the aquatic environment. Based on the available chronic data, the substance is not to be classified as chronically hazardous to the aquatic environment.


 


Rationale:


The substance is not to be classified as acutely hazardous to the aquatic environment, since the lowest acute effect value is > 1 mg/L.


Chronic data are available for aqutaic invertebrates and algae, therefore classification is based on the available chronic and acute toxicity data.:


- Chronic toxicity data:


Chronic toxicity data are available for algae (72-h ErC10 = 119.4 mg/L; BASF AG, 1990; recalculated with Toxrat Pro v3.3.0) and for daphnia (21 -d EC10 = 2.24; BASF SE, 2023). According to the criteria outlined in Table 4.1.0(b)(i) (Commission Regulation (EU) No 286/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for non-rapidly degradable substances) the substance is not to be classified as chronically hazardous to the aquatic environment.


- Acute toxicity data:


The lowest acute effect value is ≥100 mg/L; worst-case approach based on the available acute results of the most sensitive species Leuciscus idus (fish: 96h LC50 >=100 to <=215 mg/L; BASF AG, 1989); Furthermore, the log Kow is < 4 (Log Kow = -0.19; at 25°C; BASF AG, 1989) and the log D is also < 4 (pH 5 = -0.655, pH 7 = -0.029; pH 9 = 0.096; SPARC, BASF 2021). The substance is not to be classified based on the categories outlined in Table 4.10(b) (iii) (Commission Regulation (EU) No 286/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/008.


 


Atmospheric compartment


The test substance is not listed in Annex 1 of Regulation (EC) 2037/2000 on substances that deplete the ozone layer.


The test substance does not belong to the green house gases listed in P Forster, PV Pamaswamy et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Basis. Contribution of Working Goup 1 to the Fourthe Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change.