Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2010-02-09 to 2010-05-28
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to OECD guideline

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
12252-12-9
Cas Number:
12252-12-9
IUPAC Name:
12252-12-9
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Ettringite
IUPAC Name:
Ettringite
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Ettringit)
- Molecular formula: Ca6[Al(OH)6]2(SO4)3.26H2O
- Substance type: white suspension
- Physical state: liquid/solid
- Lot/batch No.: R-Cl050609pH7
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2010-12-25
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
formulation of Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Ettringit) in water, 100 g/l, neutralized with sulfuric acid to pH7.0, which resulted in a content of dry mass of 102 g/l.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratory Animal Breeders, D-88353 Kißlegg, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 4-6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 324 -404 g
- Housing: groupwise
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +- 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
100 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
100 %
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:one animal tested with intradermal concentration of 0, 1, 2,5 and 5 %.4 animals tested with 24h occlusive dermal application of 0.5 ml of 0, 25, 50 and 100 % test item formulation.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 , first intradermal and second dermal exposure
- Exposure period: dermal exposure period: 48 h
- Test groups:1
- Control group:1
- Site: dorsal region and the flanks
- Frequency of applications: topical induction one week after the intradermal induction
- Duration: 3 weeks after the dermal induction
- Concentrations: 100%

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups:1
- Control group:1
- Site: doral region and flankx
- Concentrations: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): no later than 21

OTHER:
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5 ml 100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
no
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.5 ml 100%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: no.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

After a pilot study with 5 animals the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) was performed in 2010 on 15 female guinea pigs (10 animals for the test item group and 5 control animals) to determine whether the test item Casul-Pulver getrocknet (Etteringit) exhibits skin-sensitising properties. Additional 2 animals were used for dose-finding for the challenge concentration. Intradermal induction: 5%. topical induction: 100%, challenge: 100%. The test item was formulated in sterile 0.9% NaCl-solution.

The challenge led to no skin effect and the animals showed no clinical signs. Under the conditions of this test the test item is not sensitising.