Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 206-190-3 | CAS number: 306-83-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
In vitro
HCFC 123 was negative when tested in standard Ames assays (Central Toxicology Laboratory, 1989; Longstaff et al., 1984).
In an earlier study, HCFC 123 was tested for mutagenicity in a series of suspension and plate assays using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains (Ames), as well as Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain D4 (forward mutation assay), in the presence and absence of S9. HCFC 123 was found to be negative in both of these assays.
HCFC 123 was evaluated for clastogenic potential in 3 in vitro cytogenetic assays using human lymphocytes both in the presence and absence of rat liver-derived S9 mix.
In one study, human lymphocytes were exposed to HCFC-123 at dose levels of 50, 250 and 500 μg/ml in the absence of S9 mix and 100, 500 and 1,000 μg/ml in the presence of S9 mix (Central Toxicology Laboratory, 1992). In the presence of S9 mix, no increases in the frequency of chromosomal aberrations were observed. In the absence of S9 mix, dose-related increases in the chromosomal aberration frequency were observed which were statistically and biologically significant at 500 μg/ml.
A study in the liquid phase and in the vapour phase was carried out by Life Science Research (1991a and 1991b).
When tested in the liquid phase at 0.005% (v/v), positive response in the absence of S9, but no significant evidence for a positive response in the presence of S9 were observed (Life Science Research 1991a).
In the vapour phase study, cultured human lymphocytes were exposed to 25,000 ppm or 100,000 ppm HCFC-123 in the absence of S9, and to 300,000 ppm in the presence of S9. In both cases, biologically and statistically significant positive responses were produced (Life Science Research 1991b). In vivo HCFC-123 was tested for the ability to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in an rat hepatocyte assay incorporating an auto-radiographic technique. Male Alderley Park (Alpk:APfSD) rats were exposed by inhalation at 8,000, 12,500 or 20,000 ppm HCFC-123 for 6 hours. Hepatocytes from exposed rats were assessed for the induction of UDS at the two highest dose levels. At in vivo at exposure levels up to 20,000 ppm, HCFC-123 did not induce DNA repair in rat hepatocytes (Central Toxicology Laboratory, 1993). An in vivo micronucleus assay was conducted to evaluate the genotoxic potential of HCFC-123 (Hoechst, 1988). NMRI mice were exposed to levels of 2,000, 6,000 or 18,000 ppm in air for 6 hours. Under the conditions of this assay, exposure to HCFC-123 did not result in an increased number of micronuclei. HCFC-123 was further evaluated for genotoxic activity in an chromosome aberration study with peripheral blood lymphocytes from Sprague-Dawley rats (Hazelton, 1992). The blood samples were taken from male rats that had been exposed (6 h/d, 7 d/wk) over a period of 14 weeks to HCFC-123 concentrations of 300, 1,000 or 5,000 ppm HCFC-123. Chromosome aberrations were determined only in the high dose group. The authors concluded that HCFC-123 was not genotoxic in this assay. Conclusions HCFC 123 showed no mutagenic potential in bacterial mutation assays. In vitro chromosomal aberration studies showed unconclusive results. However, negative results were obtained in an in vivo chromosomal aberration study in rat blood lymphocytes and in an in vivo micronucleus study in mouse bone marrow erythrocytes. Negative results were observed also in an UDS study in rat hepatocytes. Overall HCFC 123 is to be considered as not genotoxic or mutagenic.Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
HCFC 123 does not meet the classification criteria for genotoxicity and mutagenicity in accordance withEU Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
