Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-167-4 | CAS number: 79-01-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: U.S. EPA Whole Effluent Testing Program method, modified to minimize volatilization
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ASTM (1994). Standard Guide for Conducting Three-Brood, Renewal Toxicity Tests with Ceriodaphnia dubia, E 1295—89. Am. Soc. Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method was modified to minimize volatilization
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- In tests with individual components, toxicant concentrations were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. Newly prepared test solution and 24-h-old test solution composited from three replicates from each treatment level were analyzed. Acute toxicological results are based on the geometric mean of the two measured concentrations for each treatment level measured at the beginning of the test. Chronic toxicological results are based on the geometric mean of the four measured concentrations for each treatment level measured during the duration of the experiment.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Stock solutions of test chemicals were prepared by adding amounts of chemical below their reported water solubility to dilution water using glass syringes.
No carriers were used.
Stocks were proportionally diluted to yield other concentrations. - Test organisms (species):
- Ceriodaphnia dubia
- Details on test organisms:
- C. dubia were obtained from Aquastar, Inc. (Mobile, Alabama) and cultured in house.
Tests were conducted in artificial moderately hard water.
Light was provided by full spec- trum fluorescent bulbs with a color rendering index '90 at an intensity of 20 mE/m /S and a photoperiod of 16L : 8D.
Daphnids were fed an algae and cereal leaf mix containing equal numbers of cells of Selenastrum capricornutum and Chlorella vulgaris mixed with a rye grass infusion. - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 d
- Hardness:
- 68.3
- pH:
- 7.6
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Dissolved oxygen was monitored on 24-h-old solutions and always remained above 7.0 ppm.
- Conductivity:
- 207.8
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 0, 13, 24, 54, 90, 212 µmol
- Details on test conditions:
- To minimize volatilization, instead of 30-ml beakers, individual organ- isms were tested in 25-ml borosilicate glass vials filled to capacity and closed tightly using teflon PTFE-lined silicon septa held in place by polypropylene screw-on caps. Solutions were renewed daily.
Dissolved oxygen was monitored on 24-h-old solutions and always remained above 7.0 ppm.
Survival, behavior, and reproduction were observed at the time of daily renewal. Because the chemicals tested commonly have a sedating effect, care was taken to distinguish dead from narcotized individuals; daphnids that did not move when gently prodded were examined for a heartbeat at a magnification of 100X. Tests were continued until 60% of the control animals had completed three broods, i.e., 6 or 7 days. - Reference substance (positive control):
- not specified
- Key result
- Duration:
- 2 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 17 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect conc.:
- 17 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 7.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- IC50
- Effect conc.:
- 11 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Details on results:
- 2-day LC50: 130 µM (99 - 170)
7-day LC50: 129 µM (113 - 147)
NOEL for reproduction: 54 µM
LOEL for reproduction: 90 µM
IC50 reproduction 82 µM (77-86)
Mean chemical retention: 86.4
Values were recalculated based on a molecular weight for TCE of 131.4 g/mol - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Toxicity tests with individual chemicals were analyzed to determine criterion effect levels for mortality and reproduction following standard methods (U.S. EPA, 1994). Both 2- and 7-day LCs (concentrations lethal to 50% of the organisms) were calculated using binomial or trimmed Spearman—Karber tests, as appropriate.
After appropriate tests of normality, effects on reproduction (number of young per female through the end of the test) were analyzed with ANOVA, followed by one-sided Dunnett’s comparison of means to the control to determine NOELs (no-observed- effect levels) and LOELs (lowest-observed-effect levels). In addition, ICs (concentrations inhibiting reproduction by 50% relative to mean control performance) were calculated from smoothed data using bootstrap analysis (Norberg- King, 1993). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In a study conducted according to U.S. EPA Whole Effluent Testing Program method, Ceriodaphnia dubia were exposed to concentrations of 0, 13, 24, 54, 90, 212 µmol TCE and continued until 60% of the control animals had completed three broods, i.e., 6 or 7 days.
Mortality was observed at higher concentrations resulting in an EC50 of 17 mg/L both after 48 hours and 7 days.
The NOEC for reproduction was found to be 7.1 mg/L and the LOEC was 12 mg/L.
The concentration inhibiting reproduction by 50% relative to mean control performance (IC50) was calculated to be 11 mg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
The NOEC for reproduction obtained from a study according to to U.S. EPA Whole Effluent Testing Program method of 7.1 mg/L was used for assessment.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 7.1 mg/L
Additional information
One reliable study is available to predict long-term toxicity of TCE.
In a study conducted according to U.S. EPA Whole Effluent Testing Program method, Ceriodaphnia dubia were exposed to concentrations of 0, 13, 24, 54, 90, 212 µmol TCE and continued until 60% of the control animals had completed three broods, i.e., 6 or 7 days.
Mortality was observed at higher concentrations resulting in an EC50 of 17 mg/L both after 48 hours and 7 days.
The NOEC for reproduction was found to be 7.1 mg/L and the LOEC was 12 mg/L.
The concentration inhibiting reproduction by 50% relative to mean control performance (IC50) was calculated to be 11 mg/L.
Additional information is available from two long-term studies with Daphnia magna. However, these studies were not found to be reliable as for one study there were possible problems with infection of the test organisms (Kordel et al., 1984) and for the other it was found that a 21-day test was not possible unless the Daphnia had been treated with streptomycin (Scheubel, 1984). Use of the food supplement could also cause problems as it did not dissolve fully. It is not entirely clear from the report whether the problems described affected the outcome of the tests.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.