Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-211-0 | CAS number: 117-81-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
DEHP induced minimal skin and eye irritation in animals and did not induce skin irritation in human volunteers. Data are insufficient to determine the
respiratory irritant potential of DEHP.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Little White Russian
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Biberach
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.1-2.3 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum K4 diet for rabbits, Ssniff Spzialdiät GmbH, 4770 Soest
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum tap water
- Acclimation period: 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20+/-1
- Humidity (%): 60+/-5
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped (10x10cm)
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 8 d
- Number of animals:
- 3 males
- Details on study design:
- The exposed skin area is 6 cm2.
After the 4-hour exposure, the exposed area was rinsed with warm water.
The skin reactions were evaluated after 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and after 6 and 8 days, using the grading system of the OECD guideline. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8d
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8d
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 8d
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- At the 1-hour observation, all rabbits showed very slight erythema, and one rabbit also a very slight oedema. At 24 hours, the reaction of one rabbit had progressed to a well-defined erythema.
At 48 hours, all rabbits had very slight erythema which at 72 hours was accompanied by a dry appearance of the skin.
At 6 days, the skin surface appeared scaly, and at 8 days the skin was free from reaction. - Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information not classified Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008
- Conclusions:
- DEHP was slightly irritating to the skin
- Executive summary:
In a study performed in accordance with OECD guideline 404, skin irritation of DEHP (> 99% pure) was studied. The hair was clipped from the dorsal and lateral part of the trunk of three male Little White Russian rabbits. The undiluted test substance (0.5 cm2) was applied to a skin area of 6 cm2 and covered with a patch. After 4 hours, the patch was removed and the skin gently rinsed with warm water. The skin reactions were evaluated after 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and after 6 and 8 days, using the grading system of the OECD guideline. At the 1-hour observation, all rabbits showed very slight erythema, and one rabbit also a very slight oedema. At 24 hours, the reaction of one rabbit had progressed to a well-defined erythema. At 48 hours, all rabbits had very slight erythema which at 72 hours was accompanied by a dry appearance of the skin. At 6 days, the skin surface appeared scaly, and at 8 days the skin was free from reaction. It was concluded that DEHP was slightly irritating to the skin.
Mean scores calculated for times 24, 48 and 72h of animals 1, 2 and 3 were 1, 1.33 and 1 for erythema and 0, 0.33 and 0.33 for oedema, respectively.
Reference
Animal | Number | Sex | 1h | 24h | 48 h | 72 h | 6 days | 8 days | ||||||
Erythema | Oedema | Erythema | Oedema | Erythema | Oedema | Erythema | Oedema | Erythema | Oedema | Erythema | Oedema | |||
1 | 38219 | M | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | dryness | 0 | scaly | 0 | 0 | |
2 | 38335 | M | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | dryness | 0 | scaly | 0 | 0 | |
3 | 38599 | M | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | dryness | 0 | scaly | 0 | 0 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
The acute dermal irritative and corrosive properties of DEHP have been investigated in a study conforming with OECD guideline 404 (Mürmann, 1987). The hair was clipped from the dorsal and lateral part of the trunk of three male Little White Russian rabbits. Undiluted DEHP (> 99% pure) (0.5 ml) was applied to a skin area of 6 cm2and covered with a patch. After 4 hours, the patch was removed and the skin gently rinsed with warm water. The skin reactions were evaluated after 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and after 6 and 8 days, using the grading system of the OECD guideline. At the 1-hour observation, all rabbits showed very slight erythema, and one rabbit also a very slight oedema. At 24 hours, the reaction of one rabbit had progressed to a well-defined erythema. At 48 hours, all rabbits had very slight erythema which at 72 hours was accompanied by a dry appearance of the skin. At 6 days, the skin surface appeared scaly, and at 8 days the skin was free from reaction. It was concluded that DEHP was slightly irritating to the skin.
Mean scores calculated for times 24, 48 and 72h of animals 1, 2 and 3 were 1, 1.33 and 1 for erythema and 0, 0.33 and 0.33 for oedema, respectively.
In a skin irritation study performed according to GLP principles and conforming with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended method, 3 male and 3 female New Zealand White rabbits were used (Greenough, 1981). The skin of the back was clipped free of hair and 2 of the 4 patch test areas were abraded. One square inch chromatography paper patches were wetted with the undiluted test substance (DEHP), or with 10% aqueous sodium lauryl sulphate (as positive control substance). Patches were applied to both intact and abraded skin and left in position for 24 hours, thereafter the skin was cleansed. The test sites were scored immediately (24-hour reading) and 48 hours later (72-hour reading). Reactions were evaluated according to the FDA recommended scoring system. DEHP caused mild to moderate reactions at 24 hours. At the 72-hour reading, no treated sites showed any response to treatment.
Mean scores calculated for times 24 and 72h of the 6 treated animals (non-abraded) were 0.33 and 0.25 for erythema and for oedema, respectively. After abrasion of the skin, these scores were 0.58 and 0.5 for erythema and oedema, respectively.
Eye irritation
In another study also performed in accordance with OECD guideline 405, eye irritation of DEHP (>99% pure) was studied (Mürmann, 1987). DEHP in a volume of 0.1 ml was installed in the right eye of three male Little White Russian rabbits. The left eye served as control. The animals were evaluated after 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and after 6 days of application, using the grading system of the OECD guideline. At 1 hour, the conjunctivae of all three rabbits showed mild redness and one rabbit showed mild discharge. No conjunctival reactions were observed at the later observation times. All observations for chemosis, corneal opacity and lesions of the iris were negative. Mean irritation scores calculated for times 24, 48 and 72h of the animals 1, 2, 3 were 0, 0, 0 for cornea, 0, 0, 0 for iris, 0, 0, 0 for conjunctiva and 0, 0, 0 for chemosis, respecitvely.
In a study performed according to GLP principles and conforming with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended method, DEHP in a volume of 0.1 ml was introduced into the right eye of 3 male and 3 female New Zealand White rabbits (Greenough, 1981). The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and at 7 days, and the reactions were scored according to the FDA recommended scoring system. No reactions were found in the cornea or iris at any point of time. The conjunctivae of 5 eyes exhibited mild redness at 1 hour, while one eye showed very mild redness. At 24 hours, mild redness persisted in 3 eyes, while the remainder had no redness. No redness was observed at 72 hours or 7 days.
Mean irritation scores calculated for times 24, 48 and 72h of the 6 treated animals were 0 for cornea, 0 for iris, 0.14 for conjunctiva and 0.14 for chemosis.
Respiratory tract irritation
No studies specifically addressing this issue have been found.
In a study of acute toxicity by inhalation, groups of rats were exposed to DEHP in concentrations of 3.39, 6.82 or 10.62 mg/litre for 4 hours (Greenough, 1981). The respiratory tract was subjected to detailed macroscopic examination in all animals and revealed dark red foci and patches in the lungs. These foci and patches were observed more frequently in the treated animals (present in 19 out of 30 rats exposed to DEHP) than in the controls (present in 2 out of 10 rats exposed to clean air). The lung-to-body weight ratios of all treated groups were similar to the ratios obtained in the control group.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating
Effects on eye irritation: slightly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to the criteria edicted in REGULATION (EC) No 1272/2008 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 16 December 2008, no classification is warranted for skin, eye and respiratory irritation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.