Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 500-234-8 | CAS number: 68891-38-3 1 - 2.5 moles ethoxylated
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 Oct. 1994 - 6 Feb. 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 995
- Report date:
- 1995
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian bone marrow chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Alcohols, C12-14, ethoxylated, sulfates, sodium salts
- EC Number:
- 500-234-8
- EC Name:
- Alcohols, C12-14, ethoxylated, sulfates, sodium salts
- Cas Number:
- 68891-38-3
- Molecular formula:
- not applicable, UVCB
- IUPAC Name:
- Alcohols, C12-14(even numbered), ethoxylated < 2.5 EO, sulfates, sodium salts
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Italia S.p.A., Calco, Como, Italy
- Age at study initiation: 5 - 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 25 - 32 g (males); 20 - 27 g (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, immediately after arrival at test facility
- Fasting period before study: yes, overnight
- Housing: 5 animals/cage, separated by sexes, in clear polycarbonate cages (type 2b: Techniplast) with a stainless steel mesh lid and floor; each cage equiped with absorbent bedding which was inspected daily and changed as necessary.
- Diet: Altromin MT; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATE: 26 Oct. 1994
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: injectable grade sterile distilled water
- Lot/batch no.: 22143-lB (Don Baxter S.p.A., Trieste, italy) - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Fresh solutions of the test substance were prepared for each day's work; solutions were prepared on a weight/volume basis. Solutions of the test substance, following corrections of active constituent were prepared in injectable grade sterile distilled water. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not applicable
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- Test groups: 10, 24 and 48 h
Positive control group: approx. 26 h
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- corrected for a.i. content of test material
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- corrected for a.i. content of test material; represents the recommended limit dose for administration periods < 14 days according to OECD TG 475
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Test groups: 5 for each sampling time (10, 24 and 48 h)
Positive control group: 5 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg bw)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tissue: femoral bone marrow
Cell type: femoral bone marrow cells - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- SAMPLING TIMES
Test groups: 10, 24 and 48 h after treatment
Positive control group: 26 h after treatment
CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Range finding study performed to find the maximum tolerated dose.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
Following treatment and prior to sample collection, animals are injected intraperitoneally with 4 mg/mL colchicine and samples are collected 3 h thereafter. Cells are harvested from the bone marrow, swollen, fixed and stained, and analysed for chromosomal aberrations.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Slides were fixed with a methanol:acetic acid solution, air-dried and stained with Giemsa.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
50 metaphase spreads per animal were examined microscopically at high magnification for the presence of chromosomal aberrations. Only metaphases containing 40 chromosomes are scored for aberrations. The number of chromosomes, the specific types and numbers of aberrations are recorded. The Vernier readings of aberrant or equivocal metaphases are recorded.
OTHER:
The mitotic index is calculated. This is based on the number of metaphases observed per 1000 cells and is expressed as a percentage. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is considered to have clastogenic properties if a statistically significant increase in the incidence of cells bearing aberrations is observed at any test point, excluding gaps. The lesions observed must be consistent with those expected at the sampling time at which the increases are observed. The internal consistency of the findings within groups are also taken into account.
- Statistics:
- The experimental unit investigated in the present study is the proportion of cells from an animal which exhibit chromosomal aberrations. It is therefore assumed that the data has a binomial error structure, each cell out of a total of 'n' for each animal either bearing or not-bearing aberrations.
A logistic-linear model is fitted to the data adding the factors 'Sex', 'Treatment' and 'Sex-Treatment Interaction' in turn. The change in deviance with each factor is compared with the Chi-squared distribution to determine the level of significance. The deviance associated with the residual term is compared with the Chi-squared distribution to determine the goodness-of-fit of the logistic-linear model. This allows the construction of a table similar to a classical analysis of variance.
Data from in vivo cytogenetic assays often contain extra-binomial variation, which may result in part from animal-to-animal variation, or from the responses of different populations of cells within animals. This situation will be highlighted by a significant lack of fit of the logistic-linear model. When this is the case, an allowance for the extra-binomial variation can be made using a generalised 'heterogeneity factor' to weight the logistic-linear model variables.
The statistical analysis is performed using the values for the total number of aberration-bearing cells observed for each animal, excluding gaps from consideration.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range:
250, 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals:
No clinical signs were observed at any dose level tested.
- Evidence of cytotoxicity in tissue analysed:
No reduction in the mitotic index was observed in any treatment group.
A summary of the test results can be found under "Any other information on results incl. tables", Table 1 - 2.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results of the 24 h exposure experiment
Dose (mg/kg bw/d) | ||||
0 | 1000 | 2000 | CCP | |
Postexposure period [h] | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
Total no. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
No. of animals with aberrant metaphases | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
Analyzed metaphases | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Aberrant metaphases | 0 | 2 | 2 | 72 |
Including gaps | 0 | 2 | 2 | 72 |
Excluding gaps | 0 | 2 | 2 | 72 |
Exchanges | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Polyploidy | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Table 2: Summary table of the results
Dose (mg/kg bw/d) | ||||
0 | 1000 | 2000 | CCP | |
Postexposure period [h]: 24 | ||||
Total no. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Analyzed metaphases | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Percent abberrant cells (Mean ± SD) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | 17.6*** ± 4.4 |
Mitotic index (Mean ± SD) | 41.0 ± 12.7 | 52.6 ± 9.1 | 61.7 ± 13.6 | 41.6 ± 11.8 |
Postexposure period [h]: 10 | ||||
Total no. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Analyzed metaphases | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Percent abberrant cells (Mean ± SD) | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 34.1 ± 9.3 | - |
Mitotic index (Mean ± SD) | 30.2 ± 13.0 | 0.6 ± 10.0 | 34.1 ± 8.0 | - |
Postexposure period [h]: 48 | ||||
Total no. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Analyzed metaphases | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
Percent abberrant cells (Mean ± SD) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.8 ± 1.4 | - |
Mitotic index (Mean ± SD) | 68.8 ± 5.3 | 64.5 ± 5.3 | 67.5 ± 5.7 | - |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In the present in vivo cytogenicity study in mice, compliant with GLP and according to OECD test guideline 475, the test substance did not induce chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of mice after oral administration at 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw to both male and female animals.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.