Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
27 January 2016 - 08 March 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

1
Reference substance name:
Glycerides, tallow sesqui-, hydrogenated, propoxylated
EC Number:
614-598-1
Cas Number:
68553-12-8
Molecular formula:
n/a
IUPAC Name:
Glycerides, tallow sesqui-, hydrogenated, propoxylated

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA/Ca
Remarks:
CBA/CaOlaHsd
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
10%, 25% or 50%.
No. of animals per dose:
Five/dose
Positive control substance(s):
not specified
Statistics:
The data was processed to give group mean values for disintegrations per minute and standard deviations where appropriate. individual and group means disintegrations per minute values were assessed for dose response relationships. Data was first assessed for suitability by analysis of normality and homogeneity of variance. If the asseumptions that the data are both normally distributed and has homogeneity of variances, then parametric one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's multiple comparison procedure were used to determine statistical significance. If the assumptions were not met, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis Rank Sum and Mann-Whitney U test procedures were used.

Probability values (p) are presented as follows:
P<0.001 ***
P<0.01 **
P<0.05 *
P>/=0.05 (not significant)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.21
Test group / Remarks:
10%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.01
Test group / Remarks:
25% in acetone/olive oil 4:1
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
2.46
Test group / Remarks:
50% in acetone/olive oil 4:1

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Concentration (%w/w) in acetone/olive oil 4:1  Stimulation Index  Result
 10  1.21  Negative
 25  2.01  Negative
 50  2.46  Negative

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The substance was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test.
Executive summary:

In a local lymph node assay to evaluate the sensitisation potential of the substance female mice (five animals/concentration) were exposed to the substance for 3 consecutive days. The SI of 2.46 (at the highest concentration) indicates that the test material is not a sensitiser.