Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The purity of the test substance was unknown. The protocol was not described in details.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Sensitization to nordihydro-guaiaretic acid.
Author:
Golberg L.
Year:
1963
Bibliographic source:
Food and Cosmetics Toxicology, 1, 114.
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Studies on allergy towards some simple chemical substances
Author:
Griepentrog F.
Year:
1961
Bibliographic source:
Arzneimittel-Forsch., 11, 920-922.

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Guinea-pigs were injected with the test substance intradermally on 10 successive days. Three weeks after the injections, the test substance was
rubbed onto the injection site in the form of a 1% solution or suspension in peanut oil.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
other: sensitization test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study conducted prior to the recognition of the LLNA test as the preferred in vivo test method to assess skin sensitisation.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Guaiacol
EC Number:
201-964-7
EC Name:
Guaiacol
Cas Number:
90-05-1
Molecular formula:
C7H8O2
IUPAC Name:
Phenol
Details on test material:
The origin of guaiacol was not reported and its purity was unknown.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
peanut oil
Concentration / amount:
1% in peanut oil
Day(s)/duration:
10 days
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
other: substance rubbed onto injection sites
Vehicle:
peanut oil
Concentration / amount:
1% in peanut oil
Day(s)/duration:
single administration
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
no data
Details on study design:
Guinea-pigs were injected with the test substance intradermally on 10 successive days. Three weeks after the injections, the test substance was
rubbed onto the injection site in the form of a 1% solution or suspension in peanut oil and the area was examined 1, 2 and 3 days following the
application

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
not specified
No. with + reactions:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
Not specified
No. with + reactions:
0
Remarks on result:
other: no data available
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: No data available

Any other information on results incl. tables

Guaiacol did not evoke skin reactions.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Not sensitizing
Executive summary:

In a sensitizing study (Goldberg, 1963), guinea-pigs were injected with Gaiacol intradermally on 10 successive days. Three weeks after the injections, the test substance was rubbed onto the injection site in the form of a 1% solution or suspension in peanut oil and the area was examined 1, 2 and 3 days following the application.

Gaiacol did not induce sensitization, and it should not be classified.