Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-919-5 | CAS number: 12040-43-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt had no mutagenic potential in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation. (Andres, 2015, OECD 471)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and Guideline conform; B13.14 is a replicate of OECD 471.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 7/1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umweltschutz und Gewerbeaufsicht, Rheinland-Pfalz
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt
Batch: code # 1107274003
Purity: > 99%
Appearance: White powder
CAS: 12040-43-6
Expiry Date: November 01, 2018
Storage Conditions: (provided by the Sponsor) At room temperature, moisture protected
Stability: Stable a room temperature - Target gene:
- TA97a: hisD6610
TA98: hisD3052
TA100: hisG46
TA102: hisG428
TA1535: hisG46 - Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium LT2 : TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- H2O, DMSO and positive Control
First experiment: 5000 / 1500 / 500 / 150 / 50 μg/plate
Second experiment: 5000 / 2500 / 1250 / 625 / 313 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: and 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamide (6 µg and 80 µg, respectively)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Amino-anthracene
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: and 2-Aminoanthracene (40 µg and 3 µg, respectively)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- First experiment:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Incubation time:
- Incubation temperature: 37 °C
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: per strain and dose, four plates with and four plates without S9 mix were used.
Second experiment:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Incubation time: 20 min.
- Incubation temperature: 37 °C
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: per strain and dose, four plates with and four plates without S9 mix were used. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate (increase factor >= 2) in at least one strain can be observed.
- Statistics:
- A spreadsheet software was used to calculate mean values and standard deviations as well as the increase factor of revertant induction.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA 97a, 98, 100, 102 and 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt has no mutagenic potential.
Reference
The test item did not show mutagenic effects in both experiments. The number of revertant colonies was not increased in comparison with the spontaneous revertants (solvent only).
Cytotoxicity of the test item was not detected. The bacterial background lawn was visible and the number of revertants was not significantly decreased.
As no complete dissolution was possible, undissolved particles were visible on the plates in both experiments in the two highest concentrations.
Therefore it can be stated, that under the test conditions, the test item Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt is not mutagenic in the Bacterial Reverse Mutation.
Test using Salmonella typhimurium, strains TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Based on the negative results of tested sodium silicoaluminate in an in vivo study, no mutagenic potential is expected from the exposure to silicic acid, aluminium magnesium sodium salt.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Test material ist different from reference substance but comparable, see chapter 13, attachment 'Analogue Approach Justification'
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The host organism is inoculated by intraperitoneal injection with a common indicator microorganism/tester strain before treatment with the test substance. After "incubation" in the host organism, the tester strain is withdrawn from the ascites and tested for mutation on minimal agar plate., e.g. accroding to Ames.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- other: host mediated assy
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- FDA-Compound 71-45, "sodium silicoaluminate",
synthetic silica
Lot no. SR-1621 - Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICL-ICR
- Sex:
- male
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Details on exposure:
- Type: Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay
Method: The test substance was administered orally to 10 host animals per dose. In the acute study the bacteria (Salmonella typhimurium TA 1530 and his G-46)were inocculated i.p. after the administration of the test substance. In the subacute study the bacteria were injected after the last administration of the test substance. Negative (0.85 % saline) and positive (100 mg/kg dimethylnitrosamine) controls were run in parallel. The animals were sacrificed three hours after administration and the bacteria were removed from the peritoneal cavity. The induction of reverse mutation was quantified on agar plates. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single administration ("acute") and repeated administration (5 times, "subacute")
- Frequency of treatment:
- 1x and 5x (1x/d)
- Dose / conc.:
- 4.25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- suspended in 0.85 % saline, administered 1x/d (Test I)
- Dose / conc.:
- 42.5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- suspended in 0.85 % saline, administered 1x/d (Test I)
- Dose / conc.:
- 425 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- suspended in 0.85 % saline, administered 1x/d (Test I)
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw (total dose)
- Remarks:
- suspended in 0.85 % saline (Test II)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (males only)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- yes, treated with 100 mg/kg bw Dimethylnitrosamine (DMN)
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- There was a high increase in mutants following oral treatment with Dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), but no significant increases in mutation rates at any dose and dose regimen.
- Conclusions:
- There was a high increase in mutants following oral treatment with DMN, but no significant increases in mutation rates at any dose and dose regimen.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro data
Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt, synthetic amorphous silica and sodium silicoaluminate did not show mutagenic activity in in vitro systems in the presence and absence of an external metabolising system: These included bacterial Salmonella typhimurium strains (Andres 2015, Litton 1974 bacteria/yeast) and mammalian cell lines (Litton 1974 human lung cells (two times, with SAS and ASA), Geissel 2020).
In vivo data
A host mediated assay conducted with sodium silicoaluminate in mice did not show a significant increase in mutation rates at any dose and dose regimen. (Litton 1974).
Justification for classification or non-classification
No need for classification as the in vitro and in vivo studies consistently demonstrate negative results for
Silicic acid Aluminium Magnesium Sodium Salt and structurally related compounds.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.