Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-670-9 | CAS number: 18917-91-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-03-27 to 2012-06-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted July 21, 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 31 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Aluminium trilactate
- EC Number:
- 242-670-9
- EC Name:
- Aluminium trilactate
- Cas Number:
- 18917-91-4
- Molecular formula:
- C9H15AlO9
- IUPAC Name:
- Aluminium trilactate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aluminiumtrilactat
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- thymidine kinase (TK)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media:
Basic medium: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium + penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 μg/mL, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamin
Growth medium: Basic medium, supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (=R10 medium)
Exposure medium:
-for 3 hour exposure: test substance in basic medium supplemented with 5% (v/v) heatinactivated horse serum (R5-medium)
-for 24 hour exposure: test substance in basic medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heatinactivated horse serum (R10-medium)
Selective medium: basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R20), 5 μg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT)
Non-selective medium: basic medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (R20)
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: no data
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes, prior to experiment - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- First experiment
Without S9-mix: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 1500, 2000 μg/mL
With 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.1, 1, 3.3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 μg/mL
Second experiment
Without S9-mix: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 750, 1000 μg/mL
With 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.1, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data
- The final concentration of the solvent in the exposure medium was 0.8% (v/v)
Controlsopen allclose all
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: (without metabolic activation)
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: 15 µg/L (3 h), 5 μg/mL (24 h)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- other: (with metabolic activation)
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: 7.5 - 10 μg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 h/24 h in the absence of S9 mix (2 experiments), 3 h in the presence of S9 mix
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 d
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 12 d
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 15 d
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5 μg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 independent experiments, 1 replicate each
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
8E06 cells (1E06 cells/mL) for 3 hours treatment, 5E06 cells (1.25E05 cells/mL) for 24 hours treatment
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls (CEday2) is between 65 and 120%. An acceptable number of surviving cells (1E06) could be analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50 per 1E06 survivors and ≤ 170 per 1E06 survivors.
c) The growth rate (GR) over the 2-day expression period for the negative controls should be between 8 and 32 (3 hours treatment) and between 32-180 (24 hours treatment).
d) The mutation frequency of MMS should not be below 500 per 106 survivors, and for CP not below 700 per 1E06 survivors.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been defined by the IWGT as the mean of the negative/solvent MF distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than MF(controls) + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if:
a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of MF(controls) + 126.
b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
The pH and osmolarity of a concentration of 2942 μg/mL were 5.32 and 0.408 Osm/kg respectively
(compared to 7.33 and 0.424 Osm/kg in the solvent control).
Precipitation:
First experiment: After 15 minutes, the test substance formed a heavy suspension at the dose level of 1000 μg/mL.
In the second experiment the test substance precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 100 μg/mL and above.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the dose range finding test, L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells were treated with a test substance
concentration range of 33 to 2942 μg/mL in the absence of S9-mix with a 3 and 24 hour treatment
period and in the presence of S9-mix with a 3 hour treatment period. The relative suspension growth was 37 and 42% at the highest test substance concentration of 2942 μg/mL compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control in the absence and presence of S9-mix, respectively. In the absence of S9-mix, the relative suspension growth was 7% at the highest test substance concentration of 2942 μg/mL compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent-treated control cultures were between the
minimum and maximum value of the historical control data range. Except in the first experiment, in which the mutation frequency of one of the solvent control cultures in the absence of S9-mix was just below the historical control data range. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Aluminium trilactate is not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma L5178Y test system under the experimental conditions described in this study. - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell gene mutation assay according to OECD guideline 467, adopted July 21, 1997 (thymidine kinase (TK)), L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells cultured in vitro were exposed to Aluminium trilactate (93.1% purity) in DMSO in the following concentrations in the presence and absence of mammalian metabolic activation (S9 mix):
First experiment
Without S9-mix: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 1500, 2000μg/mL
With 8% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.1, 1, 3.3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000μg/mL
Second experiment
Without S9-mix: 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 750, 1000μg/mL
With 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0.1, 1, 3, 10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000μg/mL
Aluminium trilactate was tested up to cyctotoxic concentrations. The positive controls induced the appropriate response. There was noevidenceof induced mutant colonies over background.
This study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 476 forin vitromutagenicity (mammalian forward gene mutation) data.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.