Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Repeated dose toxicity study in rats (90 days, diet):

A 90 -day repeated dose toxicity study was performed according to OECD 408 on Wistar rats administered with naphthenic acid at 3 dose levels for 90 days (1500 ppm, 4200 ppm and 12500 ppm, actual intake 107, 302 and 881 mg/kg bw/day, resp.) by oral feed (key, K1; Weisz, 2018). The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for naphthenic acid is considered to be 302 mg/kg bw /day for the combined sexes (289 mg/kg bw/day for males and 316 mg/kg bw/day for females).

Combined repeated dose/ reproductive and developmental toxicity:

A supporting combined repeated dose/reproductive and developmental toxicity study performed according to OECD 422 was available for naphthenic acid (supporting, K1; HPVIS, 2010). The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 100 mg/kg bw/day, whereas NOAEL for neurotoxicity was 900 mg/kg bw, both in male and female rats.

Overall, it is questioned whether the route of exposure in the OECD 422 study (oral gavage) had did not influence the NOAEL via the induction of a bolus dose. As no effects were observed at 302 mg/kg bw/d in the 90d repeated dose toxicity study (oral diet), this dose level is considered for further safety assessment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018-05-03 to 2018-08-02
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Umicore, 2017787NA12
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 July 2019
- Purity: considered as 100 %

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature (15-25 °C, ≤70 Relative Humidity%)
- Stability under test conditions: The test item was incorporated into the animal feed. The stability of the test item in the diet has been verified for a period of at least 11 weeks at room temperature.
-Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Analysis of the diets for homogeneity and concentration of the test item was performed by an analytical method validated at the Test Site using GC-FID (gas chromatography-flame ionization detection) method to determine the Naphthenic acids content on two occasions from each batch used in the study (once at the start of feeding and once during the last week of the treatment).

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: The test item was incorporated into ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H “Complete Feed for Rats and Mice-maintenance” by ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D-59494 Soest Germany, to generate the test concentrations required. The pelleting process is considered not to induce an "unmixing" of the diets or particle segregation, and would prevent the potential settling out of the fine-heavy particles that could occur in handling/transport of powder diets. Naphthenic acids was incorporated into the diet and mixed for up to approximately 16 minutes (approximately 8 minutes for premix preparation, and approximately 8 minutes for preparation of the complete diets; minor variations were acceptable as practical). Following mixing, pellets were prepared by simple compression; no binding agents, steam, external heat, any other process or substance were used that might affect the test item or the quality of the diets. Similar diet preparation procedures were used to generate control diet (0 mg Naphthenic acids/kg diet). The prepared diets were stored at room temperature, in sewed bags pending and during transport to Citoxlab Hungary Ltd. At Citoxlab Hungary Ltd., the prepared diets were stored also at controlled room temperature.

FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material): The test item was incorporated into ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H “Complete Feed for Rats and Mice-maintenance”



Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on species / strain selection:
The rat was selected as it is a readily available rodent species, historically used in safety evaluation studies and is acceptable to appropriate regulatory authorities. Wistar rat as a rodent is one of the standard strains for repeat-dose toxicity studies.
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, Sandhofer Weg 7, D-97633 Sulzfeld, Germany.
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: approximately 7 weeks at start of treatment
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 254 – 297 g; Females: 181 – 221 g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing:
Cage type: Type II and/or III polycarbonate
Bedding: Lignocel® (produced by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + Co.KG, Germany) Bedding for Laboratory Animals and nest building material (Arbocell crinklets natural (produced by J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + Co.KG, Germany)) were available to animals during the study
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): The animals received ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H “Complete Diet for Rats and Mice – Breeding and Maintenance” produced by ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D-59494 Soest, Germany, with or without Naphthenic acids (treated or control groups, respectively), ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water was supplied from 500 mL bottles, ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 14-15 days

DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY: Water quality control analysis was performed at least once every three months and microbiological assessment was performed monthly, by Veszprém County Institute of State Public Health and Medical Officer Service (ÁNTSZ, H-8201 Veszprém, József A. u. 36., Hungary).The food and water were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19.1 – 25.9 °C
- Humidity (%): 32 – 75 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15-20 air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 03 May 2018 to 01 August 2018
Route of administration:
oral: feed
Details on route of administration:
The dietary route was selected as it is the most relevant route of human exposure.
Vehicle:
other: Animal feed
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test item was shipped to ssniff® Spezialdiäten GmbH from Citoxlab Hungary Ltd. After arrival, the test item was incorporated into ssniff® SM R/M-Z+H “Complete Feed for Rats and Mice-maintenance” by ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D-59494 Soest Germany, to generate the test concentrations required.

DIET PREPARATION
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Naphthenic acids was incorporated into the diet and mixed for up to approximately 16 minutes (approximately 8 minutes for premix preparation, and approximately 8 minutes for preparation of the complete diets; minor variations were acceptable as practical). Following mixing, pellets were prepared by simple compression; no binding agents, steam, external heat, any other process or substance were used that might affect the test item or the quality of the diets. Similar diet preparation procedures were used to generate control diet (0 mg Naphthenic acids/kg diet).
- Storage temperature of food: The prepared diets were stored at room temperature

VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 1500, 4200 and 12500 ppm

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Analysis of the diets for homogeneity and concentration of the test item was performed by an analytical method validated at the Test Site using GC-FID (gas chromatography-flame ionization detection) method to determine the Naphthenic acids content on two occasions from each batch used in the study (once at the start of feeding and once during the last week of the treatment). Two batches from each dose level were used during the study, thus 4 sampling occasions were performed in total.

Sampling for the measurements: Five representative test-item treated diet samples of an appropriate weight were collected at each occasion during the study, from five different locations of one representative diet container from each concentration. Additionally, at one sample was similarly taken from the control diet, for analysis of Naphthenic acids concentration (i.e a total of 16 samples per occasion). Diet samples were kept at room temperature until shipment. Samples were shipped as soon as possible after collection for concentration and homogeneity measurement to the Principal Investigator of the Test Site.

The dietary samples were delivered together with a verified sample list stating the ssniff® identification number, concentration, sampling location, sample mass and sampling date.

Acceptance criteria of the concentration analysis were set according to the analytical method validation, expected to be at 100 ± 20% of the nominal concentrations. Acceptance criteria of the homogeneity was that the CV of replicates (from 5 different locations) must be less than 10%.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
90 days
Frequency of treatment:
A constant concentration of Naphthenic acids in diet was administered to treated groups for a 90-day treatment period.
Dose / conc.:
0 mg/kg diet
Remarks:
Control
Dose / conc.:
1 500 ppm
Remarks:
Low dose, 107 mg/kg
Dose / conc.:
4 200 ppm
Remarks:
Mid dose, 302 mg/kg
Dose / conc.:
12 500 ppm
Remarks:
High dose , 881 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 males and 10 females per dose group
Control animals:
yes, plain diet
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: The concentrations of Naphthenic acids were set by the Sponsor in consultation with the Study Director based on the available data and information from previous experimental work, including the results of a 14-day dose range finding and palatability study.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): The animals were assigned to their respective dose groups by randomization based on body weights. Animals were randomly allocated to the control and dose groups based on the most recent actual body weight; the software PROVANTIS v.9 was used in order to verify homogeneity/variation among/within groups. Males and females were randomised separately.
- Fasting period before blood sampling for clinical biochemistry: Yes
- Other: Before the onset of the 90-day treatment period, all animals received the same control diet for 7 days during acclimation period. The first day of dosing of each animal was regarded as Day 0. All animals underwent necropsy upon completion of the 90-day treatment period (Day 89). Blood samples for Clinical pathology examination were collected prior to necropsy.
Positive control:
No
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once a day except on those days when detailed clinical observations are made.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: before the first treatment (on Day 0 male/female) and weekly thereafter, in the morning hours (am) and once before necropsy.
- Observations included examinations of the skin, fur, eyes, eyeballs and mucous membranes, autonomic activity (lachrymation, piloerection, pupil size, respiratory pattern, occurrence of secretions and excretions), circulatory and central nervous system (tremor, convulsion, muscular contractions, etc.), somatomotor activity and behaviour pattern (changes in exploratory behaviour, ordinary behaviour including changes in grooming, headshaking, gyration, etc., abnormal behaviour such as autophagia/self-mutilation, backward motion, abnormal vocalization, aggression, etc.), motor coordination, ambulatory abnormalities, changes in body position and posture (ex. hunchback posture, etc), gait, or response to handling and to environmental stimulation. Particular attention was directed to observations for tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhoea, lethargy, sleep and coma.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were recorded with a precision of 1 g at randomisation (pre-treatment period), on the first day of treatment (Day 0, prior to start of treatment), then weekly, including on Day 89, and prior to necropsy, fasted on Day 90.

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption was measured with a precision of 1 g before the start of treatment (Day 0), then twice weekly during the treatment period. Control diet consumption during the pre-experimental period was measured with a precision of 1 g on Day -7 (start) and on Day -1 (end). The control diet consumption between Day -1 and Day 0 was not measured.
- Animal food consumption per cage was measured at least twice weekly and the mean weekly food consumption and daily food intake per rat was calculated. Based on food consumption data, the mean dose intake of each group was calculated for reporting purposes on the basis of mg/kg body weight/day, in addition food conversion efficiency (g/g) was calculated as [weekly body weight gain (g)/weekly food consumption (g)].

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Ophthalmoscopic examination was conducted in all animals before treatment (Day -1 or -2), and in the Control group and High dose group animals during Week 11/12 (Day 82/83). Mydriasis was produced after instillation of eye drops "Cicloplegicedol" (10 mg/mL cyclopentolate hydrochloride) into the conjunctival sac. The evaluation was performed using a WelchAllynTM ophthalmoscope.

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At the end of the treatment period, prior to scheduled necropsy
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: pentobarbital
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all animals
- Parameters examined: RBC - Red Blood Cell (erythrocyte) count, WBC - White Blood Cell (leukocyte) count, Hgb - Haemoglobin concentration, Hct - Haematocrit (relative volume of erythrocytes), MCV -Mean Corpuscular (erythrocyte) Volume, MCH - Mean Corpuscular (erythrocyte) Haemoglobin, MCHC - Mean Corpuscular (erythrocyte) Haemoglobin Concentration, RDW - Red Cell (erythrocyte) volume, Plt - Platelet (thrombocyte) count, MPV - Mean Platelet Thrombocyte volume, RETIC % - Reticulocyte count, NE % - Neutrophil, LY % - Lymphocyte, MO % - Monocyte, BA % - Basophil, EO % - Eosinophil, LUC % - Large Unstained Cells, APTT - Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, PT - Prothrombin Time.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: At the end of the treatment period, prior to scheduled necropsy
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: all animals
- Parameter examined: Glucose - Blood sugar concentration, T-BIL - Total Bilirubin concentration, Urea - Urea concentration, Chol - Cholesterol concentration, Creat.- Creatinine concentration, Phos. - Phosphorus concentration, Na+ - Sodium concentration, K+ - Potassium concentration, Ca++ - Calcium concentration, Cl - Chloride concentration, Tot. Prot. - Total Protein concentration, Alb. - Albumin concentration, A/G - Albumin/globulin ratio, AST/GOT - Aspartate Aminotransferase activity, ALT/GPT - Alanine Aminotransferase activity, GGT - Gamma-Glutamyl transferase activity, ALKP- Alkaline Phosphatase activity, Bile acids.


URINALYSIS: Yes / No / Not specified
- Time schedule for collection of urine: Urine collection was conducted over approximately 16 hours, during an overnight period of food deprivation of animals
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: Yes
- Parameters examined: LEU / Leukocyte, NIT / Nitrite, pH, PRO - Protein, GLU - Glucose, UBG / Urobilinogen, BIL / Bilirubin, KET / Ketones, BLD / ERY Blood/Erythrocytes, SG / Specific Gravity, SED / Sediment, VOL / Volume, Colour/appearance.

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Towards the end of the treatment period, during Week 11/12
- Dose groups that were examined: all animals
- Battery of functions tested: Sensory reactivity to different type of stimuli (e.g. auditory, visual and proprioceptive), assessment of grip strength and motor activity were conducted and the general physical condition and behaviour of animals were tested.

Parameters such as, body position, locomotor activity, respiration rate, respiration type, piloerection, head searching, compulsive biting or licking, circling, upright walking, retropulsion, jumping, exophthalmos, twitches, clonic convulsions, tonic convulsions, tremor, startle, transfer arousal, spatial locomotion, gait, posture, limb position, finger approach, finger withdrawal, touch escape response, diarrhoea, diuresis, visual placing, grip strength, body tone, corneal reflex, pinna reflex, toe pinch, grasping reflex, positional struggle, skin, mucous membrane colour, salivation, palpebral closure, lachrymation, limb tone, abdominal tone, tail pinch, righting reflex, and vocalisation were evaluated.

To measure the landing foot splay, the hind paws of the rat were painted with ink and the rat was dropped from a horizontal position onto the appropriate record sheet covering the examination table. This was performed 3 times for each animal on each test day. The distance between the two resulting ink spots was measured. The fore paws of the rat were painted for any possible additional measurements.

- Motor activity: was conducted using Automatic Monitoring System of rat locomotor activity SMART v. 2.5 (Harvard Apparatus, Germany). Locomotor activity was monitored by placing each animal individually into an open-field for a 1-hour observation time, when DVD recording of movement was made. Recording was made for a duration of 60 minutes, under dim-light and undisturbed conditions. The DVD was analysed with “SMART” software after all recordings were made to produce the appropriate parameters. The data from all groups was evaluated for distance travelled in 5-minute segments. The data from the 5-minute segments were presented graphically with the intention of showing plateau activity in controls, and comparing the treatment groups.

- Fore/hind grip strength: conducted using a grip strength meter (Model GS3, Bioseb, Chaville, France), an instrument designed to quantify objectively rodent muscular strength, in order to identify and assess quantitatively any potential effect of test item. The rats were held appropriately such that the fore limbs were allowed to grip the support bar and pulled back until they released the bar; the device measured the maximum grip strength. This was performed 3 times for each animal on each test day. The procedure was repeated with the hind limbs with the appropriate grip support.

IMMUNOLOGY: Not examined


Sacrifice and pathology:
Terminal procedures: Necropsy and macroscopic examination were performed on all animals, at the end of treatment period, on Day 90 (after the sample collection for clinical pathology evaluation). The animals were euthanized by exsanguination under pentobarbital anaesthesia.

GROSS PATHOLOGY: After exsanguination the external appearance was examined, all orifices, and the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and the appearance of the tissues and organs were observed macroscopically. Any abnormality was recorded with details of the location, colour, shape and size, as appropriate. In addition, bone marrow smears from the femur of each animal were prepared at necropsy. The smears were fixed, then stained but not analysed.

ORGAN WEIGHT:
- The following organs were trimmed of fat and weighed in all animals: Brain, Epididymides, Heart, Kidneys, Liver, Prostate, Seminal vesicles with coagulating glands, Spleen, Testes, Thymus, Uterus including cervix, Adrenal glands, Ovaries, Thyroid with parathyroid glands, Pituitary.
- Paired organs were weighed together. Absolute organ weights were measured, and relative organ weights to the body and brain weights were calculated and reported.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:
- The following tissues and organs were collected, fixed and embedded in paraffin wax: Lungs with bronchi (Lungs of euthanized animals were infused with formalin; 3 lobes, left, right cranial, right caudal), Skeletal muscle (quadriceps), Adrenals, Lymph node (Mandibular and mesenteric), Small intestine (Duodenum, ileum and jejunum with Peyer’s patches), Animal identification (Fixation and preservation only), Ovary, Spinal cord (Transverse sections, 3 levels - cervical, thoracic and lumbar), Aorta (Aorta thoracic and abdominal), Oviduct, Spleen, Brain, Pancreas, Sternum with marrow, Epididymis, Pituitary, Stomach, Eye with the optic nerve (If applicable, optic nerves were examined histologically only if present in routine sections), Prostate, Testis, Oesophagus, Salivary gland (including mandibular, sublingual and parotid glands), Thymus, Femur with marrow, Thyroid with parathyroid gland (If applicable, parathyroids were examined histologically only if present in routine sections), Heart (Section including both ventricles and atria, septum with papillary muscle), Tongue, Kidney, Sciatic nerve, Trachea, Large intestine (Caecum, colon and rectum), Seminal vesicle with coagulating gland, Urinary bladder, Extraorbital lachrymal gland, Uterus (Horns, body and cervix), Harderian gland, Skin (subcutis with mammary gland (inguinal)), Vagina, Liver (Liver, 3 lobes, left lateral, right medial, caudate).
- Full histopathology was performed in Groups 1 (Control) and 4 (High dose).
Statistics:
The statistical evaluation of appropriate data was performed with the statistical program package of SAS 9.2 software package (within the validated Provantis system). The following decision tree was applied automatically for statistical evaluation of continuous numeric data. The normality and heterogeneity of variance between groups were checked by Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests using the most appropriate data format (log-transformed when justified). Where both tests showed no significant heterogeneity, an Anova / Ancova (one-way analysis of variance) test was carried out. If the obtained result was positive, Dunnett’s (Multiple Range) test was used to assess the significance of inter-group differences; identifying differences of <0.05 or <0.01 as appropriate. This parametric analysis is the better option when the normality and heterogeneity assumptions implicit in the tests are adequate.

If either of the Shapiro-Wilk or Levene tests showed significance on the data, then the ANOVA type approach is not valid and a non-parametric analysis was required. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used after Rank Transformation. If there was a positive result, the inter-group comparisons were performed using Dunn test; identifying differences of <0.05 or <0.01 as appropriate.

For non-continuous data, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend was applied and the Chi-squared test was used for statistical differences relative to control.

For pathology data (macroscopic and microscopic data) the Cochran-Armitage test for trend was applied, then if appropriate, the Chi-squared test homogeneity test. If significance was plausible based on a user-defined value (0.05), a pairwise test of each treatment group versus the control group was made. If the group size was <5 then Fisher’s Exact Test was used, if the group sizes were bigger then the Chi-squared test was used; identifying differences of <0.05, <0.01 or <0.001 as appropriate.


Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No test item related clinical signs were observed during the study.

The following individual observations were not attributed to systemic effects of the test item: One Mid dose male (#3010) had tonic convulsions on Days 76 and 89. Thin fur was seen unilaterally on the cheek and/or on the neck in one Mid dose male (#3003) from Day 77 and in one High dose female (#4507) from Day 84 until the end of the observation period.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
There was no mortality during the study.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
In the Mid and High dose animals, statistically significantly lower bodyweight and body weight gain values were observed during the study. The day 89 body weights of the High dose were about 17% and 15% below controls in males and females respectively; the Mid dose were about 8% and 10% below control. The low body weight and body weight gain values in the Mid and High dose groups correlated with the recorded food consumption values. It was considered that the observed effects were caused by low palatability of the treated diet, the most significant lower weight gain was in the first week of feeding, when female High dose animals lost weight. The male overall body weight gain during the study was 33% lower in the High dose group and 15% lower in the Mid dose group compared to the male Control. The female overall body weight gain during the study was 45% lower in the High dose group and 30% lower in the Mid dose group compared to the female Control.

The bodyweight and body weight gain values of the Low dose did not show any test item related effect.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Lower food consumption was measured in the Mid and High dose groups during the study, reaching statistical significance at several occasions. In general, the extent of the low food consumption was greater in the beginning of the study and the effect slowly decreased towards the end of the 90-day observation period.

Slightly lower food consumption was measured also in the female Low dose group, reaching statistical significance at a few occasions, but without consequences on body weight gain. The male Low dose food consumption did not show any test item related effect.

The recorded food consumption values correlated with the observed body weight changes.

The test item dose intake values (mg/kg bw/day) were calculated from the body weight, food intake and diet concentration. The mean achieved dose levels (combined for males and females) were 107, 302 and 881 mg/kg bw/day in the Low, Mid and High dose groups, respectively.

The aim to reach a dose intake equivalent to 1000 mg/kg bw/day in the High dose groups was not fulfilled due to the low palatability of the test item; however, the body weight effect was sufficient to ensure the High dose was acceptable for a regulatory study (see summary table in section "any other information on results").
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No test item-related changes compared to pre-treatment were noted in the Control and High dose groups at the terminal ophthalmoscopy examination. Thus, animals of the lower dose levels were not examined at the end of the study.
Haematological findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No test item-related changes were observed in the haematology parameters. Statistically significant differences were considered to be incidental, there was no relationship with dose and/or all recorded values were near or within the historical control ranges. These differences were considered to not reflect an adverse effect of the test item.

Coagulation parameters: The Prothrombin Time (PTT) was statistically (p<0.01) lower in the female Mid and High dose groups, when compared to the control. All values were considered to be in the normal range and there was no clear dose-response, the statistical differences were not considered to represent an adverse effect.
See Table 2 in section 'Any additional information on results' for detailed data.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Elevated Alkaline Phosphatase activity (ALKP) was seen in the animals. The ALKP was significantly higher in the Mid dose (p<0.05) and High dose (p<0.01) animals. The male and female High dose group mean ALKP means were out of the historical ranges, while the Mid dose mean values were below the upper limit of the ranges. The low dose values were slightly (10-22%) above the control, without any statistical significance. The observed high ALKP values indicate a dose dependent effect of the test item. There were no tissues with adverse histological changes of tissue damage, although large percentage liver weight increases were observed (about 40% and 60% relative to body weight) hence it is plausible the ALKP increases may have been related to hepatic effects of the test item. The increased ALKP at the High dose was outside the historic range, and although there was no clear evidence for which tissue, it is not possible to exclude the possibility of a relatively minor adverse effect at the High dose.

In the High dose females significantly increased potassium level was recorded which correlates with the histopathological findings in the adrenals; the values in some High dose females was outside, or close to the historic control maximal values. The male mean values were unaffected by treatment. The toxicological significance of higher potassium in High dose females is uncertain.

Besides this, all other significant differences were regarded as incidental and of no toxicological significance.
See Table 3 in section 'Any additional information on results' for detailed data.
Urinalysis findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No test item-related changes were observed in the urinalysis parameters. The significantly lower protein presence in the male High dose group and the significantly lower presence of urine crystals in the male Low dose group are not toxicologically relevant.
Behaviour (functional findings):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no changes in animal behaviour, general physical condition or in the reactions to different type of stimuli in the control or test groups.

There was no adverse effect of treatment noted during the assessment of grip strength, foot splay or motor activity. A statistically significantly lower landing foot splay in the High dose females was considered as a secondary effect of a lower body weights in the group and not a toxic effect of the test item (15% lower body weight, 27% lower foot splay; all means were well within the historical control range). Neurotoxic test items cause an increased foot splay, so a reduced foot splay does not usually indicate an adverse effect. Other differences in the neurological assessment parameters were considered as incidental and not to reflect an effect of the test item.

All dose groups of males and females had a normal locomotor activity; in all cases, the initial activity was high, with reduced activity in each 5-minute period to an approximate plateau by about 20-30 minutes. There was no statistical significance between the test item treated animals and the Control when evaluating the overall distance travelled (0-60 min, cm). The test item did not increase or decrease the normal locomotor activity.
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The terminal bodyweights of the Mid dose and High dose animals were lower than the controls by 8-11% and 16%, respectively, due to the lower food consumption of these animals. Therefore, it is considered that the organ / bodyweight ratios are not good indicators for organ weight changes. Thus, mainly the absolute and relative to brain weights were used for evaluation of test item-related effects.

Significantly higher absolute and relative to brain weight kidney weights were seen in the male High dose groups; however, all these values were still within the historical control ranges (up to 15% above control). The females had completely normal kidney weight values. As the observed values were within the historical control range and no microscopic changes were seen at histopathology, these organ weight changes were considered as adaptive, non-adverse changes. (The significantly higher kidney / bodyweight ratio in the male Mid dose group was considered to be caused by the lower bodyweights in this group and not because of an organ weight change.)

The absolute and relative to brain weight liver weights were also statistically higher (p<0.01) in the male and female High dose groups. The High dose female values were also out of historical control range (up to 35% above control). In the Mid dose females, the liver weights were also slightly increased. The Low dose animals had normal liver weight values. The effect was confirmed at histopathology as being a non-specific adaptive change to the high work load of the liver.

Moreover, the absolute and relative to brain weight thymus weights were slightly lower in the High dose groups, reaching statistical significance only in the males (p<0.05). The observed differences correlate with the body weight changes and therefore were considered as toxicologically not relevant. No effect was seen at histopathology in the thymuses.

Besides these, all other statistically significant weight differences were considered to be incidental and not test item-related or ascribed to differences in body weight.

See Table 1 in section 'Any additional information on results' for detailed data.
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
No treatment related macroscopic findings were noted at necropsy.
Bilateral dilatation with clear fluid of the uterus was seen in 6 females and it was considered as normal oestrus. The unilateral dilatation of the pelvis in two males and small ovaries in one female were considered as incidental or background.
See Table 4 in section 'Any additional information on results' for detailed data.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Test item-related microscopic findings were seen in the liver, adrenal and thyroid glands of the High dose groups.

Minimal to moderate centrilobular hepatocellular hypertrophy was observed in 9/10 male and 10/10 female High Dose rats. This finding correlates with the increased liver weights observed in the High dose groups. It is considered that the hepatocellular hypertrophy was caused by the enzyme induction in hepatocytes in response to chemical exposure and it is a non-adverse adaptive change.

Minimal follicular cell hypertrophy was observed in the thyroid of 6/10 High Dose males. This change is considered secondary to hepatic change and most unlikely a direct toxic effect of the test item. This change is not considered to reflect an adverse effect of the test item on the thyroid gland.

Minimal to slight hypertrophy of the zona glomerulosa cells in the adrenal was observed in 8/10 High dose females and in 1/10 High dose males. Zona glomerulosa is responsive to increased serum potassium levels. In the current study, statistically significant 16.5% increase in serum potassium level was observed in High Dose females. Similar changes were not observed in High Dose males. Toxicological significance of this change observed only in females is uncertain, but there was no evidence of any clear adverse effect in this organ.
See Table 5 in section 'Any additional information on results' for detailed data.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not examined
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
302 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
clinical biochemistry
histopathology: non-neoplastic
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
Remarks on result:
other: Although none of the individual findings in the High dose group were clearly adverse, taking into account the degree of liver weight increase, and the other findings observed at the High dose, altogether the effects are considered adverse.
Key result
Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
881 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
System:
hepatobiliary
Organ:
liver
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
not specified
Relevant for humans:
not specified

Detailed data tables:

Table 1 Absolute and relative values for organ weights (Mean +/- SD)

Sex

 

Males

Females

Groups/Conc (ppm/day)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Terminal bodyweight (g)

561.1

+/-41.8

568.4

+/-53.8

514.1

+/-39.4

466.9 **

+/-34.2

306.1°°

+/-24.1

300.1

+/-22.6

273.6 **

+/-15.0

255.8 **

+/-15.1

Historical control data

455 – 657

Historical control data

254 – 352

Kidneys

 (g)

3.062

+/-0.194

3.205

+/-0.400

3.367

+/-0.288

3.533 **

+/-0.317

1.855°°

+/-0.162

1.920

+/-0.306

1.740

+/-0.130

1.718

+/-0.143

Historical control data

2.59 – 4.22

Historical control data

1.45 – 2.29

Kidneys / Bodyweight (%)

0.547 °°

+/-0.039

0.565

+/-0.067

0.656 **

+/-0.052

0.757 **

+/-0.045

0.607

+/-0.049

0.638

+/-0.068

0.636

+/-0.036

0.672

+/-0.046

Historical control data

0.518 – 0.761

Historical control data

0.519 – 0.748

Kidneys / Brain weight (%)

142.22°

+/-18.55

141.19

+/-16.76

148.19

+/-11.02

161.33 *

+/-15.55

90.77

+/-6.39

91.37

+/-12.00

85.78

+/-5.64

83.44

+/-7.20

Historical control data

117.50 – 189.91

Historical control data

71.43 – 109.05

Liver

(g)

15.052°

+/-1.321

15.538

+/-1.505

15.759

+/-1.768

17.392**

+/-1.554

8.661°°

+/-1.033

9.176

+/-1.272

9.701

+/-0.980

11.702**

+/-1.203

Historical control data

11.22 – 22.55

Historical control data

6.37 – 10.01

Liver / Bodyweight (%)

2.687°°

+/-0.207

2.738

+/-0.184

3.061 **

+/-0.186

3.723**

+/-0.129

2.827°°

+/-0.218

3.056

+/-0.322

3.544**

+/-0.286

4.575**

+/-0.375

Historical control data

2.183 – 3.442

Historical control data

2.27 – 3.50

Liver / Brain weight (%)

697.08 °°

+/-79.11

684.94

+/-62.44

693.00

+/-66.22

793.65**

+/-67.81

423.23°°

+/-38.43

437.12

+/-52.12

478.29

+/-45.29

568.93**

+/-65.59

Historical control data

496.28 – 939.58

Historical control data

307.73 – 489.90

Thymus

 (g)

0.434°°

+/-0.090

0.469

+/-0.097

0.457

+/-0.075

0.345 *

+/-0.041

0.412

+/-0.067

0.397

+/-0.084

0.370

+/-0.103

0.347

+/-0.065

Historical control data

0.26 – 0.82

Historical control data

0.18 – 0.54

Thymus / Bodyweight (%)

0.077

+/-0.014

0.083

+/-0.017

0.089

+/-0.011

0.075

+/-0.012

0.135

+/-0.021

0.132

+/-0.025

0.136

+/-0.038

0.135

+/-0.022

Historical control data

0.052 – 0.155

Historical control data

0.067 – 0.176

Sex

 

Males

Females

Groups/Conc (mg/kg bw/day)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Thymus / Brain weight (%)

19.83°°

+/-2.99

20.73

+/-4.49

20.12

+/-3.19

15.74*

+/-1.88

20.08

+/-2.74

18.89

+/-3.64

18.32

+/-5.41

16.78

+/-2.63

Historical control data

10.74 – 38.32

Historical control data

8.87 – 27.55

Brain

(g)

2.176

+/-0.226

2.269

+/-0.088

2.272

+/-0.088

2.194

+/-0.115

2.044

+/-0.112

2.097

+/-0.095

2.028

+/-0.066

2.061

+/-0.091

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

-

Brain/bodyweight

(%)

0.388°°

+/-0.029

0.402

+/-0.031

0.444**

+/-0.029

0.472**

+/-0.040

0.669°°

+/-0.032

0.701

+/-0.036

0.743**

+/-0.047

0.807**

+/-0.046

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

-

Notes:

Only parameters where statistical significance was demonstrated in one or two sexes are included in the table.

 *= p<0.05; **= p<0.01; Dunnett two-sided test.

°= p<0.05,°°=p<0.01; Analysis of Variance test

Values out of the historical control range are indicated with bold font.


 

Table 2 Haematology (Mean +/- SD)

Sex

Males

Females

Groups/Conc (ppm/day)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Red blood count (M/µL)

9.12

+/-0.402

8.89

+/-0.284

9.01

+/-0.392

8.53 **

+/-0.322

7.821

+/-0.576

8.111

+/-0.407

7.975

+/-0.525

7.931

+/-0.434

Historical control data

8.07-9.61

Historical control data

-

Haemoglobin concentration (g/dL)

14.85

+/-0.40

14.52

+/-0.51

14.61

+/-0.66

14.21

+/-0.53

14.24°

+/-0.58

14.10

+/-0.46

13.91

+/-0.51

13.61 *

+/-0.41

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

13.4-16.3

Mean cell haemoglobin (pg)

16.31

+/-0.57

16.34

+/-0.48

16.21

+/-0.52

16.67

+/-0.47

18.24

+/-1.16

17.39

+/-0.57

17.44

+/-0.73

17.17 *

+/-0.53

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

16.0-19.9

Monocytes

(%)

3.19

+/-0.89

3.10

+/-0.51

2.53

+/-0.66

2.55

+/-1.16

3.80°

+/-2.06

2.33 *

  +/-0.79

2.27 *

+/-0.59

2.36

+/-0.48

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

1.2-6.2

Prothrombin time

 (sec)

10.23

+/-0.42

10.07

+/-0.23

10.14

+/-0.29

10.02

+/-0.15

9.69°°

+/-0.22

9.50

+/-0.16

9.25 **

 +/-0.17

9.35 **

+/-0.14

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

8.9 – 9.9

Notes:

Only parameters where statistical significance was demonstrated in one or two sexes are included in the table.

*= p<0.05, **= p<0.01; Dunnett two -sided test.

°= p<0.05,°°=p<0.01; Analysis of Variance test


 

Table 3 Clinical chemistry (mean +/-SD)

Sex

Males

Females

Groups/Conc (ppm/day)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

ALKP

(U/L)

81.2

+/-10.3

89.4

+/-21.0

106.3*

+/-20.1

139.0 **

+/-28.6

44.6

+/-14.4

54.4

+/-9.2

62.6*

+/-15.7

120.4**

+/-36.7

Historical control data

46 – 128

Historical control data

30 – 66

Bile acids

(μmol/L)

9.374

+/-1.269

9.597

+/-2.333

9.367

+/-0.922

11.59+

+/-1.628

10.910

+/-1.989

10.402

+/-3.061

11.099 

+/-2.581

12.653

+/-3.950 

Historical control data

5.53 – 35.56

Historical control data

-

ALT/GPT

(U/L)

45.5

+/-7.5

57.2

+/-40.7

45.3

+/-9.3

58.2

+/-22.0

61.3

+/-16.5

47.5*

+/-10.2

36.5**

+/-2.7

46.8*

+/-9.9

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

21 – 201

K+ (Potassium)

(mmol/L)

6.35

+/-1.09

6.15

+/-0.71

5.66

+/-0.33

6.03

+/-0.58

5.10

+/-0.35

5.35

+/-1.06

5.42

+/-0.32

5.94++

+/-0.77

Historical control data

-

Historical control data

4.4 – 6.3

Notes:

Only parameters where statistical significance was demonstrated in one or two sexes are included in the table.

*= p<0.05, **= p<0.01; Dunnett two sided test,

+= p<0.05,++= p<0.01; Dunn two sided test

Values out of the historical control range are indicated with bold font


 

Table 4 Gross pathology necropsy (Number of affected animals/ number of examined animals) 

 

 Sex    Males           Females         
 Group/conc (ppm/day)    control (0) Low (1500)  Mid (4200)  High (12500)   control (0) Low (1500)  Mid (4200)  High (12500) 
 kidney - dilatation of pelvis  examined  10  10  10  10  10  10  10  10
   normal  10/10  10/10  9/10  9/10  10/10  10/10  10/10  10/10
   dilatation; right, pelvis  0/10  0/10  1/10  1/10  0/10  0/10  0/10  0/10
 ovaries  examined  -  -  -  -  10  10  10  10
   normal  -  -  -  -  10/10  10/10  9/10  10/10
   small; bilateral  -  -  -  -  0/10  0/10  1/10  0/10
 uterus (cervix+body+horn)  examined  -  -  -  -  10  10  10  10
   normal  -  -  -  -  9/10  9/10  9/10  7/10
   dilatation; body; horn  -  -  -  -  1/10  1/10  1/10  3/10


Table 5 Histopathology (Number of affected animals/number of examined animals)

Sex

Males

Females

Groups/Conc (mg/kg bw/day)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Control

(0)

Low

(1500)

Mid

(4200)

High

(12500)

Liver

Examined

10

0

0

10

 

 

 

10

Hypertrophy, hepatocellular, centrilobular; minimal

 

 

8

0

 

 

4

slight

0

 

 

1

0

 

 

4

moderate

0

 

 

0

0

 

 

2

Adrenals

Examined

10

0

0

10

10

0

0

10

hypertrophy; zona glomerulosa; bilateral, minimal

1

 

 

1

0

 

 

5

slight

0

 

 

0

0

 

 

2

Thyroid gland + parathyroid gland

Examined

10

0

0

10

10

0

0

10

Hypertrophy, follicular cell; bilateral, minimal

1

 

 

6

0

 

 

0

 

Notes:

°p<0.001 group factor Chi-Squared & Fisher’s Exact Test: Chi-Squared

ANALYSIS OF THE TREATED DIETS: No test item was detected in the Control samples. The test item was homogenously distributed in each diet. The concentration of the test item in the diets was within the acceptable range at each dose level. Based on these results, the diets were considered suitable for the study purposes.


Table 6: Summary of dose intake values

 Group No.  1  2  3  4
 Group designation  Control  Low dose  Mid dose  High dose
 Nominal dose level (ppm)  0  1500  4200  12500
 mean dose intake (mg/kg bw/day)  0      
 males  103  289  895
 females  0  111  316 867 
 combined  0  107  302  881


Conclusions:
No test item was detected in the control diet samples. The test item was homogenously distributed in each diet. The concentration of the test item in the diets was within the acceptable range at each dose level at all occasions.
Naphthenic acids administered in diet at concentrations of 1500, 4200 and 12500 ppm, was equivalent to dietary doses of approximately 107, 302 and 881 mg/kg bw/day in the Low, Mid and High dose groups, respectively. Reduced palatability of the treated diet was seen at 4200 and 12500 ppm.
In summary, daily administration of Naphthenic acids in diet to Wistar rats during the treatment period under the conditions of this study did not result in test item related mortality or clinical signs. The lower body weight, body weight gain and food consumption values in the Mid and High dose groups are considered to be caused by the low palatability of the treated diet, with no evidence of a clear systemic toxic effect of the test item.
At clinical pathology, increased level of Alkaline Phosphatase activity (ALKP) was recorded in the High dose groups, which may correlate with hepatic effects seen at the organ weight measurement and histopathology. High potassium was measured in some High dose females, corresponding with adrenal histopathology. These findings were not clearly adverse. No other clear test item-related findings were seen in the clinical pathology parameters.
No macroscopic changes were seen at necropsy.Increased liver and kidney weights noted in the High dose male and female animals are considered to be a non-specific adaptive change in the liver and kidney, although the liver weight increases relative to body weight were about 40% and 60% for males and females respectively.At histopathology of the Control and High dose animals, hepatocellular hypertrophy in the liver and follicular cell hypertrophy in the thyroid were seen and are considered as secondary, non-adverse changes. The toxicological significance of hypertrophy in the adrenals, observed mostly in the High dose females, is uncertain.Although none of the individual findings in the High dose group were clearly adverse, taking into account the degree of liver weight increase, and the other findings observed at the High dose, it is considered prudent to not declare the High dose as being free of any adverse findings.
In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for Naphthenic acids is considered to be 302 mg/kg bw/day for the combined sexes (289 mg/kg bw/day for males and 316 mg/kg bw/day for females).
Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Remarks:
combined repeated dose and reproduction / developmental screening
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
No data
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study is performed by NTP according to GLP and valid methods, therefore it is considered to be adequate, reliable and relevant for classification. The score 1 was given by HPVIS.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
An extension for in vivo micronucleus study was also integrated in the study (see 7.6.2.)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OPPTS 870.3650
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
An extension for in vivo micronucleus study was also integrated in the study (see 7.6.2.)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
An extension for in vivo micronucleus study was also integrated in the study (see 7.6.2.)
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
no data
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The naphthenic acids were suspended in corn oil to the appropriate concentrations and administered in 10 ml/kg doses.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Males: dosing for 28-29 days
Females: Depending on the time at which mating occurred, females were dosed for 39-53 days
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, 900 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- All rats were examined twice daily for mortality and general health.
- All animals were examined approximately 1 hour after each treatment, and all unusual observations were recorded.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule:Detailed physical examinations of all animals were conducted weekly.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Body weights of male rats were recorded one week prior to test substance administration, on the first day of dose administration, on a weekly basis during the study and at termination. Body weights of female rats were recorded once week prior to test substance administration, on the first day of dose administration and weekly until evidence of copulation was obtained. From that point body weights of female rats were recorded on gestation days (GD) 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 and on lactation days (LD) 0, 1 and 4 (termination). For females for which there was no evidence of copulation, body weights were recorded weekly until termination. Body weights of offspring were recorded on post-natal day (PND) 1 and then on PND 4, prior to termination.

FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption determined: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No (gavage)
FOOD EFFICIENCY: no

WATER CONSUMPTION: No

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- On the day of scheduled termination
- The hematological investigation included measurements of total leukocyte count, erythrocyte count, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, reticulocyte count, mean platelet volume, red cell distribution width, hemoglobin distribution width, differential leukocyte count, and red cell morphology.
- Parameters checked in table 2 were examined.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- On the day of scheduled termination
- The serum chemistry investigation included measurements of concentrations of albumin, total protein, globulin, albumin/globulin ratio, total bilirubin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminostransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase, glucose, total cholesterol, calcium, chloride, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, triglycerides, and bile acids.

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- The potential for nervous system effects was assessed using a functional observation battery (FOB). All rats in the vehicle (corn oil) and naphthenic acid-treated groups were examined prior to dosing, after approximately 28 days of dosing, and, for females, prior to termination. The FOB procedures were based on previously developed protocols (Gad, 1982; Haggerty, 1989; Irwin, 1968; Moser et al., 1988; 1991; O’Donoghue, 1989). The testing was conducted in a sound attenuated room with a white noise generator set to operate at 70 + 10 dB. The investigators conducting the FOB were not aware of the treatment groups from which the respective animals were taken. The FOB consisted of the following: home cage observations; handling observations; open field observations; sensory observations and neuromuscular observations (Table 2). In addition there were physiological observations including body weight, body temperature and examination for catalepsy. There was also an assessment of locomotor activity which was measured electronically using a computer-controlled system with a series of infrared photobeams in a clear plastic rectangular cage. Animals were tested separately in 60 minute sessions divided into 5 minute intervals.
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
- At termination rats were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation.
- Necropsies were conducted on all animals sacrificed in extremis or at study termination.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
- Organs were removed weighed
- See table 1 and 3

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
- Organs were placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histologic examination.
- The disposition of organs and tissues was as listed in the table 4.
Statistics:
Mean parental body weights (weekly, gestation and lactation), body weight changes and food consumption, body weight changes, absolute and relative organ weights, clinical pathology values (except for gamma glutamyltransferase), and continuous FOB values were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Snedecor and Cochran, 1980) to determine intergroup differences between the vehicle control and test substance-treated groups. If the ANOVA revealed significant (p < 0.05) intergroup variance, Dunnett test (Dunnett, 1964) was used to compare the test substance-treated groups to the control group. Histopathological findings in the test substance-treated groups and FOB parameters yielding scalar or descriptive data were compared to the vehicle control group using Fisher’s Exact Test (Steel and Torrie, 1980). Gamma glutamyltransferase data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA (Kruskal and Wallis, 1952) to determine intergroup differences between the vehicle control and test substance-treated groups. If the ANOVA revealed significant (p < 0.05) intergroup variance, Dunn Test (Dunn, 1964) was used to compare the test substance-treated groups to the vehicle control group.
Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
2 mortalities and clinical observations seen in high dose females; clinical observations in some high dose group males.
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence):
2 mortalities and clinical observations seen in high dose females; clinical observations in some high dose group males.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Body weight gain at high dose was reduced for less than 10% in males and 4% in females versus control groups (not statistically significant).
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Food consumption was reduced in the high dosed male and female groups (statistically significant).
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Slightly reduced hemoglobin in males (statistically significant), however not in females.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Small incidental findings only, within historical range.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Increased liver weight in males and females of medium and high dose groups (only statistically significant at high dose). Significant increase in kidney weight in males of medium and high dose group (only statistically significant at high dose).
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Pale kidneys in the high dose males and reduction in the number of corpora lutea in the high dose females
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Hyaline-droplets in high dosed male kidneys (not relevant for humans); liver hepatocellular hypertrophy in high dosed males & females (adaptive); thyroid gland hypertrophy and vacuolation in (mid) and high dosed males & females (compensatory).
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
Two high dose females were terminated on Lactation Day 2; one was sacrificed in extremis due to acute inflammation of the uterus; the other was sacrificed due to total litter loss. All other rats survived to scheduled termination. Clinical observations, which were noted only in high dose group females and approximately an hour of dosing included hunched posture; rocking, lurching, and/or swaying while ambulating; walking on tiptoes; hypoactivity; and shallow respiration. Some of the high dose group males also exhibited hunched posture.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN, FOOD CONSUMPTION
Body weight gain was reduced in high dose group males but the overall difference was less than 10% and the differences were not statistically significant. Among the females, the body weight gain in the high dose group was approximately 4% below control values but not significantly different at the end of the mating period. These differences in weight gain were associated with significantly reduced food consumption in the high dose group animals.

HAEMATOLOGY
There were some hematology changes, primarily reductions in parameters related to hemoglobin content which were considered to have been treatment related. However, as is apparent from Table 1, the differences were small and there was no consistency between males and females.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
The clinical chemistry values showed a similar pattern. Among males the only statistically significant differences between control were for creatinine (control value = 0.3 + 0.1 mg/dL versus a value of 0.4 + 0.0 in the high dose group, p < 0.01), and chloride (control value = 104 + 1.1 mEq/L versus a value of 102 + 1.3 in the high dose group, p < 0.01). Among the female rats, statistically significant differences were found for albumin (control = 4.3 + 0.2 g/dL versus 4.7 + 0.3 in the high dose group, p < 0.05), total protein (control = 6.3 + 0.3 g/dL versus 6.7 + 0.4 in the high dose group, p < 0.05), glucose (control = 115 + 11 mg/dL versus 130 + 8.0 in the high dose group, p < 0.05), cholesterol (control = 69 + 14 mg/dL in the control versus 89 + 19 in the high dose group, p < 0.05), calcium (control = 10.6 + 0.4 mg/dL in the control versus 11.5 + 0.6 in the high dose group, p < 0.01), and phosphorus (control = 3.9 + 0.6 mg/dL versus 5.5 + 1.2 in the high dose group, p < 0.05). All of the differences were small and within the historical range of the laboratory. Additionally, most were significant at only the 0.05 level, and there was no consistency of response between the sexes. In the absence of any corresponding pathological findings, these differences were most likely incidental.

NEUROBEHAVIOUR
There were no statistically significant differences in parameters assessed as part of the functional observation battery including home cage observations, handling parameters, open field observations, sensory observations or neuromuscular observations. There were some small differences in body weight gain as indicated previously but other physiological parameters (catalepsy, body temperature) were not affected by treatment. There were also no differences in locomotor activity patterns.

ORGAN WEIGHTS
Organ weight determinations in males revealed significant increases in weights of liver, kidney, thyroid/parathyroid and epididymis although the differences in thyroid/parathyroid and epididymal weights were only statistically different when compared on a relative to body weight basis. In females, there was a significant increase in liver weights and significant reductions in lung weights, and absolute uterine weights (table 3). The lung weights were within the historical range for the laboratory, and were not associated with any pathological changes. The uterine weights were not significantly different when compared relative to body weights. All gravid females were in lactational anaestrus and undergoing involution. Uterine weight values all fell within the historical range for the laboratory and were not associated with any gross, histopathologic or clinical pathology changes. Other than the uterine weights there were no microscopic differences in the reproductive organs of the male and female rats.

GROSS PATHOLOGY
The only notable gross observations were those of pale kidneys in the high dose males and a reduction in the number of corpora lutea in the high dose group females. Otherwise, the results of the gross examination were not remarkable.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
The results of the pathological investigation are summarized in Table 4 . Kidney changes, reported in male rats only, were consistent with hyaline-droplet nephropathy (α2u-globulin-mediated nephropathy). The liver changes, found in organs from both male and female rats from the high dose group, were described as hepatocellular hypertrophy. Other changes included cortical lymphoid depletion of the thymus in females, primarily in rats from the high dose group. Epithelial hypertrophy and cytoplasmic vacuolation of the thyroid gland was noted in all treated animals, and cytoplasmic vacuolation of the zona fasciculate in the adrenal cortex was reported in males from all treatment groups and in high dose group females. The microscopic examination also revealed minimal cardiomyopathy which occurred with increased incidence in the males in the 100, 300 and 900 mg/kg/day groups. The pathologist noted that cardiomyopathy is a common finding in rats (Greaves, 2007a), that the incidence of cardiomyopathy in the treated animals was within the historical range of the laboratory, and that the severity of cardiomyopathy in the treated male rats was similar to or less than the degree of severity found in the control animals. The pathologist also noted that the cardiomyopathy was not associated with any gross observations, organ weight changes or alterations in clinical pathology parameters.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC
No neoplastic changes.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
Not provided

OTHER FINDINGS
The gross and pathological assessments did reveal some differences that were treatment-related but were unlikely to have been toxicologically important. Liver weights were significantly increased in high dose groups of both male and female rats, and there was also a statistically significant increase in liver weight in the 300 mg/kg/day dose group in the males. The histological findings were essentially limited to minimal evidence of hepatocellular hypertrophy in the high dose group animals. As none of the liver enzyme markers were increased, this was most likely evidence of enhanced metabolic capacity and adaptive rather than adverse (Cattley and Popp, 2002). Kidney weights were significantly elevated in the male rats from the high dose group, but not in the female rats. The histological evidence revealed the presence of hyaline droplets, mostly judged to have been of minimal severity, which increased in frequency in the male rats in a dose-dependent manner. As these were not found in female rats, the histological findings and gender-specificity, suggest the kidney changes were the consequence of an α-2u-globulin-related process which is male rat specific and not relevant to humans (Hard et al., 2008; Baetcke et al., 1991; Swenberg and McKeeman, 1998 ).

Minimal cardiomyopathy was reported to have increased in a dose-related fashion in male rats but was not considered to have been toxicologically important. In part because this is a common observation in control rats (Greaves et al., 2007b), and, additionally because the incidence was within the historical control range of the laboratory, the severity was not greater than that seen in the control groups, and because these microscopic observations were not associated with any other gross or clinical findings.
Other changes included higher mean thyroid/parathyroid weights with corresponding epithelial hypertrophy and cytoplasmic vacuolation. The histologic changes were mostly judged as minimal. It is plausible that these changes reflected a compensatory response related to the increased metabolic capacity of the liver and more rapid turnover of thyroid hormones (Curran, 1991; Capen, 1997). Lymphoid depletion of the thymus was observed in the high dose females and microscopic findings of cytoplasmic vacuolation of the adrenal cortex were noted in the males and high dose group females. The lymphoid cortical depletion of the thymus and adrenal cortex vacuolation were considered to have been stress responses (Greaves, 2007b) although cytoplasmic vacuolation of the adrenal cortex can also occur spontaneously (Frith et al., 2000) or as the result of pharmacological effects (Greaves, 2007c). The overall no effect level for all systemic effects was 100 mg/kg/day.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Systemic toxicity
Effect level:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
gross pathology
haematology
histopathology: non-neoplastic
mortality
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
Neurotoxicity
Effect level:
>= 900 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: not relevant, no adverse neurotoxic effects observed up to the highest dose level tested
Critical effects observed:
not specified

_Table 2. Results of investigations of hematology and clinical chemistry parameters which were statistically different from control values.

Parameter Measured

Corn Oil Control

100 mg/kg/day

300 mg/kg/day

900 mg/kg/day

Males, data taken at terminal sacrifice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Red Blood Cell Count (106/ul)b

9.22+0.54

9.28+0.28

8.91+0.34

8.78+0.22c

Hemoglobin (g/dL)b

15.7+0.72

15.8+0.48

15.2+0.54

14.7+0.44c

Hematocrit (%)b

48.1+2.4

48.6+1.6

46.5+1.5

45.0+1.8d

Platelet (103/ul)b

854+151

885+84

803+144

976+87d

Leukocytes, absolute (103/ul)b

0.02+0.02

0.03+0.02

0.02+0.02

0.04+0.03a

RDW (%)b

11.4+0.4

11.5+0.4

11.6+0.4

12.5+0.6d

HDW (g/dL)b

2.58+0.10

2.68+0.12

2.76+0.16c

2.77+0.27c

Females, data taken at termination (lactation day 4)

 

White blood cell countb

5.15+1.30

6.89+1.58

7.68+2.24c

7.59+1.85c

APTT (seconds)b

16.8+1.9

15.9+2.3

15.8+3.1

13.9+1.4c

Lymphocytes, absolute (103/ul)

3.32+0.61

4.50+1.42

5.11+1.75c

4.96+1.60c

Monocytes, absolute (103/ul)

0.11+0.10

0.24+0.21

0.21+0.12

0.35+0.23c

1. Parameters not affected by treatment included:

a.      Males – white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume (fL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg), mean corpuscular hemoglobin content (g/dL), prothrombin time (sec), APTT (sec), reticulocytes (%), reticulocytes, absolute (103/ul), MPV (fL), neutrophils (%), lymphocytes (%), monocytes (%), eosinophils (%), basophils (%), leucocytes(%), neutrophils, absolute (103/ul), lymphocytes, absolute (103/ul), monocytes, absolute (103/ul), eosinophils, absolute (103/ul), basophils, absolute (103/ul).

b.      Females – red blood cell count (106/ul), Hemoglobin content (g/dL), hematocrit (%), mean corpuscular volume (fL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (pg), mean corpusc ular hemoglobin content (g/dL), platelet count (103/ul), prothrombin time (sec), reticulocytes (%), reticulocytes, absolute (103/ul), ), MPV (fL), neutrophils (%), lymphocytes (%), monocytes (%), eosinophils (%), basophils (%), leucocytes(%), neutrophils, absolute (103/ul), eosinophils, absolute (103/ul), basophils, absolute (103/ul), Leukocytes absolute (103/ul), RDW (%), HDW (g/dL)

Table3. Statistically significant changes in terminal body weights and organ weights (g). The data are given as mean+SD.

Parameter

Sham Control

Corn Oil Control

100 mg/kg/day

300 mg/kg/day

900 mg/kg/day

Males

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Body Weight

467+27

454+45

448+45

439+34

412+28

Liver

15.61+1.43

13.46+2.01

13.98+2.04

15.69+1.83*

19.94+2.08b

Kidney

3.51+0.25

3.21+0.20a

3.38+0.39

3.53+0.33

3.77+0.46b

Heart

1.46+0.09

1.46+0.21

1.41+0.14

1.43+0.13

1.32+0.13

Thyroid/parathyroid

0.019+0.002

0.019+0.001

0.020+0.002

0.020+0.002

0.020+0.002

Epididymis (LT)

0.57+0.14

0.60+0.05

0.60+0.04

0.66+0.05a

0.63+0.06

Epididymis (RT)

0.62+0.04

0.62+0.06

0.61+0.03

0.66+0.04

0.65+0.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

Females

Final body Weight

335+25

313+23

301+30

294+24

289+24

Liver

13.6+2.0

11.7+1.5

12.1+1.1

13.3+1.5

17.9+2.4b

Kidney

2.39+0.17

2.07+0.18a

2.11+0.15

2.05+0.25

2.17+0.19

Heart

1.21+0.23

1.10+0.10

1.08+0.10

1.07+0.11

1.01+0.13

Lungs

1.36+0.13

1.40+0.13

1.26+0.12a

1.20+0.12b

1.20+0.07b

Uterus/Vagina

1.07+0.19

1.00+0.14

0.86+0.08a

0.88+0.11a

0.85+0.12a

a = P < 0.05, b = P < 0.01

Table 4. Summary of microscopic findings from rats following repeated treatment with refined naphthenic acids.

Sex

Males

Females

Doses,mg/kg/day

Corn Oil

100

300

900

Corn Oil

100

300

900

N

12

12

12

12

9

12

10

10

Kidney

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hyaline Droplets

0

3

10b

11b

0

0

0

0

Minimal

0

3

9b

9b

0

0

0

0

Mild

0

0

1

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nephropathy

0

0

2

9b

0

0

0

0

Minimal

0

0

2

5a

0

0

0

0

Mild

0

0

0

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypertrophy, hepatocellular, centrilobular

0

0

0

8b

0

0

0

10b

Minimal

0

0

0

8b

0

0

0

10b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vacuolation, hepatocellular

2

1

2

0

0

1

0

2

Minimal

1

1

2

0

0

1

0

2

Mild

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thymus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depletion, lymphoid, cortex

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

5a

Minimal

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

4

Mild

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thyroid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hypertrophy, epithelial

0

6a

9b

11b

0

3

4

8b

Minimal

0

6a

9b

11b

0

3

4

6a

Mild

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vacuolation, cytoplasmic

0

6a

9b

10b

0

3

4

8b

Minimal

0

6a

9b

10b

0

3

4

8b

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adrenal Cortex

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vacuolation, cytoplasmic

0

2

3

2

0

0

0

2

Minimal

0

2

3

2

0

0

0

1

Mild

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cardiomyopathy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimal

8

5

4

4

3

3

2

4

Mild

4

7

8a

8a

0

0

0

0

a = P < 0.05, b = P < 0.01

Conclusions:
The overall no adverse effect level for all systemic effects was 100 mg/kg/day.
The overall no adverse effect level for neurotoxicity was 900 mg/kg/day.
Executive summary:

A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in Wistar ratswas performed by oral gavage with Naphtenic acids in corn oil. There were 3 test material treated groups (100, 300 and 900 mg/kg bw) along with a vehicle treated group (corn oil) each in 12 animals/sex/group. Male rats were dosed during premating, mating and afterwards for 28 days in total and females were dosed during premating, mating, gestation and up to day 3 post partum. In this section, only repeated dose toxicity parameters are discussed: (furher info on reproductive & developmental parameters is given in Section 7.8.1 and 7.8.2.

At the lowest dose of 100 mg/kg bw, no effects were observed both in male and female rats. At the 300 and 900 mg/kg bw doses, there were no relevant effects on clinical chemistry (only slight incidental findings) and neurobehiour at all dose levels. Further effects at the medium and high doses are described:

-  Two mortalities and clinical observations were seen in high dose females; clinical observations in some high dose group males.

-   Body weight gain at the high dose was reduced for less than 10% in males and 4% in females versus control groups (not statistically significant). This was associated with reduced food consumption in both groups (statistically significant).

-   Slightly reduced hemoglobin in males (statistically significant), however not in females.

-   Increased liver weight in males and females of medium and high dose groups (only statistically significant at high dose); significant increase in kidney weight in males of medium and high dose group (only statistically significant at high dose).

-   Pale kidneys in the high dose males and reduction in the number of corpora lutea in the high dose females.

-   Hyaline-droplets in high dosed male kidneys (not relevant for humans); liver hepatocellular hypertrophy in high dosed males & females (considered to be rather adaptive than adverse); ad thyroid gland epithelial hypertrophy and cytoplasmatic vacuolation in (mid) and high dosed males & females (considered to be compensatory related to the increased metabolic capacity of the liver and more rapid turnover of thyroid hormones).

In conclusion, NOAEL for systemic toxicity was 100 mg/kg bw, whereas NOAEL for neurotoxicity was 900 mg/kg bw, both in male and female rats.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
302 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subchronic
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
High quality study
System:
gastrointestinal tract

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

90 -days repeated dose toxicity study

A 90-day study was performed to obtain information on the toxicity of Naphthenic acids, when administered in diet to Wistar rats at 3 dose levels for 90 days. Forty male and forty female Wistar rats were treated (10 males and 10 females per group) with 0, 1500, 4200 or 12500 ppm, what could be recalculated as actual intake as 0, 107, 302 and 881 mg/kg bw/day.

Analysis of diets for test item concentration and homogeneity was performed at the start of feeding and once during the last week of the treatment for the two batches used during the study, using a validated GC-FID method.

Parameters measured during the study included signs of morbidity and mortality twice daily, daily general observation or weekly detailed observation of clinical signs, weekly body weight and food consumption, and clinical pathology evaluation, including haematology, coagulation, clinical chemistry and urinalysis.The mean dose intake of each group was calculated based on the food consumption data.Neurological assessment, such as functional observation battery (FOB) including measurements of the landing foot splay, grip strength and motor activity were performed during the last week of the treatment. At termination, necropsy with macroscopic examination was performed. Weights of selected organs were recorded and representative tissues/organs were sampled and preserved in appropriate fixatives from the animals.Full histopathology was performed in Groups 1 (Control) and 4 (High dose).

The daily administration of Naphthenic acids in diet to Wistar rats during the treatment period under the conditions of this study did not result in test item related mortality or clinical signs.

The lower body weight, body weight gain and food consumption values in the Mid and High dose groups are considered to be caused by the low palatability of the treated diet, with no evidence of a clear systemic toxic effect of the test item.

At clinical pathology, increased level of Alkaline Phosphatase activity (ALKP) was recorded in the High dose groups, which may correlate with hepatic effects seen at the organ weight measurement and histopathology. High potassium was measured in some High dose females, corresponding with adrenal histopathology. These findings were not clearly adverse. No other clear test item-related findings were seen in the clinical pathology parameters.

No macroscopic changes were seen at necropsy.

Increased liver and kidney weights noted in the High dose male and female animals are considered to be a non-specific adaptive change in the liver and kidney, although the liver weight increases relative to body weight were about 40% and 60% for males and females respectively.

At histopathology of the Control and High dose animals, hepatocellular hypertrophy in the liver and follicular cell hypertrophy in the thyroid were seen and are considered as secondary, non-adverse changes. The toxicological significance of hypertrophy in the adrenals, observed mostly in the High dose females, is uncertain. Additional histopathology tests are performed in the mid and low dose groups and will be available in the final report.

Although none of the individual findings in the High dose group were clearly adverse, taking into account the degree of liver weight increase, and the other findings observed at the High dose, it is considered prudent to not declare the High dose as being free of any adverse findings.

In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for Naphthenic acids is considered to be 302 mg/kg bw/day for the combined sexes (289 mg/kg bw/day for males and 316 mg/kg bw/day for females).

The final report of this study is not yet available as additional histopathology is performed on the mid and low dose groups. Update of endpoint summary is scheduled for July 2019.

Combined repeated dose with reproduction / developmental toxicity

The OECD 422 study (HPVIS, 2010) is performed in Wistar rats, exposed by oral gavage with naphthenic acid in corn oil. There were 3 test material treated groups (100, 300 and 900 mg/kg bw) along with a vehicle treated group (corn oil) each in 12 animals/sex/group. Male rats were dosed during premating, mating and afterwards for 28 days in total and females were dosed during premating, mating, gestation and up to day 3 post partum.

At the lowest dose (100 mg/kg bw), no effects were observed both in male and female rats. At the 300 and 900 mg/kg bw doses, there were no relevant effects on clinical chemistry (only slight incidental findings) and neurobehaviour.

Following effects are observed at the mid dose (300 mg/kg bw/d):

- increased liver weight in males and females

- significant increase in kidney weight in males

- thyroid gland epithelial hypertrophy and cytoplasmatic vacuolation in males (considered compensatory related to the increased metabolic capacity of the liver and more rapid turnover of thyroid hormones).

- there were no effects observed on clinical chemistry parameters

Following effects are observed at the high dose (900 mg/kg bw/d):

-  Two mortalities and clinical observations were seen in females; clinical observations in some males.

-   Body weight gain at the high dose was reduced for less than 10% in males and 4% in females versus control groups, associated with

reduced food consumption in both groups.

-   Slightly reduced hemoglobin in males, however not in females.

-   Increased liver weight in males and females; significant increase in kidney weight in males.

-   Pale kidneys in the males and reduction in the number of corpora lutea in the females (not statistically significant).

-   Hyaline-droplets in male kidneys (not relevant for humans); liver hepatocellular hypertrophy in males & females (adaptive); and thyroid gland epithelial hypertrophy and cytoplasmatic vacuolation in males and females (considered compensatory related to the increased metabolic capacity of the liver and more rapid turnover of thyroid hormones).

In conclusion, hazardous effects were observed in the mid and high dose group (300 and 900 mg/kg bw/d, resp.). Similar effects are observed in the 90 -day repeated dose toxicity study but at a higher dose level (881 mg/kg bw/day). There were no adverse effects observed in the 90 -day study at the dose level of 302 mg/kg bw/d. It might thus be questioned whether the route of exposure in the OECD 422 study (oral gavage) did not influence the NOAEL, by induction of a bolus dose in the stomach or gastrointestinal tract. As no effects were observed at 302 mg/kg bw/d in the 90-day repeated dose toxicity study (via oral diet), this dose level is considered as the most reliable dose descriptor for systemic effects after repeated exposure.

 

Justification for classification or non-classification

Available data suggest values that warrant no classification for specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure according to the criteria laid down in Regulation 1272/2008 (CLP).