Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-870-1 | CAS number: 111-44-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Oral exposure:
Based on a GLP study carried out according to OECD test guideline No. 422 (reliability 1), the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for P0 reproductive performance is 3 mg/kg/day based on reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for P0 reproductive performance and fetal toxicity is < 0.6 mg/kg/day based on slightly higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day.
Inhalation exposure:
Only low reliability (reliability 4) data are available. The data originate from a review on the toxicology of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether by USEPA (1989), which cites the results of unpublished studies by Dow Chemical. Rats and guinea pigs were exposed for 130 days to the substance (concentration: 0.43 mg/L; 7h/days; 5 days/week). Exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues, but no tests of reproductive function or success were performed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study conducted on behalf of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Name (as cited): 2,2'-Dichlorodiethyl ether
- Purity: 99.50% (GC)
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: stored at room temperature in a dark place - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Crj: CD(SD)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Japan (Hino Breeding Center)
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: [yes/no]
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: males = 333.0–370.1g ; females = 205.3–250.1g
- Housing: biotron barrier system
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: eight days, including six days of quarantine
DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY:
- Feed: Oriental Kobo Kogyo solid feed, MF, lot nos. 060306 and 060509
- Water: Hita City tap water (chlorine added)
Feed and water confirmed to be within the reference values set down by the "Contaminant Limits in Feed and Media" in the EPA’s harmful substance guidelines
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21–25°C
- Humidity (%): 40–70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 19h dark / 7h light - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Remarks:
- Fujimi Seiyakusho, lot no. 0380HS
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance was prepared by weighing a known amount of 2,2'-dichloroethyl ether in olive oil to reach a final concentration of 0.3% (w/v). Solutions at 0.06 and 0.012% (w/v) were diluted from the 0.3 w/v% solution with olive oil. New stock solution were prepared weekly and stored in a cool dry place before dosing.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: the substance was considered to be insoluble in pure water
- Concentration in vehicle: 0.06, 0.012 and 0.3% (w/v)
- Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg bw - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: one-to-one
- Length of cohabitation: until mating but no longer than 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged alone - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The uniformity of the test substance in the prepared solution was measured by taking n = 1 samples from the top, middle, and bottom layers of the prepared 0.3 and 0.12 w/v% solutions, pretreating the samples, and measuring the test substance concentration once each using gas chromatography (GC).
Stability of the test substance in the prepared solution was measured by storing the prepared solutions whose uniformity was confirmed in a cool, dark place, taking n = 1 samples from the middle layer after storage for seven and 14 days, pretreating these, and then using GC to measure the test substance concentrations once each.
Concentration of the test substance in the prepared solution was measured by taking n = 1 samples from the middle layer after preparation of the initially prepared 0.3, 0.06, and 0.012 w/v% solutions, pretreating these, and then using GC to measure the test substance concentrations once each.
The 0.3 and 0.012 w/v% solutions were confirmed to be uniform and stable after storage for 14 days in a cool, dark place. The test substance concentration in the prepared solution used for the initial dosing was confirmed to be 100±10% for all concentrations in the set values for 0.3, 0.06, and 0.012 w/v%. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: 42 days
Females: 42-45 days - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.6 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Dose selection was based on a range finding study.
Three male and three female rats from each group were used to conduct a repeated oral dosing for a period of 14 days at doses of 0, 1, 5, 20, and 100 mg/kg bw/day.
Observations: Increase in hematocrit at 5 mg/kg bw/day and higher. At 20 mg/kg bw/day and higher, low spontaneous locomotion and low respiratory rate were observed. At 100 mg/kg bw/day, weight loss, staggering gait, abnormal gait, coma, feeding problems, low stool amount, low body temperature, lid-closure, deep breathing, mucous stool, prone and recumbent positions, and staining of the lower abdomen and around the anus. All test animals died at this dose.
Dose selection for the full test: Based on observations from the range finding study, the maximum dose was set at 15 mg/kg bw/day with two other doses at 3 and 0.6 mg/kg/day. The doses were slected based on the fact that low spontaneous locomotion and low respiratory rate was observed at 20 mg/kg bw/day and that the dosing period would be longer.
- Rationale for animal assignment: randomized extraction by weight, so that members of each group were of approximately the same weight
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: 5 males and females (unmated) from the 0 and 15 mg/kg bw/day groups
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 14 days - Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule:
Males: twice a day from the first day of dosing until the day before necropsy
Females: twice a day from the first day of dosing until the fourth day of delivery, including the delivery state and nursing state
Recovery period: once a day during the recovery period until the day before necropsy
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: observed in a blind fashion once prior to dosing and once a week after dosing had started
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Males and females were measured once a week during the habituation period and on the day of grouping. After grouping, males were measured on dosing day 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 43 (day of removal). The females were measured on dosing day 1, 3, 7, and 14, and gestation day 0, 7, 14, 17, and 20 during the gestation period, and, after delivery, postpartum day 0 (day of delivery), 4, and 5 (day of removal). During the recovery period, both males and females were measured on day 1, 3, 7, 14, and 15 of recovery.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE :
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Not specified
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: the last day of the dosing period and the last day of the recovery period
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (ether)
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 5 animals/sex/dose group
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: the last day of the dosing period and the last day of the recovery period
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: 5 animals/sex/dose groupd.
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule: observed in a blind fashion once prior to dosing and once a week after dosing had started
- Dose groups that were examined: all dose groups
- Battery of functions tested: reactivity testing, posture, motor activity, respiration, lid closure, gait, tremor/twitch/convulsion, and presence/absence of stereotypic behaviour and abnormal behaviour
IMMUNOLOGY: No - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- For all females, vaginal plaque was taken from the day dosing started until the day mating was confirmed. Giemsa staining was used for optical microscopy. The average number of days in the oestrous cycle was calculated between oestrus days between the first and 14th days of dosing. The incidence of abnormal oestrous cycles (individuals not exhibiting regular oestrous cycles) was also calculated.
- Statistics:
- Significant differences with the control group in the parents’ mating rate, insemination rate, conception rate, implantation rate, pre-implantation embryo loss rate, post-implantation embryo loss rate, birth rate, delivery rate, day 0 live birth rate and day 4 live birth rate were tested using the chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test if the peripheral frequency was 10 or less).
The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test method was used to test significance of the birth rate, live birth rate, out of table abnormality rate, and day 4 survival rate of pups in all groups, followed by a test of significant difference with the control groups using the Dunnett multiple comparison method. - Reproductive indices:
- FERTILITY TEST:
Mating was checked daily during the mating period. If sperm was found in the vaginal plug or the vaginal plaque, mating was assumed to have been performed, and that day was established as day 0 of pregnancy. The following indices were calculated:
- Mating rate: (number of copulating animals/number of animals placed together) × 100
- Insemination rate: (number of males that impregnated a female/number of mating males) × 100
- Conception rate: (number of pregnant females/number of mating males) × 100
- Days required for mating
- Implantation rate: (number of implantation marks/number of corpora lutea of pregnancy) × 100
- Pre-implantation embryo loss rate: [(number of corpora lutea of pregnancy – number of implantation marks)/number of corpora lutea of pregnancy] × 100
- Post-implantation embryo loss rate: [(number of implantation marks – number of pups born)/number of implantation marks] × 100
DELIVERY AND NURSING:
The following indices were calculated:
- Gestation period (number of days from the day mating was confirmed until the day delivery was complete)
- Birth rate: (number of females birthing live pups/number of pregnant females) × 100
- Delivery rate: (number of birthed pups/number of implantation marks) × 100 - Offspring viability indices:
- Number of births, number of dead pups, number of live births, sex and number of live births outside the table were examined on the day of birth (calculated starting on day 0 after birth). The general state, the number of pups alive and the number of pups who died was observed through day 3 after birth, and on the fourth day after birth (slaughter date) the number of pups, the sex, the number of live pups outside the table, the number of dead pups, and the number of dead pups outside the table were examined, and the following indices were calculated:
- Birth rate: (number of live births/number of implantation marks) × 100
- Live birth rate: (number of live births/number of births) × 100
- Day 0 live pup ratio: number of live male pups on day 0/number of live pups on day 0
- Out of table abnormality rate: (number of live births having out of table abnormalities/number of examined live births) × 100
- Day 4 survival rate: (number of live pups four days after birth/number of births on day of birth) × 100
- Day 4 live pup ratio: number of live male pups on day 4/number of live pups on day 4 - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- DOSING PERIOD
Salivation was observed in one female each in the 3 and 15 mg/kg groups before mating was confirmed. Besides this, low spontaneous locomotion, respiratory rate and body temperature were seen on dosing day 22 in one animal in the 0.6 mg/kg group during the gestation period. This animal died during delivery the next day. Reddish urine was observed in one animal in the 15 mg/kg group.
RECOVERY PERIOD
No abnormalities were seen in any of the males or females. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One animal in the 0.6 mg/kg group died during delivery.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- AT THE END OF DOSING PERIOD
Among males, low mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular haemoglobin were observed in the 3 mg/kg and higher groups. No significant differences were seen in the 0.6mg/kg group.
Among females, a high lymphocyte ratio was seen in the 0.6 mg/kg group, but no related changes were observed, so this was not thought to be a toxicologically important change. No significant differences were seen in the 3 and 15 mg/kg groups.
AT THE END OF RECOVERY PERIOD
No significant differences were seen in the male groups receiving the test substance.
Among females, high red blood cell and platelet counts were observed in the 15 mg/kg group, and a low reticulocyte count ratio and neutrophil ratio were observed. - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- AT THE END OF DOSING PERIOD
No significant differences were seen in the test substance dosing groups among males or females.
AT THE END OF RECOVERY PERIOD
Among males, high chlorine values were seen in the 15 mg/kg group. Among females, high urea nitrogen values were observed in the 15 mg/kg group, but no relevant changes were seen, so this was thought to be an incidental change. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Although continuous resting was observed in one animal in the 3 mg/kg group, the animal was normal until collection of the vaginal plaque on day 16, so this was deemed to be caused by a phantom pregnancy. No abnormalities were seen in any other animals.
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All females were pregnant in the control and treated groups. There was no effect on gestation length, the number of corpora lutea or the number of implantation sites. No differences were observed on the gestation index (Number of pregnant females with live pups / Number of pregnant females ×100), on the implantation index (Number of implantation sites / Number of corpora lutea × 100) or on preimplantation loss.
A lower delivery index (Number of pups born / Number of implantation sites × 100) was observed in test animals treated with 0.6 and 15 mg/kg bw/day. However, no effect was observed at 3 mg/kg bw/day and the connection with dose is thus unclear. The effect on delivery rate was considered incidental in the 0.6 and 3 mg/kg bw/day, while it was considered to be an effect of toxicity of the test substance at 15 mg/ kg bw/day.
Higher post-implantation loss ((Number of implantation sites - Number of live pups on postnatal day 0) / Number of implantation sites x 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (7.2, 15.6, 17.0 and 18.7%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day) group, respectively). Similarly, lower birth index (Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of implantation sites × 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (92.8, 84.4, 83.0 and 81.3%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day) group, respectively). However, it is these observation originates from toxicity towards germ cells of the P0 generation, from embryotoxicity or, more generally, from maternal toxicity. In addition, no effect was observed on measured parameters and significant differences were only observed on derived indices.
See "Any other informations on results incl. tables" for details - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Parental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effect at the highest dose
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Reproductive performance
- Effect level:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Effect level:
- < 0.6 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: slighlty higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A drop in body temperature in three litters was observed in the 3 mg/kg group, a wound to the end of the tail was observed in one animal in nine in one litter in the 15 mg/kg group, and a drop in body temperature was observed in another litter in the same group. These observations were considered incidental.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The live birth index (number of pups born alive/number of pups born x 100) was slightly lower in the 3 mg/kg bw/day (88.8%) compared with the concurrent contrl (96%). However, without any dose relationship and any similar finding at the high dose of 15 mg/kg bw/day, this was considered incidental.
Higher (98.1%) day 4 survival rates (i.e. viability index corresponding to the number of pups alive on PND 4/number of pups born alive x 100) as compared to control (89.9%) was observed in the 0.6 mg/kg bw/day group. At the opposite, a significant decrease in the viability index was found in the 3 mg/kg group (80.1%), while no significant effects were detected at 15 mg/kg bw/day (87.8%). Without any dose relationship and without any significant effect observed at 15 mg/kg bw/day, these observations were considered as incidental.
Higher post-implantation loss ((Number of implantation sites - Number of live pups on postnatal day 0) / Number of implantation sites x 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (7.2, 15.6, 17.0 and 18.7%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day) group, respectively). However, it is unclear if post-implantation originates from toxicity towards germ cells of the P0 generation, from embryotoxicity or, more generally, from maternal toxicity.
Significant differences related to pups mortality parameters were only observed on derived indices. No significant differences were observed on measured parameters (number of live pups (male or female) at birth or at PND 4). The mortality observed is not considered to be treatment related. - Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant differences were seen in the weights on the day of birth and four days later in groups receiving the test substance.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- < 0.6 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: slighlty higher post-implantation loss that may originate from embryotoxicity.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 0.6 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Following the oral (gavage) administration of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether at doses of 0.6, 3 and 15 mg/kg/Day, the only effect observed was a higher absolute and relative weights of the adrenal glands in the 15 mg/kg group of the male recovery group, and high absolute weights of the thymus in the same female group. However, as these findings were not associated with any other organic changes, they were considered incidental.
The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for parental toxicity is therefore 15 mg/kg/Day.
There were no test item-related pathological changes in the male or female genital system and no effect on the oestrus cycle. here was no effect on gestation length, the number of corpora lutea or the number of implantation sites. No differences were observed on the gestation index, on the implantation index or on preimplantation loss. A lower delivery index was observed in test animals treated with 0.6 and 15 mg/kg bw/day. However, no effect was observed at 3 mg/kg bw/day and the connection with dose is thus unclear. The effect on delivery rate was considered incidental in the 0.6 and 3 mg/kg bw/day, while it was considered to be an effect of toxicity of the test substance at 15 mg/ kg bw/day.
Higher post-implantation loss was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (7.2, 15.6, 17.0 and 18.7%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively). Similarly, lower birth index (Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of implantation sites × 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (92.8, 84.4, 83.0 and 81.3%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively).
Under the conditions of this study he No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for P0 reproductive performance is 3 mg/kg/day based on reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for P0 reproductive performance and foetal toxicity is < 0.6 mg/kg/day based slighlty higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day. - Executive summary:
The objectives of this study, conducted on behalf of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, were to evaluate the potential toxic effects of the test item, Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether, when exposed for a minimum of 28 Days and the potential to affect male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behaviour, conception, parturition and early postnatal development. Parental, reproduction (up to and including implantation) and developmental (from implantation onwards) No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Levels (NOAELs) were evaluated. This GLP study was carried out according to OECD test guideline No. 422.
Three groups of 12 males and 12 femalesCrl:CD (SD) rats were given the test item, Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether, by daily oral (gavage) administration at dose levels of 0.6, 3 and 15 mg/kg/day. The male animals received dosing starting two weeks prior to the start of the mating period, throughout the mating period, and up to the day before the necropsy, for a total of 42 days. The female animals received dosing starting two weeks prior to the start of the mating period, throughout the mating, gestation, and nursing periods, and up to the day before the necropsy (fourth day of delivery), for a total of 42 to 45 days. Males and females were subjected to general and detailed observation throughout dosing, including functional assessments, weight and food intake measurements, necropsy, histopathological examinations of major organs and blood tests.
High absolute and relative weights of the adrenal glands were seen in the 15 mg/kg group of the male recovery group, and high absolute weights of the thymus were seen in the same female group. However, the adrenal glands did not have any other accompanying organic changes, nor were any changes seen in the relative weights of the thymus, so these were judged to be incidental changes. No ignificant change in any other the investigated parameters was observed at 15 mg/kg bw/day, which was considered to be the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for parental toxicity.
P0 Generation:
There were no test item-related pathological changes in the male or female genital system and no effect on the oestrus cycle. All females were pregnant in the control and treated groups. There was no effect on gestation length, the number of corpora lutea or the number of implantation sites. No differences were observed on the gestation index, on the implantation index or on preimplantation loss. A lower delivery index was observed in test animals treated with 0.6 and 15 mg/kg bw/day. However, no effect was observed at 3 mg/kg bw/day and the connection with dose is thus unclear. The effect on delivery rate was considered incidental in the 0.6 and 3 mg/kg bw/day, while it was considered to be an effect of toxicity of the test substance at 15 mg/ kg bw/day.
Higher post-implantation loss was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (7.2, 15.6, 17.0 and 18.7%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively). Similarly, lower birth index (Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of implantation sites × 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (92.8, 84.4, 83.0 and 81.3%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively). However, it is unclear if these observations originate from toxicity towards germ cells of the P0 generation, from embryotoxicity or, more generally, from maternal toxicity. In addition, no effect was observed on measured parameters and significant differences were only observed on derived indices.
F1 generation:
The live birth index (number of pups born alive/number of pups born x 100) was slightly lower in the 3 mg/kg bw/day (88.8%) compared with the concurrent contrl (96%). However, without any dose relationship and any similar finding at the high dose of 15 mg/kg bw/day, this was considered incidental.
Higher (98.1%) day 4 survival rates (i.e. viability index corresponding to the number of pups alive on PND 4/number of pups born alive x 100) as compared to control (89.9%) was observed in the 0.6 mg/kg bw/day group. At the opposite, a significant decrease in the viability index was found in the 3 mg/kg group (80.1%), while no significant effects were detected at 15 mg/kg bw/day (87.8%). Without any dose relationship and without any significant effect observed at 15 mg/kg bw/day, these observations were considered as incidental.
In conclusion, under the conditions of this study the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for P0 reproductive performance is 3 mg/kg/day based on reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for P0 reproductive performance and fetal toxicity is < 0.6 mg/kg/day based slightly higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day.
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- repeated inhalation exposure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- no tests of reproductive function or success were performed
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Study report from Dow chemical (1958). Exposure to a fixed dose 7hr/day, 5dys/week for 130 days. No access to the full study report.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- pre-GLP
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Name (as cited): Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
- Purity: not specified - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 130 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7h/day; 5 days/week
- Dose / conc.:
- 69 ppm
- Remarks:
- equivalent to 0.43 mg/L
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Positive control:
- Not specified
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy of reproductive tissues
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
- Histopathological examination of reproductive tissues - Reproductive indices:
- Reproductive function or success not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Reduced body weight.
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effects on lungs, heart, liver, kidneys and reproductive tissues.
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
- Conclusions:
- Inhalation exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether (7h/days; 5 days/week) for 130 days at 0.43 mg/L did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues.
- Executive summary:
In this review on the toxicology of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether, the author cites an unpublished study from Dow Chemical (1958), where rats were exposed for 130 days to the substance (concentration: 69 ppm; 7h/days; 5 days/week). The publication does not detail the result obtained from this study. The significance of the findings is questionable as only one test concentration was studied and the number of test animals is not specified. However, it has been subjected to the formal review process of U.S. EPA and it is thus judged acceptable for the assessment of the substance.
Inhalation exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether (7h/days; 5 days/week) for 130 days at 0.43 mg/L did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues, but no tests of reproductive function or success were performed.
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- repeated inhalation exposure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- no tests of reproductive function or success were performed
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Study report from Dow chemical (1958). Exposure to a fixed dose 7hr/day, 5dys/week for 130 days. No access to the full study report.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- pre-GLP
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Name (as cited): Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
- Purity: not specified - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 130 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7h/day; 5 days/week
- Dose / conc.:
- 69 ppm
- Remarks:
- equivalent to 0.43 mg/L
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Positive control:
- Not specified
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy of reproductive tissues
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
- Histopathological examination of reproductive tissues - Reproductive indices:
- Reproductive function or success not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Reduced body weight.
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effects on lungs, heart, liver, kidneys and reproductive tissues.
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
- Conclusions:
- Inhalation exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether (7h/days; 5 days/week) for 130 days at 0.43 mg/L did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues.
- Executive summary:
In this review on the toxicology of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether, the author cites an unpublished study from Dow Chemical (1958), where guinea pigs were exposed for 130 days to the substance (concentration: 69 ppm; 7h/days; 5 days/week). The publication does not detail the result obtained from this study. The significance of the findings is questionable as only one test concentration was studied and the number of test animals is not specified. However, it has been subjected to the formal review process of U.S. EPA and it is thus judged acceptable for the assessment of the substance.
Inhalation exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether (7h/days; 5 days/week) for 130 days at 0.43 mg/L did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues, but no tests of reproductive function or success were performed.
Referenceopen allclose all
## Reproductive parameters in parental rats treated orally with 2,2'-dichlorodiethylether in the combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test:
Dose (mg/kg bw/day) | ||||
0 | 0.6 | 3 | 15 | |
Number of mated pairs | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Number of of copulated pairs | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Number of of pregnant females | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Copulation index (%)* | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Fertilization index (%)** | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Conception index (%)*** | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Pairing days until copulation (Mean ± SD) | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 0.9 |
* (Number of copulated pairs /Number of mated pairs) × 100
** (Number of impregnated males /Number of males in copulated pairs) × 100
*** (Number of pregnant females /Number of females in copulated pairs) × 100
## Postnatal course of rat litters whose parents treated orally with 2,2'-dichlorodiethylether in the combined repeated dose and reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test:
Dose (mg/kg bw/day) | ||||
0 | 0.6 | 3 | 15 | |
Number of pregnants | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Gestation length in days (Mean ± SD) | 21.9 ± 0.5 | 21.9 ± 0.3 | 22.1 ± 0.5 | 22.2 ± 0.4 |
Number of dams with live newborns: | ||||
- on postpartum day 0 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 12 |
- on postpartum day 4 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 11 |
Number of corpora lutea (Mean ± SD) | 15.3 | 15.9 | 15.7 | 15.7 |
Number of implantation sites (Mean ± SD) | 15.1 | 15.5 | 15.2 | 15.2 |
- Gestation index (%)1 | 100 (12/12) | 100 (12/12) | 100 (12/12) | 100 (12/12) |
- Implantation index (%)2 | 98.9 (181/183) | 97.4 (186/191) | 96.8 (182/188) | 96.8 (182/188) |
- Delivery index (%)3 | 96.7 (175/181) | 87.1 (162/186)** | 93.4 (170/182) | 88.5 (161/182)** |
Postnatal day 0 | ||||
- Number of pups born (Mean ± SD) | 14.6 ± 1.6 | 14.7 ± 1.7 | 14.2 ± 1.6 | 13.4 ± 3.1 |
- Number of live pups (Mean ± SD) | 14.0 ± 2.2 | 14.3 ± 2.2 | 12.6 ± 2.9 | 12.3 ± 3.1 |
- Number of live males (Mean ± SD) | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 7.3 ± 2.1 | 6.9 ± 2.9 | 6.3 ± 2.6 |
- Number of live females (Mean ± SD) | 7.1 ± 2.7 | 7.0 ± 2.1 | 5.7 ± 2.1 | 6.1 ± 2.4 |
- Birth index (%)4 | 92.8 (168/181) | 84.4(157/186)* | 83.0(151/182)** | 81.3(148/182)** |
- Live birth index (%)5 | 96.0 (168/175) | 96.9(157/162) | 88.8(151/170)* | 91.9(148/161) |
- Sex ratio6 | 83/168 | 80/157 | 83/151 | 75/148 |
- Sex ratio per dam (Mean ± SD) | 0.50 ± 0.15 | 0.51 ± 0.12 | 0.54 ± 0.15 | 0.51 ± 0.15 |
- Preimplantation loss (%)7 | 1.1 (2/183) | 2.6 (5/191) | 3.2 (6/188) | 3.2 (6/188) |
- Postimplantation loss8 (%) | 7.2 (13/181) | 15.6 (29/186)* | 17.0 (31/182)** | 18.7 (34/182)** |
- Pups weight (Mean ± SD, g) | ||||
Male | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.7 |
Female | 6.2 ± 0.5 | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 6.3 ± 0.7 |
Postnatal day 4 | ||||
- Number of live pups (Mean ± SD) | 13.7 ± 1.8 | 14.0 ± 2.1 | 13.4 ± 2.1 | 11.8 ± 3.0 |
- Number of live males (Mean ± SD) | 6.5 ± 1.9 | 7.1 ± 1.9 | 7.8 ± 2.5 | 5.9 ± 2.2 |
- Number of live females (Mean ± SD) | 6.7 ± 3.1 | 7.0 ± 2.1 | 4.3 ± 3.0 | 5.4 ± 2.8 |
- Viability index (%)9 | 89.9 (151/168) | 98.1 (154/157)** | 80.1 (121/151)* | 87.8 (130/148) |
- Sex ratio10 | 71/151 | 78/154 | 70/121 | 65/130 |
- Sex ratio per dam (Mean ± SD) | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.51 ± 0.12 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.57 ± 0.13 |
- Pups weight (Mean ± SD, g) | ||||
Male | 9.6 ± 1.7 | 10.3 ± 1.3 | 9.8 ± 2.1 | 11.0 ± 1.2 |
Female | 9.3 ± 1.6 | 9.9 ± 1.2 | 9.1 ± 2.1 | 10.5 ± 1.6 |
1 Number of pregnant females with live pups / Number of pregnant females ×100
2 Number of implantation sites / Number of corpora lutea × 100
3 Number of pups born / Number of implantation sites × 100
4 Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of implantation sites × 100
5 Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of pups born × 100
6 Number of live males on postnatal day 0 / Number of live pups on postnatal day 0
7 Number corpora lutea - Number of implantation sites) / Number of corpora lutea × 100
8 (Number of implantation sites - Number of live pups on postnatal day 0) / Number of implantation sites × 100
9 Number of live pups on postnatal day 4 / Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 × 100
10 Number of live males on postnatal day 4 / Number of live pups on postnatal day 4
* Significantly different from vehicle control at p <0.05
** Significantly different from vehicle control at p <0.01
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 3 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- GLP study conducted according to a relevant guideline (OECD TG 422).
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- 430 mg/m³
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Non guideline study. No detailed methodology or results are provided. The reliability of existing data is considered to be low.
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
3 studies were used to assess toxicity to reproduction. Two studies, assigned in reliability 4, originate from a review on the toxicology of Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether by USEPA (1989), which cites the results of unpublished studies by Dow Chemical. Rats and guinea pigs were exposed for 130 days to the substance (concentration: 0.43 mg/L; 7h/days; 5 days/week). Exposure to Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether did not produce any gross or histological changes to reproductive tissues, but no tests of reproductive function or success were performed.
The third study, from the NITE Chemical Risk Information Platform, consists in a Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test according to OECD Guideline N°422 under GLP (reliability 1). This study was selected as Key study: Three groups of 12 males and 12 females Crl:CD (SD) rats were given BCEE by daily oral (gavage) administration at dose levels of 0.6, 3 and 15 mg/kg/day. The male animals received dosing starting two weeks prior to the start of the mating period, throughout the mating period, and up to the day before the necropsy, for a total of 42 days. The female animals received dosing starting two weeks prior to the start of the mating period, throughout the mating, gestation, and nursing periods, and up to the day before the necropsy (fourth day of delivery), for a total of 42 to 45 days. There were no test item-related pathological changes in the male or female genital system and no effect on the oestrus cycle. here was no effect on gestation length, the number of corpora lutea or the number of implantation sites. No differences were observed on the gestation index, on the implantation index or on preimplantation loss. A lower delivery index was observed in test animals treated with 0.6 and 15 mg/kg bw/day. However, no effect was observed at 3 mg/kg bw/day and the connection with dose is thus unclear. The effect on delivery rate was considered incidental in the 0.6 and 3 mg/kg bw/day, while it was considered to be an effect of toxicity of the test substance at 15 mg/ kg bw/day. Higher post-implantation loss was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (7.2, 15.6, 17.0 and 18.7%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively). Similarly, lower birth index (Number of live pups on postnatal day 0 / Number of implantation sites × 100) was observed at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day and above (92.8, 84.4, 83.0 and 81.3%, in the control, 0.6, 3, 15 mg/kg bw/day group, respectively).
Under the conditions of this study he No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for P0 reproductive performance is 3 mg/kg/day based on reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for P0 reproductive performance and foetal toxicity is < 0.6 mg/kg/day based slighlty higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on a GLP study carried out in rat according to OECD test guideline No. 422 (reliability 1) and selected as key study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for P0 reproductive performance is 3 mg/kg/day based on reduced delivery index at 15 mg/kg bw/day. The NOEL for P0 reproductive performance and fetal toxicity is < 0.6 mg/kg/day based on slightly higher post-implantation loss and lower birth index at 0.6 mg/kg bw/day.
According to the classification criteria of EC regulation 1272/2008, Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether should not be classified for reproductive toxicity.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.