Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 295-371-0 | CAS number: 92044-91-2
Partition coefficient
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite v4.11 Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows v 4.11. US EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
KOWWIN v1.68
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Overall remarks, attachments" section.
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other:
- Version / remarks:
- REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: EPI Suite v4.11
- Model(s) used: KOWWIN v1.68
The octanol-water partition coefficient of organic compounds is estimated starting from the chemical structure, which is divided into fragments (atom or larger functional groups). Coefficient values of each fragment or group are summed together to yield the log P estimate. For the complete method's description see field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
The datasets used for the model development (2447 molecules) and for the external validation (10946 molecules) are described in the field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 4.74
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 4.6
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite v4.11 Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows v 4.11. US EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
KOWWIN v1.68
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Overall remarks, attachments" section.
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other:
- Version / remarks:
- REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: EPI Suite v4.11
- Model(s) used: KOWWIN v1.68
The octanol-water partition coefficient of organic compounds is estimated starting from the chemical structure, which is divided into fragments (atom or larger functional groups). Coefficient values of each fragment or group are summed together to yield the log P estimate. For the complete method's description see field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
The datasets used for the model development (2447 molecules) and for the external validation (10946 molecules) are described in the field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 0.78
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 1.28
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
EPI Suite v4.11 Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows v 4.11. US EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
KOWWIN v1.68
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Overall remarks, attachments" section.
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other:
- Version / remarks:
- REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: EPI Suite v4.11
- Model(s) used: KOWWIN v1.68
The octanol-water partition coefficient of organic compounds is estimated starting from the chemical structure, which is divided into fragments (atom or larger functional groups). Coefficient values of each fragment or group are summed together to yield the log P estimate. For the complete method's description see field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
The datasets used for the model development (2447 molecules) and for the external validation (10946 molecules) are described in the field 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 7.88
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 7.93
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
Referenceopen allclose all
TYPE |
NUM |
LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION |
COEFF. |
VALUE |
Frag |
2 |
-CH3 [aliphatic carbon] |
0.5473 |
1.0946 |
Frag |
16 |
-CH2- [aliphatic carbon] |
0.4911 |
7.8576 |
Frag |
2 |
-CH [aliphatic carbon] |
0.3614 |
0.7228 |
Frag |
2 |
-OH [hydroxy, aliphatic attach] |
-1.4086 |
-2.8172 |
Frag |
1 |
-O- [oxygen, aliphatic attach] |
-1.2566 |
-1.2566 |
Frag |
2 |
-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach] |
-0.9505 |
-1.9010 |
Factor |
1 |
Multi-alcohol correction |
0.4064 |
0.4064 |
Factor |
1 |
HO-CH2-CH(-OH)-C-O- [linear-type] correc. |
0.4000 |
0.4000 |
Const |
|
Equation Constant |
|
0.2290 |
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
TYPE |
NUM |
LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION |
COEFF. |
VALUE |
Frag |
1 |
-CH3 [aliphatic carbon] |
0.5473 |
0.5473 |
Frag |
10 |
-CH2- [aliphatic carbon] |
0.4911 |
4.911 |
Frag |
2 |
-CH [aliphatic carbon] |
0.3614 |
0.7228 |
Frag |
3 |
-OH [hydroxy, aliphatic attach] |
-1.4086 |
-4.2258 |
Frag |
1 |
-O- [oxygen, aliphatic attach] |
-1.2566 |
-1.2566 |
Frag |
1 |
-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach] |
-0.9505 |
-0.9505 |
Factor |
1 |
Multi-alcohol correction |
0.4064 |
0.4064 |
Factor |
1 |
HO-CH2-CH(-OH)-C-O- [linear-type] correc. |
0.4000 |
0.4000 |
Const |
|
Equation Constant |
|
0.2290 |
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
TYPE |
NUM |
LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION |
COEFF. |
VALUE |
Frag |
3 |
-CH3 [aliphatic carbon] |
0.5473 |
1.6419 |
Frag |
22 |
-CH2- [aliphatic carbon] |
0.4911 |
10.8042 |
Frag |
2 |
-CH [aliphatic carbon] |
0.3614 |
0.7228 |
Frag |
1 |
-OH [hydroxy, aliphatic attach] |
-1.4086 |
-1.4086 |
Frag |
1 |
-O- [oxygen, aliphatic attach] |
-1.2566 |
-1.2566 |
Frag |
3 |
-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach] |
-0.9505 |
-2.8515 |
Const |
|
Equation Constant |
|
0.2290 |
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
Description of key information
Log Pow = 1 to 8 (QSAR models: VEGA / ALogP version 1.0.0 and EPI Suite / KOWWIN version 1.68)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Overall results
Table 1: For the three evaluated components of the substance, the Log Pow values as estimated by the VEGA/ALogP and EPI Suite/KOWWIN models are reported. When relevant, the two most similar substances identified by VEGA are also included (using their CAS number), together with their similarity degree with the target component, experimental Log Pow values and the predictions obtained by the QSAR models.
Evaluation of |
Molecule / CAS |
Similarity degree |
Experimental Log Pow |
VEGA / ALogP |
EPI Suite / KOWWIN |
C8monoester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
1.28 |
0.78 |
40427-75-6 |
0.887 |
1.46 |
1.049 |
0.93 |
|
78617-12-6 |
0.881 |
0.73 |
0.592 |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C8diester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
4.6 |
4.74 |
114593-88-3 |
0.814 |
2.79 |
2.406 |
2.86 |
|
40427-75-6 |
0.806 |
1.46 |
1.049 |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C8triester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
7.93 |
7.88 |
466-07-9 |
0.793 |
2.1 |
2.928 |
2.43 |
|
51008-91-4 |
0.788 |
2.95 |
3.16 |
2.97 |
Discussion
The applicability domain (AD) evaluation performed by the VEGA software suggests that C8monoster fits within the AD of ALogP model, whereas the other two components are not fully compliant with it. Based on the molecular weight and the number of fragments identified, all the components fit within the AD of the KOWWIN model.
Similar estimation for the three components are obtained by both models, which also provide moderate to good performance on the similar substances; based on these considerations, the results obtained by ALogP for the C8diester and C8triester, even if not fully compliant with the AD, can be considered as supporting information in the Weight of Evidence approach.
Only the C8monoster component is predicted with non-negligible difference between the two models. The ALogP provides slightly better results on the similar molecules, leading to consider its prediction for the C8monoester as slightly more reliable.
The target substance is also composed by esters of C10 fatty acids, which would be predicted with slightly higher Log Pow values compared to the C8 ones.
Conclusion
Considering the results obtained for the target components and the similar substances, a Log Pow range between 1 and 8 can be considered as a reasonable estimation for the whole substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
