Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 446-630-3 | CAS number: 181587-01-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Aug 1999 - Feb 2000
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- no data reported on dam thyroid weight and histopathological assessment, dam thyroid hormones and fetal anogenital distance
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 000
- Report date:
- 2000
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- Draft 1998 (for updating guideline of 1981)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- current version adopted in 2018
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no investigation of dam thyroid weight and histopathological assessment, dam thyroid hormones, fetal anogenital distance
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: M.A.F.F., Japan, No. 4200
- Version / remarks:
- 1985
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 446-630-3
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 181587-01-9
- Molecular formula:
- C13H9Cl2F3N4OS
- IUPAC Name:
- 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-(ethanesulfinyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: New Zealand White Crl: Kbl/BR (SPF)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Saint Aubin les Elbeuf, France
- Weight at study initiation: 2.48 - 3.69 kg
- Housing: individually, in plastic cages on a perforated cage floor
- Diet: Certified Rabbit Pellet diet UAR 110 C-10, 250 ± 5 g
- Water: filtered water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 12 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 21
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): approximately 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES:
From: 29 Aug 1999
To: 09 Dec 1999
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: aqueous solution of 0.5% methylcellulose 400 (w/v)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: An appropriate amount of the test substance was suspended (w/v) in the vehicle and stored at approximately 5 °C (± 3 °C). Homogeneity of the suspensions was checked for all concentrations. Stability of the test substance in suspension was determined before the begin of the study at concentrations of 62.5, 75 and 15000 mg/L and was found acceptable within a period of 21 days.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Aqueous methylcellulose samples were diluted with acetonitrile. The quantification was performed by HPLC using UV detection at 277 nm and external standardization. Test substance formulations in aqueous methylcellulose were demonstrated to be stable over a 21-day period at 5°C ± 3°C. Concentrations checks were in a range of [90-106%] of the nominal values.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: artificial insemination
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: The day of insemination referred to as day 0 of pregnancy. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 - 28 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily, 7 days/week
- Duration of test:
- 29 days
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.25 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 30
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses based on results obtained in a previous range-finding study (1999) in rabbits.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): The rabbits were allocated to the different groups using a body weight dependent procedure to ensure that the females inseminated with the same male were distributed among the different groups.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily (morning and afternoon); on weekends and public holidays once daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: gestation days (GD) 0, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 29
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: full feeder weights were measured on GD 1 and daily thereafter through GD 28; empty feeder weights were measured on GD 2 and every day through GD 29
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on GD 29
- Organs examined: macroscopic examination of the visceral organs, recording of the number of ribs - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter
- individual body weights of live foetuses - Statistics:
- For maternal and litter parameters, Dunnett's test was used to compare exposed groups to controls when the overall effect was statistically significant (p<0.05 via the ANOVA F-test). The Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) linear regression model was used for analyzing fetal body weight and fetal death status, and the GEE logistic model was used for analysing fetal sex. Although fetal death status is a binary outcome (dead vs. live foetus), this parameter was still analysed via a linear regression model because the distribution of the variable was too sparse for computations required for logistic regression. All GEE regression models assumed exchangeable intralitter correlations and used a robust variance estimator for regression parameters. Individual t-tests for pairwise comparisons to control were evaluated when the overall treatment effect was statistically significant (p<0.05 via a Wald chi-square test).
- Indices:
- Percentage of pre-implantation loss: [(no. of corpora lutea - no. of implantations) / no. of corpora lutea] * 100
Percentage of post-implantation loss: [(no. of implantations - no. of live foetuses) / no. of implantations] * 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All clinical signs were those commonly observed, recorded once only or distributed between different groups and were not considered to be treatment-related.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- During the study period, no treatment-related deaths were observed. In the control group, 3/60 females were found dead on GD 10, 12 and 21. The necropsy revealed a gavage error in two cases and in the other case no abnormal findings were observed. In the 0.25 mg/kg bw/day group, 2/30 females died on GD 8 and 10 due to a gavage error.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4 mg/kg bw/day, the mean body weight changes for all intervals during the dosing period were significantly lower than the corresponding control values. From GD 6 through 18, a body weight loss of -0.27 kg was observed compared to a gain of 0.21 kg in the control group. At 2 mg/kg bw/day, the body weight changes were reduced for many intervals, showing statistical differences for GD 6-8, 6-14, 6-18, 6-22 and 6-26. At 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, the body weight changes were considered to be unaffected by treatment when compared to the controls. The corrected body weight change did not show any statistical differences between treated and control groups.
Tables for maternal body weights and weight gains can be found in attached documents. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Food consumption showed similar significant effect when expressed in g/day or g/kg/day. At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, mean food consumption was significantly reduced during each interval from GD 6 to GD 22 and significantly increased for GD 26 to 29. At 2.0 mg/kg bw/day, food consumption was significantly reduced for GD 10 to 14 and for GDI 4 to 18, At 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, mean food consumption was unaffected by treatment.
Tables for food consumption can be found in attached documents. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gravid uterine weight did not show significant differences between groups (please refer to the table in the attached document).
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4 mg/kg bw/day, accentuated lobular pattern of the liver was observed in females that aborted (10/11 females with abortions).
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the 4 mg/kg bw/day group, 11/28 pregnant females aborted between GD 21 and 27. Nearly all of this females (10/11) had pale and/or accentuated lobular pattern of the liver. In the 2 mg/kg bw/day group, 2/24 pregnant females aborted on GD 25 and 28.
All females aborted after reduced food consumption and body weight loss indicating maternal toxicity as cause of the observed abortions. No abortion was observed in any other dose group. - Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, the mean post-implantation loss percentage was increased (not statistically significant) when compared to the control group value. It was linked to an increased number of late resorptions (statistically significant for females with live foetuses) and an increased percentage of dead foetuses (no statistically significant).
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, two females were observed with resorptions only.
- Early or late resorptions:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, an increased number of late resorptions was observed (statistically significant for females with live foetuses).
- Dead fetuses:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, an increased percentage of dead foetuses was observed (not statistically significant).
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The pregnancy rate was between 80 and 97% across all groups. At least 20 females per group treated with up to 2 mg/kg bw/day had live foetuses at cesarean section (see table 1). In the 4 mg/kg bw/day group, 13 females had live foetuses.
- Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed at this dose level
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic
- Effect level:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- food consumption and compound intake
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- development
- Effect level:
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed at this dose level
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- development
- Effect level:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- dead fetuses
- early or late resorptions
- number of abortions
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- uterus
- Description (incidence and severity):
- abortions starting at 2 mg/kg bw/day; increased post-implantation loss and late resorptions at 4 mg/kg bw/day. However, effects were regarded as secondary to the reduced food consumption of dams.
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 4.0 mg/kg bw/day, the number of live foetuses was slightly but not statistically significantly reduced when compared to control group value.
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The number of runt foetuses (body weight < 28.0 g) was not affected by treatment. No foetal external findings were considered to be related to treatment as all findings concerned one foetus only per group.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No malformations showed any dose-related increase. No marked ossification delay was noted but a few findings were slightly increased at 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg bw/day (incomplete ossification of pubis, metacarpal and/or middle phalanges). All the other variations and anomalies were considered to be randomly distributed between all groups.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The examination of heads of half of the number of foetuses did not reveal any treatment-related findings.
At visceral examination, a few malformations were observed but none of them was considered to be related to treatment except the two diaphragmatic hernia recorded at 4 mg/kg bw/day. All variations and anomalies were considered to be randomly distributed between treated and control groups without any treatment-related increase. - Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: overall findings (reduction in number of fetuses (non-significant), diaphragmatic hernia (low incidence (2 fetuses in 2 litter)) and incomplete ossification (slight severity)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects observed
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- other: overall findings (reduction in number of fetuses (non-significant), diaphragmatic hernia (low incidence with 2/80 fetuses in 2 litter) and incomplete ossification (slight severity)
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Animal status and pregnancy rate
|
Control |
dose groups [mg/kg bw/day] |
|||
|
0.25 |
0.5 |
2 |
4 |
|
No. of inseminated females |
60 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
No. of death females |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No. of abortions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
No. of pregnant females |
53 |
29 |
26 |
24 |
28 |
- with live foetuses |
46 |
26 |
24 |
30 |
13 |
- with resorptions only |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
- with implantations only |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
No. of non-pregnant females |
7 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
Pregnancy rate [%] |
88 |
97 |
87 |
80 |
93 |
Table 2: Litter response and foetal parameters
|
Control |
dose groups [mg/kg bw/day] |
|||
|
0.25 |
0.5 |
2 |
4 |
|
No. of all pregnant dams observed |
50 |
27 |
26 |
22 |
17 |
No. of Corpora Lutea per dam |
10.0 |
10.3 |
9.3 |
9.5 |
9.4 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
|
No. of Implantation Sites per litter |
8.0 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
7.0 |
6.3 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
|
Pre-implantation loss per litter [%] |
22.2 |
26.2 |
19.8 |
27.8 |
35.1 |
3.2 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
4.9 |
7.5 |
|
No. of early resorptions per litter |
0.340 |
0.519 |
0.423 |
0.182 |
0.294 |
0.133 |
0.188 |
0.168 |
0.084 |
0.143 |
|
No. of late resorptions per litter |
0.020 |
0 |
0.017 |
0 |
0.176 |
0.020 |
0 |
0.053 |
0 |
0.128 |
|
Post-implantation loss per litter [%] |
17.1 |
9.8 |
17.9 |
16.9 |
38.7 |
3.9 |
4.2 |
5.8 |
6.3 |
10.0 |
|
No. of all pregnant dams with live foetuses |
46 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
13 |
No. of Corpora Lutea per dam |
10.4 |
10.3 |
9.8 |
10.1 |
10.5 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
|
No. of Implantation Sites per litter |
8.3 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
|
Pre-implantation loss per litter [%] |
21.0 |
23.7 |
18.5 |
26.9 |
28.6 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
7.3 |
|
No. of early resorptions per litter |
0.370 |
0.538 |
0.458 |
0.200 |
0.231 |
0.144 |
0.194 |
0.180 |
0.092 |
0.166 |
|
No. of late resorptions per litter |
0.022 |
0 |
0.083 |
0 |
0.231 |
0.022 |
0 |
0.058 |
0 |
0.166 |
|
Post-implantation loss per litter [%] |
9.9 |
6.3 |
11.0 |
8.6 |
19.8 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
3.7 |
3.0 |
6.8 |
|
No. of live foetuses per litter |
7.5 |
7.3 |
7.1 |
6.8 |
6.2 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
|
No. of dead foetuses per litter |
0.3 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
|
No. of foetuses examined |
359 |
191 |
174 |
143 |
90 |
Dead foetuses [%] |
3.3 |
0 |
1.7 |
4.9 |
11.1 |
0.9 |
0 |
0.9 |
2.7 |
5.3 |
|
Male foetuses [%] |
45.8 |
46.1 |
46.2 |
52.9 |
51.3 |
2.8 |
2.8 |
4.7 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
|
Fetal body weight [g] |
39.7 |
39.8 |
40.5 |
37.4 |
38.3 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
1.4 |
Table 3: Fetal observations (excerpt)
Group |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Visceral anomalies |
||||||||||||
|
Number of fetuses examined |
Number of litters examined |
||||||||||
|
178 |
169 |
191 |
171 |
135 |
80 |
23 |
23 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
13 |
|
Number of heads examined |
Number of heads examined |
||||||||||
|
83 |
80 |
90 |
78 |
63 |
38 |
22 |
23 |
26 |
23 |
20 |
12 |
|
Number of fetuses affected (mean % of fetuses affected) |
Number of fetuses affected (mean % of fetuses affected) |
||||||||||
Diaphragmatic hernia |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
2 (1.6) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
2 (15.4) |
Skeletal anomalies |
||||||||||||
|
Number of fetuses examined |
Number of litters examined |
||||||||||
|
178 |
169 |
191 |
171 |
136 |
80 |
23 |
23 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
13 |
|
Number of heads examined |
Number of heads examined |
||||||||||
|
95 |
89 |
101 |
93 |
73 |
42 |
23 |
23 |
26 |
24 |
20 |
13 |
|
Number of fetuses affected (mean % of fetuses affected) |
Number of fetuses affected (mean % of fetuses affected) |
||||||||||
Pubis (unilateral/bilateral): incomplete ossification |
4 (3.1) |
3 (1.2) |
4 (2.5) |
2 (1.0) |
14 (8.2) |
11 (11.0) |
3 (13.0) |
2 (8.7) |
4 (15.4) |
1 (4.2) |
6 (30.0) |
4 (30.8) |
1stmetacarpal: incomplete ossification or unossified. Forepaws: 4thor/and 5thmiddle phalanges: unossified. |
18 (9.8) |
19 (11.4) |
20 (12.1) |
17 (10.6) |
39 (27.6) |
31 (35.4) |
6 (26.1) |
12 (52.2) |
13 (50.0) |
11 (45.8) |
13 (650.) |
8 (61.5) |
Groups: 1 and 5 (control), 6 (0.25 mg/kg bw/day), 2 (0.5 mg/kg bw/day), 3 (2.0 mg/kg bw/day), 4 (4.0 mg/kg bw/day)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- No deaths were considered to be treatment-related. Abortions occurred at 2 and 4 mg/kg bw/day with a high incidence at 4 mg/kg bw/day. All the abortions were between GD 21 and 28 and in all cases after a reduction of food intake for several days and a body weight loss observed in dams. Additionally, nearly all of the high dose group females that aborted had pale and/or accentuated lobular pattern of the liver.
Body weight changes and food consumption at 2 and 4 mg/kg bw/day were significantly reduced for many intervals during the dosing period, when compared to control values. The mean number of late resorptions was slightly increased at 4 mg/kg bw/day. Moreover, increased post-implantation loss and fetal death was observed at 4 mg/kg bw/day without reaching statistical significance. All other litter parameters did not show any significant treatment-related effects. Fetal body weights were considered unaffected by treatment. No malformations at external, visceral and skeletal examination were considered to reflect any abnormal development linked to treatment except two foetuses at 4 mg/kg bw/day with a diaphragmatic hernia. Incomplete ossification was noted for a very few bones; it was limited to 2 and 4 mg/kg bw/day and did not reflect any general ossification delay.
Based on the results of the conducted study, a NOAEL of 0.5 mg/kg bw/day was derived for maternal systemic and maternal developmental toxicity. In regard to fetal toxicity, a NOAEL of 2 mg/kg bw/day was established taking into account the overall effects on fetuses (reduced number of live fetuses (non-significant), diaphragmatic hernia (low incidence with 2/80 fetuses) and incomplete ossification (slight severity)). Due to clear maternal systemic toxicity at this dose levels, the effects observed on maternal developmental and fetal parameters are considered as secondary, non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.