Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 247-852-1 | CAS number: 26628-22-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-02-23 to 2010-03-01
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted September 2009
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium azide
- EC Number:
- 247-852-1
- EC Name:
- Sodium azide
- Cas Number:
- 26628-22-8
- Molecular formula:
- N3Na
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium azide
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Odenwaldschlachthof Brensbach, 64395 Brensbach, Germany
- Number of animals: 9
Freshly isolated bovine eyes were collected from the abattoir. Excess tissue was removed from the excised eyes. The isolated eyes were transported to the laboratory in Hank's BSS supplemented with streptomycin penicillin at ambient temperature. The corneae were isolated on the same day after delivery of the eyes, inserted in pre-cooled preservation medium composed of Medium 199 supplemented with L-glutamine, Na-bicarbonate and Taurine, and stored in the refrigerator at 2-8 °C until the following day. Shortly before use, Dextran was added to the medium.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.75 mL of a 20% (w/v) solution of the test item were applied to the isolated corneas
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The corneas were exposed to the test item for 4 hours.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- After incubation with the test item, the anterior side of the corneas were incubated with sodium fluorescein solution for additional 90 minutes before the fluorescence of the posterior compartment was determined.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 cornea for each tretment: test item, positive and negative control
- Details on study design:
- Corneas were mounted in a cornea holder and laced in a chamber with an anterior and a posterior side which were both filled with medium and equilibrated at 32°C in a water bath. The anterior department was then exposed to the test item, dissolved in saline, for 4 h.
10% benzalconium chloride was used as positive control and saline as negative control.
After 4 hour treatment the test item was rinsed off the application side with fresh medium and the opacity of the corneas was determined.
Medium was changed and the anterio side was incubated for additional 90 minutes with sodium fluorescein solution. Subsequently the fluorescein concentration in the mposterior side medium was measured at 490 nm to serve as measure for the permeability of the cornea.
EVALUATION OF RESULTS
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive and negative control corneae was calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading (t240 – t0), for each individual cornea. The average change in opacity of the negative control corneae was calculated and this value was subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
The corrected OD490 value of each cornea treated with positive control and test item was calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.
The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score of the negative control:
In vitro Score = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The following formula was used to determine the in vitro score of the positive control and the test item:
In vitro Score = (opacity value – opacity value mean negative control) + (15 x corrected OD490 value)
The in vitro score was calculated for each individual treatment and positive control cornea. The mean in vitro score value of each treated group was calculated from the individual in vitro score values. Depending on the score obtained, the test item was classified into one of the categories listed in table 1.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- 3
- Value:
- -0.67
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The acceptance criteria for the negative control were met. With the negative control (0.9% NaCl solution) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed. The mean in vitro score was calculated as 1.37.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The acceptance criteria for the positive control were met. The positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalconium chloride) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae and therefore, is classified as very severe eye irritant. The mean in vitro score was calculated as 148.56.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2: Results after 240 Minutes Incubation Time
Test Group |
Opacity value = Difference (t240-t0) of Opacity* |
Permeability at 490 nm (OD490)* |
In vitro Score |
Mean in vitro Score |
Proposed in vitro Irritation Scale |
||
|
|
Mean |
|
Mean |
|
|
|
Negative Control |
1 |
0.67 |
0.046 |
0.047 |
1.69 |
1.37 |
Non eye irritant |
Negative Control |
1 |
0.045 |
1.68 |
||||
Negative Control |
0 |
0.049 |
0.74 |
||||
Positive Control |
153.33* |
0.020* |
153.64 |
148.56 |
Very severe eye irritant |
||
Positive Control |
136.33* |
0.050* |
137.09 |
||||
Positive Control |
154.33* |
0.040* |
154.94 |
||||
Sodium azide |
- 1.67* |
0.080* |
- 0.46 |
- 0.67 |
Non eye irritant |
||
Sodium azide |
- 1.67* |
0.056* |
- 0.82 |
||||
Sodium azide |
- 1.67* |
0.062* |
- 0.73 |
*corrected values
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item sodium azide is not considered to be an eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
In an in vitro study performed to assess the corneal irritation and damage potential of sodium azide by means of the BCOP assay using fresh bovine corneae according to the OECD Guideline 437 (September 2009), after a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t0), the 20% solution in saline (w/v) of the test item sodium azide (purity 99.3%), the positive and the negative controls were applied to corneae and incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 2 °C. The posterior chamber contained MEM medium supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and L-glutamine and 1% fetal calf serum (FCS) (complete medium = cMEM). After the incubation phase the test item, the positive and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneae and opacity was measured again (t240). After the opacity measurements permeability of the corneae was determined while application of 1 mL of a fluorescein solution for 90 minutes at 32 ± 2 °C in a horizontal position. The liquid coming out was measured spectrophotometrically. With the negative control (0.9% NaCl solution) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed. The positive control (10% (w/v) benzalconium chloride) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae and therefore, is classified as very severe eye irritant. The test item sodium azide did not cause any opacity or permeability of the cornea when compared with the results of the negative control. The calculated mean in vitro score was -0.67 and therefore, the test item was classified as non eye irritant.
In conclusion, it can be stated that in this study and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item sodium azide is not considered to be an eye irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
